RE: last package

2002-01-17 Thread Mark Bradshaw

Ok Chuck.  Thanks for the demo. :o)  I should have utmpdump wrapped up
tomorrow, with a patch to cygutils.  I'll also zip up my killall version to
see if you want to include that.

Mark

> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: last package
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> 
> > 
> > I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com:
> > 
> > cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co .
> > 
> > Feel free to add a cygutils directory.
> 
> 
> Okay -- I've added it and imported v0.9.7.  Also, I've added 
> Mark's last 
> implementation and the supporting autotools changes so that 
> last builds 
> within cygutils. There is a licensing problem with Mark's changes to 
> utmpdump so we're still waiting on that and his killall 
> implementation.
> 
> Mark -- to see the diff, do the following:
> 
> $ export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps
> $ cvs login
> (Logging in to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> CVS password: anoncvs
> $ cvs co cygutils
> $ cd cygutils
> $ cvs diff -r v0_9_7 > my_patch
> Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding.
> cvs server: Diffing .
> cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file bootstrap
> cvs server: Diffing licenses
> cvs server: Diffing src-bsd
> cvs server: Diffing src-gpl
> cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.1
> cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.c
> cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/lastb.1
> cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/oldutmp.h
> cvs server: Diffing src-pd
> 
> Translation:
>I added the last.1, lastb.1, last.c and oldutmp.h files to the 
> src-gpl subdirectory.
>I made additional changes to:
>  AUTHORS (added Mark)
>  ChangeLog (always a good idea...)
>  PROGLIST (added last)
>  README (mentioned last)
>  src/Makefile.am  ( This is the biggie )
>  src/Makefile.in  (running bootstrap regenerates this
>based on the Makefile.am changes)
> 
> That's the kind of thing that I'd expect as a large "add a 
> new program 
> to cygutils" patch.
> 
> --Chuck
> 



Re: last package

2002-01-16 Thread Charles Wilson



Christopher Faylor wrote:


> 
> I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com:
> 
> cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co .
> 
> Feel free to add a cygutils directory.


Okay -- I've added it and imported v0.9.7.  Also, I've added Mark's last 
implementation and the supporting autotools changes so that last builds 
within cygutils. There is a licensing problem with Mark's changes to 
utmpdump so we're still waiting on that and his killall implementation.

Mark -- to see the diff, do the following:

$ export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps
$ cvs login
(Logging in to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
CVS password: anoncvs
$ cvs co cygutils
$ cd cygutils
$ cvs diff -r v0_9_7 > my_patch
Warning: Remote host denied X11 forwarding.
cvs server: Diffing .
cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file bootstrap
cvs server: Diffing licenses
cvs server: Diffing src-bsd
cvs server: Diffing src-gpl
cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.1
cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/last.c
cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/lastb.1
cvs server: tag v0_9_7 is not in file src-gpl/oldutmp.h
cvs server: Diffing src-pd

Translation:
   I added the last.1, lastb.1, last.c and oldutmp.h files to the 
src-gpl subdirectory.
   I made additional changes to:
 AUTHORS (added Mark)
 ChangeLog (always a good idea...)
 PROGLIST (added last)
 README (mentioned last)
 src/Makefile.am  ( This is the biggie )
 src/Makefile.in  (running bootstrap regenerates this
   based on the Makefile.am changes)

That's the kind of thing that I'd expect as a large "add a new program 
to cygutils" patch.

--Chuck




Re: last package

2002-01-16 Thread Charles Wilson



Mark Bradshaw wrote:

> Charles,
>When you get back to reading the list, I'm ready to include last,
> utmpdump, and killall (working without /proc!) in cygutils.  Drop me a
> line...


If you've already done the work of integrating your new files and 
makefile changes into the cygutils source dist, then send me a patch. 
Otherwise, if you just send me the new files and special notes for how 
to build them (libraries needed, etc) then I can add them to cygutils. 
Also, I'd need to know what license the original source last, utmpdump, 
and killall programs were distributed under -- GPL, BSD-w/advert, 
BSD-no/advert, public domain, etc.

--Chuck





RE: last package

2002-01-16 Thread Mark Bradshaw

Charles,
   When you get back to reading the list, I'm ready to include last,
utmpdump, and killall (working without /proc!) in cygutils.  Drop me a
line...

Mark

> -Original Message-
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:11 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: last package
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:06:08PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> > Charles:
> > OK.  Scratch killall.  I didn't realize it used /proc.  
> :o(  Anyway,
> > what do you want for last and utmpdump.
> > 
> > Anyone else:
> > Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have
> > plans that direction?
> 
> Oooh... big job... pretty beeg job...
> 
> Corinna
> 
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails 
> regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 



Re: last package

2002-01-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:06:08PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> Charles:
>   OK.  Scratch killall.  I didn't realize it used /proc.  :o(  Anyway,
> what do you want for last and utmpdump.
> 
> Anyone else:
>   Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have
> plans that direction?

