[CTRL] MUST READ: Set-Up for Endless War / IRAQ QUAGMIRE
-Caveat Lector- (I said many weeks ago this war would be a mess and a quagmire. Bush and Cheney just cannot get their feeble/greedy minds off the oil. You bastards deserve to burn in hell for your crimes against humanity. God is God. (Put me on your list, Office of Homeland Security!) --SW) --- Forwarded message follows --- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Christopher Rudy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:SNET: MUST READ: Set-Up for Endless War / IRAQ QUAGMIRE Date sent: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 20:12:14 -0700 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Set-Up for Endless War / IRAQ QUAGMIRE Insight on the International Capitalist/Communist Conspiracy (ICCC) EXCERPTS: One military expert I saw on the tube said if we have to fight house-to-house, which is likely, we should expect 30% casualties. Thirty per cent! The ideology of the war party is concocted by a new kind of conservative called a neoconservative,known as a neoconfor short. The neoconwants to abolish limited, small government. He wants to replace it with total government, totalitarian government. He hates American independence. He wants to replace it with American Empire. These neoconslove war, war in which others sons will fight, endless war to impose that Empire, perpetual war for the perpetual peace of totalitarian world government. In other words, the neoconis nothing but an old-fashioned Socialist wearing new clothes. The fact that Bush, like Clinton, is supervising(setting up -CR) the invasion of our country designed to submerge it in world government isn't mentioned. [for their script for invasion, see www.heartcom.org/3rdperil.htm -CR] --- article follows: Who's Whose... Which Side Are You On? By: Alan Stang Karl Marx drew considerable inspiration from George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the German philosopher who devised the so-called dialectic,in which a thesis confronts an antithesis, producing a synthesis that becomes a new thesis. Marx and Vladimir Lenin, the first Soviet dictator, added materialism,and the billionaire totalitarian Socialist conspirators who rule us have used dialectical materialism as a tool of scientific Socialism ever since. Needless to say, there is nothing scientific about Socialism. The term scientific Socialism is more of an oxymoron than conservative Republican. The juxtaposition of the two words is mere public relations poppycock. But the world government conspirators are coldly realistic.They know that as they approach their goal, they will face opposition they can't ignore, more and more the closer they come. They know they can't wish it away. So, they use dialectical materialism to confront it. They do two things: (1) They create their own opposition and (2) they infiltrate the genuine opposition and pervert it. No other opposition is permitted. All opposition that begins as genuine is diverted into one of those two avenues. By this means, the conspirators control the opposition. The opposition becomes part of the dialectical process. Theses keep confronting antitheses yielding syntheses that become new theses until the arrival of totalitarian world government - Communism - where the process stops. For instance, this is why they have kept alive the Nazi threat all these years with movies about it and reminders of the Holocaust. If you stand in their way, if you oppose them, they will call you a Nazi and accuse you of anti-Semitism. The fact that Arabs are also Semites makes the term meaningless today, but the conspirators have used it with great success. Applying techniques devised by Antonio Gramsci, founder of the Italian Communist party, they have infiltrated and perverted the entire U.S. government. And they are using dialectical materialism in the present fraud in Iraq. On one side they give us the people who hate America and oppose the war. That side includes longtime Communist organizers and the useful idiots (Lenins phrase) they manipulate, idiots like Michael Moore, Barbara Streisand and well-meaning mothers who want peace. On the other, they give us the war party, devised for people who see the Communist hands in the demonstrations and want no part of them. The ideology of the war party is concocted by a new kind of conservative called a neoconservative,known as a neoconfor short. The neoconwants to abolish limited, small government. He wants to replace it with total government, totalitarian government. He hates American independence. He wants to replace it with American Empire.
[CTRL] Must Read on Vaccinations!
