Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-28 Thread Steve Suranie

-Caveat Lector-

Perhaps it would be good if you offered a specific example instead of
blanketing all scientist in this fashion. I missed the beginning of this
thread so I'm not sure if you are talking about a specific incident or just
scientist in general.

 --
 From: tenebroust
 Reply To: Conspiracy Theory Research List
 Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:02 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

 -Caveat Lector-

 That is precisely why the analogy works becuase established science has a
 religious structure and as such does not take any guff from those who wish
 to go outside of its constraints.




 On Wed, 27 June 2001, Foxter wrote:

 
  !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
  HTMLHEAD
  META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
  META content=MSHTML 5.50.4134.600 name=GENERATOR
  STYLE/STYLE
  /HEAD
  BODY bgColor=#c8e0d8
  DIVOn Tue, 26 Jun 2001, tenebroust wrote:BRgt;The short answer is
 that they
  are ignorant and very when theyBRgt;deliberately do not look at
 evidence and
  cover up or ridicule theoriesBRgt;proposed that do not fit into their
 well
  established theories (read:BRgt;FACTS).BRBRThe problem is that
 Modern
  Science has become a new religion, repleteBRwith its own rules and
 dogma...and
  anyone deviating from the acceptedBRdogma is branded a heretic and
  'excommunicated'...BRBRBRJuneBRBR/DIV
  DIVFONT face=Galliard BT color=#80 size=2And the leader of
 this new
  religion is the Dollar/ECU/Yen, thenbsp;motivation Greed./FONT/DIV
  DIVFONT face=Galliard BT color=#80 size=2That explains why
 ordinarily
  kind men and women abandonnbsp;common sense and
  compassion./FONT/DIV/BODY/HTML

 Welcome to the desert of the real.  Morpheus, in The Matrix

 My God it's full of stars!  Dave Bowman, in 2001: A Space
 Odyssey
 Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
 http://www.shopping.altavista.com

 A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing
 propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance--not soap-boxin---please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theor-'--with its many half-truths, mis-
 directions and outright fra-ds--is used politically by different groups
 with
 major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and
 thought.
 That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
 always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
 credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
  A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
  A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om



A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-28 Thread tenebroust

-Caveat Lector-

It is not a blanket statement.  It is meant to refer to scientists who hold old line 
theories (not necessarily invalid or untrue ones, lets get that straight), like 
evolution, the inhabitants of early America, the origin of the Sphinx, etc.  Who 
routinely keep research out of peer reviewed publications, ignore or ridicule 
alternate theories that are put forward by reputable scientists, NOT because the 
theories are stupid or invalid, or UNscientific but because they hold the view that 
their theory is correct and all others MUST therefore be wrong, and thus should be 
ignored.



On Thu, 28 June 2001, Steve Suranie wrote:


 -Caveat Lector-

 Perhaps it would be good if you offered a specific example instead of
 blanketing all scientist in this fashion. I missed the beginning of this
 thread so I'm not sure if you are talking about a specific incident or just
 scientist in general.

  --
  From: tenebroust
  Reply To: Conspiracy Theory Research List
  Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:02 PM
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:  Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists
 
  -Caveat Lector-
 
  That is precisely why the analogy works becuase established science has a
  religious structure and as such does not take any guff from those who wish
  to go outside of its constraints.
 
 
 
 
  On Wed, 27 June 2001, Foxter wrote:
 
  
   !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
   HTMLHEAD
   META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
   META content=MSHTML 5.50.4134.600 name=GENERATOR
   STYLE/STYLE
   /HEAD
   BODY bgColor=#c8e0d8
   DIVOn Tue, 26 Jun 2001, tenebroust wrote:BRgt;The short answer is
  that they
   are ignorant and very when theyBRgt;deliberately do not look at
  evidence and
   cover up or ridicule theoriesBRgt;proposed that do not fit into their
  well
   established theories (read:BRgt;FACTS).BRBRThe problem is that
  Modern
   Science has become a new religion, repleteBRwith its own rules and
  dogma...and
   anyone deviating from the acceptedBRdogma is branded a heretic and
   'excommunicated'...BRBRBRJuneBRBR/DIV
   DIVFONT face=Galliard BT color=#80 size=2And the leader of
  this new
   religion is the Dollar/ECU/Yen, thenbsp;motivation Greed./FONT/DIV
   DIVFONT face=Galliard BT color=#80 size=2That explains why
  ordinarily
   kind men and women abandonnbsp;common sense and
   compassion./FONT/DIV/BODY/HTML
 