Oooh... big job... pretty beeg job...

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.



RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw

Charles:
OK.  Scratch killall.  I didn't realize it used /proc.  :o(  Anyway,
what do you want for last and utmpdump.

Anyone else:
Is there anyone currently working on a /proc filesystem, or have
plans that direction?

Mark

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Bradshaw 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:01 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: last package
> 
> 
> I think they would fit there just fine.  All three of them 
> (will be finished with killall soon).  What do you need from me?
> 
> Mark



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:20:05PM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:10:29PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >How "big" are they?  If they are only a single .c file each (killall.c, 
> >utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the 
> >cygutils package, if you'd prefer./.
> >
> >One of these days I'll get around to creating a sourceware-based CVS 
> >tree for cygutils...Chris, how do I do that?
> 
> I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com:
> 
> cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co .
> 
> Feel free to add a cygutils directory.

I've filled the already existing 'cygrunsrv' directory with life
so you can checkout the latest cygrunsrv sources from there, too.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.



RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw

I think they would fit there just fine.  All three of them (will be finished
with killall soon).  What do you need from me?

Mark

> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:44 PM
> To: Mark Bradshaw
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: last package
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> 
> > Very small.  All source combined is 33KB.  Executables are 
> 23.5KB.  This is
> > just last and utmpdump.  
> > 
> > You want 'em?
> 
> 
> Dunno yet.  I'm not really concerned about # kilobytes.  My 
> "rule" for 
> cygutils is "one .c file per application" -- I want to limit 
> cygutils to 
> very simple, small apps.  (I'm assuming that nobody would try 
> to put the 
> entire source code to MSWord into a single .c file).
> 
> Take a look at the current cygutils -src archive and tell me 
> what you think
> 
> --Chuck
> 
> 



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Charles Wilson



Mark Bradshaw wrote:

> Very small.  All source combined is 33KB.  Executables are 23.5KB.  This is
> just last and utmpdump.  
> 
> You want 'em?


Dunno yet.  I'm not really concerned about # kilobytes.  My "rule" for 
cygutils is "one .c file per application" -- I want to limit cygutils to 
very simple, small apps.  (I'm assuming that nobody would try to put the 
entire source code to MSWord into a single .c file).

Take a look at the current cygutils -src archive and tell me what you think

--Chuck





RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw

Very small.  All source combined is 33KB.  Executables are 23.5KB.  This is
just last and utmpdump.  

You want 'em?

Mark

> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:10 PM
> To: Mark Bradshaw
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: last package
> 
> 
> How "big" are they?  If they are only a single .c file each 
> (killall.c, 
> utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the 
> cygutils package, if you'd prefer./.
> 
> One of these days I'll get around to creating a sourceware-based CVS 
> tree for cygutils...Chris, how do I do that?
> 
> --Chuck
> 
> Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> 
> > I don't mind.  It's already done, actually.  Now I'm eyeing 
> up their version
> > of killall too.
> > 
> > Mark
> > 
> > 
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:47 PM
> >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >>Subject: Re: last package
> >>
> >>
> >>On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> >>
> >>>Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done.
> >>>
> >>It doesn't matter.  If you don't like to port it, just
> >>forget it.  I just thought it would be a good idea to
> >>borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well.
> >>
> >>Corinna
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails 
> >>regarding Cygwin to
> >>Cygwin Developer
> >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Red Hat, Inc.
> >>
> >>
> 
> 



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Christopher Faylor

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:10:29PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>How "big" are they?  If they are only a single .c file each (killall.c, 
>utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the 
>cygutils package, if you'd prefer./.
>
>One of these days I'll get around to creating a sourceware-based CVS 
>tree for cygutils...Chris, how do I do that?

I've just added you to the cygwin-apps group on sources.redhat.com:

cvs -d :ext:sources.redhat.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps co .

Feel free to add a cygutils directory.

cgf



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Charles Wilson

How "big" are they?  If they are only a single .c file each (killall.c, 
utmpdump.c, last.c) then they are candidates for addition to the 
cygutils package, if you'd prefer./.

One of these days I'll get around to creating a sourceware-based CVS 
tree for cygutils...Chris, how do I do that?