-Caveat Lector- New, excellent historical piece on the history of vaccinations Bill Kalivas Webmaster www.historicist.com The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can bribe the people with their own money. -- Alexis de Tocqueville Complete liberty of contradicting our opinion is the very condition which justifies us in assuming its truth. John Stuart Mill A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Must Read on Vaccinations! With URL
-Caveat Lector- New, excellent historical piece on the history of vaccinations. http://www.reformation.org/vaccine.html Bill Kalivas Webmaster www.historicist.com The American Republic will endure, until politicians realize they can bribe the people with their own money. -- Alexis de Tocqueville Complete liberty of contradicting our opinion is the very condition which justifies us in assuming its truth. John Stuart Mill A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Must Read: Eurosnots
-Caveat Lector- From http://www.nationalpost.com/ Maybe he just loathes Arabs even more than Jews (which, for linguistic pedants, would make him technically a perfect anti-Semite). This guy has the key!!! }}}Begin April 25, 2002 The Eurosnots learn nothing Mark Steyn National Post On Sunday, Jean-Marie Le Pen, the alleged extreme right-wing madman, managed to place second in the first round of the French Presidential election. Since then, many Europhile commentators in the English- speaking world have been attempting to reassure us that the significance of this event has been much overplayed -- Le Pen only got a little more than he usually gets, pure fluke he came second, nothing to see here, move along. The best response to this line of thinking was by the shrewd Internet commentatrix Megan McArdle: They're completely missing the point, which is that it's hilarious. Absolutely. You'd have to have a heart of stone not to be weeping with laughter at the scenes of France's snot-nosed political elite huffily denouncing Sunday's result as an insult to the honour of the Republic. I was in Paris a couple of weeks ago and I well remember the retired French diplomat who assured me that a man like George W. Bush is simply not possible in our politics. For a creature of such crude, simplistic and extreme views to be one of the two principal candidates in a presidential election would be inconceivable here. Inconceivable! Please, no giggling. Somehow events have so arranged themselves that French electors now face a choice, as the papers see it, between la droite et l'extrême droite. The French people have taken to the streets in angry protests against ... the French people! Which must be a relief to the operators of McDonald's franchises, British lorry drivers and other more traditional targets of their ire, but is still a little weird. Meanwhile, the only thing that stands between M. Le Pen and the Elysée Palace, President Chirac, has declared himself the representative of the soul of the Republic. In the sense that he's a shifty dissembler with a long history of financial scandal and no political principles, he may be on to something. While M. Chirac has cast himself as the defender of France, M. Le Pen is apparently the defender of the Jews. While I was over there, he was the only candidate who was seriously affronted by the epidemic of anti- Jew assaults by French Muslims. The Eurosnots told me this was cynical, given that M. Le Pen is notoriously anti-Jew and not above doing oven jokes in public. But that doesn't necessarily make him cynical. Maybe he just loathes Arabs even more than Jews (which, for linguistic pedants, would make him technically a perfect anti-Semite). Maybe he just resents the Muslims muscling in on his turf: We strongly object to the Arab attacks on the Jews. That's our job. But, given that Chirac and Jospin brushed off the Jew-bashing epidemic like a speck of dust on their elegant suits, Le Pen's ability to co-opt it into his general tough-on-crime/tough-on-immigrants approach showed at the least a certain political savvy. Still, despite the racism and bigotry, I resent the characterization of M. Le Pen as extreme right. I'm an extreme right-wing madman myself, and it takes one to know one. M. Le Pen is an economic protectionist in favour of the minimum wage, lavish subsidies for France's incompetent industries and inefficient agriculture; he's anti- American and fiercely opposed to globalization. In other words, he's got far more in common with Naomi Klein than with me. He would fit right in as a guest host on the CBC's CounterSpin. Even the antipathy toward Jews is more of a left-wing thing these days -- see the EU, UN, Svend and Mary Robinson, etc. Insofar as anyone speaks