Can you be banned for an unpopular opinion?
Can you be banned for an unpopular opinion? Why ban someone for an unpopular opinion anyway? What exactly is in the first amendment? If law enforcement advises a company to ban a person, how does one appeal? I really think Cloudflare, Reddit, and the DoJ IG should be shut down. Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
Re: AnarchoPunk Update
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:40:09AM -0300, Punk wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:24:20 -0400 > Steve Kinney wrote: > > > > Who are you planning to kill, exactly? And what sort of 'crime' gets > > > you first a 'talk' and then gets you murdered? Not sure how any of your > > > comments addresses any of the points I made. > > > > Nobody 'tall. But any society /will/ act to protect itself against > > people who exhibit chronic violent behavior - > > you must be referring to people like berwick and his summary executions > of 'pedophiles'? > > By the way, I assume that berwick is going to execute children who > 'play doctor' too, since such children are, well, 'pedophiles' themselves. > > > > > with exceptions where > > civilized societies reward that behavior so long as it serves the > > purposes of the worst offenders, its ruling class. > > and that such exceptions actually include all 'civilized' societies in > which mass murder is completely institutionalized and worshiped. You know, > like the western cesspool, especially the USA, etc. > > > > > > >> Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have. > > > > > >> Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating > > >> tort claims, > > > > > > > > > yeah but not the point at hand. And anarchy isn't frontier 'justice' > > > either. Whatever you mean by 'justice'. > > > > Anarchy simply means the absence of a social command hierarchy acting > > through coercive means. > > Anarchy means more than that. It means a social order based on > voluntary cooperation. And whether interactions are voluntary or not is > defined at the individual level. It's also a rationalistic anti-authoritarian > philosophy, so it can make a few devastating comments on things like > jew-christian theocracy, for instance. > > > > Anarchism denotes theoretical consideration and > > rhetoric related to defining and implementing (relatively) nonviolent > > social conventions and behavior. > > Not just 'nonviolent' but consensual. Consent is purported or "deemed" to be non-existent for children until the day of their 16th birthday. To "deem" something is to say that that which is, is not what it is, or does not exist when it does exist, or does exist when it does not in fact exist. Deeming is demonic in principle, i.e. enforced/fiat denial of reality. Deeming is for power structures, psychological control or torture, the enforcement of submission to the will of another - "psychological rape" if you will, with the ultimate goal being self-censorship (self psychological rape?) Discussion of childhood sexuality in the present milieu of SJW terrorists, typically leads to superficially cheap and dangerous slurs, ad-homs and calls for murder, since it's all dichomatic black and white certainties and finalities, "one's personal childhood experiences of playing doctor be damned". > > The word "justice" indicates "adjustment." > > Nah. The word justice indicates justice =) It's a word stolen from > latin "justitia" (spanish justicia). "Adjustment' may come from the same root > but it's a derived word and has a different meaning. > > roman justice was even personified or made into a godess although roman > justice was rather flawed. Regardless, the libertarian concept of justice > stands. Justice being the state in which personal rights are respected, or > restitution for rights violations is paid(to the extent possible) > > > > > > > Lao Tzu say: "A man most conversant in the rites acts, but when no one > > responds, rolls up his sleeves and resorts to persuasion by force." > > > > The most typical problems with any idealistic -ism arise when people > > take abstract ideas literally and try to apply them without > > consideration of material context in the real world. As guiding > > principles, abstractions like "anarchy" can deliver a lot of value; but > > as explicit instructions held to apply universally, they often achieve > > the exact opposite of their intended results. > > > That's kinda vague? But maybe you are referring to 'anarcho' fascists > like berwick and the like? They perfectly fit my previous comments about fake > libertarians and true fascists. > > I bet if you criticize google, amazon and the rest of the NSA, berwick > and his pal jakobo would go into hysterical pro-corporate propaganda mode, > just like their accomplice, scumbag jeffrey tucker > > > https://mises.org/library/movie-gets-it-right > > > https://allevents.in/acapulco/anarchapulco-2019-with-jeffrey-tucker/20002435396795 > > > et cetera. > > > > > > > > :o) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: AnarchoPunk Update
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:24:20PM -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 4/10/19 8:29 PM, Punk wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:02:02 -0400 > > Steve Kinney wrote: > >> The inherent logical disconnect between anarchy and law enforcement > >> underlines the irrelevance of /most/ debate about how an anarchist > >> society should be run. > > > > Learning what lunatics like berwick and co. think is valuable. And the > > idea that they are representatives of anarchist philosophy is of course > > completely laughable. > > > >> I prefer what used to be called frontier justice: When someone makes > >> enough trouble to motivate enough people to do something about it, they > >> act: Maybe a good talking-to; if that fails to curb the behavior in > >> question, maybe running the offender out of town; if that seems > >> inadequate to protect the community, maybe killing the bastard. > > > > Who are you planning to kill, exactly? And what sort of 'crime' gets > > you first a 'talk' and then gets you murdered? Not sure how any of your > > comments addresses any of the points I made. > > Nobody 'tall. But any society /will/ act to protect itself against > people who exhibit chronic violent behavior - with exceptions where > civilized societies reward that behavior so long as it serves the > purposes of the worst offenders, its ruling class. > > >> Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have. > > > >> Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating > >> tort claims, > > > > > > yeah but not the point at hand. And anarchy isn't frontier 'justice' > > either. Whatever you mean by 'justice'. > > Anarchy simply means the absence of a social command hierarchy acting > through coercive means. Anarchism denotes theoretical consideration and > rhetoric related to defining and implementing (relatively) nonviolent > social conventions and behavior. > > The word "justice" indicates "adjustment." > > Lao Tzu say: "A man most conversant in the rites acts, but when no one > responds, rolls up his sleeves and resorts to persuasion by force." > > The most typical problems with any idealistic -ism arise when people > take abstract ideas literally and try to apply them without > consideration of material context in the real world. As guiding > principles, abstractions like "anarchy" can deliver a lot of value; but > as explicit instructions held to apply universally, they often achieve > the exact opposite of their intended results. Reminder of the town of anarchy: [ANARCHY] Town posts armed guards to stop contraband entry https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2018-July/042502.html A Mexican Town Overthrew Their Local Government And Things Are Going Great https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-02/mexican-town-overthrew-their-local-government-and-things-are-going-great The town of Cherán, Mexico was once plagued… Cherán is now run by autonomous groups of armed individuals… members of an autonomous militia — guard every entrance to the town, looking for strangers with contraband… “Contraband” would be considered political propaganda posters of those who claim the right to rule other human beings. …Cherán has achieved something unthinkable in Michoacán: a dramatic drop in murder rates, with rates for other serious crimes hovering at nearly zero. For those in Mexico, especially in an election year marred by wanton political murders, Cherán stands as proof that, in the country’s entrenched cycle of violence, the key ingredient to that violence is the state.
Re: AnarchoPunk Update
On 4/10/19 4:03 PM, Punk wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:50:18 -0400 > grarpamp wrote: > > >> Dealing with Pedophilia in an Anarchist Society with Yaakov Markel via >> Anarchast >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NWLFBHrWdU > > of course, another quite remarkable thing is how this two scumbags > parrot to the tee the current psychobabble 'scientific' dogmas about > 'therapists', 'trauma' and the like. > > so here's a half sane voice to counter these 'libertarians'. > > https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7633118-the-trauma-myth > > " psychologist Susan Clancy reports on years of research and contends > that it is not the abuse* itself that causes trauma—but rather the narrative > that is later imposed on the abuse experience." > > go figure. It's all just...propaganda from monkeys and their puritan, > anti-sex (non) 'culture' based on jew-kkkristian (non) 'values'. > > > *there of course is no 'abuse' in consensual acts. The inherent logical disconnect between anarchy and law enforcement underlines the irrelevance of /most/ debate about how an anarchist society should be run. I prefer what used to be called frontier justice: When someone makes enough trouble to motivate enough people to do something about it, they act: Maybe a good talking-to; if that fails to curb the behavior in question, maybe running the offender out of town; if that seems inadequate to protect the community, maybe killing the bastard. Frontier justice is not perfect, but it's the best system we have. Compare the Libertarian belief that incorruptible Courts adjudicating tort claims, on a level playing field where wealth, power, and political prejudice provide no advantages, can exist. :o) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Cryptocurrency: Govt Competes Four Markets
Govt competes for crypto company sellouts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oc8jAtB_69o Four Books that will Change Your Views https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vi2k4TJLzP4 Patrick Byrne Interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NREbyB6UUu0
AnarchoPunk Update
Parasites on Parade - New book by Larken Rose https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxR1tNTGlww https://www.amazon.com/Parasites-Parade-Larken-Rose/dp/1092138285 Dealing with Pedophilia in an Anarchist Society with Yaakov Markel via Anarchast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NWLFBHrWdU This Freedom Thing Is Way More Complicated Than I Thought - Anarchizona Keynote by Berwick https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt4vrQXP7tw https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=anarchizona JW Weatherman Bitcoin Q w 10HoursofBitcoin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgkUnsB1kjg What Is The A.R.K. & How To Get It w Mark Passio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsKe6kmqlAM https://www.whatonearthishappening.com/ark What On Earth Is Happening Ep 204 - How To Find Occulted Information In The Era Of Internet Censorship https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_m0qC0P1B8 The Only True Solution - Natural Law w Mark Passio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttqCyJ3Gcew https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8c4f-FGx7c Amazon Book Burning - More Books Get Censored https://www.tr.news/amazon-on-a-book-burning-spree/ Border Control https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGmcFqRhN1I Quit Your Government Jobs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asr7Jqs0tIs https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=quit+your+government+job Statist Finds Out He's An Anarchist - Larken Rose & Hodey Johns https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpYZZafQOPM Statist Power Vacuum Fail https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLomFbTVzWo Your Right to Film the Police - Ford Fischer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fno7GBXJbto "We Will Not Comply" Rally for Gun Rights v Antifa in Ohio,US https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaa5rkcW0ZI
