[CTRL] George Bush I: The Man Who Helped Make September 11 A Reality

2002-09-13 Thread Jei

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.jihadunspun.net/newsarchive/article_internal.php?article=25763list=/newsarchive/index.php;

George Bush I: The Man Who Helped Make September 11 A Reality
Sep 11, 2002
William L. Anderson

As Americans embarrassingly stumble into a mawkish remembrance of those
awful attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon a year ago, I would
like to take time to honor (if that is an appropriate word) the man who
more than anyone else made those attacks a reality: George H.W. Bush. While
conservatives blame Bill Clinton and Democrats still are looking to find if
the present George W. Bush Administration was culpable (it was), I would
like to turn to the real source, the man whose legacy we seem to have
forgotten.

If anything, conservatives claim that the only problem of Bush I was the
failure to take out Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War. Actually, I would like
to question whether or not there should have been a war in the first place
and point out that the Gulf War, for all of the supposed glory it brought
the U.S. Armed Forces, was a huge disaster that continues to this day to
have awful repercussions upon much of the world.

To understand the magnitude of Bush I’s folly, we need to return to 1990,
when Iraq invaded Kuwait in early August. The previous fall, the communist
regimes of Eastern Europe had fallen and the once-formidable U.S.S.R. was
beginning to break up, as the Cold War had ended. For people who had lived
their entire lives under the shadow of all that the struggle between East
and West had been, this was a wonderful and heady moment.

With the end of the threat of nuclear war between the U.S.S.R. and the USA
having ended, for a brief moment, it seemed that prospects for a larger
peace could not have been greater – that is until that fateful day when Iraq
invaded Kuwait. In another era, this invasion would have gone unnoticed, as
the actions of one desert regime against another would not have had any
effect upon the world scene. However, because of the fact that a huge
portion of the world’s crude oil comes from the Persian Gulf region, that
was enough to make politicians panic, as people began to assess the
possibilities of Saddam Hussein having control over that oil.

The U.S. Government dealings with Hussein himself provide an informative
study of how not to engage in foreign policy. During the 1980s, when Iraq
was at war against Iran, which had held a large number of Americans as
hostage in the last year of Jimmy Carter’s administration, Hussein was seen
as a U.S. ally. Like the Muslims who hold to the belief that the enemy of
my enemy is my friend, the U.S. Government courted Hussein as a moderate
who could stand as a bulwark in the region against the fanaticism of the
Iranian Islamic regime. After all, Iraq was a secular country, despite its
overwhelming Muslim population, and there was a thriving Christian community
there.

Even when an Iraqi warplane attacked a U.S. ship in the Persian Gulf in
1987, killing dozens of U.S. sailors, the U.S. Government, then under Ronald
Reagan, accepted Iraq’s apology for its mistake in much the same way the
U.S. Government told the public that the deadly 1967 Israeli attack on the
U.S.S. Liberty also was a mistake. Even when Hussein’s armed forces used
poison gas against Iranian soldiers, Iraq was still regarded as a moderate
regime in State Department language.

In July 1990, however, it all changed. After the U.S. ambassador to Iraq,
April Glaspie, indicated to Hussein that the Bush Administration would not
object to an invasion of Kuwait, the Iraqis took the U.S. at its word and
sent its armies over the border, meeting almost no resistance. (At the time,
there was a legitimate dispute at the Iraq-Kuwait border involving the
Kuwaiti practice of drilling sideways under the border to extract oil from
pools in Iraq. No one seems to have remembered that this was Hussein’s main
gripe, although Iraqis never have regarded Kuwait, which once was part of
Iraq, as a legitimate state in the first place.)

After Iraq invaded Kuwait, Bush demanded that the Iraqis leave at once.
Saddam, once our ally, all of a sudden was a demon, a threat to world peace
and someone who was obsessed with obtaining and building weapons of mass
destruction. The Saudi Arabian Royal Family also privately expressed fear
that Saddam (who probably was more popular in Saudi Arabia than the corrupt
rulers of the royal family) would turn his military might towards them.

