[ITP] OpenSP-1.5.1-1

2004-07-09 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hello,

I want to contribute/maintain OpenSP, version 1.5.1.

Canonical homepage: http://openjade.sf.net/

Prerequisite for OpenJade.

Monolithic tarball because it is a stable production release.  In case
the API/ABI changes I'll provide a library/runtime package with the DLL.

setup.hint:
sdesc: SGML parser, production release.
ldesc: The OpenJade project provides a suite of tools and libraries
for validating, processing and applying DSSSL (Document Style Semantics
and Specification Language) style sheets to SGML and XML documents.
requires: cygwin libintl2 libiconv2


http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/opensp/OpenSP-1.5.1-1.tar.bz2
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/opensp/OpenSP-1.5.1-1-src.tar.bz2
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/opensp/setup.hint


Gerrit
-- 
$ make signature
make: *** No rule to make target `signature'.  Stop.





setup / postinastall script question

2004-07-09 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hello,

will it work with setup.exe to set the PATH in a postinstall script?

I.e.:

export PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
* do something *


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=



Re: setup / postinastall script question

2004-07-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

 Hello,

 will it work with setup.exe to set the PATH in a postinstall script?

A postinstall script is just like any other shell script.  I don't see any
reason why it wouldn't.

 I.e.:

 export PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
 * do something *
 Gerrit

Well, postinstall scripts are usually run with /bin/sh, which means that
you'd have to use the following syntax:

PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
export PATH

(note the quotes, BTW, as many Windows paths have spaces).
HTH,
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster.  -- Patrick Naughton


Yaakov: libbonobo builds ok. (was: Re: Gerrit: plans for Gnome 2.6)

2004-07-09 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Yaakov,

 libIDL (Yaakov)
 ORBit2 (Yaakov)
 intltool
 intltool (Gerrit)

 libbonobo

 So this is the next on the list... I'll start now to build libbonobo.

libbonobo builds fine with your libIDL and ORBit2 packages.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=



Re: setup / postinastall script question

2004-07-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul  9 09:46, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
 On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
  export PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
 
 Well, postinstall scripts are usually run with /bin/sh, which means that
 you'd have to use the following syntax:
 
 PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
 export PATH

Erm... `export FOO=bar' is perfectly valid bourne shell syntax.  Just try
it in ash.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Co-Project Leader  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.


Harold gone?

2004-07-09 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
 Render ?
 Harold, is .pc file missing here?

Hm, Harold is gone...

Who takes over all his packages?



Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=



Re: setup / postinastall script question

2004-07-09 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

 On Jul  9 09:46, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
  On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
   export PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
 
  Well, postinstall scripts are usually run with /bin/sh, which means that
  you'd have to use the following syntax:
 
  PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
  export PATH

 Erm... `export FOO=bar' is perfectly valid bourne shell syntax.  Just try
 it in ash.

Well, in all the bourne shell manuals I've seen, the export command can
only take a list of names.  The above is extended syntax that works in
ash, but is certainly not valid bourne shell syntax (incidentally, IIRC,
$(cmd) is not valid bourne shell syntax either, although it too works in
ash).

I understand that Cygwin's /bin/sh *is* ash, so if the postinstall script
is intended to only run on Cygwin, the point is moot.  I guess I was being
conservative, as well as thinking that if the postinstall script is also
reused in some other system that supports them (is it Debian's apt?), the
above might cause a problem.
Igor
-- 
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
  |\  _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'   Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster.  -- Patrick Naughton


Re: Harold gone?

2004-07-09 Thread Charles Wilson
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hm, Harold is gone...
Who takes over all his packages?
Dunno if Harold is gone as in shall never darken our door again.  He 
just relinquished primary control over the cygwin-xfree project.  He 
didn't say anything about giving up any of his other packages, nor that 
he would stop reading these lists.

Now, it may be true that he IS going to give up all of his pkgs and 
leave the cygwin community -- but so far, he hasn't said that, or if 
he did I missed it.

Let's not probate the will until we're sure he's kaput.
--
Chuck


Re: Harold gone?

2004-07-09 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Chuck hit the nail on the head.  I handed over control of Cygwin/X 
because I am no longer interested in it.  On the other hand, I still use 
Cygwin proper to get things done, so I can't exactly just sit there if 
package foo is not yet available for Cygwin and I need it for 
something I am working on... I'll have to package and maintain it 
myself.  So Chuck was right in guessing that I am not giving up my non-X 
packages, but I am giving up the Cygwin/X project and I don't want to 
work on the X Server anymore, that is all.

Harold
Charles Wilson wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hm, Harold is gone...
Who takes over all his packages?

Dunno if Harold is gone as in shall never darken our door again.  He 
just relinquished primary control over the cygwin-xfree project.  He 
didn't say anything about giving up any of his other packages, nor that 
he would stop reading these lists.

Now, it may be true that he IS going to give up all of his pkgs and 
leave the cygwin community -- but so far, he hasn't said that, or if 
he did I missed it.

Let's not probate the will until we're sure he's kaput.
--
Chuck


Re: [ITP] OpenSP-1.5.1-1

2004-07-09 Thread Harold L Hunt II
+1 from me.  I've been dying to get OpenJade on Cygwin for years. 
However, I can't remember if it was OpenSP or OpenJade itself that gave 
compilation problems.  In other words, have you finished the tough part 
yet, or was OpenSP easy?

