Re: Quantum radar?

[jamesd]

On 5/13/2018 1:42 AM, Steven Schear wrote:

Even if not, well designed (UWB) passive/multiphasic will.

On Sat, May 12, 2018, 1:32 AM jim bell > wrote:


Quantum Radars Could Unstealth the F-22, F-35 and J-20 (Or Not)

https://www.yahoo.com/newsroom/vibes/us-military/v-6f4ee341-6205-3949-8a2e-43a9c5d8ab6f_c-5701a826-de83-3a65-8dc8-71d0bdb067c5_a-5701a826-de83-3a65-8dc8-71d0bdb067c5


This technology has been known in principle for forty years, though at 
the time it did not occur to me it would be useful in actual practice. 
It seemed like a purely theoretical thought experiment.


If you paint your aircraft with radar absorbing paint, then to radar in 
the quantum domain, it is as if it was painted day glow orange.


Stealth will also show up to multiphasic radar with widely separated 
transmitters and receivers, which is what the Russians are doing, or 
hope to do.


The best tactic would be to combine both methods, with a long fibre 
optic cable transmitting entangled photons between widely separated 
transmitter and receiver stations.  I strongly suspect the chinese are 
planning to combine both methods, connecting radar stations between 
their artificial islands, in which case stealth will cease to work near 
china and near the south china sea.

Tentacles of the Octopus

[grarpamp]

Random talk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceFLx4eBgPg
The Octopus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4_m71QvkJ8
We do it better
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-Ttt-Ptldc
On the road tour with AK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSbO80uY630

Tucker on Crypto
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zo6RopWuBlU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwy5kgwvzE4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WT41oWaqog
w Molyneux on War Profits
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WlftSkGFXk

Re: OT is there place on earth where the sun doesn't rise from near east?

[grarpamp]

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 1:44 PM, jim bell  wrote:
> Piece of trivia:  The "Geographic pole" actually wanders a bit, probably
> mostly due to displacements of the mass of oceans and the atmosphere.
> I think it's on the order of about 100 meters or so.   Presumably, this has
> to be accounted for in the calculations used by GPS receivers.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_polar_wander
>
> This doesn't have anything to do with the movement of the magnetic poles,
> BTW.
>
> On Saturday, May 12, 2018, 8:37:43 AM PDT, Georgi Guninski
>  wrote:
>
> is there place on earth where the sun doesn't rise from near east?
>
> counterexample will be near the poles. there are two kinds of poles:
> geographic pole and magnetic pole. it appears to depend how they are
> placed:  the middle of the line between them is a good candidate --
> in this case exchanging them will swap directions.

Humans generally first defined "East" by magic magnetism voodoo,
and generally the Sun rising "over there" in nomadic capabilities regardless,
irrespective of trivial degenerate cases in modern science. A
definition unlikely
to change geophysically, till well beyond first voyages to the stars,
thus compelling
new contextually relavant astronomical definitions upon humanity at that time.

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal#Effects_on_biosphere
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetometer

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_Earth
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_catastrophic_risk
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Overshoot_Day
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_resource

Getting off the rock asap is of profound importance.
Launch yourself today.

Re: OT is there place on earth where the sun doesn't rise from near east?

[jim bell]

 Piece of trivia:  The "Geographic pole" actually wanders a bit, probably 
mostly due to displacements of the mass of oceans and the atmosphere.I think 
it's on the order of about 100 meters or so.   Presumably, this has to be 
accounted for in the calculations used by GPS 
receivers.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/True_polar_wander

This doesn't have anything to do with the movement of the magnetic poles, BTW.  
                      Jim Bell

On Saturday, May 12, 2018, 8:37:43 AM PDT, Georgi Guninski 
 wrote:  
 
 is there place on earth where the sun doesn't rise from near east?

counterexample will be near the poles. there are two kinds of poles:
geographic pole and magnetic pole. it appears to depend how they are
placed:  the middle of the line between them is a good candidate --
in this case exchanging them will swap directions.

  

Re: Quantum radar?

[Steven Schear]

Even if not, well designed (UWB) passive/multiphasic will.

On Sat, May 12, 2018, 1:32 AM jim bell  wrote:

> Quantum Radars Could Unstealth the F-22, F-35 and J-20 (Or 
> Not)https://www.yahoo.com/newsroom/vibes/us-military/v-6f4ee341-6205-3949-8a2e-43a9c5d8ab6f_c-5701a826-de83-3a65-8dc8-71d0bdb067c5_a-5701a826-de83-3a65-8dc8-71d0bdb067c5
>
>
>

OT is there place on earth where the sun doesn't rise from near east?

