[CTRL] School District Sued for Forcing Gay Propaganda

2002-02-12 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/2/11/212844.shtml

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

School District Sued for Forcing Gay Propaganda
Dawn Rizzoni, CNSNews.com
Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2002
Angry parents are suing a California school district for authorizing
pro-homosexual presentations to be shown to elementary school pupils as
young as eight.
The parents say school employees forced the kids to attend the play Cootie
Shots, even though the parents had signed opt-out forms to prevent their
children from being exposed to sexually-oriented discussions.

The play was performed last year at two elementary schools that are part of
the Novato Unified School District in California's Marin County.

Fringe Benefits, a group describing itself as a coalition of theater
activists dedicated to building bridges between gay, lesbian, bisexual and
transgender youth and their straight peers, teachers, and parents, presented
Cootie Shots on Feb. 26, 2001 at Pleasant Valley Elementary School and on
Mar. 2, 2001 at San Ramon Elementary School. The audience was third, fourth
and fifth graders.

Cootie Shots, also the title of a book, refers to the schoolyard taunt that
children use to brag that they have been inoculated against the cooties of
other children who might be different from them in some way. The book is
meant to promote tolerance and celebrate diversity, according to its
authors, Norma Bowles and Mark E. Rosenthal.

The Novato School District Diversity Program has similar objectives.

The [Novato Unified School] District's goal is to make sure that children
feel safe in school and part of that feeling of security comes from knowing
that unkind things will not be said to you or about you by other children or
adults, according to a statement from the minutes of a March 20, 2001 school
district meeting.

However, Brad Dacus, spokesman for Pacific Justice Institute, a non-profit
legal defense organization representing the eight parents in the lawsuit,
said the play contained homosexual overtures that led children to believe
that homosexuality is acceptable and that those who don't approve are
hate-filled bigots.

Despite the opt-out forms the parents had signed and returned to the schools
to exclude their children from programs such as Cootie Shots, Dacus said
that no students were excluded and that school staff members ended up telling
the parents that many of the opt-out forms had gotten lost.

Dianne Pavia, a spokeswoman for Novato Unified School District, was unable to
comment about the lost forms. Nor would she comment on specifics of the play,
because of the lawsuit, except to say that it was not meant to advance any
agenda other than the safety of children.

The assembly's purpose was to work with kids around the issue of bullying,
name-calling, and harassing of all kinds, Pavia said. These issues are a
national concern for all parents and the school district is dedicated to
making their schools as safe a place as possible for all students.

Undermining Parents' Rights

Dacus insists that the core issue is parental rights and that his clients'
rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
were violated.

This lawsuit is the first in a major litigation campaign to combat school
districts who attempt to undermine the statutory and constitutional rights of
parents, Dacus said. We intend to aggressively sue every school district
that similarly violates the rights of parents.

The parents seek unspecified financial damages in their lawsuit, plus a
permanent injunction to prevent programs such as Cootie Shots from being
shown to students in the future without parental notification and written
consent, Dacus said.

Whenever irreconcilable damage has been done to children, Dacus said,
Pacific Justice Institute will make it as costly and painful as possible for
offending schools. Dacus said his organization wanted schools to know that
there's a high price to be paid for ignoring parental rights.

One skit in the play that angered the parents was The Parable of the
Stimples, during which a group of funny noise-making people are ridiculed.
The script states, BUT the BIG PROBLEM was that everyone was taught that
making funny noises was BAD! Wrong! Something to be afraid of!

During the play, Stimple Gilbert is sent to the principal's office after
making a funny noise, only to discover that the principal himself is a secret
noisemaker.

When Gilbert's parents discover that Gilbert is a noisemaker, they react with
embarrassment. They tell Gilbert not to make the noise so that he can be
normal like them. Soon, Gilbert discovers that people are afraid of the
noise.

At that point, the narrator encourages the audience to save Gilbert by making
a loud noise themselves.

Make a noise for Gilbert! the narrator says. Make a noise for all of the
Stimples in the world.

