It's all shits and giggles until the condom comes off

[Steven Schear]

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-28/nsa-deletes-honesty-and-openness-core-values

Re: "Doublethink Approval Kit" by Ministry of Truth & Pozilla

[rooty]

Sea sea no need to spend unnecessary time learning JavaScript and reinventing 
wheel xss

BeEf > Metasploit Is a fav embedded video and pics 404 redirects you no the 
deal lol

Empire for Winblows John knows how it works he hooked me once or was that you

 Original Message 
On Jan 28, 2018, 5:41 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:

> On Jan 28, 2018 22:27, "Shawn K. Quinn"  wrote:
>
>> On 01/28/2018 07:08 PM, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
>>> I would like to see an end user caja system that constrains java [...]
>>
>>>
>>> Which was how javascript was originally supposed to work.
>> Please do not confuse Java and JavaScript. The only relationship between the 
>> two is that Netscape paid Sun to license the Java trademark to what was 
>> previously known as LiveScript. (This was back when Netscape and Sun still 
>> existed as separate companies, mid-1990s or so.)
>
> Oh, Shawn, my dear, thank you a lot!  <3
>
> Wow, I do need to study coding really hard this year or consider seriously 
> the 'harakiri' option, uff...  Both will be pretty painful, ouch!  :((
>
>>

Re: The least probable thing in the world is my innocence

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 08:20:29PM -0500, rooty wrote:
> Well said Zeenan - kgb people do have hearts-

O

M

G

The sock puppet spoke!

Here, have a cookie :)


http://russiafeed.com/hollywood-composer-randy-newman-writes-award-winning-song-putin-must-listen/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ya-FGHdBso
Randy Newman - Putin (Official Video)-6Ya-FGHdBso.mp4

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[juan]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:48:47 -0500
Steve Kinney  wrote:


> People have superstitious beliefs about most of the things they know
> exist but don't understand.  They know Javascript exists but they do
> not know how it works, therefore it must be either Good or Evil.  In
> this frame of reference, Evil would be the "most correct" answer,
> because Javascript does get used for Evil purposes like diverting
> users' web browsers to hostile sites, inflicting unwanted porn ads 


LMAO - evil porn - spoken like a true christian eh



> 
> In more rational terms, Javascript is neither Good nor Evil, it's just
> software that web browsers download from websites and run
> automatically.

Of course JS by itself is just one of dozens
of  very shitty scripting languages yet the way JS is used in
the 'web 2.0' is 'evil'. 


> Most often Javascript qualifies as "junk software",
> eating system resources and annoying website visitors for no reason
> other than fashion.  Javascript that enables browsers to present
> interactive maps, online games etc. would qualify as Good. 

not really - it would be better if you used well defined
clients for that sort of thing. 


> The most
> widely distributed Javascript code in the world is the Google
> Analytics tracker; this code qualifies as Evil, since most users do
> NOT want their browsing habits to be under total surveillance, and
> doubly so because most users have no idea it exists.
> 
> Calling a website that teaches people how to AVOID most user
> surveillance and profiling on the networks Evil because it uses
> Javascript seems a bit silly to me.  


if you are referring to me, I didn't say that detox site was
'evil', I said and repeat it is a  joke.

Hell, even the majority of sites that use javashit extensively
display most of their content even when javashit is disabled.





> The site teachers users about
> Javascript and how to control it, along with lots of other privacy and
> security information and tools.  As a net result, users gain a LOT
> more control over their privacy and security situation relative to the
> Internet.
> 
> Would the Data Detox Kit be a "better" website without Javascript?  I
> think so.  Its designers think otherwise.  They probably base their
> position on an assessment that they way /they/ use Javascript makes
> the site more convenient for most end users, leading to more public
> uptake of the privacy and security tools and information provided.

bullshit



> 
> :o)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[Cecilia Tanaka]

Rayzer, Juan, did I mention today how much do I love you both?  Very, very
much, I swear!  I do love you, couple of fools!  :D

And Steve, thank you very much for the wise comments, my love!  <3

I was here laughing and thinking about a very old message of mine, where I
mentioned I would love to organize a CypherPunks List Party.  I would love
to meet personally a lot of persons who always write here and there, and
some of the most amazing lurkers of the whole world.  :)

I did still not receive any formal answer about the JS thing, but I am
completely sure we will get it or...  well, they will be obligated to
listen me singing for help...  And, wow, I love music, but I sing *really*
bad!  It's almost a torture, a horrible act against the human rights, but
technically it's legal, woohoo!!!  :D

Dear all, I wish you a lovely night and will let you with a pretty funny
and unexpected post because everyone needs to laugh...  :)

"Elon Musk denies zombie apocalypse rumors, sells 10,000 flamethrowers just
in case."



