Re: Moon Math and Pretty Rainbows

2017-11-01 Thread Cecilia Tanaka 
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:08 PM, grarpamp  wrote:
> https://i.imgur.com/orsOrzw.png
>
> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7a4wy5/before_we_go_any_further_id_like_to_say_one_thing/
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Alw5hs0chj0
>
> https://i.redd.it/afkmeq8mlbvz.jpg
>
> https://imgur.com/citY5yh
>
> BTC+BCC+BTG=7500
>
> NYE party @ 9000+ ;)
>
> "It might make sense just to get some in case it catches on."

I do love pretty rainbows, but "The Tetris God" was very infamous,
hahahaha!!!  ;D

Moon Math and Pretty Rainbows

2017-11-01 Thread grarpamp 
https://i.imgur.com/orsOrzw.png

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7a4wy5/before_we_go_any_further_id_like_to_say_one_thing/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Alw5hs0chj0

https://i.redd.it/afkmeq8mlbvz.jpg

https://imgur.com/citY5yh

BTC+BCC+BTG=7500

NYE party @ 9000+ ;)

"It might make sense just to get some in case it catches on."

Is it still good practice to reinstall everything after you are owned?

2017-11-01 Thread How Rude ! 
> Steve Kinney admin at pilobilus.net
> Wed Nov 1 13:58:03 PDT 2017
>

> User refusal is the principal barrier
> to security
>

Bullshit.
User knowledge is.
And you don't seem to know much.

> clueless lusers
>

This shit attitude affirms my claim.

> network security
>

There is no such thing.  This is an oxymoron.
You are familiar with the purpose of the internet.

> threat model
> cost
>

"I ain't doin' nuffin' worf loogin' at, sheeeit."
Useless.

Re: Is it still good practice to reinstall everything after you are owned?

2017-11-01 Thread Steve Kinney 
On 11/01/2017 02:56 PM, How Rude ! wrote:

> Also:
> blackhat.com/eu-17/briefings/schedule/#how-to-hack-a-turned-off-computer-or-running-unsigned-code-in-intel-management-engine-8668
> 
> JS;DR:
> All computers are fucked.

Now that's music to every clueless luser's ears:  "Don't waste a moment
of time or give up an inch of convenience for security, because there is
no such thing as security."  Not only does this justify the lusers'
categorical refusal to spend a moment of time or give up an inch of
convenience, it also assures them that they are /smarter/ than people
who do give a damn about network security.

Whether any given computer is fucked on a given day depends on many
factors.  Network security begins with a threat model:  Who might want
to steal or destroy your data, what resources do they have, and if an
adversary is successful what do you stand to lose?  Next look at the
methods for locking those particular adversaries out, and the cost in $$
and time for doing so:  Compare the price of a solid defense to the
value of what you are defending:  When it costs more to defend an asset
than it is worth, you lose.  When it costs less to defend an asset than
it is worth, you win.

It is almost always orders of magnitude easier and cheaper to defend a
computer than to attack one - IF one starts with tools that CAN be
secured, which rules out Microsoft operating systems and software.
Where and as security fail is unavoidable - i.e. your shop needs a
commercial software package that will not run on anything but a
Microsoft OS - the value of the work product will justify the costs
(including minor personal inconvenience) of properly quarantining the
machine(s) it lives on.  If not, you don't really need that work product
and the problem solves itself the cheap way:  "We stopped using that."

As a bonus, defending digital assets from one's "most serious"
adversaries will automatically defend those assets from lesser beings.
Perfect or absolute security does not exist because it can not exist:
But almost anyone can afford a good enough security model to reduce the
odds of serious security incidents per decade from near certainty to a
low single digit percentage.

Network security axiom:  User refusal is the principal barrier to secure
networking.

:o/







signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Donald J. Trump Orders Release of JFK Files

2017-11-01 Thread Commies Did It 
Because all you niggers are faggots.

OFFICIAL ARCHIVE:
archives.gov/research/jfk/2017-release

TORRENT OF ARCHIVE:
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:e403fd59d10ccf6197d5a779afccd4aa3c6a41d7=JFK_zip
mega.nz/#!Bt80WbCS!qQGqxqg2qjAbnPZTcyUZ_Fv9JooSYPXpHRpCpSgIPMI

BATCH FILES:
>Same as torrent
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.zip
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z01
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z02
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z03
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z04
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z05
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z06
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z07
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z08
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z09
archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/zip/jfk.z10

PDF MIRRORS:
mega.nz/#F!AtMWUAiZ!VIM5O8Lbgw5E1fzAwPMYeA (mirror #1)
mega.nz/#F!0DZTEKYR!a4OY18ul6foob-NjpGtAbw (mirror #2)

AUDIO:
>FLAC
mega.nz/#F!Rk9H0A6K!tGlMXBRGd2TKB05FGVTY2g
>MP3 @ 165kbps
mega.nz/#F!A08wwRTY!DJ9juncTo53JLWi3GPj9YQ
>Vorbis @ 160kbps
mega.nz/#F!IkEhmSAK!h5rQuCyZ21JHWTdcV-QnVA
>OPUS @ 128kbps
mega.nz/#F!Ms8AjSIT!KuMekh2tkZTv30BrR0tQIA
>PCM/Wav/Raws
mega.nz/#F!lPom1QTT!-ez2WVeX2Cm5Hu6V3m0jfw

Is it still good practice to reinstall everything after you are owned?

2017-11-01 Thread How Rude ! 
> rooty arfspoop at protonmail.com
> Wed Nov 1 09:15:16 PDT 2017
>

> winblows is a virus
>
Not true.  It is a botnet.

Also:
blackhat.com/eu-17/briefings/schedule/#how-to-hack-a-turned-off-computer-or-running-unsigned-code-in-intel-management-engine-8668

JS;DR:
All computers are fucked.

Re: Is it still good practice to reinstall everything after you are owned?

2017-11-01 Thread rooty 
hi hi Georgi - winblows is a virus get off the sauce

 Original Message 
On Sep 19, 2017, 4:37 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:

> Is it still good practice to reinstall everything after you are owned?
>
> It used to be, but after reading about windows viruses I am not sure it
> is.

Re: Post Halloween Music In This Thread... :)

2017-11-01 Thread Cecilia Tanaka 
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:57 AM, grarpamp  wrote:



> [...]  probably not any of the seriously
> creepy bone chilling audio buried in long forgotten moldy
> dark corners of the net that won't be mentioned here ;)

The lyrics of "Five Little Pumpkins Sitting On a Gate" are pretty
scary for me, my dear pumpkin.  The happy pumpkins were together,
singing, wanting to have some fun and play, but the lights went out
(their lives, their souls?)  and they rolled out of the sight  (were
buried?  five pumpkins corpses next to the gate?)...  B...  #fear
:(((

"Five little pumpkins sitting on a gate,
First one said "Oh my, it's getting late!"
Second one said "There are witches in the air,"
Third one said "but we don't care!"
Fourth one said "Let's run and run and run."
Fifth one said "I'm ready for some fun!"
Ooo ooo went the wind, and out went the lights,
And five little pumpkins rolled out of sight."