-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.zolatimes.com/V3.9/pageone.html
<A HREF="http://www.zolatimes.com/V3.9/pageone.html">Laissez Faire City Times
- Volume 3 Issue 9</A>
-----
The Laissez Faire City Times
March 1, 1999 - Volume 3, Issue 9
Editor & Chief: Emile Zola
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Boldly Go... Where?

by Sunni Maravillosa


The original Star Trek series, despite its flaws, got one thing right:
humans love to explore. Since the first caveman wondered what was over
the ridge and traversed it to find out, our species has been discovering
and exploring new lands, and conquering the challenges they present. Be
it withering desert, stormy seas, or bitter cold, humans have endured
the worst that nature has hurled, and have not only survived, but
thrived in such places.

In addition to mastering the physical topography of the planet,
adventurers have explored other realms as well. We’ve peered at life at
microbial levels, witnessed the births and deaths of stars, and unlocked
the fearsome power of the atom. Many of these accomplishments were
undertaken with rudimentary equipment and no formal technique—the
indomitable drive to know spurred men on. Today, with no knowledge of
Galileo, Copernicus, Leeuwenhoek, or Koch, anyone with a modest sum to
spend on equipment can explore the heavens, or the protozoans living in
a nearby pond. Thanks to the technological contributions of unknown h
undreds of men and women, we can inexpensively explore mountains and
plains in agonizing cold or ferocious heat, in the comfort of our own
vehicles.

When Europeans began to settle America, it was a particular kind of
person who made the arduous journey, embarking on an uncertain new path.
At first, the settlers were outcasts from their own countries, who
nevertheless had the determination to succeed. As the country took form
and revealed its riches—and new possibilities awaiting to the
west—others poured into the United States from all over the world. Some
were outcasts unpopular in their homeland, but increasingly they were
restless souls, unhappy with the numbing tradition of the entrenched way
of life in their community. These adventurers recognized the potential
this country offered and risked everything for the possibility of
finding a better way of life, one that they were free to choose or
create. What they shared, however, was a willingness to endure hardship
for something in which they believed—what we would today call rugged
individualism, or "the American spirit". Europeans continue to comment
on the American spirit, sometimes in admiration but more often in
bemusement. It’s difficult for one who lives on land that’s been owned
by his family for hundreds of years, outside of a village that has
existed even longer, to understand the American drive to explore, to
create, to push every possible boundary. Although this spirit seems to
be decreasing somewhat, it remains a striking contrast even today.

I have an inchoate theory as to why these differences have come about. I
believe that Americans have been "bred" to be more adventurous. I’m not
suggesting that the differences are purely genetic, although that
undoubtedly plays some role in this dynamic. In creating this country,
and in its rapid population expansion due to immigration by siphoning
off the restless, malcontented, and most ambitious individuals from
Europe, the more daring removed themselves from their homelands and
their cultures. In essence, whatever genetic makeup our immigrant
ancestors may have shared, by coming here and passing it along to their
offspring, a society of free-thinkers and doers was also created, which
has been perpetuated over the generations. The result is a country which
can boast of more achievements and more creators than any other in the
last two centuries. While other countries do have notable scientists and
innovators, many of them seem to find their way to the United States, in
part because of the freedom—and encouragement—to dream, to explore, to
create that they find here.

The Stars, Our Destiny

The most recent physical frontier explored is space. Russians and
Germans wrote about rocketry and space travel and conducted tests, but
it was an American, Robert Goddard, who launched the first modern
rocket. While it was the Soviet Union that put the first man into space,
the American spirit of rising to the challenge led to the first man on
the moon—and so far, the only projects that have placed men on the
moon—being American. In addition to that accomplishment, much of the
technology that made that feat possible—technology which we use
daily—was developed in the US as well.

