Re: [ITP] util-linux

2006-04-05 Thread Charles Wilson

Charles Wilson wrote:
I've got a version of cygutils (1.3.0-1) ready to upload which has the 
following programs removed:

  cal col colcrt colrm column ddate getopt mcookie namei rename rev
Its upload needs to be synchronized with the following:

(1) adding Yaakov's util-linux

 (3) agetty, more, and setsid would have to be marked _obsolete AND dummy
 packages with version numbers larger than their respective current
 versions uploaded, for each of those three.

I'll handle the above...


(2) Q: maybe cygutils' setup.hint file should require: util-linux
   PRO: that way, people won't suddenly see their favorite little
utility disappear
   CON: util-linux requires e2fsprogs and libpcre0.  Since cygutils
is required by some packages in the Base category, this
would effectively pull util-linux, e2fsprogs, and libpcre0
into Base.  Not sure that's a good idea, just so somebody
can keep their 'ddate' working.
Note: it's even worse: *perl* is a requirement of util-linux (chkdupexe 
and scriptreplay).


Consensus summary: cygutil's setup.hint should NOT require util-linux. 
This will have the result that the following utilities

  cal col colcrt colrm column ddate getopt mcookie namei rename rev
may silently disappear from users' systems if they only upgrade cygutils 
without also installing util-linux.  Hopefully either (a) few people 
care about these specific 11 utilities, or (b) those that do care will 
read the cygwin-announce list.



Finally, I have a few questions about the util-linux -2 packaging.

(A) why are `more' and `arch' in /bin and not /usr/bin ?  (That's the 
way linux does it is not sufficient: on linux, there is actually a 
difference between the two directories.) I'm uncertain that setup.exe 
will DTRT here, since it is NOT a cygwin program...I'm *fairly* sure it 
will DTRT, since otherwise all our stuff in /usr/bin wouldn't unpack 
into CYGWINROOT\bin\ properly but ...


Okay, this isn't really a problem.  setup.exe WILL Do The Right Thing, 
so this is not a showstopper.  Personally I'd like to see arch and more 
explicitly installed into /usr/bin/ not /bin in the next release, but 
that's just MHO, and the current package is okay as-is, in this respect.


(B) After installing all the prerequisites listed in the README, I can't 
build the util-linux package.  pg.c fails with

  pg.c:62:22: nl_types.h: No such file or directory
nl_types is provided by the catgets package, but that's not listed as a 
prereq.  (Further, why is it using catgets, instead of gettext? 
everything ELSE in util-linux seems to use gettext...)  This is probably 
a build-type NOT run-time dependency, since I doubt pq exec's the 
gencat.exe utility.


Anyway, after installing the catgets package...the build succeeds.


This is not a showstopper either.  Yaakov just needs to promise to 
update the README file to add catgets as a build dependency for the next 
release.


So, IMO, all outstanding issues are addressed -- magic 
three-letter-acronym: GTG.


I'll go ahead do steps #1 and #3 above, and send an announcement about 
the cygutils update to the relevant list.


--
Chuck


Re: [ITP] util-linux

2006-04-05 Thread Charles Wilson

Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

All affected maintainers have agreed to the transition.  Please review
new packages:

ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/util-linux/util-linux-2.12r-2-src.tar.bz2
ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/util-linux/util-linux-2.12r-2.tar.bz2
ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/util-linux/setup.hint

Please, DO NOT UPLOAD until a new cygutils package without the
conflicting commands is uploaded first.


Uploaded (and uploaded the harmonized cygutils package also).  Yaakov, 
please send an announcement (for util-linux) to the appropriate list.