up for Jews in the West, it's only a few right-wing columnists, Newt Gingrich, Christian conservatives and Mrs. Thatcher -- or, as a reader e-mailed the other day, all you Hebraic assholes on the right. M. Le Pen is a nationalist and a socialist -- or, if you prefer, a nationalist socialist. Hmm. A bit long but, if you lost a syllable, you might be in business. But terms like left and right are irrelevant in French politics. In an advanced technocratic state, where almost any issue worth talking about has been ruled beyond the scope of partisan politics, you might as well throw away the compass. The presidential election was meant to be a contest between the supposedly conservative Chirac and his supposedly socialist Prime Minister, Lionel Jospin. In practice, this boils down to a candidate who's left of right of left of centre, and a candidate who's right of left of right of left of centre. Chirac and Jospin ran on identical platforms -- they're both in favour of high taxes, high unemployment and high crime. So, with no significant policy differences between them, the two candidates were relying on their personal appeal, which, given that one's a fraud and the other's a dullard, was asking
[CTRL] [MUST READ] Rapist Clinton Blew His Chance to Get Bin Laden [MUST READ]
Did Clinton Blow His Chance to Get Bin Laden? Thursday, December 06, 2001 BILL O'REILLY, HOST: Now for the Top Story tonight. There's been a persistent criticism that the Clinton administration could have captured Usama bin Laden but blew it. In July of 2000, American activist Mansoor Ijaz says he brought information to Mr. Clinton that could have led to bin Laden's apprehension. Mr. Ijaz joins us now. Let's walk through this for people who don't know you. You say you met with President Clinton how many times in seven years? MANSOOR IJAZ, COUNTERTERRORISM EXPERT: Probably 30, 35 times, something like that. O'REILLY: Face to face. IJAZ: Yes. O'REILLY: And the reason he decided to see you? IJAZ: Well, there was no question I was a big contributor to the Democratic Party. I embraced his concept of trying to expand into the Muslim-American, Arab-American communities. I'm a person of a Pakistani origin. We were trying to develop a voice, a political voice, in this country... O'REILLY: All right, how much money... IJAZ: ... (UNINTELLIGIBLE)... O'REILLY: ... did you donate to the Democrats? IJAZ: Out of my own pocket, probably about $300 or $400,000. And I raised another half a million or so for... O'REILLY: All right, so about... IJAZ: ... (UNINTELLIGIBLE)... O'REILLY: ... a million dollars because of you went to the Democrats. So Clinton saw you 30 times in seven years. IJAZ: yes. O'REILLY: You were interested in Usama bin Laden why? IJAZ: It wasn't Usama bin Laden per se, it was the concept and the problem associated with Islamic radicalism and the rise of radicalism throughout the Islamic world. And the primary area that I was concerned about initially was Pakistan, because the corrupt practices of the governments there, successive governments there, had caused a lot of oppression in the lower layers of the society. And these people, when they give up, they decide, All right, the hell with it, then we're going to go and blow something up. O'REILLY: All right. So you had a big view, worldview, that you wanted President Clinton to consider. IJAZ: That's correct. O'REILLY: But you did bring up bin Laden, correct? IJAZ: Absolutely, no question about it. O'REILLY: And what specifically did you tell him could happen? IJAZ: I told both him and his national security team that there was a much better way to deal with the countries that were harboring what we called terrorists at that time, that maybe those countries had come to the conclusion that it wasn't so good for them either to have Islamic radicalism spin out of control. They were fundamentalists. They didn't want the fanatical part of Islam to crop up in their midst. So when I went to the Sudan, it was because, at that time, we had pushed bin Laden out. We, the United States, had told the Sudan, We don't want you to extradite him to Saudi Arabia, we don't want you to do anything else with him, just let him go. Wherever he goes, it's not our problem. O'REILLY: All right. So we did push him out of the Sudan... IJAZ: That's right. O'REILLY: ... the Sudan sent him out to Afghanistan. IJAZ: Then I come to Sandy Berger in August of 1996 and I say that Dr. Thurabi (ph), who was the religious ideological leader of the Sudan, is prepared to do business with us. He's prepared to help us understand what's going on in these radical frameworks. And the answer was nothing. O'REILLY: Nothing. IJAZ: No response. Susan Rice... O'REILLY: All