Re: Restore Alt-Ctl-Backspace As Server Kill

2009-02-03 Thread Tim Daneliuk
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Mark J. Reed wrote:
>> I don't use it, but "startfluxbox" sounds like something that kicks of
>> fluxbox and then exits (vs xterm which stays around).   Could that be
>> the problem?
> 
> Likely true.

That is, indeed what it was .. at least in some form.  The 
fix turned out to be to configure fluxbox to kickoff an xterm
when *it* started.  I am still unclear why this is happening.
When a wm is kicked off, it has to run in background.  ISTM
that this should be enough to keep the X session up ... it's
not for some reason.  It seems that X specifically wants to
be attached to some kind of terminal/pseudoterminal
to stick around, notwithstanding the use of the -n option,
which seemed to make no difference.


> 
>> Also, if you're using ssh, why not use ssh forwarding instead of
>> sending the X traffic back over a separate, unencrypted connection?
>> And you don't need to logout explicitly; terminating the shell does
>> the same thing.
>>
>> ssh -Y u...@machine startfluxbox
>>
>> you might try
>>
>> ssh -nY u...@machine startfluxbox

Neither of these solved the problem (not surprising).  However,
introducing X forwarding *really* slowed startup down - from about
2-3 seconds to about 10-15 seconds.  It looks like this is all
related to setting up the encrypted channel, because once it's 
setup, system interaction is at subjectively normal speed.

>>
>> to prevent standard input from causing a problem...
> 
> D'oh.  That *is* a much better way to do this.  I shall look into
> this as I am able ...
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>>  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;xterm;logout"
>>>
>>> But both of these have the problem:
>>>
>>>  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;startfluxbox;logout"
>>>  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;exec startfluxbox;logout"
>>>
>>>
>>> Now the "Narrowing It Down" and "Really Strange" part.  This works
>>> just fine:
>>>
>>>  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;exec fluxbox;logout"
>>>
>>> It seems that something (I have not figured out just what yet)
>>> about the default fluxbox startup script (on FreeBSD 6-STABLE in this
>>> case) is interacting with the cygwin X server and killing it.
>>>
>>> Oiy, my head ...
> 
> 


-- 

Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: Restore Alt-Ctl-Backspace As Server Kill

2009-02-03 Thread Tim Daneliuk
Mark J. Reed wrote:
> I don't use it, but "startfluxbox" sounds like something that kicks of
> fluxbox and then exits (vs xterm which stays around).   Could that be
> the problem?

Likely true.

> 
> Also, if you're using ssh, why not use ssh forwarding instead of
> sending the X traffic back over a separate, unencrypted connection?
> And you don't need to logout explicitly; terminating the shell does
> the same thing.
> 
> ssh -Y u...@machine startfluxbox
> 
> you might try
> 
> ssh -nY u...@machine startfluxbox
> 
> to prevent standard input from causing a problem...

D'oh.  That *is* a much better way to do this.  I shall look into
this as I am able ...

Thanks!


> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;xterm;logout"
>>
>> But both of these have the problem:
>>
>>  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;startfluxbox;logout"
>>  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;exec startfluxbox;logout"
>>
>>
>> Now the "Narrowing It Down" and "Really Strange" part.  This works
>> just fine:
>>
>>  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;exec fluxbox;logout"
>>
>> It seems that something (I have not figured out just what yet)
>> about the default fluxbox startup script (on FreeBSD 6-STABLE in this
>> case) is interacting with the cygwin X server and killing it.
>>
>> Oiy, my head ...
> 


-- 

Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: Restore Alt-Ctl-Backspace As Server Kill

2009-02-03 Thread Tim Daneliuk
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Jon TURNEY wrote:
>> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>>> I really hate the assignment of Alt-F4 to kill a running X-server.
>>>> What magic must I perform to set it back to the more traditional
>>>> Alt-Ctl-Backspace combo?  Thanks.
>>> Let me ask this more properly.  I know how to use -nounixkill and
>>> -nowinkill to prevent keyboard initiated kills of the server.
>>>
>>> I use a VirtuaWin on a WinXP system to provide multiple desktops.
>>> One of them is activated via Ctrl-Alt-F4.  When I do this,
>>> it kills the running instance of Cygwin/X which apparently sees
>>> this key combo as a "kill server" command.  This is true whether
>>> or not -nounixkill and/or -nowinkill are in use.
>>>
>>> Ideas?
>> I'm afraid I'm not able to reproduce this.
>>
>> I see that the code doesn't consider the state of the control or shift
>> keys when looking for alt-f4 to close the server (so ctrl-alt-f4 also
>> closes it, which is possibly a bug), but this should also be disabled by
>> -nowinkill, which is what I observe.
>>
> 
> Very strange.  I start my Xserver instance like this:
> 
> run XWin :$SCREEN -nowinkill -unixkill -ac +kb -clipboard -silent-dup-error 
> -nod
> ecoration&
> 
> 
> Then I login like this (both of these via a cygwin shell script):
> 
> ssh $u...@$remote "export DISPLAY=$DISPLAY;$COMMAND;logout"
> 
> I can bounce between VirtuaWin sessions all like via Ctl-Alt- and
> all is well until I try Ctl-Alt-4.  If I exit VirtuaWin, that key combination
> does not kills the session, so this hints at this being a VirtuaWin problem
> not one in cygwin ...
> 
> 
> 
> 

OK ... I've narrowed the problem down and it is REALLY strange:

In updating to VirtuaWin 4.01, I notice that I either misreported the
problem and/or the bug has expanded with this new release. Now when I
switch to any other virtual desktop, it randomly kills the Xsession.

