Re: Remove fortune quotes attributed to or providing admiration of Adolf Hitler [pr bin/52735]

2017-11-18 Thread Harry Waddell
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 21:24:18 +0100
Rhialto <rhia...@falu.nl> wrote:

> I agree that bad history should be remembered in context and not
> forgotten. However, that is not what these quotes do. They give no
> context, and they make A.H. seem like a relatively normal person.

These "normalizing" quotes are actually a critical part of a much bigger 
external context since Hitler is such a well known/reviled figure in history.

Since we know that we all have the potential for violence and dehumanization of 
an 
out-group, e.g. as exhibited in the "Stanford Prison Experiment", 
if anything, these quotes make him more terrifying, not less.

Harry Waddell


 


Re: USB keyboard recognized during boot menu, not later

2015-06-20 Thread Harry Waddell
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 16:07:42 + (UTC)
chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas) wrote:

 In article 20150620030528.GA9337@odin, Mayuresh  mayur...@acm.org wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:53:51PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
  Uncomment xhci if you feel adventurous from GENERIC...
 
 Tried. It works, but very vaguely. E.g. if I take out the keyboard, it
 doesn't recognize that and if I re-insert it doesn't work.
 
 I noticed a comment in GENERIC that xhci is experimental.
 
 Looks like, for now I'll have to switch to some other OS, possibly Debian
 8, which I already tried. Will revisit this after a few months.
 
 you could try the nick usb branch...
 
 christos
 
 

I filed PR 49981 for what might be a similar issue. I have a new super 
micro X10DRC-LN4+ system that  also has a non-working usb bus. I
disabled xhci in the bios, but still no luck. It's ok running 
netbsd-6 for now, but obviously I'd like to get this fixed 
so I can upgrade someday.


HW


Re: MegaRAID 3008/3108

2015-06-03 Thread Harry Waddell
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:13:07 +0100 (BST)
Stephen Borrill net...@precedence.co.uk wrote:

 Anyone working on adding support for SYMBIOS MEGARAID 3108 (0x1000/0x005d) 
 or 3008 (0x1000/0x005f)? These are supported in OpenBSD by the mfii driver 
 which also supports the MEGARAID 2208 (0x1000/0x005b). In NetBSD, the 
 mfi(4) driver was extended to support the 2208 (Thunderbolt) rather than 
 adding a new driver. The 3008/3108 will require another MFI_IOP type 
 (OpenBSD call it 25).
 
 -- 
 Stephen
 

I have a system with this on the motherboard, but I'm dropping an lsi 9261-i8 
in 
because the newer cards are not supported. My vendor has told me that the 9261 
is near EOL, 
so it would be really helpful if someone could add support for the newer LSI 
cards. Unfortunately, I don't have much experience in this area.

Harry Waddell



Re: NPF questions, issues and observations

2015-03-23 Thread Harry Waddell
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 01:09:39 +
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius rm...@netbsd.org wrote:

 Harry Waddell wadd...@caravaninfotech.com wrote:
  
  I know NPF is a work in progress, and so is its documentation, but now
  that I have used it for a fairly large project, I have several questions
  and a few problems. I'm using netbsd-7 as of 3/12/15. 
  
  1. this validates
  
  $private_addr = { 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/14, 192.168.0.0/16 }
  map vlan200 dynamic $private_addr - $mesh_map_addr pass from
  mesh_nattable to ngroutes
  
 but this does not
  
  map vlan200 dynamic mesh_nattable - $mesh_map_addr pass from
  mesh_nattable to ngroutes
  
 This seems like an artificial constraint, but I could be missing
  something. 
 
 Yes.  In fact, when the extended map syntax is used, the value on the
 left hand side (in a case of outbound NAT) is ignored because the filter
 criteria is explicitly defined by the pass ... rule.  The parser only
 validates the syntax.  When I was implementing this, I was considering
 something like:
 
 map wm0 dynamic any - $nat_ip pass from table1 to table2
 
 However, I was not sure whether the keyword any (or perhaps
 explicit) would make it clearer or, contrary, would just confuse
 users.  Thoughts?
 
...
  4. Since group names are unique ( when direction is factored in ), I
  don't see what he advantage is to the ruleset syntax for dynamic
  rules. I supect this is because there's a lot of functionality in
  the group-opt I don't understand. Would someone provide some
  additional explanation of dynamic rulesets?
 
 Dynamic rulesets allow you to add/remove rules on the fly, think of
 iptables-style rules.  In npf.conf, ruleset is just a syntactic
 sugar for group which indicates that the group will have the rules
 managed dynamically rather than statically.  Does that answer your
 question?
 
  5. With my large npf.conf file, npfctl comamnds and npf itself seem
  to hang after repeated reloads and a system reboot is required to
  clear the problem. Has anyone else experienced this. I think a PR
  is in order. 
 
 This is a bug.  I need more details about your problem, but I have
 just committed one fix in -current (and requested a pullup to
 netbsd-7 branch) which is likely to be a fix for the same problem you
 are experiencing.
 
 Pull-up ticket containing the fix is #630.
 
...
 
 -- 
 Mindaugas
 

Concerning the map syntax

map wm0 dynamic any - $nat_ip pass from table1 to table2

I don't think that any adds much value. Given that all is a keyword
already, I suspect it may lead to more confusion on the part of users. 
The current syntax is fine, but the documentation could use some 
additional clarification.

As for dynamic rulesets, it seems that if all the definition does is set 
an attribute of the group, it might be better to make dynamic an optional
keyword in the group declaration. I don't think it's worth making an
incompatible syntax change given that NPF is no longer a new feature
and netbsd-7 is already in beta.

The fix and pullup to netbsd-7 this weekend fixed the npfctl lockup issues
I was experiencing. Thank you very much!

Harry Waddell