RE: Not yet supported (was: emacs shell)

2007-12-12 Thread Dave Korn
On 12 December 2007 18:40, Marc Girod wrote:

 And the error in the terminal from where emacs was started is (several
 times each code, as if at random, with different address ranges):
 
 379530601 [main] emacs 4964 child_copy: linked dll data write copy failed,
 0x33B000..0x33B440, done 0, windows pid 4080, Win32 error 487
 570693374 [main] emacs 4964 child_copy: linked dll data write copy failed,
 0x94..0x940240, done 0, windows pid 4080, Win32 error 998
 
 
 OK. I get now the same kind of errors again with startx:
 
 326 [main] xterm 4680 child_copy: linked dll data write copy failed,
 0x869000..0x86CF40, done 0, windows pid 5416, Win32 error 87
 xterm: Error 29, errno 11: Resource temporarily unavailable
 Reason: spawn: fork() failed
 xinit:  Resource temporarily unavailable (errno 11):  can't send HUP to
 process group 4680
 
 ...and I found such hits in older messages in the archive, with other
 variants of Windows, in conjunction to inconsistent versions of cygwin1.dll.

  That's one thing that can cause it.  Another cause is interference from
system-call-hooking software such as anti-virus and firewalls.  What the error
message is trying to tell you is that during the fork operation, it has been
unable to duplicate an area of memory from the parent process into the child
process.  Since it's a requirement that fork() create child processes
identically laid out to their parents, this is a fatal situation.

 I checked there is no such problem now.

  Good.  The next things to try would be running a rebaseall[*], and checking
the BLODA[**].

 But running 'cygcheck -s', I got into:
 
 Windows Longhorn/Vista (not yet supported!) Ver 6.0 Build 6000

  Yes, Vista isn't well supported; not a lot of the list members even have it!

cheers,
  DaveK

[*]  - less -c /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/rebase-2.4.3.README
[**] - http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2007-q4/msg00026.html
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Not yet supported

2007-12-12 Thread Ken Brown

On 12/12/2007 2:37 PM, Marc Girod wrote:


After this, startx started at least twice in a row, but emacs didn't show
up.
I.e. started, but no window!...


This is an old problem.  You have to reinstall libncurses7 to get emacs 
back.  See


   http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2006-10/msg00540.html

Ken

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



RE: Not yet supported (was: emacs shell)

2007-12-12 Thread Marc Girod

Thanks...


Dave Korn wrote:
 
   Good.  The next things to try would be running a rebaseall[*], and
 checking
 the BLODA[**].
 

rebaseall ran without any output.
The only BLODA I can recognize is McAfee anti-virus.
There is an integrated WebCam on the laptop, but no Logitech labelled
process in the task manager output.

After this, startx started at least twice in a row, but emacs didn't show
up.
I.e. started, but no window!...

I ran the ash  rebaseall with my normal account, not as Administrator...?

Marc
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/tetex-on-Vista-tp14108577p14302172.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Not yet supported [Attn emacs maintainer]

2007-12-12 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

According to Ken Brown on 12/12/2007 12:44 PM:
 
 This is an old problem.  You have to reinstall libncurses7 to get emacs
 back.  See
 
http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2006-10/msg00540.html

So, is emacs 22.1 ever going to be promoted to current?

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHYIms84KuGfSFAYARAr+HAJwMhIedtOPWCPE3g+eEBiFgPCcLvwCfe3kt
JVL+UdbvNsSisIQtSd5db18=
=IZ9J
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Not yet supported [Attn emacs maintainer]

2007-12-12 Thread Ken Brown

On 12/12/2007 8:23 PM, Eric Blake wrote:

So, is emacs 22.1 ever going to be promoted to current?


Unfortunately, there are serious problems with the (experimental) emacs 
22.1 package, as I and at least one other person reported last July when 
it was released.  See especially


http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-07/msg00773.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-07/msg00799.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-07/msg00844.html

I haven't heard whether there's been any progress resolving this.

Ken

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/



Re: Not yet supported [Attn emacs maintainer]

2007-12-12 Thread NE
Dear All,

I am trying to use xemacs. After installation of cygwin, I used once
but later it doesn't work. it gives this error: temacs can only be
run in -batch mode

what do you suggest?

thanks
regards

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/