Re: BLODA FAQ entry.
On Jan 8 20:19, Dave Korn wrote: > On 07 January 2008 13:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Fortunately it's quite simple by using cvs. I don't know > > of any hidden gotchas. If there are any, I'd be as screwed up as > > anybody :) > > So as far as you know we just build winsup as normal and commit the > generated html files as new revisions over the existing ones in wwwdocs, yep? Yep. Usually I had to `sudo cvs up` in /sourceware/www/sourceware/htdocs/cygwin afterwards, but for some reason the `cvs ci' was enough this time. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
RE: BLODA FAQ entry.
On 07 January 2008 13:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 2 19:46, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -, Dave Korn wrote: Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the sources are changed, but I guess not. How do we get the online version of the FAQ to rebuild? >>> >>> It isn't automatic. I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in >>> creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this. >>> >>> cgf >> >> Ah. Who, to judge from lack of posting, is still away on xmas/newyear >> break of some description. > Erm... are you talking about me, by any chance? I don't think so... I think the clue is in the typo :) > I have now updated the FAQ. But thanks nonetheless! > Fortunately it's quite simple by using cvs. I don't know > of any hidden gotchas. If there are any, I'd be as screwed up as > anybody :) So as far as you know we just build winsup as normal and commit the generated html files as new revisions over the existing ones in wwwdocs, yep? That's kinda what I expected but I always like to hear from someone who's done something before, because they might know about the unknown unknowns... cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today
Re: BLODA FAQ entry.
On Jan 2 19:46, Dave Korn wrote: > On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -, Dave Korn wrote: > >> On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -, Dave Korn wrote: > The long-promised FAQ entry. > [...] > >>> [...] > >> Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the > >> sources are changed, but I guess not. How do we get the online version of > >> the FAQ to rebuild? > > > > It isn't automatic. I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in > > creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this. > > > > cgf > > Ah. Who, to judge from lack of posting, is still away on xmas/newyear break > of some description. (I could /probably/ update just the two related pages > with copies freshly built from source, but I'd rather someone who's done it > regularly before and knows of any hidden gotcha's did it, or at least said if > it's really that simple before I went and borked anything.) Guess I'll just > be patient. Erm... are you talking about me, by any chance? I have now updated the FAQ. Fortunately it's quite simple by using cvs. I don't know of any hidden gotchas. If there are any, I'd be as screwed up as anybody :) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
RE: BLODA FAQ entry.
On 02 January 2008 19:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:46:16PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -, Dave Korn wrote: On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >> >> The long-promised FAQ entry. >> >> winsup/doc/ChangeLog >> >> 2007-29-12 Dave Korn >> >> * faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda): New entry. >> (faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus): Link to faq.using.bloda. >> * faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang): Likewise link to faq.using.bloda. > > Looks good. Thanks for doing this. Please check in. Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the sources are changed, but I guess not. How do we get the online version of the FAQ to rebuild? >>> >>> It isn't automatic. I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in >>> creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this. >> >> Ah. Who, to judge from lack of posting, is still away on xmas/newyear >> break of some description. (I could /probably/ update just the two >> related pages with copies freshly built from source, but I'd rather >> someone who's done it regularly before and knows of any hidden gotcha's >> did it, or at least said if it's really that simple before I went and >> borked anything.) Guess I'll just be patient. > > That's why I usually wait. Every time I regen the pages, they end up > looking strange. > > cgf You mean like that time when all the graphics changed to hippos? Yeh, that /was/ strange! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today
Re: BLODA FAQ entry.
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:46:16PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >>> On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -, Dave Korn wrote: > > The long-promised FAQ entry. > > winsup/doc/ChangeLog > > 2007-29-12 Dave Korn > > * faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda): New entry. > (faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus): Link to faq.using.bloda. > * faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang): Likewise link to faq.using.bloda. Looks good. Thanks for doing this. Please check in. >>> >>> >>> Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the >>> sources are changed, but I guess not. How do we get the online version of >>> the FAQ to rebuild? >> >> It isn't automatic. I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in >> creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this. > > Ah. Who, to judge from lack of posting, is still away on xmas/newyear break >of some description. (I could /probably/ update just the two related pages >with copies freshly built from source, but I'd rather someone who's done it >regularly before and knows of any hidden gotcha's did it, or at least said if >it's really that simple before I went and borked anything.) Guess I'll just >be patient. That's why I usually wait. Every time I regen the pages, they end up looking strange. cgf
RE: BLODA FAQ entry.
On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >> On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -, Dave Korn wrote: The long-promised FAQ entry. winsup/doc/ChangeLog 2007-29-12 Dave Korn * faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda): New entry. (faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus): Link to faq.using.bloda. * faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang): Likewise link to faq.using.bloda. >>> >>> Looks good. Thanks for doing this. Please check in. >> >> >> Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the >> sources are changed, but I guess not. How do we get the online version of >> the FAQ to rebuild? > > It isn't automatic. I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in > creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this. > > cgf Ah. Who, to judge from lack of posting, is still away on xmas/newyear break of some description. (I could /probably/ update just the two related pages with copies freshly built from source, but I'd rather someone who's done it regularly before and knows of any hidden gotcha's did it, or at least said if it's really that simple before I went and borked anything.) Guess I'll just be patient. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today
Re: BLODA FAQ entry.
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >>> >>> The long-promised FAQ entry. >>> >>> winsup/doc/ChangeLog >>> >>> 2007-29-12 Dave Korn >>> >>> * faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda): New entry. >>> (faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus): Link to faq.using.bloda. >>> * faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang): Likewise link to faq.using.bloda. >> >> Looks good. Thanks for doing this. Please check in. > > > Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the >sources are changed, but I guess not. How do we get the online version of the >FAQ to rebuild? It isn't automatic. I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this. cgf
RE: BLODA FAQ entry.
On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >> >> The long-promised FAQ entry. >> >> winsup/doc/ChangeLog >> >> 2007-29-12 Dave Korn >> >> * faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda): New entry. >> (faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus): Link to faq.using.bloda. >> * faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang): Likewise link to faq.using.bloda. > > Looks good. Thanks for doing this. Please check in. Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the sources are changed, but I guess not. How do we get the online version of the FAQ to rebuild? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today
Re: BLODA FAQ entry.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -, Dave Korn wrote: > > The long-promised FAQ entry. > >winsup/doc/ChangeLog > >2007-29-12 Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda): New entry. > (faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus): Link to faq.using.bloda. > * faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang): Likewise link to faq.using.bloda. Looks good. Thanks for doing this. Please check in. cgf
BLODA FAQ entry.
The long-promised FAQ entry. winsup/doc/ChangeLog 2007-29-12 Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda): New entry. (faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus): Link to faq.using.bloda. * faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang): Likewise link to faq.using.bloda. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today bloda-faq.patch Description: Binary data
