Chance discovery brings quantum computing using standard microchips a step closer | Science | AAAS

[jim bell]

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03/chance-discovery-brings-quantum-computing-using-standard-microchips-step-closer

Jim Bell's comment:
My isotope-modified integrated circuit material invention 
https://daltonium.com/     uses a very similar principle, putting 
spin-containing atomic nuclei into an electric field.  The main difference is, 
my invention does not act on individual atoms, but fields of atoms in a layer.  
Also, Intel was just granted a patent for an isotopically-purified way to build 
a material relatively free of nuclear spin.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/10388848.html

So, effectively, in patent terms, I will own the right hand of a duplex, while 
Intel will own the left hand of a duplex.

           Jim Bell

[quote]
Chance discovery brings quantum computing using standard microchips a step 
closer

By Adrian ChoMar. 11, 2020 , 12:35 PM

An accidental innovation has given a dark-horse approach to quantum computing a 
boost. For decades, scientists have dreamed of using atomic nuclei embedded in 
silicon—the familiar stuff of microchips—as quantum bits, or qubits, in a 
superpowerful quantum computer, manipulating them with magnetic fields. Now, 
researchers in Australia have stumbled across a way to control such a nucleus 
with more-manageable electric fields, raising the prospect of controlling the 
qubits in much the same way as transistors in an ordinary microchip.



“That’s incredibly important,” says Thaddeus Ladd, a research physicist at HRL 
Laboratories LLC., a private research company. “This could potentially change 
the game for nuclear qubits in silicon.”

An ordinary computer flips bits from 1 to 0 and back again. A quantum computer 
employs qubits that can be set to 0, 1, or, thanks to the bizarre rules of 
quantum mechanics, 0 and 1 at the same time. This enables a quantum computer to 
crunch a huge number of inputs simultaneously, which is one reason why a big 
one should able to solve certain types of complex problems that would swamp any 
conventional computer. Last year, researchers with Google claimed their small 
quantum computer performed an abstruse calculation that would have taken 
conventional supercomputers millennia.
Jim





|  | Virus-free. www.avast.com  |

Re: test message

[Cecilia Tanaka]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020, 09:18, some jerk using my email address wrote:

>
> Ahh, we know you finally found Jesus and took a long, deep, sabatical,
> hihi!
>


WTF?!  Had Juan to find Jesus for you, incompetent Christians?  >:(

Holy sh_t, did you lose the guy *again* in 2020, after so many years
waiting for him?!  Oh, please...  #palmface³  :(((


PS 1:  -  Stop with this stupid spoofing thing, rooty.  Please, it is NOT a
good moment for playing with me.  Go play with Jesus or other imaginary
creatures.  I do always prefer dragons and unicorns.


PS 2:  -  I do definitely love Greg!  Thanks for the patience with all the
list problems and also with my laziness!  Sorry, I swear I used bcc only
because I was f_cking busy!  :P

It's an ill wind...

[Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH]

Consider, if you will, a possible outcome of the current bio-crisis.
(I want it over, swiftly, and with as little damage to humanity as
possible, I really do, but it doesn't look promising at the moment)

We're seeing some congress critters self-quarantining. I think it
likely that more will do the same.

And yet, they (and some of you, even it not not so much me) want the
work of the Congress to continue.

How to resolve this?

One solution is teleconferencing. Votes, meetings, etc., could be
carried out this way, and work (such as it is) can get done. Think of
the transparency (if not voluntarily achieved, perhaps attained with
the help of some volunteer work by technologically sophisticated
persons of flexible morals).

If this goes on for a while, there's no reason why they (the
accumulated they of Congress and staff) wouldn't become acculturated
and accustomed to this new way.

At that point, what's to stop the congress critters and their remoras,
with suitable encouragement, to permanently relocate to their own
districts.

It would certainly make lobbying more difficult, being in view of
their constituents, rather than sequestered in the summer hellhole
that is DC.

I have a dream...

Kurt

Re: [OSI] [ESR] Open Source Iniciative bans co-founder, Eric S. Raymond.

[Zenaan Harkness]

Great post!


