-Caveat Lector-
>From NewAustralian
> Looking Out
>
> Peter Zhang's
> Column
>
> Clinton
> and
> BeijingThe New Australian
> No. 124, 21-27 June 1999
>
> I keep getting emails from American readers pleading to know how
> deeply Clinton has damaged American national security. In truth, I
> cannot say much more than I have already but I shall once again repeat
> myself: American security has been shattered. Chinese officials have
> privately bragged about the extent of their penetration, their placing
> of agents, their successful use of bribery and blackmail. I have heard
> stories that I would never repeat, though I know them to be true,
> because many readers would consider them fantastic. But would they be
> any more fantastic than a president selling his country's secrets to a
> potential enemy? And yet this is exactly what Clinton has done. To
> gain some grasp of the danger in which Clinton may very well have put
> America one only needs to read the Cox Report.
>
> As for Bill Clinton, I personally believe he is capable of anything, a
> view shared by Chinese officials who also hold him in the greatest
> contempt. He is not only considered treacherous but unstable. A man
> completely incapable of seeing beyond tomorrow. This goes someway, in
> Chinese eyes, of understanding his motives. I pointed out in another
> article that Beijing has a profile of every member of Congress and the
> Senate. The interesting thing is that Clinton's file goes back, so I
> have been told, to his student days.
>
> This information is particularly interesting because it is clearly
> impossible for any intelligence agency, especially a foreign one, to
> determine which students will always make a career out of politics. So
> this raises an important question: why did Chinese intelligence show
> an early interest in Clinton? I'm not suggesting that Clinton was
> involved with Chinese intelligence from when he was a student only
> that it was aware of what I shall call his potential. Clearly
> something or someone, and I'm not referring to the Russians, alerted
> them. Who or what has not been revealed.
>
> There is no doubt whatsoever that when Clinton became politically
> active Chinese intelligence in his potential was renewed and steps
> were taken at a very early stage in his career to cultivate a presence
> through third parties with well-known Asian connections. To my
> knowledge this has never been done with any other American politician
> but Beijing felt confident enough to do it with Clinton. Why? Even the
> densest politician would have smelt a rat so why the confidence?
>
> The key to the puzzle lies in his psychological profile. My
> understanding is that Chinese intelligence concluded that Clinton is
> bereft of any kind of morality or cultural moorings and that he is
> totally absorbed; a man for whom the only thing that counts is what
> promotes his interest regardless of the cost to others, including the
> nation; a man with no sense of honour, integrity or loyalty but an
> uncanny ability to convey the opposite feelings. It was early evidence
> of this ability plus his thuggishness in pursuit of his own ambitions
> that finally convinced Beijing that he was a political winner.
>
> Beijing knew what many still cannot see. Clinton sees the presidency
> as a mere trophy, a kind of political Oscar. Everything he does is
> geared to winning and keeping that Oscar. Curiously enough, it this
> destructive ambition — destructive to America, that is — leaves him as
> a Democrat. Now Clinton is a genuine political thug and these type of
> thugs are attracted to politics because of the power it gives them.
> Therefore when they gain power they do what they can to accumulate
> even more. This is why the likes of Clinton are not to be found in
> political parties that preach small government, the need for low
> taxation and the virtues of patriotism.[1] No wonder it was child's
> play for Beijing to manipulate Clinton. It was like bribing a child
> with sweets.
>
> All said and done, Clinton wilfully betrayed his country. To call
> Clinton a Judas would be to insult Judas whose shame led him to commit
> suicide. Clinton is not a flawed man, as some would have it, he is a
> deeply corrupt and very dangerous man. As I said, there are stories I
> could never repeat though I do not doubt their veracity for a moment.
>
> [1]Hayek
>
> The New Australian
A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