I did the following:
  (1) moved setsid/ to _obsolete/setsid
  (2) updated the following fields in _obsolete/setsid/setup.hint
require: util-linux
category: _obsolete
sdesc: package removed; install util-linux instead
  (3) created empty package and -src package with higher version number
  in _obsolete/setsid/

  (4),(5),(6) repeat 1,2,3 for agetty
  (7),(8),(9) repeat 1,2,3 for more

  (10) uploaded new cygutils-1.3.0-1 package which does not have
  cal col colcrt colrm column ddate
  getopt mcookie namei rename rev
  (11) did **NOT** add util-linux to the requires: of cygutils'
   setup.hint

  (12) uploaded util-linux package and setup.hint

I think that's what was agreed to; hopefully I didn't mess anything up.

--
Chuck


Re: ITP: xsri

2006-04-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr  5 01:57, Charles Wilson wrote:
 Corinna Vinschen wrote:
 Charles, you're *really* long enough in that project to know what's good
 or not good for a release.  Just go ahead.  You don't have to wait for a
 GTG anymore, just upload what you think is ripe for uploading. 
 [...]
 However, given the above discussion, I'll wait a while longer before 
 moving forward with rxvt-unicode-X, in the absence of a GTG.  (The only 
 person to have attempted to build it reported problems; I'm convinced 
 those problems are resolved/PIBKAC, but he never followed up.  So...)
 
 Further, in the case of the other three packages
libW11
libXpm-W11
rxvt-W
 these all need actual votes (as they have no analogue in Linux distros), 
 and have received none as yet.  (Plus, the fact the rxvt-W *doesn't 
 actually work* is kind of a drawback.  I'd really want some community 
 buy-in before uploading these three, even as setup.hint 'test:'-only 
 packages)

Well, as I said, you really know what's good or not good :-)


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader  cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat


Please upload: clamav-0.88.1-1

2006-04-05 Thread Reini Urban
As announced yesterday, a new bugfix release.
The upstream release came yesterday when I wrote my upload request.

http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.88.1-1-src.tar.bz2
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.88.1-1.tar.bz2

you can keep 0.88-2 as prev and delete 0.88-1
hope that 0.88.1-1 is sorted after 0.88-2
-- 
Reini




Re: ITP: xsri

2006-04-05 Thread Reid Thompson

Charles Wilson wrote:



However, given the above discussion, I'll wait a while longer before 
moving forward with rxvt-unicode-X, in the absence of a GTG.  (The 
only person to have attempted to build it reported problems; I'm 
convinced those problems are resolved/PIBKAC, but he never followed 
up.  So...)


Further, in the case of the other three packages
   libW11
   libXpm-W11
   rxvt-W
these all need actual votes (as they have no analogue in Linux 
distros), and have received none as yet.  (Plus, the fact the rxvt-W 
*doesn't actually work* is kind of a drawback.  I'd really want some 
community buy-in before uploading these three, even as setup.hint 
'test:'-only packages)



where can the current sources for these be downloaded from?


Re: Please upload: clamav-0.88.1-1

2006-04-05 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

According to Reini Urban on 4/5/2006 6:26 AM:
 http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.88.1-1-src.tar.bz2
 http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.88.1-1.tar.bz2

Uploaded

 
 you can keep 0.88-2 as prev and delete 0.88-1
 hope that 0.88.1-1 is sorted after 0.88-2

0.88-1 is gone, and yes, setup.exe sorts 0.88.101 after 0.88-2.

- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!

Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEM7vU84KuGfSFAYARAhdnAJ43vMqgvmbj2C3YzqO+FV2FMjlRbgCgxgtu
CwV9XBOjmv+65/uqwdANLec=
=+Joe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Please upload: clamav-0.88.1-1

2006-04-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr  5 14:26, Reini Urban wrote:
 As announced yesterday, a new bugfix release.
 The upstream release came yesterday when I wrote my upload request.
 
 http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.88.1-1-src.tar.bz2
 http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/release/clamav/clamav-0.88.1-1.tar.bz2
 
 you can keep 0.88-2 as prev and delete 0.88-1
 hope that 0.88.1-1 is sorted after 0.88-2

Oh crap, I just rejected the announcement since it looked like a 
duplicate to me.  Please resend.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader  cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat


Re: ITP: xsri

2006-04-05 Thread Charles Wilson

Reid Thompson wrote:

Charles Wilson wrote:



However, given the above discussion, I'll wait a while longer before 
moving forward with rxvt-unicode-X, in the absence of a GTG.  (The 
only person to have attempted to build it reported problems; I'm 
convinced those problems are resolved/PIBKAC, but he never followed 
up.  So...)


