>   In Plain English (Not German): It Ain't Necessarily So
>   Washington Post
>   By Robert Cullen
>   Saturday, August 26, 2000; Page A17
>
>   Graham Greene once wrote about an elderly and somewhat whimsical
>   priest named Monsignor Quixote. A central theme of the novel, which
>   takes place in Spain in the early 1980s, is that Don Quixote--the
>   famed adventurer who battled windmills--is the priest's ancestor.
>   Almost everyone in the story seems to accept this genealogy at face
>   value, except one skeptic who openly questions how somebody could be
>   descended from a fictional character.
>
>   I felt similarly bewildered while watching the Rev. Jesse Jackson
>   address the Democratic National Convention. With characteristic vigor
>   and passion, Jackson asserted, "One vote decided that America would
>   speak English rather than German in 1776."
>
>   That statement, part of Jackson's litany of how one vote can make a
>   difference, refers to a U.S. history lesson about something familiar,
>   interesting and attention-getting. It also never happened, although
>   Jackson is far from being the only person to believe it did.
>
>   We have all come across such tidbits--those persistent historical
>   myths or inventions masquerading as facts. National party conventions
>   are especially fertile ground for them.
>
>   Eight years ago, for example, at the Republican convention at which
>   President George Bush was renominated, his predecessor Ronald Reagan
>   took to the podium and quoted a series of one-liners that he
>   attributed to Abraham Lincoln. The problem was that the platitudes
>   credited to our 16th president actually appeared first in a 1916
>   pamphlet printed by a Pennsylvania preacher named William J. H.
>   Boetcker.
>
>   The incident that inspired the myth about our almost becoming a
>   German-speaking nation occurred not in 1776 but two decades later,
>   during George Washington's second term as president. More important,
>   there was neither a vote nor even a bill to replace English with
>   German as the official U.S. language. Here's the real story.
>
>   In March 1794, a group of Germans living in Virginia presented a
>   petition to Congress asking that certain federal laws be printed in
>   their native language. A committee of the House of Representatives
>   responded by formally recommending that 3,000 sets of laws be printed
>   in both German and English and distributed to the states.
>
>   The full House debated this recommendation on Jan. 13, 1795. Unable to
>   reach a decision, the members instead considered a motion to adjourn
>   that day and revisit the proposal later. It was this that was defeated
>   by one vote, 42 to 41.
>
>   The House, which that day named a new committee to further study the
>   proposal, debated it again on Feb. 16. This time it decided to approve
>   the publication of federal statutes in English only. The Senate
>   subsequently passed this bill as well, and George Washington signed it
>   into law.
>
>   So what was merely a limited translation request has mushroomed into
>   today's tale that German was an also-ran in our national sweepstakes
>   for an official language (never mind that not even English has that
>   status).
>
>   More than a half-century after congressional actions on this matter,
>   Franz Loher published "History and Achievements of the Germans in
>   America," which did much to perpetuate the myth of the German-language
>   vote. In due time, other German Americans likewise promoted the story
>   as an example of their influence in the republic's early days.
>
>   The myth has since taken on other identities, from a tidy lesson about
>   the importance of a single vote to yet another argument against
>   bilingual education.
>
>   Jackson is only the latest in a long and distinguished line of
>   individuals who have unwittingly helped extend its already-long
>   shelf-life. Others who have done so include Ann Landers and Abigail
>   Van Buren, "Ripley's Believe It or Not," well-intentioned teachers and
>   various political activists.
>
>   Thanks to the Internet, the myth now has new opportunities to
>   circulate farther and faster than ever before. More than a few Web
>   sites feature it without qualification. To be sure, some sites at
>   least acknowledge that the myth might be folklore and still others
>   debunk it. But I worry about the ones that discuss the myth
>   uncritically and as an article of our civic faith. They guarantee new
>   converts well into the 21st century.
>
>   There are those who would insist that myths such as this one are
>   harmless tales that encourage and instruct. I think a stronger case
>   can be made that such figments of our national imagination only manage
>   to diminish and even trivialize how we remember and understand our
>   shared past. All things considered, we're probably a lot better off
>   focusing more on what actually happened and less on the historical
>   mirages along the way.
>
>   Robert Cullen is a Baltimore writer.
>
>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to