Re: California Penal Code 12355
Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote: >>> under libertarian rules justice demands restitution >>> So if, say, somebody steals $10, he has to return $10 and eventually damages >> And if he refuses... then what? >> How do you retrieve, a $significant to you value, from thief who... >> 1) has $significant, in original or convertible value, but refuses? >> 2) does not have $significant? > $10... $10... $10... You're dodging again, 3x now. > What Quit dodging. > I'm an advocate You not advocating anything certainly not from positive action. Not answering peoples questions out there and taking negative action does not advance your cause... people just ignore you. All you do is grind. Get lost with that. > the opposite More unrelated fields of study than being opposites.
The Georgia Guidestones is a statement that should not go unquestioned
The Georgia Guidestones is a statement that should not go unquestioned. Unless of course they meant it ironically. You know, a few billionaires hear about a conspiracy theory and decide to make the conspiracy real with a monument, carefully crafted and proportioned. The world population stands at over seven billion. A reduction to half a billion cannot be by the consent of the governed. Bold statements regarding the futures of others cannot go unquestioned within a free society.
What is there to protect?
What is there left to protect? The idea that elites are immune to prosecution (complete with bribes to the prosecutors to appoint a jury favorable to the defence)? The image of men you had orgies with? It is not as if any of you elites actually care about anything other than those things. There is no need to accuse other portions of the elite of pedophilia, though I question the judgement of those who require satanic symbolism for greater orgasms. Certainly there are risks, the US didn't target enemy governments in WWII because there would no one to negotiate with, but right now there is no one to negotiate with. I also refuse to be manipulated using my emotions, whatever they may be. No one ever cared, I doubt any of you will start. You people aping the emotions of normal people is unconvincing, it is certainly not met by any real deeds.
New Atlas: New ultrasound tech can make virtually any surface touch-sensitive
New Atlas: New ultrasound tech can make virtually any surface touch-sensitive. https://newatlas.com/mobile-technology/ultrasound-touch-sensitive-surfaces/ Programmable touch sensitivity.
Quantum-proof encryption?
Scientists develop security system that can never be hacked https://mol.im/a/7816429 via http://dailym.ai/android
Cryptocurrency: War on Cash, Privacy Coins to be Deployed
Cash War going down In Australia and your own shitholes... https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/edmf1y/cash_ban_hearings_politicians_discuss/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEESomYYTdU Note the beastbadges and lapel pins. https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/edgmgz/when_coinjoin_day/ https://twitter.com/bittlecat/status/1207621591820951552 https://www.usdebtclock.org/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjodLvD23kI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Obc_cJba4 Not really a true privacy coin though.
Re: California Penal Code 12355
On 12/21/19, Razer wrote: > So if, say, somebody steals $10, he has to return $10 And if he refuses... then what? >>> in the worst case you lost $10. Deal with it. >> How do you retrieve, a $significant to you value, from thief who... >> 1) has $significant, in original or convertible value, but refuses? >> 2) does not have $significant? > > I always figured it would be worth the 10 to never have to deal with the > person again. 1) See above... it's not $10 anymore, it's now respectively scaled to "$significant to you", so it can't be dodged as triviality. > to never have to deal with the person again. 2a) No, if there is no repurcussion, they'll likely keep coming back. 2b) Then it becomes beyond $significant to you, for which the original question remains. > Maybe you simply have too much shit and it NEEDS to be expropriated for > the good of society (It you were a tribal leader you'd be slaughtered in > your sleep for withholding from the rest of the group). 3) So now the thief has too much shit... yours and everyone else's. And now you have an ugly circular and cyclical thieves and slaughter society. Nice. Now if some region is voluntarily reculturing itself into a moral communal society, without stomping on anyone else including voluntarys still within it, sure a commune argument could be made, but it wasn't. The arg made was an immoral slaughterous one.
Assassination Politics AP
On 12/21/19, Razer wrote: > My suggesting is > take Jim Bell ands his 'assinine-nation politricks' and move to the > island imagined in Lord of the Flies. May the most murderous child win. The murderous child seems almost like an internal problem among players... mobsters, rivals, enemies, Hatfield McCoy, etc. That always exists and is relatively self contained. Now an Assassination Politics instance operating in either autonomous mode, or in a "managed" mode for or devolving into sick bloodsport profit that raptures on humanity's tendencies therein, a distributively supported TV gameshow straight out of fiction memes "Let's bid $random human for $20k Alex"... these modes would have some real problems regarding innocent people getting originally harmed. That's different from say a distributed "fair" Hammurabi Code. And different from the original harm happening everyday news in essentially one on one unrelated and first events. Not much improvement happens there without lots of outreach, cultural education, hippie love, etc. The bloodsport and actions of Governments and even Corporations, their force against voluntary choices following no harm... would surely end as their workers quit them in droves. The question herein is which sport is worse, better, or more easily solveable or minimized, and by what means... Govt's or the Gameshow's. Does not the potential, and even propensity and or eventuality for sport (as history shows), make both Govt and AP very difficult to recommend, and essentially impossible to recommend as "pure" things.
Re: "Sonic attack" in China.
coderman wrote: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Friday, December 20, 2019 9:04 PM, jim bell wrote: > >> 'Sonic attack' impacted 'at least 20 regions' of US diplomat's brain - but >> cause remains unknown, new study finds >> https://news.yahoo.com/sonic-attack-impacted-least-20-204353837.html >> >> Jim Bell's comment: >> >> Why not use a sound spectrum analyzer, running on a smartphone app, >> to identify this? > > > because it's not RF: it's pesticides! > https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-49770369 > > (they checked radio and audio spectrum to no avail...) > > > best regards, I stopped reading at the sub-head '...may have been...'. Cuba is know as the most SUSTAINABLE nation on the planet and that INTRINSICALLY means ORGANIC farming. Little to no pesticides are used in Cuba and this is simply TRANSFERENCE of Capitalist Industrial-Ag belief systems into a disinformation vacuum... In other words the rotted gray matter of people living in the mind-death grip of consumer capitalism... Perhaps the US Spy/'Diplomats' on Cuba only eat food grown on the US mainland from toxic-ally contaminated shitholes like Florida, LousyAnna, and the rest of the Gulf Coast. Rr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: On Linux's /dev/random, /dev/urandom, getrandom()
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, December 20, 2019 9:07 PM, coderman wrote: > tldr; > > Just use /dev/urandom! I think urandom is secure as long as its output pass the Marsaglia die hard tests (provide a fair unbiased unpredictable stream of bits)