  Welcome to the desert of the real.  Morpheus, in The Matrix
 
  My God it's full of stars!  Dave Bowman, in 2001: A Space
  Odyssey
  Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
  http://www.shopping.altavista.com
 
  A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
  DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
  ==
  CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing
  propagandic
  screeds are unwelcomed. Substance--not soap-boxin---please!  These are
  sordid matters and 'conspiracy theor-'--with its many half-truths, mis-
  directions and outright fra-ds--is used politically by different groups
  with
  major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and
  thought.
  That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
  always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
  credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
 
  Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
  
  Archives Available at:
  http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
   A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A
 
  http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
   A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A
  
  To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
  SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
  SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Om
 
 

 A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
 directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
 major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
 That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
 always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
 credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
  A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http

Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-27 Thread tenebroust

-Caveat Lector-

The short answer is that they are ignorant and very when they deliberately do not look 
at evidence and cover up or ridicule theories proposed that do not fit into their well 
established theories (read: FACTS).



On Tue, 26 June 2001, Andrew Hennessey wrote:


 -Caveat Lector-

 yep lets feel superior about the ordinary joe six pack lay person -
 thenlets have a critical look at our superior intellect and where exactly
 that has gotten the human race over the last century.

 Did you know that Lord kelvin wrote a treatise on aether and gravitation
 which he presented to the royal society in 1901 and in that he not only puts
 forward the theory of the gaseous turbulence of the aether but of the basic
 principles of Chaos Theory - and by doing so - he had advanced Cosmology by
 a hundred years - see www.santafe.edu but look where we are now -
 Einstein's disclaimer on
 aether was the michelson morley experiment - I mean is it logical that if we
 examine the inside of something the size of a can of beans for aether and
 not find any that we can then project that classically irrationally result
 as an absolute a priori on INFINITY ??
 Einstein's fixed C and no ether also hit the skids in 1920 with Olbers
 paradox - has anybody ever heard of it - if not - why not -
 it suggests that  its a paradox that the sky isn't white at night - because
 all the photons in the cosmos should have been here by now - but something -
 some paradox has held them up [not ether say the ignorant scientists] but
 something - its a paradox - blah blah

 By the rules of the scientific game written by karl Popper in his
 Conjectures and Refutations he suggests that if a theory is not falsifiable
 it is redundant - that it is not rational to keeep going back to and
 remodifying a theroy - it should be discarded - but ignorant 'scientists'
 keep doing that with the Big bang - even though there is a ribbon of
 galaxies called the great wall with matter far older than the big bang
 theory allows for - another lemon that should be trashed.

 Schifflers Horns is a paradox in mathematical topology - in this LINEAR
 cosmos it keeps showing up fractal.
 Well Schifflers horns is the mathematical PROOF that the Universe is a chaos
 event and non-linear.

 And superstring theory and all the spin off garbage - have you ever in your
 life heard of a more bizarre pile of crap ?? its another example of the
 constant modification of a theory that should have been scrapped decades
 ago. Everytime the 'scientists' hit a snag - they just add in another
 mathematical dimension and another layer of absurd abstraction. It goes
 completely against the cornertsone rationality of popper and the simple is
 best Occams Razor.
 I'm NOT saying that the empirical DATA on physics is bad - just the MODEL of
 superstrings that it is deployed on is Crass.

 and we look at all the 'scientists' working for the military industrial
 complex - and some people feel superior over the laymen ???
 scientists with worthless doctorates in physics and a washed out paradigm
 FULL of PARADOXES and un-unified Physics - and these 'scientists' advise
 governments that there is No Global Warming [thatcher/carbon tax], that it
 is ok to lower the pasteurisation temperatures of meat processing to make
 the processes yield more profit. that microwaves and radioactivity do not
 build up damage - that food stuffs containing harmful chemicals are ok and
 those 'scientists' feel superior ??
 what a laugh
 no the common man doesn't have a professorship in STUPIDITY
 he does have COMMON SENSE - and he/she knows that 'Science' is desperately
 trying to paper over the Cracks ...
 but its more obvious than that - the greatest scientific achievement in
 recent years was not some brilliant flawed genius like einstein or tesla or
 kelvin with sweeping new paradigms -
 it was rows and rows of big big machines doing the sorting for the human
 genome project -
 if you can give the monkeys enough typewriters - they will get their Nobel.

 andrew hennessey

 A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
 directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
 major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
 That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
 always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
 credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
  A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A


Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-27 Thread YnrChyldzWyld

-Caveat Lector-

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, tenebroust wrote:
The short answer is that they are ignorant and very when they
deliberately do not look at evidence and cover up or ridicule theories
proposed that do not fit into their well established theories (read:
FACTS).