The Saudis, as well as the Israelis and others who saw this as a golden
opportunity for a U.S. military response, began to raise the specter of Iraq
controlling the world’s largest single oil source. Journalists began to
write about the possible reappearance of the dreaded gas lines, forgetting
that the chaos at the gas pumps in the USA during the 1970s was the direct
result of government price controls on domestic crude oil and gasoline. The
prospect of the U.S. Armed Forces being able to set up 

[CTRL] George Bush I: The Man Who Helped Make September 11 a Reality

2002-09-11 Thread M.A. Johnson

-Caveat Lector-

~~for educational purposes only~~
[Title 17 U.S.C. section 107]

George Bush I: The Man Who Helped Make September 11 a Reality
by William L. Anderson

As Americans embarrassingly stumble into a
mawkish remembrance of those awful attacks
on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon a
year ago, I would like to take time to honor (if
that is an appropriate word) the man who more
than anyone else made those attacks a reality:
George H.W. Bush. While conservatives blame
Bill Clinton and Democrats still are looking to
find if the present George W. Bush
Administration was culpable (it was), I would
like to turn to the real source, the man whose
legacy we seem to have forgotten.

If anything, conservatives claim that the only
problem of Bush I was the failure to take out
Saddam Hussein in the Gulf War. Actually, I
would like to question whether or not there
should have been a war in the first place and
point out that the Gulf War, for all of the
supposed glory it brought the U.S. Armed
Forces, was a huge disaster that continues to
this day to have awful repercussions upon much
of the world.

To understand the magnitude of Bush I's folly,
we need to return to 1990, when Iraq invaded
Kuwait in early August. The previous fall, the
communist regimes of Eastern Europe had fallen
and the once-formidable U.S.S.R. was
beginning to break up, as the Cold War had
ended. For people who had lived their entire
lives under the shadow of all that the struggle
between East and West had been, this was a
wonderful and heady moment.

With the end of the threat of nuclear war
between the U.S.S.R. and the USA having
ended, for a brief moment, it seemed that
prospects for a larger peace could not have
been greater  that is until that fateful day when
Iraq invaded Kuwait. In another era, this
invasion would have gone unnoticed, as the
actions of one desert regime against another
would not have had any effect upon the world
scene. However, because of the fact that a huge
portion of the world's crude oil comes from the
Persian Gulf region, that was enough to make
politicians panic, as people began to assess the
possibilities of Saddam Hussein having control
over that oil.

The U.S. Government dealings with Hussein
himself provide an informative study of how not
to engage in foreign policy. During the 1980s,
when Iraq was at war against Iran, which had
held a large number of Americans as hostage in
the last year of Jimmy Carter's administration,
Hussein was seen as a U.S. ally. Like the
Muslims who hold to the belief that the enemy
of my enemy is my friend, the U.S. Government
courted Hussein as a moderate who could
stand as a bulwark in the region against the
fanaticism of the Iranian Islamic regime. After
all, Iraq was a secular country, despite its
overwhelming Muslim population, and there
was a thriving Christian community there.

Even when an Iraqi warplane attacked a U.S.
ship in the Persian Gulf in 1987, killing dozens
of U.S. sailors, the U.S. Government, then under
Ronald Reagan, accepted Iraq's apology for its
mistake in much the same way the U.S.
Government told the public that the deadly 1967
Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty also was a
mistake. Even when Hussein's armed forces
used poison gas against Iranian soldiers, Iraq
was still regarded as a moderate regime in
State Department language.

In July 1990, however, it all changed. After the
U.S. ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie,
indicated to Hussein that the Bush
Administration would not object to an invasion
of Kuwait, the Iraqis took the U.S. at its word
and sent its armies over the border, meeting
almost no resistance. (At the time, there was a
legitimate dispute at the Iraq-Kuwait border
involving the Kuwaiti practice of drilling
sideways under the border to extract oil from
pools in Iraq. No one seems to have
remembered that this was Hussein's main gripe,
although Iraqis never have regarded Kuwait,
which once was part of Iraq, as a legitimate
state in the first place.)

After Iraq invaded Kuwait, Bush demanded that
the Iraqis leave at once. Saddam, once our ally,
all of a sudden was a demon, a threat to world
peace and someone who was obsessed with
obtaining and building weapons of mass
destruction. The Saudi Arabian Royal Family
also privately expressed fear that Saddam (who
probably was more popular in Saudi Arabia
than the corrupt rulers of the royal family)
would turn his military might towards them.

The Saudis, as well as the Israelis and others
who saw this as a golden opportunity for a U.S.
military response, began to raise the specter of
Iraq controlling the world's largest single oil
source. Journalists began to write about the
possible reappearance of the dreaded gas
lines, forgetting that the chaos at the gas pumps
in the USA during the 1970s was the direct
result of government price controls on domestic
crude oil and gasoline. The prospect of the U.S.
Armed Forces being able to set up permanent
bases also appealed to a number of Democrats