right, now, they... IJAZ: ... Susan Rice sat in on that meeting, she was... O'REILLY: Right. And she says... IJAZ: ... (UNINTELLIGIBLE)... O'REILLY: ... Well, we had, or we didn't need you, Mr. Ijaz, we didn't need you, because we already had people over in the Sudan gathering intelligence information about Usama bin Laden. IJAZ: And that's a flat lie. That's all I can tell you. O'REILLY: How do you know? IJAZ: I know because I went and I sat there with the ambassador in Khartoum, who could only go there one day a week, who could only -- one day a month, excuse me, and was there for such short periods of time that the only thing he was doing when he was going there was signing the embassy slips to make sure that all the work got done. Tim Carney himself... O'REILLY: But wait a minute. The ambassador to -- the American ambassador to the Sudan could only go where one day a week? IJAZ: Into Khartoum, into his office. O'REILLY: He could only do his job one day a week. IJAZ: He was living -- exactly. O'REILLY: He was exiled. IJAZ: He was living in Nairobi at that time... O'REILLY: I see. IJAZ: ... and apparently, because of some threat to his life, which even he did not believe was real. O'REILLY: All right. Say I believe you. Bin Laden's out of there, he's out of the Sudan, OK? IJAZ: Right. O'REILLY: So what good is the Sudan do to the United States now? IJAZ: Everything that we needed to know
[CTRL] [Must read] Farley: Project Disclosure at National Press Club Event 5/9/01
-Caveat Lector- [I'm no longer a real fan of CSETI, however, it *is* the best show [effort] in town. The following, although a few years late by even their own prior estimates/time-lines, is well worth a scan! --MS] - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 3:10 PM Subject: (First take, Farley) Project Disclosure press event 5/9/01 From: Dick Farley [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Affairs Correspondent The American UFO Newsletter Wednesday, May 9, 2001 -- Washington, DC Re: Project Disclosure Press Conference -- First Take To those interested, from whatever perspectives: References: http://www.press.org http://www.DisclosureProject.org It is very important you and/or your associates take the time to view the webcast of Greer's press conference this morning. It's archived on National Press Club site, it was announced. I was there. (Actually I asked the last questions, of Dan Sheehan and Steven Greer. Sheehan answered his but Greer didn't have time. Event over!) The event lasted two and a half hours; I do not know how much of it is archived. It is supposed to remain on the NPC site for six months, but you should watch it soon. I am told the Project Discovery (CSETI Paradigm Research Group) site has it too. The event was held in the ballroom (13th Floor) of the National Press Club in Washington (14th and F. Streets, NW). While the room is available for rental by anyone, it costs less if rented through a Press Club member. According to the manager of catering for the NPC, the Project Disclosure event was booked by Ms. Sarah MacClendon, a now-90-ish veteran White House reporter who has been a thorn in the sides of many Presidents who sought to keep the American people in the dark about something Sarah believed we needed to know. This is important to consideration of the Project Disclosure event. It was well-connected, well-funded. There were references to Zero-Point Energy, anti-grav and other claims of technical advances some on this list are working on. You'll be happy to know you've already succeeded and that your technologies hold the keys to stopping global warming and ending the energy crisis, among other benefits. Of course, the weaponization of space was a primary focus of the organizers (they're against it). But the real stars were the retired military officers and FAA officials, who are agreeing to testify before a Congressional committee if one can be prodded into holding open hearings on it. One area of advance hype that did not happen were appearances via video tape of former astronauts Edgar Mitchell and Gordon Cooper. No mention was made of this and there was no video tape shown. The 21 in person witnesses each made a five-minute or less presentation, the majority of which were coherent and persuasive. As I am not given to hyperbole, and whatever one thinks about Greer and his gig, I do have to report that the event itself was professionally run and very well received. There is material now out there for intelligent public discussion of UFOs and ET,s and if there are some on this list concerned about efforts to start up a new religion for the Technocratic Age, do fasten your seat belts, because here it comes! Now! Greer