Re: what about a Security category?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lapo Luchini wrote: What about a Security category? No one else would like it? The number of pertinent packages is growing in time 0=) Lapo - -- L a p o L u c h i n i l a p o @ l a p o . i t w w w . l a p o . i t / -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkHdN7IACgkQaJiCLMjyUvs28ACdGvkUsBNUCMGVHsU9/uGETuPV 4xkAoKtv5zLzRGxdsBIEbaWK0YjfCjof =dbFY -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: what about a Security category?
Lapo Luchini schrieb: What about a Security category? No one else would like it? The number of pertinent packages is growing in time 0=) Which packages? We agreed to stay with the debian names only. Currently most of them are in Net. Which non-Net packages should go to such a Security category? $ egrep -B10 category:.*(Net$|Net ) setup.ini|grep @ |cut -c3- autossh c3270 inetutils irc lftp libopenldap2 libopenldap2_2_7 lighttpd naim ncftp netcat nfs-server openldap openldap-devel openssh pr3270 proftpd rsync setsid setup stunnel suite3270 tin ttcp whois xinetd PS: Missing IMHO is just non-US, with those packages in debian unstable: erlang-slang, httperf, netsaint-nrpe-plugin, netsaint-nrpe-server, pgp5i, rsaref2, siege-ssltunnelv, zmailer-ssl But non-US should be parallel to the contrib and release dirs on the filesystem level, if someone wants to maintain some of them. (to ease mirroring). -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
Re: [pakage updates] gnupg 1.2.6-2 / gnupg 1.4.0-2
Hi Lapo, http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.0-2.tar.bz2 For what is worth I'm using this both alone and together with enigmail/thunderbird with no problem (even downloading keys from keyservers). I also verified that it works. Do you thing this is enough to promote it from test to current? Volker -- PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913 9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [pakage updates] gnupg 1.2.6-2 / gnupg 1.4.0-2
Volker Quetschke wrote: Hi Lapo, http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.0-2.tar.bz2 For what is worth I'm using this both alone and together with enigmail/thunderbird with no problem (even downloading keys from keyservers). I also verified that it works. Do you thing this is enough to promote it from test to current? I've also been using it alone and with enigmail/thunderbird without problems, including downloading keys. I'd say it's ready to go to current. -- David Rothenbergerspammer? - [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG/PGP: 0x7F67E734, C233 365A 25EF 2C5F C8E1 43DF B44F BA26 7F67 E734