--Chuck

Mark Bradshaw wrote:

> I don't mind.  It's already done, actually.  Now I'm eyeing up their version
> of killall too.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:47 PM
>>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>>Subject: Re: last package
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>>>Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done.
>>>
>>It doesn't matter.  If you don't like to port it, just
>>forget it.  I just thought it would be a good idea to
>>borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well.
>>
>>Corinna
>>
>>-- 
>>Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails 
>>regarding Cygwin to
>>Cygwin Developer
>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Red Hat, Inc.
>>
>>





RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw

I don't mind.  It's already done, actually.  Now I'm eyeing up their version
of killall too.

Mark

> -Original Message-
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:47 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: last package
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> > Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done.
> 
> It doesn't matter.  If you don't like to port it, just
> forget it.  I just thought it would be a good idea to
> borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well.
> 
> Corinna
> 
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails 
> regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done.

It doesn't matter.  If you don't like to port it, just
forget it.  I just thought it would be a good idea to
borrow utmpdump from sysvinit as well.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.



RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw

Takes lots of shoe-horning, but it can be done.

> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Bradshaw 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: last package
> 
> 
> I'll take a look at it.
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: last package
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
> > > > Subject: RE: last package
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit
> > > > package.
> > > > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion 
> > of someone
> > > > else's
> > > > > package?  Technically it's no problem...
> > > > 
> > > > Yep, no problem.
> > > 
> > > Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it.
> > 
> > Btw., while you're at it, what about utmpdump?
> > 
> > Corinna
> > 
> > -- 
> > Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails 
> > regarding Cygwin to
> > Cygwin Developer
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > 
> 



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Robert Collins


===
- Original Message -
From: "Earnie Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: last package


> Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
> > Subject: RE: last package
> >
> > > Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit
> > package.
> > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone
> > else's
> > > package?  Technically it's no problem...
> >
> > Yep, no problem.
> >
>
> In other words, you're setting precedent and creating policy.

I guess so. Policy that is (Although it's not my domain), as for
precedent - that already exists.

Rob




RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw

I'll take a look at it.

> -Original Message-
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: last package
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
> > > Subject: RE: last package
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit
> > > package.
> > > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion 
> of someone
> > > else's
> > > > package?  Technically it's no problem...
> > > 
> > > Yep, no problem.
> > 
> > Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it.
> 
> Btw., while you're at it, what about utmpdump?
> 
> Corinna
> 
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails 
> regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
> > Subject: RE: last package
> > 
> > 
> > > Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit
> > package.
> > > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone
> > else's
> > > package?  Technically it's no problem...
> > 
> > Yep, no problem.
> 
> Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it.

Btw., while you're at it, what about utmpdump?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.



RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw

Cool.  I'm not too sure which category is appropriate.  I thought possibly
either Base or Utils.

sdesc: "last"
ldesc: "This utility searches through historical information kept in
/var/log/wtmp to determine who logged in, where they came from, when they
logged in, and how long they stayed."
category: Base
requires: cygwin


> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:09 AM
> To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: last package
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
> Subject: RE: last package
> 
> 
> > Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit
> package.
> > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone
> else's
> > package?  Technically it's no problem...
> 
> Yep, no problem.
> 
> Rob
> 



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Earnie Boyd

Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
> Subject: RE: last package
> 
> > Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit
> package.
> > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone
> else's
> > package?  Technically it's no problem...
> 
> Yep, no problem.
> 

In other words, you're setting precedent and creating policy.

Earnie.

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen

On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:08:50AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
> Subject: RE: last package
> 
> 
> > Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit
> package.
> > What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone
> else's
> > package?  Technically it's no problem...
> 
> Yep, no problem.

Yep, just rip it out and make your own nice package from it.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Robert Collins

- Original Message -
From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:08 AM
Subject: RE: last package


> Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit
package.
> What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone
else's
> package?  Technically it's no problem...

Yep, no problem.

Rob




RE: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Mark Bradshaw

Great.  Now I have a question.  Last is a part of the sysvinit package.
What's the policy on doing a package on only a portion of someone else's
package?  Technically it's no problem...

> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:06 AM
> To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: last package
> 
> 
> Sounds good.
> 
> Rob
> ===
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:53 AM
> Subject: last package
> 
> 
> > Any interest in a ported version of "last" for cygwin?  I find it
> useful
> > when some sort of remote shell program is run on cygwin (i.e.
> openssh).
> >
> > Mark
> >
> 



Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Robert Collins

Sounds good.

Rob
===
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Bradshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:53 AM
Subject: last package


> Any interest in a ported version of "last" for cygwin?  I find it
useful
> when some sort of remote shell program is run on cygwin (i.e.
openssh).
>
> Mark
>




Re: last package

2002-01-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 08:53:32AM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> Any interest in a ported version of "last" for cygwin?  I find it useful
> when some sort of remote shell program is run on cygwin (i.e. openssh).

Sure!

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.