-Caveat Lector-

~~for educational purposes only~~
[Title 17 U.S.C. section 107]

The Hillary Bogey
by William L. Anderson

Washington, D.C.  a.k.a. the "Belly of the Beast"  has
been a-twitter these past two weeks with the release of
Hillary Clinton's new book Living History. Contrary to
the hopes of conservatives, the book has sold very well
and might even justify the $8 million advance that the
former First Lady received.

The book  apparently written by a gaggle of
ghostwriters and not Mrs. Clinton herself  has not
revealed anything surprising, judging from the
accounts I have read. (No, I do not plan to read this
"book," as I tend to steer away from memoirs
penned by the political classes. If I want to read
fiction, I will go to the proper outlets.) Yet, the
usual suspects either are calling it a "triumph" or a
pack of lies, depending upon how they have
historically viewed the Clintons.

From the various sources that have reported on this
book, Mrs. Clinton claims to have been surprised
and angered when her husband "confessed" to her
that, indeed, he and Monica Lewinsky had been
doing some nasties in the Oval Office and, no, it
was not the work of the "Vast Rightwing
Conspiracy." Given that Mrs. Clinton knew from the
start that Bill's denials were outright lies, this
passage alone should give us pause to think that
Hillary Clinton is anything but a spinner of
fabricated tales, second only to her husband.

Elsewhere, we read that she wanted to do all sorts
of wonderful things for the country, but those Bad
Republicans who wish to "turn back the clock" so
old people can die in the streets kept her and Bill
from giving all of us free healthcare. We read that
the tax increases of 1993 created prosperity, and
that the modest tax cuts of 2001 created a recession.
(In other words, Hillary Clinton proves she is
economically illiterate  but we already knew that.)

As for her social activism, she tells us the same
thing she said a decade ago: her support of the
welfare state comes from her "Old time Methodist"
upbringing. (Murray Rothbard already has dealt
with that explanation, so there is no use in my
plowing the same ground that he so ably did before
his untimely death.)

All that being said, let me say that I believe that the
significance of this book is not that Mrs. Clinton
gives us the same drivel she poured out of the White
House while First Lady, but rather that it proves
once again the absolute mediocrity that
characterizes the political classes in this country.
For her supporters, Living History somehow
"proves" that Hillary is ready to be President of the
United States, while her detractors either try to tell
us that the book proves that either she is not
presidential material or they quake in fear at the
prospect of a Hillary presidency.

Now that I have said it, let me now say that this
whole business has become quite ridiculous. Those
who support her say she will make a wonderful
president, while those who hate her believe she
will be dishonest and vindictive. Perhaps I need to
put it another way: if she were to become president,
her behavior would mirror nearly everyone else
who has held this office in my lifetime.

Does this mean I think she should be president? My
short answer, not surprisingly, is "no." I would hate
to see Hillary Clinton become president because I
think she would be a disaster. For all of her leftist
proclivities, I believe that she is a fascist at heart.
First, she is authoritarian and second, she most
likely would govern in the manner of her husband,
who was constantly manipulating the reins of
government to reward those companies that were in
his political camp.

However, all that being said, I cannot help wonder
if President Hillary would have launched a war
against Iraq, a conflict that no longer can be spun as
a Great Victory over the Evil Saddam. At this
writing, the U.S. Armed Forces there are losing
about one soldier or more per day as Iraqis engage
in guerilla warfare. I doubt that Mrs. Clinton would
have pulled us into such a conflict, which I believe
still will be the downfall of the presidency of
George W. Bush.

On the economic front, I doubt she would be worse
than what we are seeing from Congress and
President Bush. That is not a vote of confidence for
Mrs. Clinton. Since, as Lew Rockwell has so aptly
put it, John Maynard Keynes "rules from the grave,"
the overall economic policies of the U.S.
Government will be Keynesian, be it a Democrat or
Republican in the halls of power. Right now, can
anyone say with a straight face that the U.S.
Government under Republican leadership in all
branches of government is engaging in responsible
economic policy?

"But what about environmentalism?" some might
ask. Is not a Republican presidency better in that
area than what we see from Democrats? Again,
while I appreciate some of the lip service
Republicans give toward changing some
environmental policies, let us not forget that it was
the Republican administration of George I that gave
us the draconian "wetlands" rules that have
successfully resulted in the imprisonment of many
"environmental criminals" who have done dastardly
things like put fill dirt or sand on their own
property.

Keep in mind that I do not care for Hillary Clinton
and I do not wish to see her occupying the White
House. And, yes, on some issues she is truly
terrible. However, on balance while she is a
terribly polarizing person, I doubt a Hillary
presidency would be worse than what we have seen
for a long time.

Again, that is not a compliment. In absolute terms,
Hillary as president would be a disaster and further
lead this once-free country down the road to
serfdom. However, keep in mind that President
Hillary would not have to change directions, as this
current crop of Republicans is doing much the
same. Yes, she might quicken the pace a bit, but her
predecessors already will have greased the path for
her.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to