-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

Daily News 4/6/04

Book: Poppy opposed Dubya's war

By THOMAS M. DeFRANK
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF

WASHINGTON - A new book on the Bush political dynasty claims former
President George H.W. Bush opposed last year's invasion of Iraq.

In "The Bushes: Portrait of a Dynasty," Peter and Rochelle Schweizer cite as
evidence a summer 2002 interview in which the older Bush's sister said her
brother had expressed his "anguish" about the administration's preparations
for war.

"But do they have an exit strategy?" the former President is quoted as
worrying.

"Although he never went public with them," the authors assert, "the
President's own father shared many of [the] concerns" of Brent Scowcroft,
his national security adviser and a leading war opponent.

Top Bush aide Jean Becker denied the allegations yesterday.

"From the very first day, President Bush 41 unequivocally supported the
President on the war in Iraq," she said. "He had absolutely no reservations
of any kind."

Peter Schweizer is a research fellow at Stanford University's conservative
Hoover Institution and authored "Reagan's War."

The book pries open the door slightly on one of the Bush clan's most closely
held secrets: the former President's private qualms about portions of his
son's Iraq policy.

"He agrees with the policy goals but not with all of the execution," a close
friend told the Daily News.

The older Bush has maintained strict public silence about possible
differences, and only last week hammered "elites and intellectuals on the
campaign trail" for criticizing the war.

Yet close friends and associates said the older Bush, while fiercely proud
and protective of his son, nevertheless harbors concerns about the war and
its aftermath.

These sources told The News that aside from his "exit-strategy" fears of a
prolonged, bloody conflict, the ex-President is troubled that the war
fractured the international coalition he painstakingly assembled to expel
deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein from Kuwait in 1991.

One close associate said the older Bush feels Vice President Cheney and
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld may have pushed President Bush too hard
for a preemptive strike.

In his 1998 diplomatic memoir, the former President offered this impassioned
defense of his controversial decision not to attack Baghdad and topple
Saddam in 1991:

"Trying to eliminate Saddam ... would have incurred incalculable human and
political costs. ... Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could
conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land."

One well-placed Bush colleague said the older Bush recently acknowledged,
"I'm having trouble with my boy," referring to Iraq.

Originally published on April 6, 2004


www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to