The problem is that Modern Science has become a new religion, replete
with its own rules and dogma...and anyone deviating from the accepted
dogma is branded a heretic and 'excommunicated'...


June

===
Alternative Kite Radio (basic)
Alternative Kite Summer Beachparty Radio (it's always summer somewhere)
Alternative Kite Holiday Radio (everyday's a holiday)

Check out Alternative Kite Radio at
http://www.altkiteradio.trancetechno.com
===

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-27 Thread Steve Suranie

-Caveat Lector-

Of course this could be twisted the other way around, any scientist not
agreeing with your view can be labeled ignorant and said to prescribe to the
new religion and its rules and dogma...

 --
 From: Foxter
 Reply To: Conspiracy Theory Research List
 Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 9:02 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

 On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, tenebroust wrote:
 The short answer is that they are ignorant and very when they
 deliberately do not look at evidence and cover up or ridicule theories
 proposed that do not fit into their well established theories (read:
 FACTS).

 The problem is that Modern Science has become a new religion, replete
 with its own rules and dogma...and anyone deviating from the accepted
 dogma is branded a heretic and 'excommunicated'...


 June


 And the leader of this new religion is the Dollar/ECU/Yen, the motivation
 Greed.
 That explains why ordinarily kind men and women abandon common sense and
 compassion.


A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-27 Thread YnrChyldzWyld








  
  From: Steve Suranie
  Of course this could be twisted the other way around, any scientist 
  notagreeing with your view can be labeled ignorant and said to 
  prescribe to thenew religion and its rules and dogma...I 
  don't care whose views they 'agree' with, including my own...
  
  What I DO care about is that anyone calling themselves a scientist go 
  thru the scientific process to prove or disprove any theory or 
  point. Too many of them react with a kneejerk response to anything 
  considered avant-garde or 'kooky', and don't examine the evidence let 
  alone try to recreate the thing they condemn outright without 
  investigating.
  
  
  June
  
  Check out Alternative Kite Radio -- http://www.altkiteradio.trancetechno.com
  
  
  





	
	
	
	
	
	
	




_IncrediMail - Email has finally 
evolved - Click 
Here



Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-27 Thread tenebroust

-Caveat Lector-

You hit on an excellent point and that is that we don't have to agree but the end 
result should be a fair representation of the facts and alternative theories should be 
considered, not shunted aside and ridiculed.  Don't label yourself impartial unless 
you truly are.



On Wed, 27 June 2001, YnrChyldzWyld wrote:


 meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1html
 head
 meta name=GENERATOR content=IncrediMail 1.0
 /head

 BODY background= bgColor=#ff style=BACKGROUND-POSITION: 0px 0px; 
FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN: 1px scroll=yes ORGYPOS=0
 TABLE border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 id=INCREDIMAINTABLE width=95%
 TR

 TD id=INCREDITEXTREGION width=100% style=FONT-FAMILY: Arial; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; 
PADDING-LEFT: 7px; PADDING-RIGHT: 7px

   DIV id=receivestrings
   DIV dir=ltr style=FONT-SIZE: 11pt iBFrom:/B/I A
   href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];Steve Suranie/A/DIV/DIV
   Pgt;Of course this could be twisted the other way around, any scientist
   notBRgt;agreeing with your view can be labeled ignorant and said to
   prescribe to theBRgt;new religion and its rules and dogma...BRBRI
   don't care whose views they 'agree' with, including my own.../P
   Pnbsp;/P
   PWhat I DO care about is that anyone calling themselves a scientist go
   thru the scientific process to prove or disprove any theory or
   point.nbsp; Too many of them react with a kneejerk response to anything
   considered avant-garde or 'kooky', and don't examine the evidence let
   alone try to recreate the thing they condemn outright without
   investigating./P
   Pnbsp;/P
   DIVnbsp;/DIV
   DIVJune/DIV
   DIVnbsp;/DIV
   DIVCheck out Alternative Kite Radio -- A
   
href=http://www.altkiteradio.trancetechno.com;http://www.altkiteradio.trancetechno.com/A/DIV
   DIVnbsp;/DIV
   DIVnbsp;/DIV
   Pnbsp;/P/TD
 /TR

 TR
 TD id=INCREDIFOOTER width=100%

   TABLE cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 width=100%
   TR
   TD width=100%/TD
   TD align=middle id=INCREDISOUND vAlign=bottom/TD
   TD align=middle id=INCREDIANIM vAlign=bottom/TD
   /TR
   /TABLE

