Re: [ITA] gnuplot-5.2.0

2017-10-04 Thread Achim Gratz
Marco Atzeri writes:
> GTG. I changed ownership to you
>
> minor issue:
>  why gnuplot-5.2.0-0.1.cygport and not gnuplot.cygport ?

Something cygport did for whatever reason, I'll take another look once I
move it to my proper package maintenance directory and change it to
release.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds


Re: [ITA] liblzo2-2.10

2017-10-04 Thread Marco Atzeri

On 04/10/2017 20:23, Achim Gratz wrote:


As previously mentioned, I'd like to adopt liblzo2 (the package lzo2 in
cygwin-pkg-maint is non-existing and can be removed).


GTG. Changed ownership and removed lzo2.

same question: why liblzo2-2.10-1.cygport and not liblzo2.cygport ?

Regards
MArco




Re: [ITA] gnuplot-5.2.0

2017-10-04 Thread Marco Atzeri

On 04/10/2017 19:24, Achim Gratz wrote:


As previously mentioned, I'd like to adopt gnuplot.  I'm still trying to
figure out if I can resurrect the Qt terminal and maybe split the
package like most GNU/Linux distributions, so for now here's a test
package.

--8<---cut here---start->8---
root=http://cygwin.stromeko.net/
repo=$root/maint/$arch/release/gnuplot
$repo/gnuplot-5.2.0-0.1-src.tar.xz
$repo/gnuplot-5.2.0-0.1.hint
$repo/gnuplot-5.2.0-0.1.tar.xz
$repo/gnuplot-debuginfo/gnuplot-debuginfo-5.2.0-0.1.hint
$repo/gnuplot-debuginfo/gnuplot-debuginfo-5.2.0-0.1.tar.xz
--8<---cut here---end--->8---




GTG. I changed ownership to you

minor issue:
 why gnuplot-5.2.0-0.1.cygport and not gnuplot.cygport ?



Re: Dr. Volker Zell's packages

2017-10-04 Thread Marco Atzeri

On 04/10/2017 15:55, Andrew Schulman wrote:

On 03/10/2017 17:00, Andrew Schulman wrote:




Maybe openldap.


Hi Andrew,
openldap-2.4.42 builds fine with the cygwin source packages
but it segfaults during test.

The slapd.1.log suggests the segfault is on the test client and not on
the server.

Can you try to build just to double check that is not my
computer the problem ?


Sure, I will as soon as I have time.

I only use the openldap client, not the server. So if you use the server
too and are considering adopting the package, you should do that.



In reality I am not a user at all, but is it one on the
perl upgrade todo list

No problem to adopt it but we need to have it working



[ITA] liblzo2-2.10

2017-10-04 Thread Achim Gratz

As previously mentioned, I'd like to adopt liblzo2 (the package lzo2 in
cygwin-pkg-maint is non-existing and can be removed).

--8<---cut here---start->8---
root=http://cygwin.stromeko.net/
repo=$root/maint/$arch/release/liblzo2
$repo/liblzo2-debuginfo/liblzo2-debuginfo-2.10-1.hint
$repo/liblzo2-debuginfo/liblzo2-debuginfo-2.10-1.tar.xz
$repo/liblzo2-devel/liblzo2-devel-2.10-1.hint
$repo/liblzo2-devel/liblzo2-devel-2.10-1.tar.xz
$repo/liblzo2-doc/liblzo2-doc-2.10-1.hint
$repo/liblzo2-doc/liblzo2-doc-2.10-1.tar.xz
$repo/liblzo2_2/liblzo2_2-2.10-1.hint
$repo/liblzo2_2/liblzo2_2-2.10-1.tar.xz
$repo/liblzo2-2.10-1-src.tar.xz
$repo/liblzo2-2.10-1.hint
$repo/liblzo2-2.10-1.tar.xz
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

Alternatively, point setup.exe at $root and it should offer liblzo2-2.10
as an uprade.  The setup.ini is signed with my PGP key available at
$root/stromeko.gpg, which you can download and then feed to setup.exe
via the -K switch.  The fingerprint of that key is:

  B22B 4890 B89E 5E5A 795C  E305 B40B EC75 3152 B1C3

If you have the keyart script (Python, you can just download from
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/atoponce/keyart/master/keyart), this
is what you should see after importing the key into your public keyring:

> keyart stromeko
+-[DSA 2048]+
| ^.|
|^ .|
|   ^ E |
|. . ^ :|
|. .  ^ : . |
|.^  . ^.:S |
| ..  . :^. |
|.  .^ ^.^  |
|. ^:.^ ..  |
| ^:... .   |
|.^.|
+-[3152B1C3]+
+---+
| :X|
| .  ^^^|
|:   ..^|
| . : .   E |
|  i . . .  |
|   ^ S l : .   |
|i l ^ ^|
|   ^ . .   |
|  .   .|
|   . . |
|  ...  |
+---+


Regards,
-- 

Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptations for KORG EX-800 and Poly-800MkII V0.9:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KorgSDada


[ITA] gnuplot-5.2.0

2017-10-04 Thread Achim Gratz

As previously mentioned, I'd like to adopt gnuplot.  I'm still trying to
figure out if I can resurrect the Qt terminal and maybe split the
package like most GNU/Linux distributions, so for now here's a test
package.