What is *really* interesting about this is that it seems to do this
only if I launch a window manager as the $COMMAND argument above.
If I just kick off an xterm, and then manually launch the wm from there,
the problem disappears.

IOW, this works:

  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;xterm;logout"

But both of these have the problem:

  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;startfluxbox;logout"
  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;exec startfluxbox;logout"


Now the "Narrowing It Down" and "Really Strange" part.  This works
just fine:

  ssh u...@machine "export DISPLAY=mymachine:9;exec fluxbox;logout"

It seems that something (I have not figured out just what yet)
about the default fluxbox startup script (on FreeBSD 6-STABLE in this
case) is interacting with the cygwin X server and killing it.

Oiy, my head ...

---
Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: Restore Alt-Ctl-Backspace As Server Kill

2009-02-03 Thread Tim Daneliuk
Gery Herbozo Jimenez wrote:
>  
>  
>>>>> I really hate the assignment of Alt-F4 to kill a running X-server.
>>>>> What magic must I perform to set it back to the more traditional
>>>>> Alt-Ctl-Backspace combo? Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Ideas?
> 
> Why don't you use just the 'exit' word on your xterm and then right click on 
> your 'X server' icon to close/exit this application? At least works for me.

This is not the central issue - the issue is that VirtuaWin may be
prematurely killing the session.

-- 

Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: Restore Alt-Ctl-Backspace As Server Kill

2009-02-03 Thread Tim Daneliuk
Jon TURNEY wrote:
> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>> I really hate the assignment of Alt-F4 to kill a running X-server.
>>> What magic must I perform to set it back to the more traditional
>>> Alt-Ctl-Backspace combo?  Thanks.
>>
>> Let me ask this more properly.  I know how to use -nounixkill and
>> -nowinkill to prevent keyboard initiated kills of the server.
>>
>> I use a VirtuaWin on a WinXP system to provide multiple desktops.
>> One of them is activated via Ctrl-Alt-F4.  When I do this,
>> it kills the running instance of Cygwin/X which apparently sees
>> this key combo as a "kill server" command.  This is true whether
>> or not -nounixkill and/or -nowinkill are in use.
>>
>> Ideas?
> 
> I'm afraid I'm not able to reproduce this.
> 
> I see that the code doesn't consider the state of the control or shift
> keys when looking for alt-f4 to close the server (so ctrl-alt-f4 also
> closes it, which is possibly a bug), but this should also be disabled by
> -nowinkill, which is what I observe.
> 

Very strange.  I start my Xserver instance like this:

run XWin :$SCREEN -nowinkill -unixkill -ac +kb -clipboard -silent-dup-error -nod
ecoration&


Then I login like this (both of these via a cygwin shell script):

ssh $u...@$remote "export DISPLAY=$DISPLAY;$COMMAND;logout"

I can bounce between VirtuaWin sessions all like via Ctl-Alt- and
all is well until I try Ctl-Alt-4.  If I exit VirtuaWin, that key combination
does not kills the session, so this hints at this being a VirtuaWin problem
not one in cygwin ...




-- 

Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: Restore Alt-Ctl-Backspace As Server Kill

2009-01-31 Thread Tim Daneliuk
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I really hate the assignment of Alt-F4 to kill a running X-server.
> What magic must I perform to set it back to the more traditional
> Alt-Ctl-Backspace combo?  Thanks.

Let me ask this more properly.  I know how to use -nounixkill and
-nowinkill to prevent keyboard initiated kills of the server.

I use a VirtuaWin on a WinXP system to provide multiple desktops.
One of them is activated via Ctrl-Alt-F4.  When I do this,
it kills the running instance of Cygwin/X which apparently sees
this key combo as a "kill server" command.  This is true whether
or not -nounixkill and/or -nowinkill are in use.

Ideas?

-- 
--------
Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Restore Alt-Ctl-Backspace As Server Kill

2009-01-31 Thread Tim Daneliuk
I really hate the assignment of Alt-F4 to kill a running X-server.
What magic must I perform to set it back to the more traditional
Alt-Ctl-Backspace combo?  Thanks.
-- 

Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: xferee, cygwin, when's your birthday?

2007-03-25 Thread Tim Daneliuk

Kesrin Hanprasert wrote:

Kesrin Hanprasert([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
is a member of BirthdayTime.com and wants to know your birthday.

Kesrin Hanprasert says:
Hi !!
I'm inviting you to enter your birthday into my calendar at BirthdayTime.
You will help me remember it!Click  here to 
enter your birthday into my list:



I dunno about xfree, but I suppose cygwin might consider it's birthday
to be Jan. 1, 1970 ...


