Re: [Cryptography] Happy birthday, NSA!

[grarpamp]

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:03 PM, J.M. Porup  wrote:
> When will we celebrate their funeral, I wonder?

When you end the secrets, secrecy, usurious
motivations and permissions you granted to governors,
politics and business.

Re: Global warming/climate change

[grarpamp]

Before the Flood - Full Movie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90CkXVF-Q8M

Re: Scientific Progress

[juan]

On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 22:20:40 -0400
John  wrote:

> Hey - that's the second time you said you were "done" with me. After
> making a raft of bogus allegations.  Interesting rhetorical
> technique ;)

Being done with you means not taking you seriously and not 
caring about what I write to you since you are a dishonest
asshole anyway. 

For instance, now I'm going to bother replying to your
first mental vomit, just because I feel like it.

Let's assume for 'argumen's sake' that I am 'scientific'
parasite working for your beloved state and that I ALSO
criticize the 'scientific', state-funded, clown establishment
of which I am a cog.

Now, that certainly would make me an hypocrite and YET my
criticisim would still be valid. Get it? And in the case of your
first mental vomit (today) , even if you succesfully accused me
of being an hypocrite (you didn't) my criticism would stand.


Now, go pray to Holy Science to save you from the coming
World Reheating Apocalypse.  

Re: NYPD Chief "We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that."

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 09:10:59PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 04:53 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Such sensationalist languaging from a police chief is not believable,
> > so without citations this is someone beating up their assumptions in
> > anticipation, it appears.
> 
> Is this you replying to yourself? Or someone spoofing you?

Replying to myself.

Re: Scientific Progress

[Mirimir]

On 11/03/2016 08:20 PM, John wrote:
> Hey - that's the second time you said you were "done" with me. After making a 
> raft of bogus allegations.  Interesting rhetorical technique ;)
> 
> Cosmic parody? "Sonny" (lol)?  Something here is a cosmic parody, but it 
> isn't some words and beliefs you've put in my mouth. 

Hey, friends don't let friends talk to Juan ;)

> Cheers
> 
> John
> 
> On November 3, 2016 6:27:59 PM EDT, juan  wrote:
>>
>>
>>  There isn't any hypocrysy on my part. I unlike you do not
>>  advocate STATISM and CENSORSHIP in the 'cypherpunks' mailing
>>  list. 
>>
>>  "get rid of your electricity, stay away from hospitals, and go
>>  live in the woods"
>>
>>  That's exactly what the most corrupt and stupid statist shitbag
>>  would say. Do you sonny realize that the belief that all
>>  'progress' comes from state funded 'science' is its own cosmic
>>  parody? 
>>
>>  Corrupt dumbfuck, I'm not wasting any more time with you =) I
>>  suggest you join the 'crpytography' circle-jerk and get lost.
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>> Hey, the bots broken again ?  Seems to be on repeat.
>>>
>>> Your blatant hypocrisy was my point, obviously.
>>>
>>> Just because Juan says it (or denies it) - does not make it so.  
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
 On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:39 PM, juan  wrote:




Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
STATIST piece of shit.

You don't have anything really useful to add to the
conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling. 



> You can dish it the fuck out Juan, but you can't take it :)
>
> Wanna call me a faggot retard now?  How old are you anyway?  
>
> And yes, you do truly embody the "punk" ethos, which you love to
> bring up. Not punk as in punk rock, but punk as in a little
>> whipped
> bitch.
>
> Have fun with your conspiratard theories and science bashing. The
> echo chamber must be comforting.
>
>
> John
>
>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:12 PM, juan  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
>>   piece of shit.
>>
>>   You don't have anything really useful to add to the
>>   conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
>>   wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:06:10 -0400
>> John Newman  threw up:
>>
>>
 On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:11:03PM -0300, juan wrote:
   Let me point out though that your line of thinking that
   goes from "I like something" to "so it must be funded by the
   mafia" is not only nonsense, it's morally unaccpetable.
>>>
>>> If you find scientific advances that were made on the backs of
>>> university research so morally reprehensible, why don't you try
>>> living by your words, and unplug your fucking computer? 
>>>
>>> For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from
>>> hospitals, and go live in the woods you can hunt some
>>> tigers :P
>>>
>>> John

> 

Re: NYPD Chief "We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that."