Tender kisses, tight hugs, much love, and sweet dreams, dear all.  <3

c.
--
"Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or your
curiosity.  It's your place in the world; it's your life.  Go on and do all
you can with it, and make it the life you want to live."  -  Mae Jemison

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[juan]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:11:06 -0800
g2s  wrote:


> >> [ego strokes redacted], who
>   planned the 9/11 false flag attack? 
> 
> It doesn't matter who planned it. It's who stood to gain from it.
> Focus, stupid.

both things matter. And of course, in this case, it just so
happens that the planners and the beneficiaries are the same
people. 

Anyway, you said the planners were "rational". Now, as an
attack against the Glorious Land of the Free,  9/11 wasn't
'rational' - it didn't weaken the 'victims' of the attack. On
the contrary, it made them even more criminal and dangerous. 

On the other hand, as a false flag, 9/11 was pretty 'rational'.
So maybe I should read between lines and conclude  you are
admitting that the planners were general baxter, blankfein and
the rest of the pentagon gang? 




> 
> Rr
> 
> 
> > Rr
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > who accrued a group of desperate useful idiots to
> > > accomplish it. Evil is relative. Rr
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[g2s]

 Original message From: juan  Date: 1/29/18 
 2:59 PM  (GMT-08:00) To: cp  Subject: Re: "Data Detox 
Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla 
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:42:48 -0800
g2s  wrote:

> 

> > 
> > #$@&^*!((:
> > >... the same asshole who says the government owns the roads and
> > >that 9/11 was done by evil arabs..."
> > I argue for validation of driving skills before using public roads.
> > Self-validation doesn't seem like a good bet, and 911 was planned by
> > rational people 
> 
> 
> > > oh really? And who were they? 

> Absolutely does not matter.


oh come on, don't be a cowardly clown.

go ahead and further embarrass yourself, and further prove that
you are just a US govt propaganda bot. 


>> [ego strokes redacted], who
planned the 9/11 false flag attack? 

It doesn't matter who planned it. It's who stood to gain from it.
Focus, stupid.

Rr


> Rr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > who accrued a group of desperate useful idiots to
> > accomplish it. Evil is relative. Rr
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[juan]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:42:48 -0800
g2s  wrote:

> 

> > 
> > #$@&^*!((:
> > >... the same asshole who says the government owns the roads and
> > >that 9/11 was done by evil arabs..."
> > I argue for validation of driving skills before using public roads.
> > Self-validation doesn't seem like a good bet, and 911 was planned by
> > rational people 
> 
> 
> > > oh really? And who were they? 

> Absolutely does not matter.


oh come on, don't be a cowardly clown.

go ahead and further embarrass yourself, and further prove that
you are just a US govt propaganda bot. 


do tell us, oh great master of Anarchist Commie Science, who
planned the 9/11 false flag attack? 




> Rr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > who accrued a group of desperate useful idiots to
> > accomplish it. Evil is relative. Rr
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[g2s]

 Original message From: juan  Date: 1/29/18 
 2:33 PM  (GMT-08:00) To: cp  Subject: Re: "Data Detox 
Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla 
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 13:48:33 -0800
g2s  wrote:

> 
> #$@&^*!((:
> >... the same asshole who says the government owns the roads and that
> >9/11 was done by evil arabs..."
> I argue for validation of driving skills before using public roads.
> Self-validation doesn't seem like a good bet, and 911 was planned by
> rational people 


> > oh really? And who were they? 
Absolutely does not matter.
Rr





> who accrued a group of desperate useful idiots to
> accomplish it. Evil is relative. Rr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: Peek-a-Boo

[jim bell]

 On Monday, January 29, 2018, 10:56:53 AM PST, Steven Schear 
 wrote:
 
 > https://www.zerohedge.com/ news/2018-01-29/fitness- 
 >tracking-app-accidentally- reveals-secret-us-military- bases-cia-black-sites
>An interactive online fitness tracking map published in November of 2017 which 
>compiles a running history of the location and routes of 27 million 
>fitness-device users has unwittingly revealed the location, staffing, patrol 
>routes and layout of U.S. and foreign military bases around the world.