This situation is different from previous explorations in one crucial
respect: in both the USSR and US, these endeavors were
government-sponsored and financed. Rather than individuals and
businesses driving developments, government bureaus and agencies have
 monopolized this sector of the market, making competition virtually
impossible, except (mostly) by other governments willing to spend the
vast sums required for space exploration. In the US, the private sector
is forbidden by law from sending individuals into space.

Since the heady days of "the space race", things have changed
dramatically. The collapse of the Soviet Union has led to the Russian
space program being held together by chewing gum and baling wire. The US
government’s ardor has cooled as well, as budgetary considerations have
redirected funds from NASA toward other projects. The space shuttle
makes its token runs, to be sure, but genuine exploration by manned
missions has halted.

The ardor of individuals to explore the vast frontier of space hasn’t
cooled, however. Weaned on stories of Goddard’s experiments, fed a
steady diet of Heinleinian adventures [see also the on-going Laissez
Faire City Times story, "Jack Parsons and the Curious Origins of the
American Space Program"—Zola] and NASA news feeds while growing up, many
people view the skies as the next frontier to explore, and are ready to
take those bold steps forward themselves. They see the stars as our
destiny, and they know with the certainty of Galileo even as he was trie
d and imprisoned that it’s only a matter of time before this challenge
is conquered. Understandably, many who feel frustrated at their
inability to explore space hold our government and its laws responsible
for the shameful lack of progress toward this destiny. Thus, "the final
frontier" remains tantalizingly, agonizingly out of reach.

Beyond "The Final Frontier"

Rather than remain stuck by our lack of progress into space, many have
chosen another realm to explore—innerspace. By "innerspace" I mean that
adventurers and doers have turned inward, rather than outward, exploring
ideas and their implications with an intensity that approaches that of a
dedicated philosopher. Such introspection has led to the explosion of
interest in libertarianism and issues related to freedom. Cyberspace has
encouraged such explorations, as it has created virtual communities in
which like-minded individuals can meet and share ideas.

This exploration has had a number of consequences. We obdurate
individualists have a sense of what we can accomplish by working
together for freedom, and have begun various activities aimed at
accomplishing our goals. The campaigns against the National ID and the
FDIC’s "Know Your Customer" proposal are two examples. The combination
of exploration and the discovery of like minds has also increased our
discontent. Feeling security in the rightness of our position as well as
in our growing numbers, some among us have been calling for an increase
in resistance to the federal government’s attempts to corral and control
us.

The United States has become a pressure cooker. With no new physical
frontiers within reach, in part due to governmental restrictions, the
rugged individualism that created this nation and its wealth is being
stifled. As more people—driven to innerspace by the lack of access to
external realms to explore—realize the effect of those restrictions,
actions in defiance of them will increase in number as well as
intensity. What will be the outcome of this combination of forces? It’s
too early to say, but some things are clear. It is in our nature,
especially in this country, "to boldly go"—to explore and to create, and
that cannot be restrained indefinitely. Just as organized religion was
changed forever with the invention of the printing press, the world will
be changed by the information-age driven realization that to live in
chains is inimical to human nature. Whether the change will be peaceful
or bloody cannot be seen at present. The change is upon us, however, and
will pick up speed as more individuals realize that freedom is essential
to human happiness and prosperity. Where else we will boldly go remains
to be seen, but you can be sure that we will head out in the same spirit
that led our forefathers to this land.



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunni Maravillosa is a psychology professor, a writer, and the web
mistress for the Liberty Round Table.

-30-

from The Laissez Faire City Times, Vol 3, No 9, March 1, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published by
Laissez Faire City Netcasting Group, Inc.
Copyright 1998 - Trademark Registered with LFC Public Registrar
All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer
The Laissez Faire City Times is a private newspaper. Although it is
published by a corporation domiciled within the sovereign domain of
Laissez Faire City, it is not an "official organ" of the city or its
founding trust. Just as the New York Times is unaffiliated with the city
of New York, the City Times is only one of what may be several news
publications located in, or domiciled at, Laissez Faire City proper. For
information about LFC, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to