Ditto apr1 and aprutil1 (was Two identically-named libtool directories)

2009-02-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:58:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
We have two libtool directories with two setup.hints in
~release/_obsolete and ~release.  This is causing problems.  It seems
like things have been like this since at least November and no one was
complaining because upset threw out the _obsolete package in favor of a
newer one thanks purely to the fragile sort order directory inspection.
That has changed now thanks to last week's problems.

People are complaining about getting out-of-date versions of libtool.
Maybe I'll figure out the intent two seconds after sending this message
but I can't see any reason to have two packages with identical names in
the release so I have deleted the _obsolete/libtool packages.

Looks like even error-checking for upset is in order.

Two more culprits.

I don't understand why these duplicate named directories and setup.hints
were created.  Package names are supposed to be unique so it was
basically luck (and an upset bug) that the _obsolete directories were
quietly overridden before.

I've removed _obsolete/apr1 and _obsolete/aprutil1.

cgf


Re: Ditto apr1 and aprutil1 (was Two identically-named libtool directories)

2009-02-07 Thread David Rothenberger

On 2/7/2009 11:22 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:

On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:58:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:

We have two libtool directories with two setup.hints in
~release/_obsolete and ~release.  This is causing problems.  It seems
like things have been like this since at least November and no one was
complaining because upset threw out the _obsolete package in favor of a
newer one thanks purely to the fragile sort order directory inspection.
That has changed now thanks to last week's problems.

People are complaining about getting out-of-date versions of libtool.
Maybe I'll figure out the intent two seconds after sending this message
but I can't see any reason to have two packages with identical names in
the release so I have deleted the _obsolete/libtool packages.

Looks like even error-checking for upset is in order.


Two more culprits.

I don't understand why these duplicate named directories and setup.hints
were created.  Package names are supposed to be unique so it was
basically luck (and an upset bug) that the _obsolete directories were
quietly overridden before.

I've removed _obsolete/apr1 and _obsolete/aprutil1.


apr1 and aprutil1 packages are supposed to be in the _obsolete category. 
The other packages should be in libapr1 and libaprutil1.


--
David Rothenberger    daver...@acm.org

enhance, v.:
To tamper with an image, usually to its detriment.



Re: Ditto apr1 and aprutil1 (was Two identically-named libtool directories)

2009-02-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:09:35PM -0800, David Rothenberger wrote:
 On 2/7/2009 11:22 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
 On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:58:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
 We have two libtool directories with two setup.hints in
 ~release/_obsolete and ~release.  This is causing problems.  It seems
 like things have been like this since at least November and no one was
 complaining because upset threw out the _obsolete package in favor of a
 newer one thanks purely to the fragile sort order directory inspection.
 That has changed now thanks to last week's problems.

 People are complaining about getting out-of-date versions of libtool.
 Maybe I'll figure out the intent two seconds after sending this message
 but I can't see any reason to have two packages with identical names in
 the release so I have deleted the _obsolete/libtool packages.

 Looks like even error-checking for upset is in order.
 Two more culprits.
 I don't understand why these duplicate named directories and setup.hints
 were created.  Package names are supposed to be unique so it was
 basically luck (and an upset bug) that the _obsolete directories were
 quietly overridden before.
 I've removed _obsolete/apr1 and _obsolete/aprutil1.

 apr1 and aprutil1 packages are supposed to be in the _obsolete category. 
 The other packages should be in libapr1 and libaprutil1.

They were but they were spread out in two different locations in the
ftp area.

cgf