Re: xinit requires util-linux which requires perl

2009-02-04 Thread Fredrik Staxeng
Mark Geisert m...@maxrnd.com writes:

In the interests of PTC I could try to figure out a better package to contain
chkdupexe, or mcookie for that matter.  Or recode chkdupexe as a shell script. 
Is anything else but startx using mcookie? If not, why not move it there.


-- 
Fredrik Stax\ang | rot13: s...@hcqngr.hh.fr
This is all you need to know about vi: ESC : q ! RET


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: xinit requires util-linux which requires perl

2009-02-04 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
 Is anything else but startx using mcookie? If not, why not move it there.

Because mcookie comes from util-linux, not xinit, and that's where it's
going to stay.


Yaakov
Cygwin/X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkmKhmEACgkQpiWmPGlmQSPmjACfS3jxoJvZO2SzKUWiKIUj9yz7
RzsAn1lHDycF+IQuhQhRuniDV4qhkhK9
=1qfm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: xinit requires util-linux which requires perl

2009-02-03 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Mark Geisert wrote:
 Is there some way the packages could be reworked so that an X-related install 
 or
 update doesn't try to pull in perl?  It gets tiresome having to uncheck
 util-linux and perl every time I update my set of machines with setup.exe.

I'm sorry you have something against perl, but it is a standard, if not
an essential, part of *NIX systems.  The dependencies are correct;
startx calls mcookie, which is provided by util-linux.


Yaakov
Cygwin/X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAkmJFJYACgkQpiWmPGlmQSOKXgCdGQMZaO6W/cT+UTaGKDtHuVch
NOsAoNWfE1O4ROzJTpJw39y5pMfCuMD/
=Xott
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



Re: xinit requires util-linux which requires perl

2009-02-03 Thread Mark Geisert
Yaakov writes:
  Is there some way the packages could be reworked so that an X-related
  install or update doesn't try to pull in perl?  It gets tiresome having
  to uncheck util-linux and perl every time I update my set of machines
  with setup.exe.
 
 I'm sorry you have something against perl, but it is a standard, if not
 an essential, part of *NIX systems.  The dependencies are correct;
 startx calls mcookie, which is provided by util-linux.

Thanks for the reply.  Yeah, I know I have a minority viewpoint on perl.  But
like a lot of folks I tend to install only the packages I need for my own
development and for me that happens to not include perl.

I figured out that util-linux contains the chkdupexe perl script, so that's
likely why the util-linux package requires perl.  It just seems kinda curious
(in a vaguely broken way) that X itself doesn't require perl but one can't
install or update Cygwin X without pulling in perl.  Oh well.

In the interests of PTC I could try to figure out a better package to contain
chkdupexe, or mcookie for that matter.  Or recode chkdupexe as a shell script. 
Ow, my head hurts just thinking about that.  Much easier to uncheck the
setup.exe box if I want to keep from installing perl.
Thanks again  Cheers,

..mark


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/



xinit requires util-linux which requires perl

2009-01-30 Thread Mark Geisert
...and I'm trying to compute in a perl-free environment.  Yes, really.

Is there some way the packages could be reworked so that an X-related install or
update doesn't try to pull in perl?  It gets tiresome having to uncheck
util-linux and perl every time I update my set of machines with setup.exe.

Thanks for any concurrence on this,

..mark


--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/