Stats Show 'Federalization' of Law Enforcement


Government News Keywords: NAZAISM OF AMERICA!
Source: Scripps Howard News Service
Published: June 1, 2000 Author: Michael Hedges

The first comprehensive gathering of federal arrest figures portrays a growing federal law-enforcement presence in the United States, with increases in the numbers of federal agents, prosecutions and convictions.

Fueled by an expanding war on drugs and greater efforts to curtail illegal immigration, the number of federal criminal court cases rose nearly 13 percent between 1997 and 1998, part of an expansion of federal police power that concerns critics.

Federal agents arrested 106,139 in 1998, according to Justice Department statistics.

Almost half of those apprehended were for drug law or immigration violations. More than 43,000 people were sent to federal prisons that year, for an average sentence of almost five years.

The figures were released Wednesday by the Bureau of Justice Statistics as part of the first-ever comprehensive compilation of federal arrest data, according to Bureau director Jan Chaiken.

There were 83,000 federal law-enforcement officers in 1998, including 33,000 in four Justice Department agencies that conduct nearly three out of four federal criminal investigations: the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the U.S. Marshals Service.

That number has risen steadily since 1993, when there were 69,000 federal agents, with about 24,000 of them in the DEA, FBI and immigration and marshals services.

In one year, from 1997 to 1998, the number of people brought to trial in federal court rose from 69,351 to 78,172, a 12.7 percent increase.

Of those, 87 percent were convicted, usually as a result of a guilty plea.

The past decade has seen a steady rise in the percentage of those convicted in federal court who go to prison. In 1998, 71 percent of those found guilty were incarcerated, compared to just 60 percent in 1990.

The average sentence for the 43,041 convicted in federal court was four years, eleven months.

Some analysts and legal experts see in the statistics a confirmation of the "federalization" of law enforcement in America.

"Under our constitutional system, the federal government is supposed to have a very limited crime-fighting role," said Tim Lynch, an analyst with the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington. "But for the past 20 years, it seems every session of Congress has escalated the drug war, and that has led to an increase in federal agents, and federal prisons and the federal court system."

Edward Mallett, a Houston lawyer and the incoming president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said, "What is being reported here is pretty much what one would expect. ...The federalization of some formerly state offenses accounts for some of this."

Mallett said that in Texas, as the number of federal law-enforcement agents involved in anti-drug and anti-immigration activities has grown, the threshold for triggering a federal crime has fallen.

"Cases federal prosecutors would have declined a year ago they are prosecuting now," he said. "They used to turn down drug prosecutions under five kilos; now they'll prosecute for an ounce and a half. They're looking for work."

Since 1990, the number of people being held in federal jails awaiting trial or deportation has grown rapidly from just over 140,000 to more than 200,000. The number of inmates in federal prison is up more than 90 percent for the same period, from 57,000 to 109,000.

One striking figure in the report, according to legal experts, is the high number of guilty pleas - more than eight out of 10 - among people prosecuted by federal attorneys.

Joseph diGenova, a former U.S. attorney in Washington, said mandatory minimum prison sentences passed by Congress several years ago have changed the dynamic of federal prosecutions.

Most defendants in a federal prosecution try to aggressively challenge an indictment, but once charged immediately plea-bargain rather than risk stiff sentences, diGenova said.

Lynch, the Cato Institute analyst, said the growing number of federal prosecutions in America, "represents a self-fulfilling prophecy. It is the success of a bureaucracy. As you federalize more crimes and expand federal law, you increase the number of arrests and convictions."

 

#1 response: This is sad for America and any future ahead!

 

#2 response: Nothing can be done... sad. It is wise to consider, that the expansion of federal police powers is directly tied to a Republican majority in both branches of the legislature. I doubt there is ANY way to deconstruct the federal law enforcement monolith.

#3 response: Local cops have a lot of power but they can be held accountable by local elections and community peer pressure. The scary thing about federal police is you never know who they are or how to keep them accounatble. The reason the founding fathers kept policing a responsibility of local governments is because law enforcement power can be easily abused and the enforcers need constant and close scrutiny.

The SEC's or OSHA's (or all the other federal bureaucracies that think they need a hostage rescue team) armed agents, are only accountable to appointed bureaucrats.

Say no to federal police!

 

 

#4 response: I doubt there is ANY way to deconstruct the federal law enforcement monolith.

I am becoming convinced that the only way to stop the federalization of law enforcement is to end the war on drugs. Most of the unconstitutional laws, and the republican willingness to go along with them, is because of the war on drugs.

#5 response: What I meant to say.. and did not do very well is: if we have them already armed and possessing a budget to "protect" each year given by congress.... even if we all became devout christians or totally drug free in this nation... they would need to find something else to go after to justify their existence...

It is like a perpetual, self-fulfilling prophecy... we cannot make it better, because we insist on making it worse... and crying about it all the way to the morgue...

If we remove the War on Drugs operations.. who they gonna kill, incarcerate, or prosecute to justify their continued feeding at the public pigtits...??? I mean really, does anyone believe they would not eventually kill folks for eating a hamburger, if drugs, and cigarettes and alchohol were no longer a "problem"???

They must be strategically DEFUNDED on a ready, steady basis... and just HOW are we going to do THAT??? the pubbies love "law and order" excesses as much as the demmies love social welfare... in fact... keeping all those federales, judges, prosecutors, marshalls, dea agents, and so on... IS a form of WORKFARE. Where we make up phony jobs so that people can get on the public tit in perpetuity.

Follow the money... when we destroy the IRS, we must also destroy the concept of "revenue neutral" because their unlimited access to our revenue is what feeds these bastards...

The policy should be a requirement that all cuts in taxation result in a revenue NEGATIVE , that requires budget cuts in these federal "protective" nanny-roles.

Kill the IRS tax monster, and you go a LONG way towards defunding the federal excess. to blazes with "revenue neutrality." bttt

#6 response: The true enemy of the USA is the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateralists, Bilderbergers their hundreds of organizations who manipulate the American government and both major parties. They are currently in the process of elimination of the US Constitution in favor of the New World Order. Their billions originate - of course - from the tax and audit exempt proceeds of ownership of the stock of the American Federal Reserve System. They are scared silly of Buchannon - as well as any serious third party that would free Americans from the convoluted banking/monetary system shoved down our throats by Woodrow Wilson in 1913. They want to insure their position by ruling the NWO! (([EMAIL PROTECTED])




Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

[ Top | Latest Posts | Latest Articles | Self Search | Add Bookmark | Post | Abuse | Help! ]


FreeRepublic , LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
Forum Version 2.0a Copyright © 1999 Free Republic, LLC

 

 

6/2/00                                                     Document2                                                             1

Reply via email to