referred (without attribution) to Arthur Clarke's characterization of this time as the end of humanity's childhood. I will leave it to you to see the event on the web. What Greer Company have formed is something I have called in the past a nontraditional alliance, of former military folks who are decidedly conservative patriots working alongside abject liberals like Daniel Sheehan, who did legal work for the New York Times on the Pentagon Papers case and later was involved in the Karen Silkwood case (about Kerr-McGee's nuclear operations for DoE, in Texas, etc.). It is a fascinating mix and again, well worth personal review analysis by each of you. It had an impressive array of witness (21 present in the flesh), many with solid and public credentials. For the first time, some official folks having UFO sightings or knowledge are saying, in front of (a bank of 12-plus TV cameras and real press) that they will testify before Congress. This is one initiative the Majestic-12 gang will find it impossible to ignore, and with Rumsfeld-Bush space policies up for review, it will be along lines of opening up black budget projects where Congress will dig. Again, regardless of one's perspective or bias about the players, today's event is singularly important because it's the best executed such initiative we've ever had. I have my own views, of course, about some of what was said. And no, I am NOT drinking the Kool-Aid (none was served). But rather than burn up the Internet with chaff and hearsay, this one is worth you science guys and others on-list tuning in. More later and I certainly will respond to questions and to clarify hearsay, etc. It is important that this effort not degenerate into
[CTRL] *MUST READ* ReformParty Plank for Tax Reform *MUST READ*
[ the People and the States did not originally create a central government to be Feared. ] In my opinion this Plank should include repeal of the Income Tax. Its current Form: "Amended We shall create a new tax system. The new system shall be fair and simple. The new system shall raise the money needed to pay the nation's constitutionally legitimate bills. Analyze, model, and publicly debate the best options. All options should be considered, including tariffs, value-added taxes, and taxes on income, sales, assets, gasoline, and financial transactions. Allow voters to provide input on the new system. Any future tax increases under the new system must be approved by the people in the next federal election, in order to impose discipline on spending Any tax law that benefits a discrete minority shall be subject to strict scrutiny and shall become law only if a compelling interest can be demonstrated." -- Mr. Buchanan, The above Amended plank should, and must, include complete elimination of the IRS. Original Constitutional provisions for the collection of revenue to pay for a limited government is more than adequate to do the job. Adoption by the Reform Party to Repeal the Income Tax would greatly enhance its ability to increase substantiality the Poll numbers to enable participation in the Duopoly controlled Presidential Debates, then move on to Victory in November. The IRS is beyond reform; like a Snake squeezing your body to a slow death, its Head must be severed by one fatal blow. Any and all remnants of its existence must be buried along with all the other insidious programs of the Socialist Agenda which has so devastated the ethical and moral fiber of our Nation. I love my Country so much, but is current corrupt Duopoly has smothered the Liberty granted to me by the Constitution. The only way The Reform Party can appeal to the Voters to make us truly Free again is to repeal Amendment XVI to The Constitution of the United States of America; there is no alternative. (this Amendment, as you well know, was orchestrated by the international bankster cartel, and indeed its legality is in question even to this day.) In my view, such an amendment to your Plank would have major positive impact on the supporters of The Libertarian Party, The Constitution Party, and other Party's which appeal to the young, and greatly contribute to the success of The Reform Party in November. Liberty is Personal Responsibility! Personal Responsibility is Freedom! Our Nation's Soul must be cleansed of the stench of our Society which has displaced its natural innocence. Archibald Bard, Downey, The People's Democratic Socialist Republic of California PS: I have complied with your Appeal for ten fiat-dollars, and trust the cc: readers of this message will do the same by visiting the Website location created for this specific purpose: http://www.buchananreform.com/ A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] MUST READ!
