-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Heritage memo calls Clinton's late executive orders 'improper, illegal'
By Donald Lambro
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


     A legal memorandum prepared for President Bush accuses Bill Clinton of
having abused his presidential powers to issue executive orders, many of
which are described as illegal, improper or political. Top Stories
     In a 24-page review of Mr. Clinton's numerous executive orders and
federal regulatory rule-making, a senior legal analyst for the Heritage
Foundation sharply questioned the legality of many of the outgoing
president's actions and urged Mr. Bush to revoke or revise them..
     Todd F. Gaziano, who wrote the lengthy legal memorandum, said Mr.
Clinton aggressively used executive decrees "in situations where he failed to
achieve a legislative objective. Moreover, he repeatedly flaunted his
executive order power to curry favor with narrow or partisan special
interests."
     A review of Mr. Clinton's orders showed that "a disproportionate number
of these executive directives were either illegal or issued in the
furtherance of an improper policy or political objective," said the memo, a
copy of which was obtained by The Washington Times. Its findings, which are
to be made public today, will be submitted to the White House.
     "A president who abuses his executive order authority undermines the
constitutional separation of powers and may even violate it," the memorandum
said.
     "History will show that President Clinton abused his authority in a
variety of ways and that his disrespect for the rule of law was
unprecedented. Given this pattern, no one should be surprised that Clinton
sometimes abused his executive authority as well," the memo said.
     Many of the abuses by Mr. Clinton were in his use of executive orders
under the Antiquities Act of 1906, which he used to create seven national
monuments comprising a million acres of land, as well as in directives in
other areas of foreign, defense, environmental policy, regulatory review and
civil rights, the memo said.
     Congress considered legislation to prevent abuses of executive orders
but ran into stiff opposition from the Clinton administration. However, the
memo said it would be "a mistake to try to restrict a president's lawful and
proper executive order authority because of one abusive president."
     "Because few reforms can be imposed on a president over his veto, it
makes sense for Congress to work with the new president on such reforms
rather than overreact to the abuses of the last president," the memo said.
     The hundreds of executive orders that Mr. Clinton signed in the closing
months and weeks of his presidency sparked substantial controversy, and the
Heritage analysis said much of the criticism was justified.
     One of the most sweeping orders Mr. Clinton signed on Dec. 4 created the
largest protected area in the United States, covering an 84 million-acre
ecosystem around Hawaii that will be off-limits to oil exploration and will
limit commercial fishing. In another sweeping action on Jan. 9, the
Environmental Protection Agency approved regulations to protect tens of
thousands of acres of wetlands, marshes, swamps and bogs.
     All presidents have used executive orders under authority that in most
cases Congress has given them, but in Mr. Clinton's case, "a baser motive
seemed to prevail in the use of executive power," the memo said. Mr. Clinton,
it added, pushed his authority beyond legal limits.
     Every president since Harry S. Truman was "generally more careful to
stay within their constitutional and statutory grants of authority in the
exercise of their executive order authority — until the administration of
President Clinton," Mr. Gaziano wrote.
     "Although the number of illegal executive orders issued by Clinton does
not constitute a large percentage of his total 364, the pattern of illegal
orders, often without any claim of statutory or constitutional authority, was
still striking," he said.
     The memo said the "clearest example of Clinton's lawlessness" was when
he signed his " 'striker replacement' executive order" in 1993 after Congress
refused to change labor law to prohibit businesses from permanently replacing
workers who were on strike.
     The executive order was unanimously overturned by the U.S. Court of
Appeals.
     One of the most "outrageous" orders signed by Mr. Clinton, under the
Antiquities Act, was the establishment of the 1.7 million-acre Grand
Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah, the memo said. When President
Carter used this act, in most cases the areas covered only a small amount of
land.
     Mr. Clinton's order created this landmark area "with insufficient public
participation and arguably without adequate due process," Mr. Gaziano said.
While Mr. Clinton's sweeping use of the Antiquities Act is now facing legal
challenge in court, the Heritage analysis concluded that Mr. Bush has the
authority to "rescind any prior designation under the Antiquities Act."
     "Each of the executive orders should be carefully reviewed to determine
whether the current administration should: (1) allow it to continue; (2)
revoke it with a new directive; (3) revise, supplement, or otherwise amend
it; or (4) redirect agency implementation through a presidential memorandum
or other action," the memo advised.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to