Re: [WAR] ... and AP - now IP

2016-09-02 Thread Razer 
On 09/02/2016 05:34 PM, juan spewed:


> Why do you troll this mailing list rayzer? =)


I'm not trolling. You asked a question. You got my answer.


Rr

Further Spew redacted

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-02 Thread Razer 


On 09/02/2016 08:33 AM, Tom wrote:

> Obviously you've never operated an email server.

HEY YOU WIN THE FUCKING PRIZE!

I've been victimized by an op though. LOTS of people have.

Email relay operators are right in there with the "Official Observers"
on amateur radio when it comes to CENSORSHIP. Ofc THEY don't see it that
way.

Anything else bright you might care to say?

Rr


> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 08:08:39AM -0700, Razer wrote:
>> I just took a look at the Wikipedia entry for 'greylisting'. It sounds
>> awful if you're victimized by it. My personal mail from openmailbox to a
>> friend was rejected by yahoo b/c of shit like that and I didn't get a
>> notifcation for three fucking days.
> 
> Obviously you've never operated an email server. 99% of all emails
> arriving on any bigger public mail server is spam. Of course you do
> everything to minimize spam.
> 
> Since most spam comes from bot nets which do not implement queueing as
> required by the RFCs, they are successfully blocked from delivering
> their spam with greylisting.
> 
> Of course this method blocks mails coming from mailservers whose
> operators are stupid morons and do not properly configure queueing.
> 
> So, if you're blocked because someone uses greylisting, don't blame
> them, but your mail server admin. Or stop using it and look for some
> service which respects the standards. Or do it yourself.
> 
> However - a cypherpunks member whining about email problems? Really?
> 
> 
> 
> - Tom
>

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-02 Thread Dan White 

On 09/02/16 08:08 -0700, Razer wrote:

On 09/02/2016 04:41 AM, Greg Newby wrote:

One difference from the old domain is that greylisting is turned on.  I haven't 
heard of that creating problems, but it is a difference.
  - Greg


I just took a look at the Wikipedia entry for 'greylisting'. It sounds
awful if you're victimized by it. My personal mail from openmailbox to a
friend was rejected by yahoo b/c of shit like that and I didn't get a
notifcation for three fucking days.

Have you ever noted how many good domains are black-holed b/c some
asshole fascist relay operator in the midwest says so. How you never get
a response to a request to remove you from thise lists., How a 'spammer'
could intentionally create a situation that blackholes or graylists a
domain?


How Postfix handles grey listing, and how commercial providers throttle
emails is quite different. Postfix typically handles this responsibly by
returning a 4XX error to allow the sender to retry later. Commercial
providers will often silently accept email leaving the sender unaware.

Also, having a server's IP appear within on a blacklist is another problem
altogether, and is not affected by Postfix's grey listing configuration
(except for the case where it may prevent a server from showing up on a
blacklist).

Postfix can be configured to greylist based on certain criteria that could
be useful during an attack. Such an attack might be a sender guessing email
addresses, which is not an issue for 'cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org' which
is publicly known, but may provide protection for other domains/addresses
on the server.

--
Dan White

Re: Fwd: Feminist Principles of the Internet

2016-09-02 Thread Cecilia Tanaka 
On Sep 1, 2016 7:00 PM, "HateSpeech"  wrote:
>
> > Cecilia Tanaka:
> > www.feministinternet.net
>
> Fuck your feminist (otherist) principals.

Sorry, dear.  I have no feminist of mine to fuck.  All feminists are free.
I will never have "my feminist".  I am my own feminist.  :)

Women and men are human beings.  Equally able of construct a new world,
equally able of saving lives.  Both are wonderful.  People are awesome,
astonishing, my dear!  :D

For those who want to know more about their work, the link is this:

http://feministinternet.org

Love, much love and kisses for all of you!!!  <3

Ceci
--
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
say it."

Re: [tor-talk] http://jacobappelbaum.net/

2016-09-02 Thread Mirimir 
On 09/02/2016 02:32 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Mirimir  wrote:
>> https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-t3D4VVs7dbM/Uh7ydNAWrGI/O3w/XbiPTv5nG78/s1600/OB-YR457_putina_EV_20130827122520.jpg
> 
> That's hawt.
> Too bad the politik seize banned it and scared the artist
> off to asylum in France.

Yeah, I was going to make a point of that.

You can find much worse about Obama, for example, on sites hosted in the
US. Just sayin' ;)

Re: [tor-talk] http://jacobappelbaum.net/

2016-09-02 Thread Mirimir 
On 09/02/2016 01:42 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Cecilia Tanaka
>  wrote:
>> Putin riding a bear?
> 
> Yah, Putin make all US president during Putin time look like girlie men...
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8z4aeCppmu-xy6ZL3vSuyQ

OK, "girlie men". I can't resist ;)

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-t3D4VVs7dbM/Uh7ydNAWrGI/O3w/XbiPTv5nG78/s1600/OB-YR457_putina_EV_20130827122520.jpg

> Yah, excuse me now, I go talk Alex about handing out more
> BIG box of t-shirts to Russian outdoor faire goers, and think
> about it later ;)
>

Re: New list confirmation (Re: cpunks list relocation imminent (was: Re: moving on))

2016-09-02 Thread Zenaan Harkness 
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:36:43PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> > will work to sync up the archives so that the split brain we've been
> 
> Don't taint the provenance... just as your archive contains only yours,
> this file should only contain messages from newby's server:
> https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks.mbox/cypherpunks.mbox.gz
> 
> You can host your own archives wherever, and people will pick them up
> and re-host them wherever.
> 
> You can blend the html index if you want, because it's just a human
> interface, not a critical source archive.
> 
> People...
> Don't use procmail, it sucks. Maildrop is better.
> Don't use mbox, it sucks. Maildir is better.

It's all good. Thanks for the maildrop hint. I'll use Maildir when I'm
up to speed with notmuch, but not before - Maildirs are too slow
otherwise for me.

Finally - can the new cpunks admin please add a standard
subscribe/unsubscribe footer? I referred a friend and they got a
rejection on subscription request, so I'm thinking they might have tried
using the old domain. Sent them the new mailman url.

Re: Fwd: [Cryptography] "Flip Feng Shui: Hammering a Needle in the Software Stack"

2016-09-02 Thread Georgi Guninski 
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:21:18PM -0700, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
> Georgi Guninski  wrote:
> > Does Rowhammer work in clouds? According to the popular story it
> > affected only laptops.
> 
> The answer is "it depends."
>
Thanks. Just browsed through the paper, it mentions m$ azure.

Is/has been some large cloud affected? Usually academics are afraid to name big
vendors AFAICT.

This is duplicate, but don't remember the answer:
Can you induce RAM errors with some device if you are near the box?

say directed magnetic field, human made cosmic rays substitute (don't
know if this make sense).