--8<---cut here---start->8---
root=http://cygwin.stromeko.net/
repo=$root/maint/$arch/release/gnuplot
$repo/gnuplot-5.2.0-0.1-src.tar.xz
$repo/gnuplot-5.2.0-0.1.hint
$repo/gnuplot-5.2.0-0.1.tar.xz
$repo/gnuplot-debuginfo/gnuplot-debuginfo-5.2.0-0.1.hint
$repo/gnuplot-debuginfo/gnuplot-debuginfo-5.2.0-0.1.tar.xz
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

Alternatively, point setup.exe at $root and it should offer
gnuplot-5.2.0 as a test version.  The setup.ini is signed with my PGP
key available at $root/stromeko.gpg, which you can download and then
feed to setup.exe via the -K switch.  The fingerprint of that key is:

  B22B 4890 B89E 5E5A 795C  E305 B40B EC75 3152 B1C3

If you have the keyart script (Python, you can just download from
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/atoponce/keyart/master/keyart), this
is what you should see after importing the key into your public keyring:

> keyart stromeko
+-[DSA 2048]+
| ^.|
|^ .|
|   ^ E |
|. . ^ :|
|. .  ^ : . |
|.^  . ^.:S |
| ..  . :^. |
|.  .^ ^.^  |
|. ^:.^ ..  |
| ^:... .   |
|.^.|
+-[3152B1C3]+
+---+
| :X|
| .  ^^^|
|:   ..^|
| . : .   E |
|  i . . .  |
|   ^ S l : .   |
|i l ^ ^|
|   ^ . .   |
|  .   .|
|   . . |
|  ...  |
+---+


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra


Re: [PATCH setup 00/14] Use libsolv, solve all our problems... (WIP)

2017-10-04 Thread Jon Turney

On 02/10/2017 16:17, Marco Atzeri wrote:

On 02/10/2017 16:07, Jon Turney wrote:


https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.881-38-g6a01c5.x86_64.exe


Thanks for testing.


interesting question about precedence as it tries to install
cscope-15.8.0.1-2 and speex 1.2.0-2


So, this is change in behaviour. When asked to upgrade, setup will now 
always install the version which libsolv thinks has the highest version.


These versions are higher, because numeric sequences are considered 
higher than alphabetic sequences (i.e. '0' > 'b', '0' > 'rc').


Trying to control which version which gets upgraded to by setting the 
curr: value in setup.ini isn't actually always working, currently 
(perhaps this will be the subject of a whole other email...)



that is right for speex but wrong for cscope following the setup.ini
and the age of the files

version: 15.8b-1
[prev]
version: 15.8.0.1-2


So, this is actually a bug in the version sorting which calm does

(it was comparing the alphabetic sequence 'b' against the separator '.', 
rather than against the numeric sequence '0')



speex
version: 1.2.0-2
[prev]
version: 1.2rc1-1


And this is the right way round currently, only because it was noticed 
it wasn't sorted correctly when uploaded, and an override.hint added.



It seems previous setup was doing the opposite precedence
that is wrong for speex and right for cscope


I'll just point out that these two packages were made by people with 
incompatible ideas about how versions order.


I'm not going down the path of trying to support that, as that way 
madness lies...


Re: Dr. Volker Zell's packages

2017-10-04 Thread Andrew Schulman
> On 03/10/2017 17:00, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, we haven't heard from Dr. Volker Zell in quite some time,
> >> and a number of his packages are in need of updates or rebuilds.  I have
> >> marked them ORPHANED in the maintainer list.  ITAs welcome.
> > 
> > I use multitail so I can adopt it if the package is in good shape. I'll
> > take a look.
> > 
> > Maybe openldap.
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> openldap-2.4.42 builds fine with the cygwin source packages
> but it segfaults during test.
> 
> The slapd.1.log suggests the segfault is on the test client and not on 
> the server.
> 
> Can you try to build just to double check that is not my
> computer the problem ?

Sure, I will as soon as I have time.

I only use the openldap client, not the server. So if you use the server
too and are considering adopting the package, you should do that.