 /TD
 /TR

 /TABLESPAN
 id=IncrediStampSPAN dir=ltrFONT face=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif
 size=2_BRFONT
 face=Comic Sans MS size=2IIncrediMail/I - BEmail has finally
 evolved/B - /FONTA href=http://www.incredimail.com/imstampa.html;FONT
 face=Times New Roman size=3BUClick
 Here/U/B/FONT/A/SPAN/SPAN/FONT
 /BODY
 /html

Welcome to the desert of the real.  Morpheus, in The Matrix

My God it's full of stars!  Dave Bowman, in 2001: A Space
Odyssey
Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
http://www.shopping.altavista.com

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-27 Thread tenebroust

-Caveat Lector-

That is precisely why the analogy works becuase established science has a religious 
structure and as such does not take any guff from those who wish to go outside of its 
constraints.




On Wed, 27 June 2001, Foxter wrote:


 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
 HTMLHEAD
 META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
 META content=MSHTML 5.50.4134.600 name=GENERATOR
 STYLE/STYLE
 /HEAD
 BODY bgColor=#c8e0d8
 DIVOn Tue, 26 Jun 2001, tenebroust wrote:BRgt;The short answer is that they
 are ignorant and very when theyBRgt;deliberately do not look at evidence and
 cover up or ridicule theoriesBRgt;proposed that do not fit into their well
 established theories (read:BRgt;FACTS).BRBRThe problem is that Modern
 Science has become a new religion, repleteBRwith its own rules and dogma...and
 anyone deviating from the acceptedBRdogma is branded a heretic and
 'excommunicated'...BRBRBRJuneBRBR/DIV
 DIVFONT face=Galliard BT color=#80 size=2And the leader of this new
 religion is the Dollar/ECU/Yen, thenbsp;motivation Greed./FONT/DIV
 DIVFONT face=Galliard BT color=#80 size=2That explains why ordinarily
 kind men and women abandonnbsp;common sense and
 compassion./FONT/DIV/BODY/HTML

Welcome to the desert of the real.  Morpheus, in The Matrix

My God it's full of stars!  Dave Bowman, in 2001: A Space
Odyssey
Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
http://www.shopping.altavista.com

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-27 Thread Mark McHugh

-Caveat Lector-

YnrChyldzWyld wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, tenebroust wrote:
 The short answer is that they are ignorant and very when they
 deliberately do not look at evidence and cover up or ridicule theories
 proposed that do not fit into their well established theories (read:
 FACTS).

 The problem is that Modern Science has become a new religion, replete
 with its own rules and dogma...and anyone deviating from the accepted
 dogma is branded a heretic and 'excommunicated'...

 June


Amen!  I recommend Robert Anton Wilson's The New Inquisition which
is subtitled Irrational Rationalism and the Citadel of Science.

--
´´
Mark McHugh

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-26 Thread Andrew Hennessey

-Caveat Lector-

yep lets feel superior about the ordinary joe six pack lay person -
thenlets have a critical look at our superior intellect and where exactly
that has gotten the human race over the last century.

Did you know that Lord kelvin wrote a treatise on aether and gravitation
which he presented to the royal society in 1901 and in that he not only puts
forward the theory of the gaseous turbulence of the aether but of the basic
principles of Chaos Theory - and by doing so - he had advanced Cosmology by
a hundred years - see www.santafe.edu but look where we are now -
Einstein's disclaimer on
aether was the michelson morley experiment - I mean is it logical that if we
examine the inside of something the size of a can of beans for aether and
not find any that we can then project that classically irrationally result
as an absolute a priori on INFINITY ??
Einstein's fixed C and no ether also hit the skids in 1920 with Olbers
paradox - has anybody ever heard of it - if not - why not -
it suggests that  its a paradox that the sky isn't white at night - because
all the photons in the cosmos should have been here by now - but something -
some paradox has held them up [not ether say the ignorant scientists] but
something - its a paradox - blah blah

By the rules of the scientific game written by karl Popper in his
Conjectures and Refutations he suggests that if a theory is not falsifiable
it is redundant - that it is not rational to keeep going back to and
remodifying a theroy - it should be discarded - but ignorant 'scientists'
keep doing that with the Big bang - even though there is a ribbon of
galaxies called the great wall with matter far older than the big bang
theory allows for - another lemon that should be trashed.

Schifflers Horns is a paradox in mathematical topology - in this LINEAR
cosmos it keeps showing up fractal.
Well Schifflers horns is the mathematical PROOF that the Universe is a chaos
event and non-linear.

