Re: BASH 4.4 mapfile/readarray/read builtins mis-behaving with pipe [edit] documentation bug

2018-07-21 Thread BloomingAzaleas

Reply to Eric Blake,

At this time, I do not have a Linux image available to me.   If 
you saw the same behavior on Fedora, then I suggest the behavior 
originates upstream at or close the the GNU source-code level.


Mr. Penny's response asserted the observed behavior "is intended 
behavior", in which case there should exist a GNU specification 
document describing the intended pipe STDIN re-direction 
restrictions for 'mapfile', 'read' and possibly other "builtins". 
Lacking such a reference nothing can be said about intent. 
Implementation-as-intent implies errors and conceptual and 
behavioral  inconsistencies in the implementation were intended. 
I decline to think that of the distributed BASH maintenance team. 
He provided a reference to 
http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/024, where, if you read the 
page, the behavior inconsistency I reported is shown under the 
heading of "More broken stuff:".  I take that "More broken 
stuff:" opinion to mean yet others read the same surface 
discrepancy between doc and behavior as I did.


I believe what we have at this point is:

A) GNU doc lacking nuance, attention to consistent terminology, 
and helpful rule-statement to code example/counter-example 
illustrations adjacent to rule statements.  For a doc 
counter-example, the Open Group doc at 
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html 
does make an effort to distinguish behaviors between "2.14 
Special Built-In Utilities" and "2.9.1 Simple Commands" whereas 
the GNU doc indiscriminately mixes the words "commands" (section 
3.2) and "builtin" and "command" and the phrase "builtin command" 
(section 4) as if their behaviors are identical under the section 
4 title of "Shell Builtin Commands" 
(https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Shell-Builtin-Commands.html#Shell-Builtin-Commands). 
The GNU doc for shopt lastpipeis fairly opaque unless you have 
deep knowledge and that knowledge is cued when considering the 
possible meanings of "current shell environment" for built-ins 
(same process) vs. external child-process executables.


B) However conceptually inconsistent, an obsessive BASH doc 
reader could imply the observed bash built-ins behavior by 
integrating multiple hints and rule statements scattered across 
the GNU doc and then, crucially, doubting the plain meaning of 
the unqualified doc statements of "Read lines from the standard 
input..." .


Thank you for your response.

Regards,

UN*X Since '85

On 7/20/2018 12:08 PM, Eric Blake wrote:

On 07/17/2018 08:52 PM, BloomingAzaleas wrote:

Reply to Steven Penny :

    no mis-behaving: this is intended behavior - you yourself 
have given
    workarounds: either redirect output to a file that can be 
later read, or pipe to
    command grouping ala {} or () and read stdin from inside 
the subshell




I suggest the following adjustment to the man pages inserting 
a parenthetical cue regards behavior in pipes:


Is the behavior you are complaining about unique to Cygwin, or 
can it be reproduced on a GNU/Linux box?  If the latter, then 
an upstream bug report is better than asking for a 
cygwin-specific patch.  [Hint - as the maintainer of the cygwin 
bash port, I don't recall adding any cygwin-specific tweaks for 
mapfile - and a quick test on Fedora shows the same behaviors]




--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



Re: BASH 4.4 mapfile/readarray/read builtins mis-behaving with pipe [edit] documentation bug

2018-07-17 Thread BloomingAzaleas

Reply to Steven Penny :

   no mis-behaving: this is intended behavior - you yourself have given
   workarounds: either redirect output to a file that can be later read, or 
pipe to
   command grouping ala {} or () and read stdin from inside the subshell

   im not sure what you are asking here - it seems you have a grasp already of 
the
   "problem" and "solution" - so nothing more needs to be said really, as 
nothing
   needs to be fixed - another option is "lastpipe"


If the reported behavior is the intended behavior, then this 
complaint is now a documentation complaint.  Neither the Cygwin 
man pages (quoted in the original report) nor the upstream GNU 
documentation indicate any exception to stdin redirect with pipe 
in the doc paragraphs for the subject builtins.  What confuses 
the situation is that some stdin re-directions work for these 
builtins in a parent shell context (left-chevs)  but not others 
(pipes) UNLESS performed strictly at mid-night under a full moon 
using obscure incantation hidden in pieces throughout a 178-page 
pdf.  In the GNU doc, the sub-shell for builtins in a pipeline 
rule involved is obscured by burial in paragraph six of section 
3.7.3 Command Execution Environment.


I suggest the following adjustment to the man pages inserting a 
parenthetical cue regards behavior in pipes:


  mapfile [-d delim] [-n count] [-O origin] [-s count] [-t] [-u 
fd]  [-C  callback]  [-c quantum] [array]
  readarray  [-d delim] [-n count] [-O origin] [-s count] [-t] 
[-u fd] [-C callback] [-c    quantum] [array]
    Read lines from the standard input (see pipeline 
restriction) into the indexed array  variable  array,  or ...


 read [-ers] [-a aname] [-d delim] [-i text] [-n nchars] [-N 
nchars]  [-p  prompt]  [-t timeout] [-u fd] [name ...]
 One  line  is read from the standard input (see pipeline 
restriction), or ...


