Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?
I compiled Lynx under 1.5.6 and tried to run it under 1.5.5: The procedure entry point _fcntl64 could not be located in the dynamic link library cygwin1.dll How many Cygwin applications are supposed to be affected by the following changes ? - Make tmpfile 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen) - Make fcntl 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen) Yes, I know 1.5.5 is now old, but it's the last version which allows me to run screen - http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00557.html , so I switch the DLLs. -- How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:43:51PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: I compiled Lynx under 1.5.6 and tried to run it under 1.5.5: The procedure entry point _fcntl64 could not be located in the dynamic link library cygwin1.dll How many Cygwin applications are supposed to be affected by the following changes ? - Make tmpfile 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen) - Make fcntl 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen) 12. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?
Damn, no listing of the 12?.? Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:43:51PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: I compiled Lynx under 1.5.6 and tried to run it under 1.5.5: The procedure entry point _fcntl64 could not be located in the dynamic link library cygwin1.dll How many Cygwin applications are supposed to be affected by the following changes ? - Make tmpfile 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen) - Make fcntl 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen) 12. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?
I think CGF missed one or two, anyway. Plus, there are all those unofficial packages that aren't tracked at all... Igor On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Reid Thompson wrote: Damn, no listing of the 12?.? Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:43:51PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: I compiled Lynx under 1.5.6 and tried to run it under 1.5.5: The procedure entry point _fcntl64 could not be located in the dynamic link library cygwin1.dll How many Cygwin applications are supposed to be affected by the following changes ? - Make tmpfile 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen) - Make fcntl 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen) 12. cgf -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route to the bathroom is a major career booster. -- Patrick Naughton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:31:14PM -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: Damn, no listing of the 12?.? Um. I mean, really. It's pretty obvious if you think about it. No, wait. I miscounted. It's only 11. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:25:35PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I think CGF missed one or two, anyway. Plus, there are all those unofficial packages that aren't tracked at all... Ok. Lets all just agree on 15, then. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