Further, in the case of the other three packages
   libW11
   libXpm-W11
   rxvt-W
these all need actual votes (as they have no analogue in Linux 
distros), and have received none as yet.  (Plus, the fact the rxvt-W 
*doesn't actually work* is kind of a drawback.  I'd really want some 
community buy-in before uploading these three, even as setup.hint 
'test:'-only packages)



where can the current sources for these be downloaded from?



http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP/rxvt-unicode-X-7.7-2-src.tar.bz2
http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP/libW11-20060305-1-src.tar.bz2
http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP/libXpm-W11-4.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2
http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP/rxvt-W-2.7.10-1-src.tar.bz2

as stated
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2006-03/msg00119.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2006-03/msg00120.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2006-03/msg00121.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2006-03/msg00122.html

(okay, the rxvt-unicode-X one is a bit misleading; it tells where to 
find the -1-src package.  Apparently I forgot to announce the -2-src 
package).


--
Chuck



Please upload: mined-2000.12-2

2006-04-05 Thread Thomas Wolff
Due to some problems in the binary and source archives, 
please upload another version update for mined:


mkdir mined
cd mined
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/mined-2000.12-2.tar.bz2
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/mined-2000.12-2-src.tar.bz2
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/setup.hint

Thank you,
Thomas Wolff


Re: Please upload chere-0.6-4

2006-04-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:27:08PM +0100, Dave wrote:
Please upload a new version of chere. Just a documentation update that's 
been waiting for something more significant to do a release.

The setup.hint has changed to accommodate getopts jump from cygutils to 
util-linux. chere no longer depends on cygutils.

http://www.virtualsoup.org/files/setup.hint
http://www.virtualsoup.org/files/chere-0.6-4.tar.bz2

Uploaded but I removed the reference to textutils.

Where in the world did that come from?

cgf


Re: Please upload: mined-2000.12-2

2006-04-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:01PM +0200, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Due to some problems in the binary and source archives, 
please upload another version update for mined:


mkdir mined
cd mined
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/mined-2000.12-2.tar.bz2
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/mined-2000.12-2-src.tar.bz2
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/setup.hint


Uploaded.

cgf


Re: Please upload chere-0.6-4

2006-04-05 Thread Dave

Christopher Faylor wrote:

On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:27:08PM +0100, Dave wrote:

Please upload a new version of chere. Just a documentation update that's 
been waiting for something more significant to do a release.


The setup.hint has changed to accommodate getopts jump from cygutils to 
util-linux. chere no longer depends on cygutils.


http://www.virtualsoup.org/files/setup.hint
http://www.virtualsoup.org/files/chere-0.6-4.tar.bz2



Uploaded but I removed the reference to textutils.

Where in the world did that come from?

cgf


Whoops. Appears I haven't updated my copy of setup.hint for when 
textutils became coreutils... except that coreutils is also there. Doh.


I have no idea.

Thanks for pointing it out. Now fixed here too.


Dave.


Re: Please upload: mined-2000.12-2

2006-04-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 05:13:28PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:01PM +0200, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Due to some problems in the binary and source archives, 
please upload another version update for mined:


mkdir mined
cd mined
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/mined-2000.12-2.tar.bz2
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/mined-2000.12-2-src.tar.bz2
wget http://towo.net/mined/cygwin/setup.hint


Uploaded.

But this version still has problems.  mined.exe is a Linux executable.

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00136.html

It's difficult to understand how a linux executable could show up in
a cygwin tar archive.  Thomas, maybe you should try actually unpacking
the tar ball on a windows system before you release your next version.

cgf