Re: [ITP] perl-5.8.8
On Jun 19 22:42, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: On Tue, June 19, 2007 7:24 pm, Reini Urban wrote: I want to it take over from Gerrit. Cool, thanks Reini! Thank you so much. If it were up to me, you'd get three gold stars. That's a good number. I'm not the right person to test perl, just tell me when you think it's ready for prime time, ok? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
freetype update?
Hi, Can we have a freetype update, LilyPond 2.12 will require at least 2.1.10? In the mean time I have created freetype packages to test the build http://lilypond.org/cygwin/release/freetype2/ Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
Re: [ITP] perl-5.8.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Reini Urban wrote: I want to it take over from Gerrit. Great, thank you. But one thing, PLEASE give some heads-up before stabilizing 5.9/5.10? That upgrade will require rebuilding all perl modules, and I've got over 100 of them. Yaakov -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFGeSPSpiWmPGlmQSMRCH1OAJY3mCFZpI5lNNTSWnbawzvkB8ekAJ9NQjHf sKXs8VS3hosEtpphiWbgVA== =2jR1 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: freetype update?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Can we have a freetype update, LilyPond 2.12 will require at least 2.1.10? Done as announced. Thanks for the kind nudge. Yaakov -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGeSRjpiWmPGlmQSMRCHSvAJ9MsMQmbxRAUPxNZLFXMFGGRIAKDwCfVmW4 UPslUO7A4bnwiQc8S0aU3tw= =3T/P -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [ITP] perl-5.8.8
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) schrieb:
But one thing, PLEASE give some heads-up before stabilizing 5.9/5.10?
That upgrade will require rebuilding all perl modules, and I've got over
100 of them.
Sure, that will be a major move and will need some time.
2 months at least in my opinion. This is just the first beta.
5.10 will then be binary compatible to 5.9 but again in
/usr/bin, /usr/lib/perl/5.10
Currently I'm testing how to provide a perl5.9 test release which can be
used side-by-side to the stable perl-5.8.x. (as also done in my
postgresql7.4)
Put the exe's into /opt/perl5.9/bin or /usr/lib/perl5/5.9/bin or
specialized in /usr/bin/?
The only major conflicts are perlld and ld2, which require a patch if
kept in /usr/bin/
Currently I'm using the /usr/bin/*5.9.4[.exe] layout.
However /usr/bin/ld25.9.4 is really ugly.
And the only really diff is for building cygperl5_{8,9}.dll, which is
never used when already put into the target path.
So I'm thinking of leaving only the 5.8 version of perlld and ld2 there.
--
Reini Urban
http://phpwiki.org/ http://murbreak.at/
http://helsinki.at/ http://spacemovie.mur.at/
perl-5.9.5
I almost have that ready, I just wait for some of my cygwin patches upstream. With current blead (5.9.5) I get now the same number of failing tests as with 5.8 ../lib/Net/Ping/t/500_ping_icmp.t21 50.00% 2 being the only leftover. How should we name it so that users can experiment with that? Side-by-side to perl-5.8.8 I would suggest perl5.9-5.9.5-1. And when perl5.10 comes out as perl-5.10-1, the development version can switch to perl5.11-5.11-1. I couldn't find similar cases ion any distro. They just allow perl-5.9.4 besides perl-5.8.8. perl-devel seems to be misleading, maybe perl-exp or perl-experimental. I also enabled -DDEBUGGING, esp. for the new regex engine. I don't think people want 5.9 to use for the enhanced speed, mainly to test the new perl6 and regex features for the upcoming 5.10. For 5.9 I also added libxml to vendor, not only expat. And I pulled in all CPAN and CPAN::Reporter dependencies. Originally I wanted to get the vendor libs smaller, but a current CPAN is really important, and CPAN::Reporter also. -- Reini
Re: [ITP] ncdu 1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Corinna Vinschen on 6/18/2007 1:17 AM: On Jun 17 19:08, Christian Franke wrote: Dave Korn wrote: But the generated packages looked ok. Like I said before, +1. Thanks, We have four votes from Dave, Reini, Volker and me. One is still missing. I'll join the fray, since I maintain the underlying du. +1. Do we have a package ready for upload? - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGedeg84KuGfSFAYARApx+AKDI6kTRhEcp+yozfDbbt88T9vX+awCeK00z /dk5pTWAvMramPqrq1Il0mI= =mCSj -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: perl-5.9.5
On Wed, June 20, 2007 6:39 pm, Reini Urban wrote: I almost have that ready, I just wait for some of my cygwin patches upstream. With current blead (5.9.5) I get now the same number of failing tests as with 5.8 ../lib/Net/Ping/t/500_ping_icmp.t21 50.00% 2 being the only leftover. How should we name it so that users can experiment with that? Side-by-side to perl-5.8.8 Since 5.9.5 is basically a beta 5.10.0, I would actually make it a test version of a new perl5.10 package (so perl5.10-5.9.5-1). When 5.10.0 is released, the package would be updated to perl5.10-5.10.0-1 and move to current. I also enabled -DDEBUGGING, esp. for the new regex engine. Different routines with DEBUGGGING enabled are swapped in when you do use re debug, so that shouldn't be necessary. Note that DEBUGGING on vs. off are not binary-compatible, so once you pick a state, you're stuck with it unless you want to make people recompile XS modules they've built.
Re: [ITP] ncdu 1.1
Eric Blake wrote: According to Corinna Vinschen on 6/18/2007 1:17 AM: On Jun 17 19:08, Christian Franke wrote: Dave Korn wrote: But the generated packages looked ok. Like I said before, +1. Thanks, We have four votes from Dave, Reini, Volker and me. One is still missing. I'll join the fray, since I maintain the underlying du. +1. Do we have a package ready for upload? Thanks. Yes: http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/release/ncdu/ncdu-1.1-1.tar.bz2 http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/release/ncdu/ncdu-1.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://franke.dvrdns.org/cygwin/release/ncdu/setup.hint The current version from 2007-06-17 fixes the double slash and buffer overflow issues reported. Christian