[Mirimir]

On 11/03/2016 04:53 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Such sensationalist languaging from a police chief is not believable,
> so without citations this is someone beating up their assumptions in
> anticipation, it appears.

Is this you replying to yourself? Or someone spoofing you?

> On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 09:40:21AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> This is as off the charts as it gets.
>> Evidently time is very nearly up for the Clinton Crime Syndicate.
>>
>>
>>
>> BREAKING BOMBSHELL: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money
>> Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play,
>> Perjury
>> November 2, 2016
>> http://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/
>> A brief extract:
>> "
>> NYPD detectives and a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under
>> Commissioner, said openly that if the FBI and Justice Department fail to
>> garner timely indictments against Clinton and co- conspirators, NYPD
>> will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of FBI Director
>> James Comey and many FBI field offices.
>>
>> “What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my
>> stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any
>> Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We
>> will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press
>> conference if it comes to that.”
>>
>> The NYPD Chief said once Comey saw the alarming contents of the emails
>> he was forced to reopen a criminal probe against Clinton.
>>
>> “People are going to prison,” he said.
>> "
> 

Re: Scientific Progress

[John]

I should've said cave lions, not tigers - was a reference to earlier email 
where Juan made "quick work" (heh) of Tom for pointing out a few scientific 
links. 

John

On November 3, 2016 9:58:28 PM EDT, Razer  wrote:
>
>
>On 11/03/2016 01:06 PM, John Newman wrote:
>> For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from
>hospitals,
>> and go live in the woods you can hunt some tigers :P
>
>I always love that extreme overarching generalization by technocrats
>about what one should do in the way of rejecting technology before one
>can discuss it. I have parts of the above down... ... or minimized to
>as
>near a third world level as is possible in a consumer crapitalist
>society. Except the tiger part. I have raccoons and the occasional rat
>possum or skunk at my camp even if I never bring food there. At least
>these critters don't think I'M food.
>
>Rr

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: Scientific Progress

[John]

Hey - that's the second time you said you were "done" with me. After making a 
raft of bogus allegations.  Interesting rhetorical technique ;)

Cosmic parody? "Sonny" (lol)?  Something here is a cosmic parody, but it isn't 
some words and beliefs you've put in my mouth. 

Cheers

John

On November 3, 2016 6:27:59 PM EDT, juan  wrote:
>
>
>   There isn't any hypocrysy on my part. I unlike you do not
>   advocate STATISM and CENSORSHIP in the 'cypherpunks' mailing
>   list. 
>
>   "get rid of your electricity, stay away from hospitals, and go
>   live in the woods"
>
>   That's exactly what the most corrupt and stupid statist shitbag
>   would say. Do you sonny realize that the belief that all
>   'progress' comes from state funded 'science' is its own cosmic
>   parody? 
>
>   Corrupt dumbfuck, I'm not wasting any more time with you =) I
>   suggest you join the 'crpytography' circle-jerk and get lost.
>
>
>
>   
>
>
>   
>
>
>> Hey, the bots broken again ?  Seems to be on repeat.
>> 
>> Your blatant hypocrisy was my point, obviously.
>> 
>> Just because Juan says it (or denies it) - does not make it so.  
>> 
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> > On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:39 PM, juan  wrote:
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
>> >STATIST piece of shit.
>> > 
>> >You don't have anything really useful to add to the
>> >conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
>> >wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> >> You can dish it the fuck out Juan, but you can't take it :)
>> >> 
>> >> Wanna call me a faggot retard now?  How old are you anyway?  
>> >> 
>> >> And yes, you do truly embody the "punk" ethos, which you love to
>> >> bring up. Not punk as in punk rock, but punk as in a little
>whipped
>> >> bitch.
>> >> 
>> >> Have fun with your conspiratard theories and science bashing. The
>> >> echo chamber must be comforting.
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> John
>> >> 
>> >>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:12 PM, juan  wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>   Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
>> >>>   piece of shit.
>> >>> 
>> >>>   You don't have anything really useful to add to the
>> >>>   conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
>> >>>   wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling.
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:06:10 -0400
>> >>> John Newman  threw up:
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:11:03PM -0300, juan wrote:
>> >   Let me point out though that your line of thinking that
>> >   goes from "I like something" to "so it must be funded by the
>> >   mafia" is not only nonsense, it's morally unaccpetable.
>>  
>>  If you find scientific advances that were made on the backs of
>>  university research so morally reprehensible, why don't you try
>>  living by your words, and unplug your fucking computer? 
>>  
>>  For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from
>>  hospitals, and go live in the woods you can hunt some
>>  tigers :P
>>  
>>  John
>> > 