This certainly sounds like a substantial security breach.  However, I also 
wonder if, to a second level, this has been exploited to misdirect.  Could 
somebody have been aware of this, and in REALLY-black sites, they carefully  
protect against such inadvertent disclosures?  Or, perhaps, fake the existence 
of non-existent "sites" that the military wants to pretend to have?  A physical 
honey-pot
                   Jim Bell



  

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[g2s]

#$@&^*!((:
>... the same asshole who says the government owns the roads and that 9/11 was 
>done by evil arabs..."
I argue for validation of driving skills before using public roads. 
Self-validation doesn't seem like a good bet, and 911 was planned by rational 
people who accrued a group of desperate useful idiots to accomplish it. Evil is 
relative.
Rr

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[Steve Kinney]

On 01/28/2018 07:38 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> Hello from Brazil, Shiny Happy TTC People!  :D
> 
> May someone give a really good technical answer to my friends, please?  <3 
> 
> I will need to share the answer about the use of JavaScript with two
> other discussion lists, where I also received a "not-so-good" feedback
> in private.  Sorry but I am using an euphemism, uh!  :P

People have superstitious beliefs about most of the things they know
exist but don't understand.  They know Javascript exists but they do not
know how it works, therefore it must be either Good or Evil.  In this
frame of reference, Evil would be the "most correct" answer, because
Javascript does get used for Evil purposes like diverting users' web
browsers to hostile sites, inflicting unwanted porn ads on them, and
otherwise controlling the user's browser against the user's will.
Allowing a web browser to execute Javascript from random sources also
crates an attack surface for actual malware, with a variety of bad
outcomes for the end user.

In more rational terms, Javascript is neither Good nor Evil, it's just
software that web browsers download from websites and run automatically.
 Most often Javascript qualifies as "junk software", eating system
resources and annoying website visitors for no reason other than
fashion.  Javascript that enables browsers to present interactive maps,
online games etc. would qualify as Good.  The most widely distributed
Javascript code in the world is the Google Analytics tracker; this code
qualifies as Evil, since most users do NOT want their browsing habits to
be under total surveillance, and doubly so because most users have no
idea it exists.

Calling a website that teaches people how to AVOID most user
surveillance and profiling on the networks Evil because it uses
Javascript seems a bit silly to me.  The site teachers users about
Javascript and how to control it, along with lots of other privacy and
security information and tools.  As a net result, users gain a LOT more
control over their privacy and security situation relative to the
Internet.

Would the Data Detox Kit be a "better" website without Javascript?  I
think so.  Its designers think otherwise.  They probably base their
position on an assessment that they way /they/ use Javascript makes the
site more convenient for most end users, leading to more public uptake
of the privacy and security tools and information provided.

:o)







signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[juan]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:15:44 -0800
g2s  wrote:

> That was a blank email to match a blank stare, stupid.
> null


haha - piece of trolling joo shit, again, pimping JAVASCRIPT -
but wait, you're the same asshole who says the government owns
the roads and that 9/11 was done by evil arabs...while
pretending to be an 'anarchist' - meh 

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[g2s]

That was a blank email to match a blank stare, stupid.
null

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[g2s]

null

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[juan]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 09:06:59 -0800
g2s  wrote:


> ...and if you're really paranoid perhaps find some
> other hobby than the internet rather than spewing paranoia all over
> everyone like digital diarrhea. 

wow - NSA bathroom cleaner rayzer gets really mad when the
tools of the trade get a proper review



> The internet isn't Safe Space...
> never was. Never will be. Rr

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[John Newman]