And superstring theory and all the spin off garbage - have you ever in your
life heard of a more bizarre pile of crap ?? its another example of the
constant modification of a theory that should have been scrapped decades
ago. Everytime the 'scientists' hit a snag - they just add in another
mathematical dimension and another layer of absurd abstraction. It goes
completely against the cornertsone rationality of popper and the simple is
best Occams Razor.
I'm NOT saying that the empirical DATA on physics is bad - just the MODEL of
superstrings that it is deployed on is Crass.

and we look at all the 'scientists' working for the military industrial
complex - and some people feel superior over the laymen ???
scientists with worthless doctorates in physics and a washed out paradigm
FULL of PARADOXES and un-unified Physics - and these 'scientists' advise
governments that there is No Global Warming [thatcher/carbon tax], that it
is ok to lower the pasteurisation temperatures of meat processing to make
the processes yield more profit. that microwaves and radioactivity do not
build up damage - that food stuffs containing harmful chemicals are ok and
those 'scientists' feel superior ??
what a laugh
no the common man doesn't have a professorship in STUPIDITY
he does have COMMON SENSE - and he/she knows that 'Science' is desperately
trying to paper over the Cracks ...
but its more obvious than that - the greatest scientific achievement in
recent years was not some brilliant flawed genius like einstein or tesla or
kelvin with sweeping new paradigms -
it was rows and rows of big big machines doing the sorting for the human
genome project -
if you can give the monkeys enough typewriters - they will get their Nobel.

andrew hennessey

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] How Ignorant are Scientists

2001-06-26 Thread Andrew Hennessey

-Caveat Lector-

yep lets feel superior about the ordinary joe six pack lay person -
thenlets have a critical look at our superior intellect and where exactly
that has gotten the human race over the last century.

Did you know that Lord kelvin wrote a treatise on aether and gravitation
which he presented to the royal society in 1901 and in that he not only puts
forward the theory of the gaseous turbulence of the aether but of the basic
principles of Chaos Theory - and by doing so - he had advanced Cosmology by
a hundred years - see www.santafe.edu but look where we are now -
Einstein's disclaimer on
aether was the michelson morley experiment - I mean is it logical that if we
examine the inside of something the size of a can of beans for aether and
not find any that we can then project that classically irrationally result
as an absolute a priori on INFINITY ?? ie. make it into a universal law
!!!??
Einstein's fixed C and no ether also hit the skids in 1920 with Olbers
paradox - has anybody ever heard of it - if not - why not -
it suggests that  its a paradox that the sky isn't white at night - because
all the photons in the cosmos should have been here by now - but something -
some paradox has held them up [not ether say the ignorant scientists] but
something - its a paradox - blah blah

By the rules of the scientific game written by karl Popper in his
Conjectures and Refutations he suggests that if a theory is not falsifiable
it is redundant - that it is not rational to keeep going back to and
remodifying a theroy - it should be discarded - but ignorant 'scientists'
keep doing that with the Big bang - even though there is a ribbon of
galaxies called the great wall with matter far older than the big bang
theory allows for - another lemon that should be trashed.

Schifflers Horns is a paradox in mathematical topology - in this LINEAR
cosmos it keeps showing up fractal.
Well Schifflers horns is the mathematical PROOF that the Universe is a chaos
event and non-linear.

And superstring theory and all the spin off garbage - have you ever in your
life heard of a more bizarre pile of crap ?? its another example of the
constant modification of a theory that should have been scrapped decades
ago. Everytime the 'scientists' hit a snag - they just add in another
mathematical dimension and another layer of absurd abstraction. It goes
completely against the cornertsone rationality of popper and the simple is
best Occams Razor.
I'm NOT saying that the empirical DATA on physics is bad - just the MODEL of
superstrings that it is deployed on is Crass.

and we look at all the 'scientists' working for the military industrial
complex - and some people feel superior over the laymen ???
scientists with worthless doctorates in physics and a washed out paradigm
FULL of PARADOXES and un-unified Physics - and these 'scientists' advise
governments that there is No Global Warming [thatcher/carbon tax], that it
is ok to lower the pasteurisation temperatures of meat processing to make
the processes yield more profit. that microwaves and radioactivity do not
build up damage - that food stuffs containing harmful chemicals are ok and
those 'scientists' feel superior ??
what a laugh
no the common man doesn't have a professorship in STUPIDITY
he does have COMMON SENSE - and he/she knows that 'Science' is desperately
trying to paper over the Cracks ...
but its more obvious than that - the greatest scientific achievement in
recent years was not some brilliant flawed genius like einstein or tesla or
kelvin with sweeping new paradigms -
it was rows and rows of big big machines doing the sorting for the human
genome project -
if you can give the monkeys enough typewriters - they will get their Nobel.

andrew hennessey
transformation studies group

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research