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

"positive thinking", a great tool for quelling dissent

[Zenaan Harkness]

RSA ANIMATE: Smile or Die
Acclaimed journalist, author and political activist Barbara Ehrenreich
explores the darker side of positive thinking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5um8QWWRvo

Cute simple animation over a talk, ~10.5 minutes
~23MiB

Enjoy :)

Re: NYPD Chief "We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that."

[Zenaan Harkness]

Such sensationalist languaging from a police chief is not believable,
so without citations this is someone beating up their assumptions in
anticipation, it appears.



On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 09:40:21AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> This is as off the charts as it gets.
> Evidently time is very nearly up for the Clinton Crime Syndicate.
> 
> 
> 
> BREAKING BOMBSHELL: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money
> Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play,
> Perjury
> November 2, 2016
> http://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/
> A brief extract:
> "
> NYPD detectives and a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under
> Commissioner, said openly that if the FBI and Justice Department fail to
> garner timely indictments against Clinton and co- conspirators, NYPD
> will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of FBI Director
> James Comey and many FBI field offices.
> 
> “What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my
> stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any
> Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We
> will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press
> conference if it comes to that.”
> 
> The NYPD Chief said once Comey saw the alarming contents of the emails
> he was forced to reopen a criminal probe against Clinton.
> 
> “People are going to prison,” he said.
> "

NYPD Chief "We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that."

[Zenaan Harkness]

This is as off the charts as it gets.
Evidently time is very nearly up for the Clinton Crime Syndicate.



BREAKING BOMBSHELL: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money
Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play,
Perjury
November 2, 2016
http://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/
A brief extract:
"
NYPD detectives and a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under
Commissioner, said openly that if the FBI and Justice Department fail to
garner timely indictments against Clinton and co- conspirators, NYPD
will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of FBI Director
James Comey and many FBI field offices.

“What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my
stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any
Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We
will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press
conference if it comes to that.”

The NYPD Chief said once Comey saw the alarming contents of the emails
he was forced to reopen a criminal probe against Clinton.

“People are going to prison,” he said.
"

Re: Scientific Progress

[juan]

There isn't any hypocrysy on my part. I unlike you do not
advocate STATISM and CENSORSHIP in the 'cypherpunks' mailing
list. 

"get rid of your electricity, stay away from hospitals, and go
live in the woods"

That's exactly what the most corrupt and stupid statist shitbag
would say. Do you sonny realize that the belief that all
'progress' comes from state funded 'science' is its own cosmic
parody? 

Corrupt dumbfuck, I'm not wasting any more time with you =) I
suggest you join the 'crpytography' circle-jerk and get lost.









> Hey, the bots broken again ?  Seems to be on repeat.
> 
> Your blatant hypocrisy was my point, obviously.
> 
> Just because Juan says it (or denies it) - does not make it so.  
> 
> 
> John
> 
> > On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:39 PM, juan  wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
> >STATIST piece of shit.
> > 
> >You don't have anything really useful to add to the
> >conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
> >wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> You can dish it the fuck out Juan, but you can't take it :)
> >> 
> >> Wanna call me a faggot retard now?  How old are you anyway?  
> >> 
> >> And yes, you do truly embody the "punk" ethos, which you love to
> >> bring up. Not punk as in punk rock, but punk as in a little whipped
> >> bitch.
> >> 
> >> Have fun with your conspiratard theories and science bashing. The
> >> echo chamber must be comforting.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> John
> >> 
> >>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:12 PM, juan  wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>   Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
> >>>   piece of shit.
> >>> 
> >>>   You don't have anything really useful to add to the
> >>>   conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
> >>>   wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:06:10 -0400
> >>> John Newman  threw up:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:11:03PM -0300, juan wrote:
> >   Let me point out though that your line of thinking that
> >   goes from "I like something" to "so it must be funded by the
> >   mafia" is not only nonsense, it's morally unaccpetable.
>  
>  If you find scientific advances that were made on the backs of
>  university research so morally reprehensible, why don't you try
>  living by your words, and unplug your fucking computer? 
>  
>  For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from
>  hospitals, and go live in the woods you can hunt some
>  tigers :P
>  
>  John
> > 

Re: Scientific Progress

[John Newman]

Hey, the bots broken again ?  Seems to be on repeat.