> On Jan 29, 2018, at 12:06 PM, g2s  wrote:
> 
> 
>  Original message 
> From: John Newman 
> Date: 1/29/18 8:27 AM (GMT-08:00)
> To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org, g2s , juan 
> 
> Subject: Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla
> 
> 
> 
> On January 28, 2018 10:31:40 PM EST, g2s  wrote:
> >
> > Original message From: juan  Date:
> >1/28/18  6:32 PM  (GMT-08:00) To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org Subject:
> >Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla 
> >On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:38:33 -0200
> >Cecilia Tanaka  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello from Brazil, Shiny Happy TTC People!  :D
> >> 
> >> May someone give a really good technical answer to my friends,
> >> please?  <3
> >> 
> >> I will need to share the answer about the use of JavaScript with two
> >> other discussion lists, where I also received a "not-so-good"
> >> feedback in private.  Sorry but I am using an euphemism, uh!  :P
> >
> >
> > If you don't enable javascript that site won't show you any
> > content at all. They could have put a static page explaining
> > what the site is about but apparently they were too lazy to
> > do that. 
> > 
> > And, javascript is the number one tool used to track and
> > fingerprint browsers so a site about privacy (I'm assuming
> > that's what the site is about) that refuses to do anything
> > unless javascript is enabledlooks like a joke.
> >
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> Thank you all in advance!  Kisses, hugs, and much love!  <3
> >> 
> >> Ceci
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Jan 28, 2018 21:12, "juan"  wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:53:24 -0200
> >> Cecilia Tanaka  wrote:
> >> 
> >> > #  https://datadetox.myshadow.org/detox
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> "Sorry!
> >> 
> >> The Data Detox Kit requires javascript and supports newer versions of
> >> Chrome, Safari, and Firefox. Please enable javascript in your browser
> >> and refresh this page. "
> >> 
> >> 
> >> lawl - so data detox - whatever that means - requires you to
> >> run javashit malware  - priceless =)
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> >
> >> > #  https://datadetox.myshadow.org/about
> >> >
> >> > Wish you all a lovely week, la la la!  <3
> >> >
> >> > c.
> >> > --
> >> > "Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or
> >> > your curiosity.  It's your place in the world; it's your life.  Go
> >> > on and do all you can with it, and make it the life you want to
> >> > live."
> >> > -  Mae Jemison
> >
> >
> >Jscript allows for extreme interactivity between your computer and a
> >server, but the code is plaintext. It can be examined for functions.
> >Rr
> 
> > JS is usually obfuscated to the point of complete unreadability.
> Coders do this so you can't "steal" their code, or maybe
> sometimes to get slight compression (all the variables get
> renamed to one or two letter names, etc) So, you can still
> look at it, but it's often only nearly as opaque as byte code :)
> 
> Thats where crowdsourced blockers come into the picture. NoScript for 
> instance. You 
> have dozens of folks unobfuscating the scripts. Ofc you have to have some 
> trust in the blocker, and the site's intention for the data gleaned,

Yeah, noscript is cool. Been a while since I’ve really played with it. 

> and if you're really paranoid perhaps find some other hobby than the internet 
> rather than spewing paranoia all over everyone like digital diarrhea. The 
> internet isn't Safe Space... never was. Never will be.
> 

Yeah, clearly you have to make a few risk value judgements,
otherwise you may as well just stay in the default most secure position:
computer powered off ;)



> Rr

Peek-a-Boo

[Steven Schear]

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-29/fitness-tracking-app-accidentally-
reveals-secret-us-military-bases-cia-black-sites

An interactive online fitness tracking map published in November of 2017
which compiles a running history of the location and routes of 27 million
fitness-device users has unwittingly revealed the location, staffing,
patrol routes and layout of U.S. and foreign military bases around the
world.

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[juan]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 08:22:18 -0800
g2s  wrote:

> Wassamatteru? Can't read ingrish?
> You can examine the script and see what it does. You can discern
> which informatiin the server is gleaming and decide if you want to
> participate or block. Or are you a NAZI who wants to decide what
> others do when they browse? Rr null


ok razer - your trolling job for today is to pimp javascript. I
guess replacing plain text with malware is something that every
person  with a passing interest in privacy and security must
do. 

Actually useful license terms

[Ryan Carboni]

+if a critical security bug is found and unpatched in excess of 6 months
from the time the bug was first communicated, the software is unsupported
+when software becomes constructively unsupported, the source code is
either released, or sufficient documentation must be provided to reverse
engineer a patch of any code with a critical vulnerability
+no non-disclosure agreement for any software bug can be allowed more than
9 months.
+A notice must be displayed from where a compiled program is downloaded
from or extracted from that includes this code that states the amount of
money the licensee donated to this project.

obviously a lawyer can make it less ambiguous, but the idea is clear

no one will adopt this because they value monkey behaviors over
accomplishing things or their principles

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[g2s]

 Original message From: John Newman  Date: 
1/29/18  8:27 AM  (GMT-08:00) To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org, g2s 
, juan  Subject: Re: "Data Detox Kit" by 
Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla 


