RE: last package
Ok Chuck. Thanks for the demo. :o) I should have utmpdump wrapped up tomorrow, with a patch to cygutils. I'll also zip up my killall version to see if you want to include that. Mark > -Original Message- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: last package > > > > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > > I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com: > > > > cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co . > > > > Feel free to add a cygutils directory. > > > Okay -- I've added it and imported v0.9.7. Also, I've added > Mark's last > implementation and the supporting autotools changes so that > last builds > within cygutils. There is a licensing problem with Mark's changes to > utmpdump so we're still waiting on that and his killall > implementation. > > Mark -- to see the diff, do the following: > > $ export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps > $ cvs login > (Logging in to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > CVS password: anoncvs > $ cvs co cygutils > $ cd cygutils > $ cvs diff -r v0_9_7 > my_patch > Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. > cvs server: Diffing . > cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file bootstrap > cvs server: Diffing licenses > cvs server: Diffing src-bsd > cvs server: Diffing src-gpl > cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.1 > cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.c > cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/lastb.1 > cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/oldutmp.h > cvs server: Diffing src-pd > > Translation: >I added the last.1, lastb.1, last.c and oldutmp.h files to the > src-gpl subdirectory. >I made additional changes to: > AUTHORS (added Mark) > ChangeLog (always a good idea...) > PROGLIST (added last) > README (mentioned last) > src/Makefile.am ( This is the biggie ) > src/Makefile.in (running bootstrap regenerates this >based on the Makefile.am changes) > > That's the kind of thing that I'd expect as a large "add a > new program > to cygutils" patch. > > --Chuck >
Re: last package
Christopher Faylor wrote: > > I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com: > > cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co . > > Feel free to add a cygutils directory. Okay -- I've added it and imported v0.9.7. Also, I've added Mark's last implementation and the supporting autotools changes so that last builds within cygutils. There is a licensing problem with Mark's changes to utmpdump so we're still waiting on that and his killall implementation. Mark -- to see the diff, do the following: $ export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps $ cvs login (Logging in to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) CVS password: anoncvs $ cvs co cygutils $ cd cygutils $ cvs diff -r v0_9_7 > my_patch Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding. cvs server: Diffing . cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file bootstrap cvs server: Diffing licenses cvs server: Diffing src-bsd cvs server: Diffing src-gpl cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.1 cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.c cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/lastb.1 cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/oldutmp.h cvs server: Diffing src-pd Translation: I added the last.1, lastb.1, last.c and oldutmp.h files to the src-gpl subdirectory. I made additional changes to: AUTHORS (added Mark) ChangeLog (always a good idea...) PROGLIST (added last) README (mentioned last) src/Makefile.am ( This is the biggie ) src/Makefile.in (running bootstrap regenerates this based on the Makefile.am changes) That's the kind of thing that I'd expect as a large "add a new program to cygutils" patch. --Chuck
Re: last package
Mark Bradshaw wrote: > Charles, >When you get back to reading the list, I'm ready to include last, > utmpdump, and killall (working without /proc!) in cygutils. Drop me a > line... If you've already done the work of integrating your new files and makefile changes into the cygutils source dist, then send me a patch. Otherwise, if you just send me the new files and special notes for how to build them (libraries needed, etc) then I can add them to cygutils. Also, I'd need to know what license the original source last, utmpdump, and killall programs were distributed under -- GPL, BSD-w/advert, BSD-no/advert, public domain, etc. --Chuck
RE: last package
Charles, When you get back to reading the list, I'm ready to include last, utmpdump, and killall (working without /proc!) in cygutils. Drop me a line... Mark > -Original Message- > From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:11 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: last package > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:06:08PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: > > Charles: > > OK. Scratch killall. I didn't realize it used /proc. > :o( Anyway, > > what do you want for last and utmpdump. > > > > Anyone else: > > Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have > > plans that direction? > > Oooh... big job... pretty beeg job... > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails > regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Developer > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Red Hat, Inc. >
Re: last package
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:06:08PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: > Charles: > OK. Scratch killall. I didn't realize it used /proc. :o( Anyway, > what do you want for last and utmpdump. > > Anyone else: > Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have > plans that direction? Oooh... big job... pretty beeg job... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
RE: last package
Charles: OK. Scratch killall. I didn't realize it used /proc. :o( Anyway, what do you want for last and utmpdump. Anyone else: Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have plans that direction? Mark > -Original Message- > From: Mark Bradshaw > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:01 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: last package > > > I think they would fit there just fine. All three of them > (will be finished with killall soon). What do you need from me? > > Mark