Your blatant hypocrisy was my point, obviously.

Just because Juan says it (or denies it) - does not make it so.  


John

> On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:39 PM, juan  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
>STATIST piece of shit.
> 
>You don't have anything really useful to add to the
>conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
>wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling. 
> 
> 
> 
>> You can dish it the fuck out Juan, but you can't take it :)
>> 
>> Wanna call me a faggot retard now?  How old are you anyway?  
>> 
>> And yes, you do truly embody the "punk" ethos, which you love to
>> bring up. Not punk as in punk rock, but punk as in a little whipped
>> bitch.
>> 
>> Have fun with your conspiratard theories and science bashing. The
>> echo chamber must be comforting.
>> 
>> 
>> John
>> 
>>> On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:12 PM, juan  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
>>>   piece of shit.
>>> 
>>>   You don't have anything really useful to add to the
>>>   conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
>>>   wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:06:10 -0400
>>> John Newman  threw up:
>>> 
>>> 
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:11:03PM -0300, juan wrote:
>   Let me point out though that your line of thinking that
>   goes from "I like something" to "so it must be funded by the
>   mafia" is not only nonsense, it's morally unaccpetable.
 
 If you find scientific advances that were made on the backs of
 university research so morally reprehensible, why don't you try
 living by your words, and unplug your fucking computer? 
 
 For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from
 hospitals, and go live in the woods you can hunt some tigers :P
 
 John
> 

Re: Scientific Progress

[juan]

Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
STATIST piece of shit.

You don't have anything really useful to add to the
conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling. 



> You can dish it the fuck out Juan, but you can't take it :)
> 
> Wanna call me a faggot retard now?  How old are you anyway?  
> 
> And yes, you do truly embody the "punk" ethos, which you love to
> bring up. Not punk as in punk rock, but punk as in a little whipped
> bitch.
> 
> Have fun with your conspiratard theories and science bashing. The
> echo chamber must be comforting.
> 
> 
> John
> 
> > On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:12 PM, juan  wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
> >piece of shit.
> > 
> >You don't have anything really useful to add to the
> >conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
> >wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:06:10 -0400
> > John Newman  threw up:
> > 
> > 
> >>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:11:03PM -0300, juan wrote:
> >>>Let me point out though that your line of thinking that
> >>>goes from "I like something" to "so it must be funded by the
> >>>mafia" is not only nonsense, it's morally unaccpetable.
> >> 
> >> If you find scientific advances that were made on the backs of
> >> university research so morally reprehensible, why don't you try
> >> living by your words, and unplug your fucking computer? 
> >> 
> >> For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from
> >> hospitals, and go live in the woods you can hunt some tigers :P
> >> 
> >> John
> > 
> 

Re: Scientific Progress

[John Newman]

You can dish it the fuck out Juan, but you can't take it :)

Wanna call me a faggot retard now?  How old are you anyway?  

And yes, you do truly embody the "punk" ethos, which you love to bring up. Not 
punk as in punk rock, but punk as in a little whipped bitch.

Have fun with your conspiratard theories and science bashing. The echo chamber 
must be comforting.


John

> On Nov 3, 2016, at 5:12 PM, juan  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
>piece of shit.
> 
>You don't have anything really useful to add to the
>conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
>wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:06:10 -0400
> John Newman  threw up:
> 
> 
>>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:11:03PM -0300, juan wrote:
>>>Let me point out though that your line of thinking that
>>>goes from "I like something" to "so it must be funded by the
>>>mafia" is not only nonsense, it's morally unaccpetable.
>> 
>> If you find scientific advances that were made on the backs of
>> university research so morally reprehensible, why don't you try living
>> by your words, and unplug your fucking computer? 
>> 
>> For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from
>> hospitals, and go live in the woods you can hunt some tigers :P
>> 
>> John
> 

Re: Scientific Progress

[juan]

Thanks John. You keep making the point that you are a stupid
piece of shit.

