The Story Behind NAFTA

     The true story behind NAFTA is one of "byzantine mercantile
gangsterism"
     "NAFTA was an investment agreement designed to protect
American corporations in Mexico, lock in the low wage rate, and
raise cash for a beleaguered political oligarchy."
      The cast of characters mounting the campaign to 'sell
NAFTA' is carnivalesque, including NAFTA czar William Daley, who
is now national campaign chair for Vice President Al Gore.


"THE SELLING OF "FREE TRADE" --
NAFTA, Washington, and the Subversion of American Democracy"
by John R. MacArthur -- Hill and Wang; 388 pages; $25


     REVIEWED BY John Phillip Santos
     San Francisco Chronicle "Book Review," July 2, 2000


     Late in the evening of Jan. 1, 1994, I drove on a mountain
road into San Cristobal de las Casas in the southern state of
Chiapas, Mexico. The street lamps flickered in the valley below
like beacons from a distant galaxy. As I rolled with the
headlights off into that picturesque town from the era of
the Conquest, the cobblestone streets were empty. It felt eerie.
     After all, it was New Year's Day. But it also happened to be
the auspicious inaugural day of the much-vaunted North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), in observance of which a previously
unknown rebel Maya army, the Ejercito Zapatista de Liberacion
Nacional (EZLN), had seized the Palacio Municipal in San
Cristobal and declared war on the Mexican state.
     These days, barely more than five years since that night,
the Zapatistas are still in the jungles of Chiapas, occasionally
kicking up dust with the Mexican army, but when was the last time
you heard NAFTA mentioned in public? How could such a one-time
noisy panacea that would usher in an idyllic age of borderless
trade across las Americas fall so quickly out of view?
     In "The Selling of 'Free Trade': NAFTA, Washington, and the
Subversion of American Democracy," journalist and Harper's
publisher John MacArthur offers an unequivocal answer: "NAFTA was
an extension of American dominance over a much weaker country,"
in other words, a dirty business -- once done, best forgotten.
     The book is an illuminating, periodically astounding serial
account of how NAFTA was forged, then spun, out of opportunistic
backroom alliances between the Bush and Clinton administrations,
joined by congressional Republicans and Democrats alike -- all of
them in close consultation with a star chamber of businessmen and
their phalanxes of lobbyists.
     According to the author, except for an apocryphal tale of a
late night reverie in which Mexican President Carlos Salinas
allegedly had the first free-trade epiphany, Mexicans played a
secondary, junior-partner role in creating NAFTA. MacArthur
writes in a clear, spare voice, which helps the reader sort
through the byzantine mercantile gangsterism he details as the
true story behind NAFTA.
     As MacArthur steadily builds his case, it seems likely the
book will earn its extreme subtitle, "the Subversion of American
Democracy."
     "NAFTA was an investment agreement," MacArthur writes,
"designed to protect American corporations in Mexico, lock in the
low wage rate, and raise cash for a beleaguered political
oligarchy." The cast of characters mounting the campaign to "sell
NAFTA" is carnivalesque, including NAFTA czar William Daley, who
afterward became commerce secretary and is now national campaign
chair for Vice President Al Gore.
     Imagine President Reagan, sounding like another Bolivar,
speaking in Tampa in 1983 of "a united hemisphere, united not by
the arbitrary bonds of state, but by the voluntary bonds of free
ideals." Or Congressman Bill Richardson, House Majority whip,
leading the charge for passage of NAFTA, working himself into a
lather as he tries to rally the Democratic votes needed to pass
the agreement.
     Lee Iacocca has a show-stealing walk-on as the diva-oracle
of political television spots, brought in for a star performance
on behalf of treaty passage.  Lone wolf socialist Congressman
Bernie Sanders of Vermont, in protest against NAFTA, introduces a
bill to equalize American legislators' salaries with those of
their Mexican peers. And in a bravura last-minute flourish,
President Clinton, in a cell phone call, snags a vote from
Oklahoma Congressman Bill Brewster by offering to go duck hunting
with him.
     In one of the book's climactic moments, during an interview
with MacArthur, Richardson, now the embattled secretary of
energy, born in Mexico City to an American banker father and a
Mexican mother, reveals why his passions on NAFTA were so strong.
"Richardson turned misty-eyed as he recounted one of his father's
last requests. 'My father once said to me -- I think I was away
at school (in the United States), and I came home and he
said to me -- `Always help Mexico -- I'm going to die,' and,
'always help Mexico.' "
     But in another interview, with Michael Wessel, chief adviser
to Richard Gephardt on NAFTA, MacArthur hears another story: "The
fact of the matter is they won NAFTA because of money, because of
gifts, because of special interests, goodies, and everything
else. They did not necessarily win the debate."
     The debate, in case you missed it, was about the impact of
NAFTA on American and Mexican workers, along with periodic
worrying about the potentially negative environmental
consequences of expanding the maquiladora system of low-cost,
often polluting border factories. MacArthur dismisses the
resulting labor and environmental concessions as "empty
rhetoric."
     The book's attempt to ground an understanding of the NAFTA
phenomenon in the bookend stories of workers in a closing staple
factory in Queens and workers in its replacement plant in
Nogales, Mexico, is well-intentioned but slightly off-key, and
oddly measured. MacArthur captures the staple-manufacturing
process in close-ups but demurs, at first, from visiting a
worker's home in the poor colonias outside Nogales.
     Focusing on the critical years between 1991, which saw the
authorization of fast-track negotiation, and 1993, when NAFTA was
finally passed, "The Selling of `Free Trade" is at its best when
it gives us a glimpse into the cynical court intrigues and media
campaigns that won the day for the treaty.  MacArthur's advocacy
journalism also probes the underlying values and motivations of
the main actors, who managed to avoid the limelight during
their dealmaking.
     The press is portrayed as largely boosterist, with the
author only faintly commending the Wall Street Journal on its
later criticism of NAFTA for failing to create jobs in the United
States and improve the plight of Mexican workers. Given the
importance MacArthur assigns to the media for NAFTA's passage, it
would have been helpful to hear more about how broadcast and
cable news covered the story.
     Organized labor is shown as slow to respond since the early
'80s to the mounting challenges of globalization.  And MacArthur
makes an interesting historical point, tracing the intellectual
origins of the contemporary political, technocratic elite that
shaped NAFTA back to the Kennedy era, when JFK first spoke about
"sophisticated judgments which do not lend themselves to the
great sort of 'passionate movements' which have stirred this
country so often in the past." Recent WTO protesters in Seattle
and Washington might have a quarrel with that idea.
     Telling NAFTA's sordid story so well, John R. MacArthur's
book highlights the critical need for ongoing reporting of the
still unfolding political, economic and cultural consequences of
free trade with Mexico, on both sides of the border.


[John Phillip Santos' memoir, "Places Left Unfinished at the Time
of Creation," was a finalist for the 1999 National Book Award.]


Reply via email to