On January 28, 2018 10:31:40 PM EST, g2s  wrote:
>
> Original message From: juan  Date:
>1/28/18  6:32 PM  (GMT-08:00) To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org Subject:
>Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla 
>On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:38:33 -0200
>Cecilia Tanaka  wrote:
>
>> Hello from Brazil, Shiny Happy TTC People!  :D
>> 
>> May someone give a really good technical answer to my friends,
>> please?  <3
>> 
>> I will need to share the answer about the use of JavaScript with two
>> other discussion lists, where I also received a "not-so-good"
>> feedback in private.  Sorry but I am using an euphemism, uh!  :P
>
>
>   If you don't enable javascript that site won't show you any
>   content at all. They could have put a static page explaining
>   what the site is about but apparently they were too lazy to
>   do that. 
>   
>   And, javascript is the number one tool used to track and
>   fingerprint browsers so a site about privacy (I'm assuming
>   that's what the site is about) that refuses to do anything
>   unless javascript is enabledlooks like a joke.
>
>
>
>> 
>> Thank you all in advance!  Kisses, hugs, and much love!  <3
>> 
>> Ceci
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 28, 2018 21:12, "juan"  wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:53:24 -0200
>> Cecilia Tanaka  wrote:
>> 
>> > #  https://datadetox.myshadow.org/detox
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> "Sorry!
>> 
>> The Data Detox Kit requires javascript and supports newer versions of
>> Chrome, Safari, and Firefox. Please enable javascript in your browser
>> and refresh this page. "
>> 
>> 
>> lawl - so data detox - whatever that means - requires you to
>> run javashit malware  - priceless =)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> > #  https://datadetox.myshadow.org/about
>> >
>> > Wish you all a lovely week, la la la!  <3
>> >
>> > c.
>> > --
>> > "Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or
>> > your curiosity.  It's your place in the world; it's your life.  Go
>> > on and do all you can with it, and make it the life you want to
>> > live."
>> > -  Mae Jemison
>
>
>Jscript allows for extreme interactivity between your computer and a
>server, but the code is plaintext. It can be examined for functions.
>Rr

> JS is usually obfuscated to the point of complete unreadability.
Coders do this so you can't "steal" their code, or maybe
sometimes to get slight compression (all the variables get
renamed to one or two letter names, etc) So, you can still
look at it, but it's often only nearly as opaque as byte code :)

Thats where crowdsourced blockers come into the picture. NoScript for instance. 
You have dozens of folks unobfuscating the scripts. Ofc you have to have some 
trust in the blocker, and the site's intention for the data gleaned, and if 
you're really paranoid perhaps find some other hobby than the internet rather 
than spewing paranoia all over everyone like digital diarrhea. The internet 
isn't Safe Space... never was. Never will be.
Rr

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[John Newman]

On January 28, 2018 10:31:40 PM EST, g2s  wrote:
>
> Original message From: juan  Date:
>1/28/18  6:32 PM  (GMT-08:00) To: cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org Subject:
>Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla 
>On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:38:33 -0200
>Cecilia Tanaka  wrote:
>
>> Hello from Brazil, Shiny Happy TTC People!  :D
>> 
>> May someone give a really good technical answer to my friends,
>> please?  <3
>> 
>> I will need to share the answer about the use of JavaScript with two
>> other discussion lists, where I also received a "not-so-good"
>> feedback in private.  Sorry but I am using an euphemism, uh!  :P
>
>
>   If you don't enable javascript that site won't show you any
>   content at all. They could have put a static page explaining
>   what the site is about but apparently they were too lazy to
>   do that. 
>   
>   And, javascript is the number one tool used to track and
>   fingerprint browsers so a site about privacy (I'm assuming
>   that's what the site is about) that refuses to do anything
>   unless javascript is enabledlooks like a joke.
>
>
>
>> 
>> Thank you all in advance!  Kisses, hugs, and much love!  <3
>> 
>> Ceci
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 28, 2018 21:12, "juan"  wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 21:53:24 -0200
>> Cecilia Tanaka  wrote:
>> 
>> > #  https://datadetox.myshadow.org/detox
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> "Sorry!
>> 
>> The Data Detox Kit requires javascript and supports newer versions of
>> Chrome, Safari, and Firefox. Please enable javascript in your browser
>> and refresh this page. "
>> 
>> 
>> lawl - so data detox - whatever that means - requires you to
>> run javashit malware  - priceless =)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> > #  https://datadetox.myshadow.org/about
>> >
>> > Wish you all a lovely week, la la la!  <3
>> >
>> > c.
>> > --
>> > "Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or
>> > your curiosity.  It's your place in the world; it's your life.  Go
>> > on and do all you can with it, and make it the life you want to
>> > live."
>> > -  Mae Jemison
>
>
>Jscript allows for extreme interactivity between your computer and a
>server, but the code is plaintext. It can be examined for functions.
>Rr

JS is usually obfuscated to the point of complete unreadability.
Coders do this so you can't "steal" their code, or maybe
sometimes to get slight compression (all the variables get
renamed to one or two letter names, etc) So, you can still
look at it, but it's often only nearly as opaque as byte code :)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: "Data Detox Kit" by Tactical Technology Collective & Mozilla

[g2s]

Wassamatteru? Can't read ingrish?
You can examine the script and see what it does. You can discern which 
informatiin the server is gleaming and decide if you want to participate or 
block.
Or are you a NAZI who wants to decide what others do when they browse?
Rr
null