Re: JAX-WS/annotated SOAP services -- exporting implementation methods rather than interface ones?

2007-07-20 Thread Stuart Bingë
On Thursday 19 July 2007 19:59:17 Daniel Kulp wrote:
 Confirmed as a bug and logged as:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-813
 I'm testing a fix now.

Thanks for your help Daniel -- I'll eagerly await the next release then :-)

Cheers,
Stuart

__

“Complinet Ltd is registered in England. Registered office at Vintners Place, 
68 Upper Thames Street, London EC4V 3BJ. Company number 3170722. VAT No. 749 
324 021.
Complinet Inc is a corporation registered in Delaware, USA.”

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.


Re: JAX-WS/annotated SOAP services -- exporting implementation methods rather than interface ones?

2007-07-19 Thread Stuart Bingë
Hi Dan,

On Wednesday 18 July 2007 23:10:46 Dan Diephouse wrote:
 Hi Stuart,
 Did you specify a @WebService(endpointInterface=...YourInterface) on the
 implementation class? You're using the JAX-WS frontend and per the JAX-WS
 spec, thats how its supposed to work :-)

Yeah, I've got my implementation class pointing to the interface via 
endpointInterface -- I pretty much copied and pasted the example from that 
page, then tried to add a property to the implementation class. Here's my 
current test code, if it helps:

Interface:
@WebService(name = HelloWorld)
@SOAPBinding(style=Style.RPC, use=Use.LITERAL)
public interface HelloWorld {

String sayHi(@WebParam(name = text) String text);

}

Implementation:
@WebService(endpointInterface = showcase.cxf.HelloWorld)
public class HelloWorldImpl implements HelloWorld {

private String  prefix  = *** unspecified ***;

@Override
public String sayHi(@WebParam(name = text) String text)
{
return prefix + text;
}

@WebMethod(exclude = true)
public String getPrefix()
{
return prefix;
}

@WebMethod(exclude = true)
public void setPrefix(String prefix)
{
this.prefix = prefix;
}

}

So essentially the problem is if you take out the @WebMethod(exclude = true) 
on the getter and setter, they're included in the generated WSDL as methods 
of the service :-/


 Cheers,
 - Dan

 On 7/18/07, Stuart Bingë [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello all,
 
  We've been using XFire (specifically its SOAP transport) together with
  JSR-181
  annotations for some time now in our internal Spring-based web services
  (hosted in Tomcat), and are now in the process of looking to upgrade to
  CXF
  as part of a general systems upgrade. The web services are java-first,
  where we code to a SEI and then rely on XFire to generate the WSDL as
  appropriate. In addition, the SOAP binding used is RPC/Literal for
  interoperability with PHP clients.
 
  After following the Writing a service with Spring article on the CXF
  site
  (http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/writing-a-service-with-spring.html), as
  well as attempting the basic HelloWorld applet that the article
  describes
  (i.e. separate from our existing environment/services), I've discovered
  some
  strange behaviour that wasn't present with XFire.
 
  When exposing an endpoint via jaxws:endpoint ... /, the generated WSDL
  appears to be coming from the implementation class rather than the
  service interface -- i.e. getters and setters for implementation-specific
  properties
  are included in the WSDL.

 Is this the expected behaviour with jaxws:endpoint /? If so, what other

  methods are available/recommended for exposing an endpoint via an
  interface
  rather than an implementation object?

 This can be solved with @WebMethod(ignore = true) annotations on the

  implementation class, but obviously this isn't ideal and shouldn't be
  needed
  in the first place. We'd like to continue just exposing the interface as
  the
  service contract and then be able to implement the service in whatever
  way we
  deem fit.
 
  Any pointers would be greatly appreciated!
 
  Cheers,
  --
  Stuart Bingë
 
  __
 
  Complinet Ltd is registered in England. Registered office at Vintners
  Place, 68 Upper Thames Street, London EC4V 3BJ. Company number 3170722.
  VAT No. 749 324 021.
  Complinet Inc is a corporation registered in Delaware, USA.
 
  This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.

__

“Complinet Ltd is registered in England. Registered office at Vintners Place, 
68 Upper Thames Street, London EC4V 3BJ. Company number 3170722. VAT No. 749 
324 021.
Complinet Inc is a corporation registered in Delaware, USA.”

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.


JAX-WS/annotated SOAP services -- exporting implementation methods rather than interface ones?

2007-07-18 Thread Stuart Bingë
Hello all,

We've been using XFire (specifically its SOAP transport) together with JSR-181 
annotations for some time now in our internal Spring-based web services 
(hosted in Tomcat), and are now in the process of looking to upgrade to CXF 
as part of a general systems upgrade. The web services are java-first, 
where we code to a SEI and then rely on XFire to generate the WSDL as 
appropriate. In addition, the SOAP binding used is RPC/Literal for 
interoperability with PHP clients.

After following the Writing a service with Spring article on the CXF site 
(http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/writing-a-service-with-spring.html), as 
well as attempting the basic HelloWorld applet that the article describes 
(i.e. separate from our existing environment/services), I've discovered some 
strange behaviour that wasn't present with XFire.

When exposing an endpoint via jaxws:endpoint ... /, the generated WSDL 
appears to be coming from the implementation class rather than the service 
interface -- i.e. getters and setters for implementation-specific properties 
are included in the WSDL.

Is this the expected behaviour with jaxws:endpoint /? If so, what other 
methods are available/recommended for exposing an endpoint via an interface 
rather than an implementation object?

This can be solved with @WebMethod(ignore = true) annotations on the 
implementation class, but obviously this isn't ideal and shouldn't be needed 
in the first place. We'd like to continue just exposing the interface as the 
service contract and then be able to implement the service in whatever way we 
deem fit.

Any pointers would be greatly appreciated!

Cheers,
-- 
Stuart Bingë

__

“Complinet Ltd is registered in England. Registered office at Vintners Place, 
68 Upper Thames Street, London EC4V 3BJ. Company number 3170722. VAT No. 749 
324 021.
Complinet Inc is a corporation registered in Delaware, USA.”

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.