-Caveat Lector- Friday, October 10, 1999 Edition from CNN.com Missile smashup over Pacific seen as test on nuclear defense WASHINGTON (AP) - An anticipated collision over the Pacific this weekend is seen as the first test of a U.S. missile defense system that critics argue could increase - not reduce - the nuclear threat it aims to stop. Launching Saturday night from a California base is a Minuteman missile that has the potential to carry a nuclear warhead anywhere in the 50 states. Some 4,300 miles (6,900 kilometers) away in the Pacific Ocean, a booster rocket will fire an interceptor. If the two collide, at a combined speed of 16,000 mph (25,000 kph), the force would reduce both missiles to harmless space dust 140 miles (225 kilometers) above the earth. The Minuteman has a dummy warhead and a decoy balloon. The 4,500-mile-per-hour (7,240-kph) intercepting missile - a 55-inch-long (139-centimeter-long), 120-pound (54-kilogram) device that looks like scuba diving equipment - is a Raytheon-built Exoatomsopheric Kill Vehicle that will be fired from Meck Island in the Marshalls. Supporters of the land-based protective shield that will cost tens of billions of dollars if fully deployed are looking for a spectacular success. That would help compel approval by President Bill Clinton or his successor, and set the United States on a course of at least limited protection against outside nuclear attack. The most ardent proponents look to the test now scheduled Saturday night as a first step toward reviving a space-based Star Wars type system, although that is not part of current planning. The limited ``hit-to-kill'' system is designed to knock down missiles launched by rogue states or terrorists; it could not ward off a multimissile attack from a major nuclear power. The CIA says North Korea, Iran and Syria all are developing long-range missiles that could hit the United States. Saturday's test contrasts with earlier tests aimed at shorter-range launches against U.S. troops in the field. Those tests have missed more than they have hit. The Pentagon is playing down expectations for the long-postponed interceptor test, although even critics of the technology expect a successful collision. ``This is mainly to see if we can actually hit something,'' said Lt. Col. Rick Lehner, spokesman for the Pentagon's Ballistic Missile Defense Organization. ``Even if we miss and we know exactly why we miss, we will consider it a success,'' he said in an interview Wednesday. Two more tests are scheduled before a June 2000 deployment readiness review by the Pentagon and a presidential decision on initial deployment, expected shortly thereafter. At least two of the three have to intercept before the Pentagon will go ahead with broader testing, Lehner said. Whatever the outcome, the tests are raising political and practical concerns. ``This represents a serious misalignment between prevailing U.S. attitudes and prevailing international attitudes,'' said John Steinbruner, a senior Brookings Institution analyst. With more weapons and more ways of stopping them, the chance of nuclear accident increases, Steinbruner said at a news briefing sponsored by the Union of Concerned Scientists, which opposes the testing. Deployment of a possible 20 interceptors in Alaska by 2001, if approved, would put the United States in violation of the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty with Russia, said Steinbruner. Further deployments also are being considered for North Dakota. He said the test itself is likely to bring protests from Russia and China and increase resistance to any change in the ABM treaty with Russia, which prohibits any system designed to defend the whole country. The Clinton administration hopes to renegotiate the treaty in order to allow a limited system. ================================================================= Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT FROM THE DESK OF: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *Mike Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ~~~~~~~~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day. ================================================================= DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om