Harold
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hello,
I want to contribute/maintain OpenSP, version 1.5.1.
Canonical homepage: http://openjade.sf.net/
Prerequisite for OpenJade.
Monolithic tarball because it is a stable production release.  In case
the API/ABI changes I'll provide a library/runtime package with the DLL.
setup.hint:
sdesc: SGML parser, production release.
ldesc: The OpenJade project provides a suite of tools and libraries
for validating, processing and applying DSSSL (Document Style Semantics
and Specification Language) style sheets to SGML and XML documents.
requires: cygwin libintl2 libiconv2
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/opensp/OpenSP-1.5.1-1.tar.bz2
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/opensp/OpenSP-1.5.1-1-src.tar.bz2
http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/opensp/setup.hint
Gerrit


Re: Harold gone?

2004-07-09 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Harold schrieb:

 Chuck hit the nail on the head.  I handed over control of Cygwin/X 
 because I am no longer interested in it.  On the other hand, I still use
 Cygwin proper to get things done, so I can't exactly just sit there if
 package foo is not yet available for Cygwin and I need it for 
 something I am working on... I'll have to package and maintain it 
 myself.  So Chuck was right in guessing that I am not giving up my non-X
 packages, but I am giving up the Cygwin/X project and I don't want to 
 work on the X Server anymore, that is all.

Glad to hear that.

My question was, if the pkgconfig file for render is missing in the
released tarball or in the render sources or is just me who is missing
it in /usr/X11R6/lib/pkgconfig?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=



Re: Yaakov: libbonobo builds ok. (was: Re: Gerrit: plans for Gnome 2.6)

2004-07-09 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Gerrit schrieb:

 Yaakov,

 libIDL (Yaakov)
 ORBit2 (Yaakov)
 intltool
 intltool (Gerrit)

 libbonobo

 So this is the next on the list... I'll start now to build libbonobo.

 libbonobo builds fine with your libIDL and ORBit2 packages.

Here we have the first candidate for --enable-gtk-doc, the docs aren't
included in the source tarball, they need to be generated.

I'll try if I can finish at least the OpenSP / OpenJade build soon.


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=



Re: Harold gone?

2004-07-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:42:57AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

Hm, Harold is gone...

Who takes over all his packages?

Dunno if Harold is gone as in shall never darken our door again.  He 
just relinquished primary control over the cygwin-xfree project.  He 
didn't say anything about giving up any of his other packages, nor that 
he would stop reading these lists.

Now, it may be true that he IS going to give up all of his pkgs and 
leave the cygwin community -- but so far, he hasn't said that, or if 
he did I missed it.

Let's not probate the will until we're sure he's kaput.

Harold still seems to be here and I have asked *Alexander* (I called him
Andrew in three or four different email messages yesterday) to
subscribe to this list.

I don't know if he's willing to maintain Harold's old packages or not.
Andrew?  Harold?

cgf


Re: setup / postinastall script question

2004-07-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:45:39AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

 On Jul  9 09:46, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
  On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
   export PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
 
  Well, postinstall scripts are usually run with /bin/sh, which means that
  you'd have to use the following syntax:
 
  PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
  export PATH

 Erm... `export FOO=bar' is perfectly valid bourne shell syntax.  Just try
 it in ash.

Well, in all the bourne shell manuals I've seen, the export command can
only take a list of names.  The above is extended syntax that works in
ash, but is certainly not valid bourne shell syntax (incidentally, IIRC,
$(cmd) is not valid bourne shell syntax either, although it too works in
ash).

I understand that Cygwin's /bin/sh *is* ash, so if the postinstall script
is intended to only run on Cygwin, the point is moot.  I guess I was being
conservative, as well as thinking that if the postinstall script is also
reused in some other system that supports them (is it Debian's apt?), the
above might cause a problem.

FWIW, I didn't know that either of the above constructs worked in ash.  I
thought Igor's advice was correct.

Learn something new...


Re: Harold gone?

2004-07-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:11:31PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:42:57AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:

Hm, Harold is gone...

Who takes over all his packages?

Dunno if Harold is gone as in shall never darken our door again.  He 
just relinquished primary control over the cygwin-xfree project.  He 
didn't say anything about giving up any of his other packages, nor that 
he would stop reading these lists.

Now, it may be true that he IS going to give up all of his pkgs and 
leave the cygwin community -- but so far, he hasn't said that, or if 
he did I missed it.

Let's not probate the will until we're sure he's kaput.

Harold still seems to be here and I have asked *Alexander* (I called him
Andrew in three or four different email messages yesterday) to
subscribe to this list.

I don't know if he's willing to maintain Harold's old packages or not.
Andrew?  Harold?

The sad thing is that the above Andrew is not a joke.  Sigh.

I can see I'm in for many weeks of apologies for calling Alexander
Andrew.  Sorry, *Alexander*.

The even sadder thing is that I didn't need to even respond at all
since the rest of this thread made things clear.

Move along.  Nothing to see here.

cgf


Re: [ITP] OpenSP-1.5.1-1

2004-07-09 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:12:56 +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
 I want to contribute/maintain OpenSP, version 1.5.1.
 
+1 from me, too.