You don't have anything really useful to add to the
conversation. Also, given your support for statism one would
wonder what the fuck you do in this list, apart from trolling.

 

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:06:10 -0400
John Newman  threw up:


> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:11:03PM -0300, juan wrote:
> > Let me point out though that your line of thinking that
> > goes from "I like something" to "so it must be funded by the
> > mafia" is not only nonsense, it's morally unaccpetable.
> 
> If you find scientific advances that were made on the backs of
> university research so morally reprehensible, why don't you try living
> by your words, and unplug your fucking computer? 
> 
> For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from
> hospitals, and go live in the woods you can hunt some tigers :P
> 
> John

Re: Scientific Progress

[John Newman]

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 05:11:03PM -0300, juan wrote:
>   Let me point out though that your line of thinking that
>   goes from "I like something" to "so it must be funded by the
>   mafia" is not only nonsense, it's morally unaccpetable.

If you find scientific advances that were made on the backs of
university research so morally reprehensible, why don't you try living
by your words, and unplug your fucking computer? 

For that matter, get rid of your electricity, stay away from hospitals,
and go live in the woods you can hunt some tigers :P

John


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: General Michael Flynn; Loretta Lynch; James Comey; Donna Brazile; the deep state imploding?

[rooty]

email blast zeenAn killed the list - thx alot





 Original Message 
On Nov 2, 2016, 4:19 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Wow. Generals. Revolving doors. Scalps.
The Deep State imploding yet?

Let's assume the USA "constitution" does not forbid barter :)



General Michael Flynn blasts Hillary Clinton and her crimes: ‘I’m sick
of it. She should step down’
http://theduran.com/general-michael-flynn-blasts-hillary-clinton-crimes-america-im-sick-step-video/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhCCLM6oqUo



Wikileaks whistleblower revealed as deep state officials. Former deputy
Assistant Secretary of State warns of Clinton coup d’etat
http://theduran.com/wikileaks-whistleblowers-revealed-as-deep-state-officials-as-former-deputy-assistant-secretary-of-state-warns-of-clinton-coup-detat-video/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM
"
Attorney General Loretta Lynch seems to be in the pocket of the
Clintons, intervening and obstructing FBI investigations into Hillary
Clinton’s private server and e-mails at every turn. James Comey, who was
on the board of directors at HSBC bank, a bank that gave $81 million to
the Clinton Foundation, is also the current head of the FBI.
"



Donna Brazile tweets in desperation, “Please God, let this end soon” as
CNN gives her the boot
http://theduran.com/donna-brazile-tweets-desperation-please-god-let-end-soon-cnn-giver-boot/



Clinton family henchman James Carville goes insane, says ‘KGB and
Republicans’ are behind FBI investigation
http://theduran.com/clinton-family-henchman-james-carville/
"
James Carville tries to finger the ‘KGB’ over 10 times, followed by
phrases such as ‘America’s democracy is under attack’…
“The KGB is all over this election.”
“This is an attempt to hijack an election.”

- First, the KGB does not even exist, making Carville look like an
complete nutcase every time he mentions the word ‘KGB’.
- Second, not one US intelligence Agency has confirmed the Russian
government or FSB was behind the hacking.
"



FBI says no connection between Donald Trump and Russia. Harry Reid goes
full “McCarthy”
http://theduran.com/fbi-says-no-connection-between-donald-trump-and-russia-harry-reid-goes-full-mccarthyism/




Perhaps here lies part of the answer:

How Putin Derailed the West's Grand Project to Remake the World
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/11/01/how-putin-derailed-the-west/
"
This is hard for ordinary people to understand. They can’t grasp why
elite powerbrokers would want to transform functioning, stable countries
into uninhabitable wastelands overrun by armed extremists, sectarian
death squads and foreign-born terrorists. Nor can they understand what
has been gained by Washington’s 15 year-long rampage across the Middle
East and Central Asia that has turned a vast swathe of strategic
territory into a terrorist breeding grounds? What is the purpose of all
this?
...
But the real escalation is expected to take place when Hillary Clinton
becomes president in 2017. That’s when the US will directly engage
Russia militarily, assuming that their tit-for-tat encounters will be
contained within Syria’s borders. It’s a risky plan, but it’s the next
logical step in this bloody fiasco.
"