Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) gmp
On Apr 18 19:32, Achim Gratz wrote: Test packages built with gcc-4.7.2-2, please upload as test and leave current and previous unchanged. The bundled setup.hint files only set the test version, I hope this works as intended with upset. # The first line sets up shell variable wget, to be used by all later lines # simply paste into the shell from here (assumes you are in .../release). --8---cut here---start-8--- wget=wget -rxnH --cut-dirs=1 http://cygwin.stromeko.net/release; $wget/gmp/setup.hint $wget/gmp/gmp-5.1.1-1.tar.bz2 $wget/gmp/gmp-5.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2 $wget/gmp/gmp-debuginfo/setup.hint $wget/gmp/gmp-debuginfo/gmp-debuginfo-5.1.1-1.tar.bz2 $wget/gmp/libgmp-doc/setup.hint $wget/gmp/libgmp-doc/libgmp-doc-5.1.1-1.tar.bz2 $wget/gmp/libgmp10/setup.hint $wget/gmp/libgmp10/libgmp10-5.1.1-1.tar.bz2 $wget/gmp/libgmpxx4/setup.hint $wget/gmp/libgmpxx4/libgmpxx4-5.1.1-1.tar.bz2 $wget/gmp/libgmp-devel/setup.hint $wget/gmp/libgmp-devel/libgmp-devel-5.1.1-1.tar.bz2 --8---cut here---end---8--- Uploaded. The libgmp10/setup.hint file was missing a test: line. I added that on cygwin.com. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) gmp
On 2013-04-19 03:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Uploaded. The libgmp10/setup.hint file was missing a test: line. I added that on cygwin.com. I just uploaded the rest. Yaakov
Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) ppl
On 2013-04-18 12:37, Achim Gratz wrote: $wget/ppl/libppl-devel/setup.hint FYI, there is no obsoletes: tag. I created the necessary upgrade helper for ppl-devel and marked it as test:. Yaakov
[GOLDSTAR] for gmp/mpfr/mpclib/ppl/cloog-ppl (was Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) gmp)
On Apr 19 03:06, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2013-04-19 03:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Uploaded. The libgmp10/setup.hint file was missing a test: line. I added that on cygwin.com. I just uploaded the rest. Can we get a few goldstar's here for Achim? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [RFU 64bit] sqlite3-3.7.16.2-1
On Apr 18 09:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 17 15:00, Warren Young wrote: From within release/sqlite3: wget -e robots=off --cut-dirs=2 -np -nH -A'*3.7.16.2-1*' -A'*.hint' \ -r http://etr-usa.com/cygwin64/sqlite3/ Uploaded. Just a tiny hiccup: The sqlite3 package has libncurses10 in the requires line, but the 64bit release only provides libncursesw10. Just, FYI. Yaakov fixed that on cygwin.com. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
[HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit
Hi maintainers, the 64 bit Cygwin seems to be quite stable now. We're still suffering from a gcc problem which seems to affect C++ inline methods using templates, so some C++ packages might not be buildable yet(*), but other than that it looks pretty good. I would like to ask those of you owning a 64 bit Windows machine to have a look into the 64 bit distro and to try to build your packages. If dependencies are missing, please tell us here. We can look into fixing the missing deps together. If you have build problems other than due to missing deps, please report here, too. There are very likely still bugs in Cygwin and there might still lurk bugs in gcc. Just make sure that you eliminated problems in your project first. Datatype mismatches are pretty common bugs. If you have noarch packages (no binaries), please check if the dependencies for those packages are fullfilled and tell us here, too, so we can go ahead adding them to the 64 bit distro. Right now, we have a couple of missing dependencies in the 64 bit distro. If one of the packages is yours, it would be nice if you could try to build it. Here's the list of missing deps as of today: ImageMagick bash-completion cvsps dbus ghostscript libjbig-devel libjbig2 perl-Authen-SASL perl-DBD-SQLite perl-DBI perl-Net-SMTP-SSL subversion-perl terminfo-extra texlive texlive-collection-bibtexextra texlive-collection-binextra texlive-collection-latexextra texlive-collection-mathextra transfig w3m xemacs-emacs-common Thanks in advance, Corinna (*) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2013-04/msg00055.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2013-04/msg00056.html -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [ITA] grace
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 19:23:16 -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Volker Quetschke is listed as the maintainer of grace, but he seems to be MIA[1] and this package requires an immediate rebuild for Motif[2]. In order to fix this package, here we go: This got caught up together with my overnight upload, so I guess this is mine now. Gold star awarded: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#YS
Re: [ITA] postgresql-9.2.2-1
following Reini's request: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00134.html Gold star awarded: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#MA
Re: [GOLDSTAR] for gmp/mpfr/mpclib/ppl/cloog-ppl (was Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) gmp)
On Apr 19 03:06, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2013-04-19 03:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Uploaded. The libgmp10/setup.hint file was missing a test: line. I added that on cygwin.com. I just uploaded the rest. Can we get a few goldstar's here for Achim? And let's not forget ucl/upx. A pile of gold stars awarded: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#AG
Re: [RFU 64bit] sqlite3-3.7.16.2-1
On 4/19/2013 03:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Just a tiny hiccup: The sqlite3 package has libncurses10 in the requires line, but the 64bit release only provides libncursesw10. Just, FYI. Yaakov fixed that on cygwin.com. I've fixed this by making use of Cygport's new setup.hint generation feature, specifically its ability to build the requires line automatically. I moved to this new feature for this package release, but I copied over the requirements from my hand-written hint files. I just removed the REQUIRES lines and verified that Cygport does the right thing here. The automatic dependency generation doesn't include ncurses explicitly, but it does include readline which depends on ncurses. I expect setup.exe will follow the dependency chain correctly.
Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) ppl
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes: On 2013-04-18 12:37, Achim Gratz wrote: $wget/ppl/libppl-devel/setup.hint FYI, there is no obsoletes: tag. I created the necessary upgrade helper for ppl-devel and marked it as test:. Thanks. Since I guess this will come up again, could you please explain what exactly was missing? The mechanism for obsoleting packages seems to be to provide a newer empty package, is that right? An obsoletes: ppl-devel in the setup.hint in the libppl-devel would have triggered the automatic creation of this empty package? Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+ SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) gmp
Corinna Vinschen writes: Uploaded. The libgmp10/setup.hint file was missing a test: line. I added that on cygwin.com. Thank you for fixing that. Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+ SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
Re: [GOLDSTAR] for gmp/mpfr/mpclib/ppl/cloog-ppl (was Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) gmp)
Andrew Schulman writes: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#AG Glad to be of service. Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds
Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit
Corinna Vinschen writes: the 64 bit Cygwin seems to be quite stable now. We're still suffering from a gcc problem which seems to affect C++ inline methods using templates, so some C++ packages might not be buildable yet(*), but other than that it looks pretty good. I'll update my 64bit installation over the weekend and build my packages. While upx builds and works fine with 64bit, it doesn't handle the PE+ executable format, so it is unfortunately useless for 64bit executables. Is there any documentation how this format differs from the PE format so that I might look into adding support for 64bit when time permits? Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+ Waldorf MIDI Implementation additional documentation: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfDocs
Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit
Hi Achim, On Apr 19 20:00, Achim Gratz wrote: Corinna Vinschen writes: the 64 bit Cygwin seems to be quite stable now. We're still suffering from a gcc problem which seems to affect C++ inline methods using templates, so some C++ packages might not be buildable yet(*), but other than that it looks pretty good. I'll update my 64bit installation over the weekend and build my packages. While upx builds and works fine with 64bit, it doesn't handle the PE+ executable format, so it is unfortunately useless for 64bit executables. Is there any documentation how this format differs from the PE format so that I might look into adding support for 64bit when time permits? Strange that nobody did it so far. It should be rather trivial, actually. The only noticable difference between PE and PE+ are a few different values in some of the header fields and the slightly different layout of the IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER structure. For the different values in IMAGE_FILE_HEADER(*), note the fields - Machine (IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_AMD64 instead of IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_I386) - Characteristics (No IMAGE_FILE_32BIT_MACHINE flag) in IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER(**), see - Magic (IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR64_MAGIC vs. IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR32_MAGIC) - SizeOfHeaders (don't know the right values off the top of my head here) As for the different IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER structure layout: - BaseOfData has been removed - ImageBase, SizeOfStackReserve, SizeOfStackCommit, SizeOfHeapReserve, and SizeOfHeapCommit are 8 byte values now. I don't know how upx works under the hood, but I assume you also need the unpacker code in 64 bit. If it's not written in assembler, the 32 bit code should more or less do the right thing already. Corinna (*) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms680313%28v=vs.85%29.aspx (**) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms680339%28v=vs.85%29.aspx -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [RFU] (gcc-4.7.2-2 test) ppl
On Apr 19 19:55, Achim Gratz wrote: Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes: On 2013-04-18 12:37, Achim Gratz wrote: $wget/ppl/libppl-devel/setup.hint FYI, there is no obsoletes: tag. I created the necessary upgrade helper for ppl-devel and marked it as test:. Thanks. Since I guess this will come up again, could you please explain what exactly was missing? The mechanism for obsoleting packages seems to be to provide a newer empty package, is that right? An obsoletes: ppl-devel in the setup.hint in the libppl-devel would have triggered the automatic creation of this empty package? Unfortunately not. If you obsolete a package you have to create an emtpy package for the obsoleted package yourself. See, for instance, the current w32api--1.tar.bz2. It's the empty tar file for the w32api package which has been obsoeted by w32api-headers and w32api-runtime. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit
Corinna Vinschen writes: Strange that nobody did it so far. If it's any consolation, no 64bit formats are supported, not just PE+. Somebody's been rumoured to have worked (and then stopped working) on x86_64 support, but I haven't found any traces of actual code yet. It should be rather trivial, actually. The only noticable difference between PE and PE+ are a few different values in some of the header fields and the slightly different layout of the IMAGE_OPTIONAL_HEADER structure. OK, I'll tack it onto my todo list and see when I get to that. It would really be nice if setup64.exe wouldn't be as large as it currently is. I don't know how upx works under the hood, but I assume you also need the unpacker code in 64 bit. If it's not written in assembler, the 32 bit code should more or less do the right thing already. The initial unpacker stub is in assembler indeed, I haven't looked at it in any detail. However, I expect it either just works as is or it's over my head anyway. Regards, Achim. -- +[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra
Re: [HEADSUP] Please try to build your packages for 64 bit
On 4/19/2013 6:45 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: texlive texlive-collection-bibtexextra texlive-collection-binextra texlive-collection-latexextra texlive-collection-mathextra The 64-bit distro is still missing a few build dependencies for texlive: clisp libgd-devel libgs-devel libpoppler-devel libzzip-devel t1lib-devel Aside from that, I'm about to do some traveling in which I will have only sporadic and limited internet access. So I probably won't be able to work on texlive until mid-May. Sorry. Ken
