Aha.  I see now that "man XWin" and "man Xserver" are a preferable 
alternative to "Xwin -help" anyway.

>From: "Harold Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: XWin -help behavior
>Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:44:36 -0400
>
>Sam,
>
>Thanks, I forgot that point.
>
>Harold
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sam Edge
> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:40 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: XWin -help behavior
> >
> >
> > Thomas Chadwick wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > in gmane.os.cygwin.xfree on Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:30:40 -0400:
> >
> > > I just noticed today that if I run "XWin -help", I don't see
> > anything at the
> > > command-line.  I have to go look in /tmp/XWin.log to see the results.
> > > Would it make send to print this information to STERR instead
> > of the log
> > > file?
> >
> > XWin.exe is linked as a Windows GUI application to stop it requiring
> > the creation of a console window so it doesn't have redirectable
> > standard I/O.
> >
> > --
> > Sam Edge


_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

Reply via email to