-Caveat Lector-
Who's Watching the Watch Lists?
By Joanna Glasner
Mar. 25, 2003
 
SCOTTSDALE, Arizona -- The head of the venture capital firm formed by the CIA to identify technologies for improving national security said he opposes government agencies' growing reliance on watch lists.
 
Speaking Monday at the PC Forum technology conference in Scottsdale, Arizona, Gilman Louie, CEO of the CIA-backed In-Q-Tel, said he believes agencies should not rely merely on automated filtering tools to identify potential terrorists based on characteristics like travel patterns or citizenship status. One reason is the difficulty in removing your name from a list once the information has been shared with multiple parties.
 
"I think watch lists are a bad thing," Louie said, "Because they don't define how you get on and how you get off (the list)."
 
Louie's comments were in response to a question regarding the effectiveness of the Transportation Security Administration's latest screening initiative, a system known as the Computer Assisted Passenger Pre-Screening Program II, or CAPPS II. Under the program, which is under development, the TSA will screen names, addresses, birth dates and other data regarding passengers as a way to root out potential terrorists.
 
For individuals "deemed to pose a possible risk to transportation security," according to a January Federal Register notice, screenings will include additional records, including financial transaction histories and information from law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
 
Cory Doctorow, a sci-fi writer and staffer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, questioned whether individuals flagged as suspicious in the TSA's database would have the "opportunity to rebut the conclusion of an algorithm."
 
Louie, a former video-game developer who left an executive post at Hasbro Interactive to join In-Q-Tel, said he believes agencies need to perform more detailed analysis of data tagged by filtering tools. Although machine-generated data can provide leads, well-trained human analysts are required to investigate links between isolated pieces of information.
 
In its current form, Louie said, the watch-list system shares many of the faults associated with credit scoring services, whose standardized formulas are often criticized for producing unreliable indicators of creditworthiness.
 
"We all know how good credit-card companies are at scoring us," he said. "Do we want to have those kinds of systems determine whether or not you can fly?"
 
That said, Mike Hunter, CEO of Anacubis, a company that provides tools for linking data, said watch lists are a reasonable option, if their use is limited.
 
"When you're tackling a large problem, sometimes it's the only way to do it," he said.
 
As a U.K. citizen, Hunter has had personal experience with watch lists. On several occasions, when entering the United States, he was briefly detained and questioned. The reason, he said, was that a criminal on the loose shared his name and looked somewhat like him.
 
Hunter said he doesn't oppose watch lists as a means to identify potential suspects for further questioning. However, he believes the data they provide is not sufficient for more heavy-handed law enforcement actions, such as detaining someone for an extended period of time.
 
Although it may be tempting for agencies to screen for potential suspects using simple filtering that looks for characteristics like ethnicity or overseas travel history, Louie contended that the price paid in terms of civil liberties is too great.
 
"This great national debate between security and civil rights isn't a tradeoff," he said.
 
Scaled-up screening efforts at airports come as federal agencies are intensifying security measures in response to heightened fears of a domestic terrorist attack as the war in Iraq rages on. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security continues to maintain an orange level alert, its second highest, indicating a high threat of a potential attack.
 
While In-Q-Tel is backed by the CIA, it is not a government agency and functions as a private nonprofit. The fund invests primarily in companies that develop technologies in security and privacy, geospatial applications, data collection and knowledge management.
 
Recent recipients of funding include ArcSight, a security software developer, and MetaCarta, which makes applications for connecting text documents to geographic maps.
 
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,58191,00.html
 
<A HREF="">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to