-Caveat Lector- .. Forwarded from the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]: From: j [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MUST READ! Date: Friday, December 31, 1999 4:37 AM DESERT STORM WAR CRIMES COMMISSION http://www.onelist.com/community/DSWCC US Leadership MUST be protected by Vaccines 1999-30-12/17 [ The following is an open letter to Congress from the Air Force Sergeants Association ] This association has received numerous communications from enlisted and commissioned members of the Air Force who are concerned about the mandatory Department of Defense anthrax vaccination program. It is impossible for this association, based upon the data presented, to totally support this program or to fully join with those who oppose it. However, we do join with those-hopefully you are in that group-that recognize that what is happening is not good for our Armed Forces. I'm suggesting that it is time for congressional action sponsoring legislation urging ALL congressional members to step forward and voluntarily take the anthrax inoculations-as a sign of moral leadership on this issue and, perhaps of greater importance, to promote the well-being of this nation. As you know, the mandatory anthrax inoculation issue has, to some degree, impacted the morale of our Armed Forces and is threatening to our military's readiness, especially the reserve forces. However, the anthrax threat should clearly be viewed as a national security concern as well. I believe that the likelihood of the use of anthrax as a weapon would most likely occur in the context of terrorist action. Terrorists are far more likely to target the leaders of this nation at all levels, including the members of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of our government. Such an attack could occur at home or as our leaders and ambassadors travel abroad. Safeguarding our national leaders is extremely important to this nation; we need to be prepared. If the anthrax vaccine being mandated by the defense department is safe and effective, it is clearly in the nation's security interests for all national leaders to receive these inoculations. Further, your stepping forward to voluntarily subscribe to this medical regimen would demonstrate that our government is not subjecting our servicemen and women to unnecessary, non-battlefield risks that they themselves would not be willing to take. If Congress and the administration is not willing to undergo these shots due to concern about the vaccine's safety and effectiveness, morality would dictate that the program should immediately stop for servicemembers. Therefore, I ask you to set the right tone of national leadership by sponsoring a resolution urging that our national leaders, including yourself, are protected just as are our military members. The potential for an anthrax attack is not limited to the battlefields of this world. I ask you to move now, not only to demonstrate to all military members that those who lead this nation and send them to war also believe in this anthrax vaccine program and its importance, but also to protect our congressional leaders. The logic that dictates implementation of a program for force protection also applies to the protection of those who lead our nation. We appreciate the difficult job you do. I urgently request your commitment and a positive response which we will share with our members. As always, the members of this association are ready to support you on matters of mutual interest. signed JAMES D. STATON / Executive Director _ By Peter Kawaja : I wholeheartedly support this open letter, and encourage everyone who receives this document to forward it to EVERYONE, to all veterans organizations, and all Law Enforcement. I am very concerned for people like President Clinton, FBI Director Louis Freeh, Janet Reno, Madeleine Albright, Cohen, ALL the doctors, staff, and head of the VA across this nation, the head of FEMA, all their staff, the National Guard, ALL civilian doctors, nurses and staff at EVERY hospital across America, Red Cross Management and all volunteers, ALL Police Officers, Fire Department personnel and so many many more. THEY ALL NEED TO VOLUNTEER to take this vaccine to ensure a SAFE America. THOSE WHO HAVE EARS TO HEAR - LET THEM HEAR THOSE WHO HAVE EYES TO SEE - LET THEM SEE To be continued... Peter Kawaja - Keeping the faith! COPYRIGHT NOTICE: ALL presentments under the DSWCC-IGWIC / GWI-GWS, emails, or video tapes are the intellectual property of Peter Kawaja, Habib Peter, Kawaja. Permission is granted to ONLY forward/distribute publicly posted documents at the Official DSWCC site IF for non-profit, intact, unedited, without any additions or deletions. DSWCC http://www.onelist.com/community/DSWCC WEB SITE ARCHIVES : http://www.nonwo.com/dswcc/ tbc Shop for Cars On-Line:
[CTRL] *must read* Letter from Rep. Ron Paul *must read*
