Re: 6.8.99.901-1 as current? (was Re: Testing snapshots - III)

2006-03-25 Thread Jack Tanner 

Corinna Vinschen wrote:

Maybe we should make 6.8.99.901-1 the current version now?  Is it
stable enough for that?


At one point I ran the test version for a couple of weeks, and 
experienced no instability. I say go for it.


If anyone's capable of doing a rebuild, there've been a few messages 
over the last couple of months asking for new keyboard layouts to be added.



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/

6.8.99.901-1 as current? (was Re: Testing snapshots - III)

2006-03-24 Thread Corinna Vinschen 
On Mar 23 13:33, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
 For the sake of completeness.
 
 With the snapshots 20060322 the problems described in
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00624.html and in
 http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-03/msg00435.html seem to be solved!
 
 I note, only, that after launching 'startxwin.bat', if one tries:
 
mouse-3 on the X icon in the systray | Exit
 
 there is a stack dump and the XWin.exe.stackdup is created on the desktop.

That's a bug in XWin.  It just has not been present before due to a bug
in newlib which has been fixed just a couple of days before.

FWIW, the bug is apparently fixed in xorg-x11 version 6.8.99.901-1,
which is available as test version using setup.

Maybe we should make 6.8.99.901-1 the current version now?  Is it
stable enough for that?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader  cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/