Re: last package
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:20:05PM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:10:29PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > >How "big" are they? If they are only a single .c file each (killall.c, > >utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the > >cygutils package, if you'd prefer./. > > > >One of these days I'll get around to creating a sourceware-based CVS > >tree for cygutils...Chris, how do I do that? > > I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com: > > cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co . > > Feel free to add a cygutils directory. I've filled the already existing 'cygrunsrv' directory with life so you can checkout the latest cygrunsrv sources from there, too. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
RE: last package
I think they would fit there just fine. All three of them (will be finished with killall soon). What do you need from me? Mark > -Original Message- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:44 PM > To: Mark Bradshaw > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: last package > > > > > Mark Bradshaw wrote: > > > Very small. All source combined is 33KB. Executables are > 23.5KB. This is > > just last and utmpdump. > > > > You want 'em? > > > Dunno yet. I'm not really concerned about # kilobytes. My > "rule" for > cygutils is "one .c file per application" -- I want to limit > cygutils to > very simple, small apps. (I'm assuming that nobody would try > to put the > entire source code to MSWord into a single .c file). > > Take a look at the current cygutils -src archive and tell me > what you think > > --Chuck > >
Re: last package
Mark Bradshaw wrote: > Very small. All source combined is 33KB. Executables are 23.5KB. This is > just last and utmpdump. > > You want 'em? Dunno yet. I'm not really concerned about # kilobytes. My "rule" for cygutils is "one .c file per application" -- I want to limit cygutils to very simple, small apps. (I'm assuming that nobody would try to put the entire source code to MSWord into a single .c file). Take a look at the current cygutils -src archive and tell me what you think --Chuck
RE: last package
Very small. All source combined is 33KB. Executables are 23.5KB. This is just last and utmpdump. You want 'em? Mark > -Original Message- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:10 PM > To: Mark Bradshaw > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: last package > > > How "big" are they? If they are only a single .c file each > (killall.c, > utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the > cygutils package, if you'd prefer./. > > One of these days I'll get around to creating a sourceware-based CVS > tree for cygutils...Chris, how do I do that? > > --Chuck > > Mark Bradshaw wrote: > > > I don't mind. It's already done, actually. Now I'm eyeing > up their version > > of killall too. > > > > Mark > > > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:47 PM > >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > >>Subject: Re: last package > >> > >> > >>On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: > >> > >>>Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done. > >>> > >>It doesn't matter. If you don't like to port it, just > >>forget it. I just thought it would be a good idea to > >>borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well. > >> > >>Corinna > >> > >>-- > >>Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails > >>regarding Cygwin to > >>Cygwin Developer > >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Red Hat, Inc. > >> > >> > >
Re: last package
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:10:29PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >How "big" are they? If they are only a single .c file each (killall.c, >utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the >cygutils package, if you'd prefer./. > >One of these days I'll get around to creating a sourceware-based CVS >tree for cygutils...Chris, how do I do that? I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com: cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co . Feel free to add a cygutils directory. cgf
Re: last package
How "big" are they? If they are only a single .c file each (killall.c, utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the cygutils package, if you'd prefer./. One of these days I'll get around to creating a sourceware-based CVS tree for cygutils...Chris, how do I do that? --Chuck Mark Bradshaw wrote: > I don't mind. It's already done, actually. Now I'm eyeing up their version > of killall too. > > Mark > > >>-Original Message- >>From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:47 PM >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>Subject: Re: last package >> >> >>On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: >> >>>Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done. >>> >>It doesn't matter. If you don't like to port it, just >>forget it. I just thought it would be a good idea to >>borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well. >> >>Corinna >> >>-- >>Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails >>regarding Cygwin to >>Cygwin Developer >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Red Hat, Inc. >> >>
RE: last package
I don't mind. It's already done, actually. Now I'm eyeing up their version of killall too. Mark > -Original Message- > From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:47 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: last package > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: > > Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done. > > It doesn't matter. If you don't like to port it, just > forget it. I just thought it would be a good idea to > borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well. > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails > regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Developer > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Red Hat, Inc. >
Re: last package