-Original Message- From: Bard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 1:06 PM To: OutPostofFreedom Subject: *must read* Letter from Rep. Ron Paul *must read* Brothers and Sisters, Open the Attachment and read read read. Vital you pass this along to those concerned about the direction of our Nation. Mr. Paul's Website: http://www.house.gov/paul/openingpage.htm Bless all of you for keeping the faith that we will make a change in 2000. Bard "Truth will ultimately prevail where there be pains taken to bring it to light." --- George Washington An Important Recent Letter from Congressman Ron Paul (Texas) Topic: Letter from Congressman Ron Paul An Important Recent Letter from Congressman Ron Paul (Texas) Email Congressman Ron Paul An Important Recent Letter from Congressman Ron Paul (Texas): Please forward freely! Congressman Ron Paul House of Representatives 203 Cannon Washington D.C. 20515 TEL 202-225-2831 FAX 202-226-4871 Dear Friend: The other day, I made a huge "gaffe" on national TV: I told the truth about the crimes of the U.S. government. As you can imagine, the ceiling fell in, and a couple of walls too. Congressmen are supposed to support the government, I was told. Oh, it's okay to criticize around the edges, but there are certain subjects a member of the House of Representatives is not supposed to bring up. But I touched the real "third-rail" of American politics, and the sparks sure flew. I was interviewed on C-SPAN's morning "Washington Journal," and I used the opportunity, as I do all such media appearances, to point out how many of our liberties have been stolen by the federal government. We must take them back. The Constitution, after all, has a VERY limited role for Washington, D.C. If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have: no federal meddling in our schools; no Federal Reserve; no U.S. membership in the UN; no gun control; and no foreign aid. We would have no welfare for big corporations, or the "poor"; no American troops in 100 foreign countries; no Nafta, Gatt, or "fast-track"; no arrogant federal judges usurping states rights; no attacks on private property; and no income tax. We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited. That system is called liberty. It's what the Founding Fathers gave us. Under liberty, we built the greatest, freest, most prosperous, most decent country on earth. It's no coincidence that the monstrous growth of the federal government has been accompanied by a sickening decline in living standards and moral standards. The feds want us to be hamsters on a treadmill -- working hard, all day long, to pay high taxes, but otherwise entirely docile and controlled. The huge, expensive, and out-of-control leviathan that we call the federal government wants to run every single aspect of our lives. Well, I'm sorry, but that's not America. It's not what the Founders gave us. It's not the country you believe in. It's not the country I believe in. So, on that TV interview, I emphasized not only the attacks on our property, but also the decline of our civil liberties, at the hands of the federal police. There are not supposed to be ANY federal police, according to the Constitution. Then I really went over the line. I talked about the Waco massacre. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno claim those 81 church members, including 19 children, burned down their own church and killed themselves, and good riddance. So they put the few survivors on trial, and threw them in prison for 40 years. We're not supposed to remember that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms -- talk about an unconstitutional agency -- rather than arrest David Koresh on his regular morning jog, called in the TV stations for a big publicity bonanza, and sent a swat team in black masks and black uniforms to break down his front door, guns blazing. They also sent in a helicopter gunship, to shoot at the roof of a church full of innocents. The Branch Davidians resisted, and after a heartless siege of almost two months, and after cutting off food, water, and electricity, and playing horrible rock and roll through huge speakers 24 hours a day, the feds sent in the tanks to crush the walls of the church, and inject poisonous CS gas. Now, CS gas is banned under the Paris Convention on Chemical Warfare. The U.S. could not use it in a war. But it could and did use it against
Re: [CTRL] *must read* Letter from Rep. Ron Paul *must read*
-Caveat Lector- The last line of the footer indicates the letter was written in December of 1997. Is Rep. Paul still in need of contributions? Kathleen "I don't care who does the electing as long as I get to do the nominating." -- Boss Tweed "I have sworn upon the altar of god, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." - Thomas Jefferson (1800) DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