[Georgi Guninski]

is there place on earth where the sun doesn't rise from near east?

counterexample will be near the poles. there are two kinds of poles:
geographic pole and magnetic pole. it appears to depend how they are
placed:  the middle of the line between them is a good candidate --
in this case exchanging them will swap directions.

Re: Quantum radar?

[rooty]

hi jim ;-)

 Original Message 
On May 12, 2018, 1:32 AM, jim bell wrote:

> Quantum Radars Could Unstealth the F-22, F-35 and J-20 (Or Not)
> https://www.yahoo.com/newsroom/vibes/us-military/v-6f4ee341-6205-3949-8a2e-43a9c5d8ab6f_c-5701a826-de83-3a65-8dc8-71d0bdb067c5_a-5701a826-de83-3a65-8dc8-71d0bdb067c5

Quantum radar?

[jim bell]

Quantum Radars Could Unstealth the F-22, F-35 and J-20 (Or Not)
https://www.yahoo.com/newsroom/vibes/us-military/v-6f4ee341-6205-3949-8a2e-43a9c5d8ab6f_c-5701a826-de83-3a65-8dc8-71d0bdb067c5_a-5701a826-de83-3a65-8dc8-71d0bdb067c5

Re: BriarProject Messaging 1.0 Released

[grarpamp]

The blurb was from elesewhere not me.

Tor is set and ossified for over 15 years, and thus naturally like most
projects, won't be coding and deploying any major new architectural
models that analysts might cite as requisite to prevail in areas where
it fails today. Nor could call "the onion router" anymore if onion routing
happened not to be part of any future architecture.

As some here have noted, there's research both detailing
where today's popular anonymous overlay networks fail,
and what tech is out there or being formulated to build
better ones.

Look to new messaging, fill, PETS and other venues, whatever, etc..
search for papers, fidn tbe bibs, see what's out there, or what you
might create.

Re: [Cryptography] Free eBook: "Decrypting the Encryption Debate" (Upon Registion)

[grarpamp]

>> https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25010/decrypting-the-encryption-debate-a-framework-for-decision-makers

> Seems they only spent about three pages on pt3,
> conveniently shorting that entire side of the "open"debate",
> and leaving out some related sections...
> "Information Privacy Needs of Free Human Beings"
> "Why Compelled Disclosure via Theft, Jail, Torture, and Murder is Immoral"
> "Options for Strongly Encrypting Plaintext"
> "Internet Kill Switch = Stone Age"

More typical debates for sake of debating...

https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44481.pdf
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4374283/2018-02-05-Technical-Response-to-Rosenstein-Wray.pdf
https://consumersunion.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Beyond-Secrets-12.21.17-FINAL.pdf
http://sci-links.com/files/CRS-_Encryption_Intelligence-_11-98.pdf
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2018/04/subverting_back.html
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44407.pdf
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/crs/rl30273.pdf
https://www.epic.org/crs/RS20444.pdf
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43339.pdf
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45116.pdf
https://eff.org/
https://epic.org/

Outside of internal use cases, say corporate role accounts,
strong crypto isn't going away until at minimum the internet
is turned off.
Don't be that retard coding / proselytizing / demanding / mandating
broken crypto for use by others anywhere else, not least of why
because that hole will eventually be twisted asymmetrically
upon you and yours by the former later.
Besides, tools are agnostic and are thus never the problem.



Here are some helpful URL's to find papers and
things... brought to you in part by the laws of
crypto munitions and free speech...

http://uj3wazyk5u4hnvtk.onion/
http://rutrackerripnext.onion/

http://libgen.io/
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/
https://genofond.org/
http://b-ok.org/
http://bookfi.net/
http://libgen.pw/
http://u76v7ha6j4jmtz3k2lseaso5qy36lxs77klhovmptufwcodovatq.b32.i2p/

http://sci-hub.tw/
https://m.vk.com/sci_hub
http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/

https://sci-bay.org/

http://librusec.ucoz.de/forum/26

http://dreadecomdopooda.onion/

https://www.reddit.com/r/piracy/
https://www.reddit.com/r/libgen/
https://www.reddit.com/r/scihub/
https://www.reddit.com/r/datahoarder/
https://www.reddit.com/r/scholar/

http://custodians.online/