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: > Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done. It doesn't matter. If you don't like to port it, just forget it. I just thought it would be a good idea to borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
RE: last package
Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done. > -Original Message- > From: Mark Bradshaw > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: last package > > > I'll take a look at it. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: last package > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM > > > > Subject: RE: last package > > > > > > > > > > > > > Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit > > > > package. > > > > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion > > of someone > > > > else's > > > > > package? Technically it's no problem... > > > > > > > > Yep, no problem. > > > > > > Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it. > > > > Btw., while you're at it, what about utmpdump? > > > > Corinna > > > > -- > > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails > > regarding Cygwin to > > Cygwin Developer > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Red Hat, Inc. > > >
Re: last package
=== - Original Message - From: "Earnie Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:12 AM Subject: Re: last package > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM > > Subject: RE: last package > > > > > Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit > > package. > > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone > > else's > > > package? Technically it's no problem... > > > > Yep, no problem. > > > > In other words, you're setting precedent and creating policy. I guess so. Policy that is (Although it's not my domain), as for precedent - that already exists. Rob
RE: last package
I'll take a look at it. > -Original Message- > From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: last package > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM > > > Subject: RE: last package > > > > > > > > > > Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit > > > package. > > > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion > of someone > > > else's > > > > package? Technically it's no problem... > > > > > > Yep, no problem. > > > > Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it. > > Btw., while you're at it, what about utmpdump? > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails > regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Developer > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Red Hat, Inc. >
Re: last package
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM > > Subject: RE: last package > > > > > > > Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit > > package. > > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone > > else's > > > package? Technically it's no problem... > > > > Yep, no problem. > > Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it. Btw., while you're at it, what about utmpdump? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
RE: last package
Cool. I'm not too sure which category is appropriate. I thought possibly either Base or Utils. sdesc: "last" ldesc: "This utility searches through historical information kept in /var/log/wtmp to determine who logged in, where they came from, when they logged in, and how long they stayed." category: Base requires: cygwin > -Original Message- > From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:09 AM > To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: last package > > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM > Subject: RE: last package > > > > Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit > package. > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone > else's > > package? Technically it's no problem... > > Yep, no problem. > > Rob >
Re: last package
Robert Collins wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM > Subject: RE: last package > > > Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit > package. > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone > else's > > package? Technically it's no problem... > > Yep, no problem. > In other words, you're setting precedent and creating policy. Earnie. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: last package
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM > Subject: RE: last package > > > > Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit > package. > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone > else's > > package? Technically it's no problem... > > Yep, no problem. Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
Re: last package
- Original Message - From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM Subject: RE: last package > Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit package. > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone else's > package? Technically it's no problem... Yep, no problem. Rob
RE: last package
Great. Now I have a question. Last is a part of the sysvinit package. What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone else's package? Technically it's no problem... > -Original Message- > From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:06 AM > To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: last package > > > Sounds good. > > Rob > === > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:53 AM > Subject: last package > > > > Any interest in a ported version of "last" for cygwin? I find it > useful > > when some sort of remote shell program is run on cygwin (i.e. > openssh). > > > > Mark > > >
Re: last package
Sounds good. Rob === - Original Message - From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:53 AM Subject: last package > Any interest in a ported version of "last" for cygwin? I find it useful > when some sort of remote shell program is run on cygwin (i.e. openssh). > > Mark >
Re: last package
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 08:53:32AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: > Any interest in a ported version of "last" for cygwin? I find it useful > when some sort of remote shell program is run on cygwin (i.e. openssh). Sure! Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