In an interview with TCG Books, Norma Bowles, one of the book's 

Re: [CTRL] School District Sued for Forcing Gay Propaganda

2002-02-12 Thread thew

-Caveat Lector-

get in the game bill
this was posted twice last week

and dismissed
this is a program teaching tolerance, not homosexuality.

you know - turn the other cheek
hate the sin love the sinner

like that y'all

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
William of Occam


NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew


 From: Bill Richer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:04:16 EST
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [CTRL] School District Sued for Forcing Gay Propaganda

 -Caveat Lector-

 http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/2/11/212844.shtml

 WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

 School District Sued for Forcing Gay Propaganda
 Dawn Rizzoni, CNSNews.com
 Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2002
 Angry parents are suing a California school district for authorizing
 pro-homosexual presentations to be shown to elementary school pupils as
 young as eight.
 The parents say school employees forced the kids to attend the play Cootie
 Shots, even though the parents had signed opt-out forms to prevent their
 children from being exposed to sexually-oriented discussions.

 The play was performed last year at two elementary schools that are part of
 the Novato Unified School District in California's Marin County.

 Fringe Benefits, a group describing itself as a coalition of theater
 activists dedicated to building bridges between gay, lesbian, bisexual and
 transgender youth and their straight peers, teachers, and parents, presented
 Cootie Shots on Feb. 26, 2001 at Pleasant Valley Elementary School and on
 Mar. 2, 2001 at San Ramon Elementary School. The audience was third, fourth
 and fifth graders.

 Cootie Shots, also the title of a book, refers to the schoolyard taunt that
 children use to brag that they have been inoculated against the cooties of
 other children who might be different from them in some way. The book is
 meant to promote tolerance and celebrate diversity, according to its
 authors, Norma Bowles and Mark E. Rosenthal.

 The Novato School District Diversity Program has similar objectives.

 The [Novato Unified School] District's goal is to make sure that children
 feel safe in school and part of that feeling of security comes from knowing
 that unkind things will not be said to you or about you by other children or
 adults, according to a statement from the minutes of a March 20, 2001 school
 district meeting.

 However, Brad Dacus, spokesman for Pacific Justice Institute, a non-profit
 legal defense organization representing the eight parents in the lawsuit,
 said the play contained homosexual overtures that led children to believe
 that homosexuality is acceptable and that those who don't approve are
 hate-filled bigots.

 Despite the opt-out forms the parents had signed and returned to the schools
 to exclude their children from programs such as Cootie Shots, Dacus said
 that no students were excluded and that school staff members ended up telling
 the parents that many of the opt-out forms had gotten lost.

 Dianne Pavia, a spokeswoman for Novato Unified School District, was unable to
 comment about the lost forms. Nor would she comment on specifics of the play,
 because of the lawsuit, except to say that it was not meant to advance any
 agenda other than the safety of children.

 The assembly's purpose was to work with kids around the issue of bullying,
 name-calling, and harassing of all kinds, Pavia said. These issues are a
 national concern for all parents and the school district is dedicated to
 making their schools as safe a place as possible for all students.

 Undermining Parents' Rights

 Dacus insists that the core issue is parental rights and that his clients'
 rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
 were violated.

 This lawsuit is the first in a major litigation campaign to combat school
 districts who attempt to undermine the statutory and constitutional rights of
 parents, Dacus said. We intend to aggressively sue every school district
 that similarly violates the rights of parents.

 The parents seek unspecified financial damages in their lawsuit, plus a
 permanent injunction to prevent programs such as Cootie Shots from being
 shown to students in the future without parental notification and written
 consent, Dacus said.

 Whenever irreconcilable damage has been done to children, Dacus said,
 Pacific Justice Institute will make it as costly and painful as possible for
 offending schools. Dacus said his organization wanted schools to know that
 there's a high price to be paid for ignoring parental rights.

 One skit in the play that angered the parents was The Parable of the
 Stimples, during which a group of funny noise-making people are ridiculed.
 The script states, BUT the BIG PROBLEM was that everyone