At least the reader gets a cue to modify expectations and 
research the "pipeline restriction" compared to all other 
commands that work just peachy with stdin pipe re-direction.  
Regards the shopt lastpipe doc single-sentence paragraph in GNU 
section 4.3.2 The Shopt Builtin, it could be improved by adding: 
"This option will change the parent shell context behavior of 
shell builtins mapfile, readarray and read when they are used as 
the last command of a pipeline."


As to the left-chev work-arounds, yes they work, but that would 
require some script re-structuring.  In any case, "what you are 
asking here" is that there appears to be a difference between a 
plain reading of the doc paragraphs for the builtins and the 
builtins behavior and so a bug against one or the other.  If this 
were a unix/linux kernel environment, the triage emphasis would 
be documentation wording rather than implementation bug.  Given 
the Cygwin context of necessary hidden emulation chicanery on 
Windows, triage emphasis is not that obvious.  I exerted the 
effort to construct a reasonably complete report with multiple 
illustration cases contrasted to the doc to improve the FOSS, be 
it implementation or documentation.  I didn't need too.


Regards.

On 7/15/2018 7:01 PM, BloomingAzaleas wrote:
Windows 10 Pro 10.0.17134 N/A Build 17134 patched through 15 
July 2018

Cygwin 2.10.0(0.325/5/3)
Bash 4.4.12(3)

Cygwin man pages show:

  mapfile [-d delim] [-n count] [-O origin] [-s count] [-t] [-u 
fd]  [-C  callback]  [-c quantum] [array]
  readarray  [-d delim] [-n count] [-O origin] [-s count] [-t] 
[-u fd] [-C callback] [-c    quantum] [array]
    Read lines from the standard input into the indexed array 
variable  array,  or ...


 read [-ers] [-a aname] [-d delim] [-i text] [-n nchars] [-N 
nchars]  [-p  prompt]  [-t timeout] [-u fd] [name ...]

 One  line  is read from the standard input, or ...

So the expectation is that all bash stdin re-directions such as 
pipes and left chevs should work.  For mapfile/readarry, the 
output array variable MAPFILE is described as being created if 
not array_var argument is given to mapfile.


A) Searched cygwin email list with terms 'mapfile', 'readarray' 
and 'read builtin'.  No obvious hits of recent vintage in 
summary result list.


B) Confirm, not using mapfile/readarry/read, that bash stdin 
redirs work as expected.


echo multi-line_arg | /bin/cat

/bin/cat < some_unix_fmt_file

/bin/cat <C) Test mapfile/readarray/read in various stdin redir 
situations.  Basic harnesses are :


mapfile/readarry HARNESS:
stdin or fd 0 feed to mapfile
then
: "${MAPFILE[@]:?MAPFILE null or unset}"
if get past the ${:?} test then dump MAPFILE with a simple /for 
/loop as: for ent in "${MAPFILE[@]}" ; do echo ="${ent}"= ; done


read HARNESS:
stdin feed to 'read foo'
then
: "${foo:?foo null or unset}"
if get past the ${:?} test then dump variable foo with echo 
="${foo}"=


CASES:
echo multi-line_arg | mapfile
cat multi-line_unix_fm

BASH 4.4 mapfile/readarray/read builtins mis-behaving with pipe

2018-07-15 Thread BloomingAzaleas
Windows 10 Pro 10.0.17134 N/A Build 17134 patched through 15 July 
2018

Cygwin 2.10.0(0.325/5/3)
Bash 4.4.12(3)

Cygwin man pages show:

  mapfile [-d delim] [-n count] [-O origin] [-s count] [-t] [-u 
fd]  [-C  callback]  [-c quantum] [array]
  readarray  [-d delim] [-n count] [-O origin] [-s count] [-t] 
[-u fd] [-C callback] [-c    quantum] [array]
    Read lines from the standard input into the indexed array 
variable  array,  or ...


 read [-ers] [-a aname] [-d delim] [-i text] [-n nchars] [-N 
nchars]  [-p  prompt]  [-t timeout] [-u fd] [name ...]

 One  line  is read from the standard input, or ...

So the expectation is that all bash stdin re-directions such as 
pipes and left chevs should work.  For mapfile/readarry, the 
output array variable MAPFILE is described as being created if 
not array_var argument is given to mapfile.


A) Searched cygwin email list with terms 'mapfile', 'readarray' 
and 'read builtin'.  No obvious hits of recent vintage in summary 
result list.


B) Confirm, not using mapfile/readarry/read, that bash stdin 
redirs work as expected.


echo multi-line_arg | /bin/cat

/bin/cat < some_unix_fmt_file

/bin/cat