--
--------
Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: New Bash Release Broken?

2006-09-28 Thread Tim Daneliuk

Larry Hall (Cygwin X) wrote:




Ideas anyone?  Is there a change to bash syntax and I just didn't get
the memo?



That's one way to put it.

<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2006-09/msg6.html>




That was it all right ... guess I better subscribe to -announce ...
and thanks for the prompt reply ...

--
--------
Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



New Bash Release Broken?

2006-09-28 Thread Tim Daneliuk

It is my habit to update the entire cygwin installation at least once a week.
Earlier today, I updated and got the new version of bash, 3.1.17(8).
It appears broken.  The .profile I have happily used for years gives it
fits (the same .profile works fine if I invoke ksh instead of bash) and
other shell scripts that used to work, no longer do.  The shell typically
produces errors like:

: invalid option name
': not a valid identifier
: command not found
: command not found
: command not found
: command not found
: command not found
-bash: /cygdrive/c/usr/home/tundra/.profile: line 15: syntax error near 
unexpect'd token `{
'bash: /cygdrive/c/usr/home/tundra/.profile: line 15: `{

In this case, the "script" was .profile and the first 15 lines look
like this:

set -o ignoreeof
export ignoreeof
export EDITOR=emacs
export MACHINE=`uname -n`
export PAGER=less
export TZ=CST6CDT


TERM=vt100


# Function definitions

function PyD
{
cd $HOME/Dev/python/$1
}


Ideas anyone?  Is there a change to bash syntax and I just didn't get
the memo?



--
--------
Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: WinXP Taskbar Overlaps Maximized xterm

2006-09-27 Thread Tim Daneliuk

Thomas Dickey wrote:

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Larry Hall (Cygwin X) wrote:

There's a similar issue with KDE and xterm on RHEL 3.  So it could 
also be


"is" doesn't appear to be the right tense, since RHEL 3 was released a few
years ago and is not the current version.

iirc, cygwin's still distributing xterm patch #202, which is more recent 
than RHEL 3 (mid-2005).  I made improvements to the layout in the latter
part of 2005, so it would for example maximize as expected.  On the 
other hand, it still doesn't re-maximize if the font size is changed 
while maximized.


Well, the problem I am seeing is when I initially maximize xterm with a
large font already selected. (I would not expect it necessarily to work
properly if I changed fonts once already maximized.)




an upstream problem in xterm, if it still exits in the current version.
You might want to check that out.  I don't see the problem with konsole.


given that konsole was developed as part of KDE, that's understandable...




--
--------
Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: WinXP Taskbar Overlaps Maximized xterm

2006-09-27 Thread Tim Daneliuk

Tim Daneliuk wrote:

Larry Hall (Cygwin X) wrote:

Tim Daneliuk wrote:

I have DAGS and looked at the cygwin FAQ but cannot seem to find this
problem addressed, so ...

When I maximize an xterm on my WinXP workstation, it gets sized so that
the Windows taskbar slighty overlaps the bottom of the xterm window.
This makes it very difficult to read the last line on the xterm display.
Is there a fix/workaround for this?



How xterm maximizes is controlled by the window manager.  If you're
running in -multiwindow mode, you may want to consider using another
window manager that can take into account the task bar (in that


But doesn't -multiwindow mode effectively use the native WinXP window
management system (that should know about its own task bar size)?




A bit more poking around and I discovered that this behavior is font-size
sensitive.  If I start xterm with either an -fn 10x20 argument or select
the "Huge" font option once xterm has started, I get this problem of
the xterm window being slightly overwritten by the taskbar when xterm
is maximized.  With smaller fonts, this problem disappears.  I dunno
if that helps figuring out what is going on or not ...


--
--------
Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/




--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: WinXP Taskbar Overlaps Maximized xterm

2006-09-27 Thread Tim Daneliuk

Larry Hall (Cygwin X) wrote:

Tim Daneliuk wrote:

I have DAGS and looked at the cygwin FAQ but cannot seem to find this
problem addressed, so ...

When I maximize an xterm on my WinXP workstation, it gets sized so that
the Windows taskbar slighty overlaps the bottom of the xterm window.
This makes it very difficult to read the last line on the xterm display.
Is there a fix/workaround for this?



How xterm maximizes is controlled by the window manager.  If you're
running in -multiwindow mode, you may want to consider using another
window manager that can take into account the task bar (in that


But doesn't -multiwindow mode effectively use the native WinXP window
management system (that should know about its own task bar size)?




environment).  An alternative would be to hide your task bar when
you're not using it (keeping it always on top probably).





--
--------
Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/




--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



WinXP Taskbar Overlaps Maximized xterm

2006-09-27 Thread Tim Daneliuk

I have DAGS and looked at the cygwin FAQ but cannot seem to find this
problem addressed, so ...

When I maximize an xterm on my WinXP workstation, it gets sized so that
the Windows taskbar slighty overlaps the bottom of the xterm window.
This makes it very difficult to read the last line on the xterm display.
Is there a fix/workaround for this?

Tired-Of-Manually-Maximizing-My-xterm-Window-ly Yours,

Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/




--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/