> 
> 
> Open Source Initiative bans co-founder, Eric S Raymond
>  Mar 9, 2020
> 
> Last week, Eric S Raymond (often known as ESR
> , author of The Cathedral
> and the Bazaar ,
> and co-founder of the Open Source Intiative
> ) was banned from the
> Open Source Intiative (the “OSI”).
> 
> Specifically, Raymond was banned from the mailing lists used to organize
> and communicate with the OSI.
> 
> For an organization to ban their founder from communicating with the group
> (such as via a mailing list) is a noteworthy move.
> 
> At a time when we have seen other founders (of multiple Free and Open
> Source related initiatives) pushed out of the organizations they founded
> (such as with Richard Stallman being compelled to resign from the Free
> Software Foundation, or the attempts to remove Linus Torvalds from the
> Linux Kernel – both of which happened within the last year) it seems worth
> taking a deeper look at what, specifically, is happening with the Open
> Source Initiative.
> 
> I don't wish to tell any of you what you should think about this
> significant move. As such I will simply provide as much of the relevant
> information as I can, show the timeline of events, and reach out to all
> involved parties for their points of view and comments.
> 
> Raymond made the following statement, on February 27, 2020, on his personal
> blog :
> 
> “I – OSI’s co-founder and its president for its first six years – was
> kicked off their lists for being too rhetorically forceful in opposing
> certain recent attempts to subvert OSD clauses 5 and 6. This despite the
> fact that I had vocal support from multiple list members who thanked me for
> being willing to speak out.
> 
> It shouldn’t be news to anyone that there is an effort afoot to change – I
> would say corrupt – the fundamental premises of the open-source culture.
> Instead of meritocracy and “show me the code”, we are now urged to behave
> so that no-one will ever feel uncomfortable.
> 
> The effect – the intended effect – is to diminish the prestige and autonomy
> of people who do the work – write the code – in favor of self-appointed
> tone-policers. In the process, the freedom to speak necessary truths even
> when the manner in which they are expressed is unpleasant is being
> gradually strangled.
> 
> And that is bad for us. Very bad. Both directly – it damages our
> self-correction process – and in its second-order effects. The habit of
> institutional tone policing, even when well-intentioned, too easily slides
> into the active censorship of disfavored views.”
...
o

The more such censorious self righteousness (as has been exercised against 
Torvalds, Stallman, now ESR, and many others) is given air time and publicity, 
the better - the true intentions of "petty nazis" or "snowflakes" or "liberal 
censors" or "exclude to include" hypocrites, is a good thing to expose and the 
sooner real people, not the moronic NPCs causing these problems, will learn to 
get a handle on communication, power, and the holding of authority.

Lessons being learned ...

[OSI] [ESR] Open Source Iniciative bans co-founder, Eric S. Raymond.

[Cecilia Tanaka]

Open Source Initiative bans co-founder, Eric S Raymond
 Mar 9, 2020

Last week, Eric S Raymond (often known as ESR
, author of The Cathedral
and the Bazaar ,
and co-founder of the Open Source Intiative
) was banned from the
Open Source Intiative (the “OSI”).

Specifically, Raymond was banned from the mailing lists used to organize
and communicate with the OSI.

For an organization to ban their founder from communicating with the group
(such as via a mailing list) is a noteworthy move.

At a time when we have seen other founders (of multiple Free and Open
Source related initiatives) pushed out of the organizations they founded
(such as with Richard Stallman being compelled to resign from the Free
Software Foundation, or the attempts to remove Linus Torvalds from the
Linux Kernel – both of which happened within the last year) it seems worth
taking a deeper look at what, specifically, is happening with the Open
Source Initiative.

I don't wish to tell any of you what you should think about this
significant move. As such I will simply provide as much of the relevant
information as I can, show the timeline of events, and reach out to all
involved parties for their points of view and comments.

Raymond made the following statement, on February 27, 2020, on his personal
blog :

“I – OSI’s co-founder and its president for its first six years – was
kicked off their lists for being too rhetorically forceful in opposing
certain recent attempts to subvert OSD clauses 5 and 6. This despite the
fact that I had vocal support from multiple list members who thanked me for
being willing to speak out.

It shouldn’t be news to anyone that there is an effort afoot to change – I
would say corrupt – the fundamental premises of the open-source culture.
Instead of meritocracy and “show me the code”, we are now urged to behave
so that no-one will ever feel uncomfortable.

The effect – the intended effect – is to diminish the prestige and autonomy
of people who do the work – write the code – in favor of self-appointed
tone-policers. In the process, the freedom to speak necessary truths even
when the manner in which they are expressed is unpleasant is being
gradually strangled.

And that is bad for us. Very bad. Both directly – it damages our
self-correction process – and in its second-order effects. The habit of
institutional tone policing, even when well-intentioned, too easily slides
into the active censorship of disfavored views.”

So what, exactly, prompted this extreme measure? What could happen that
would be so problematic that an organization would ban their founder (and
one of the most well known individuals in the Open Source world)?

Thankfully the Open Source Initiative keeps a public archive

of
all the posts to their mailing lists. I did what any journalist would do in
this scenario… I started reading.

And I didn't have to go very far back through the archive, either. Turns
out the first post (in a very long time) from Raymond was 3 short days
before he was banned (and before the blog post he penned above).

February 24th, 2020. Raymond posted the following

to
an OSI mailing list with the title “A wild co-founder appears”:

“After twenty years of staying off this list, I have joined it.

I didn't, until now, because whenever I checked in on this list the
regulars seemed to be doing the job I expected them to do quite
competently. And I had enough of an “I can't be everywhere, dammit!”
problem without adding to it.

But there are two recent developments I find concerning that have convinced
me I need to weigh in. Please pay careful attention, as I am not making
this choice [lightly].

I will start individual threads for both issues.”

What followed from there were several posts by Eric Raymond over the next
two days – having conversations on multiple topics relating to Open Source
licensing and how the OSI should handle potential revoking of certification
of licenses.

Some of the messages had strong disagreements over OSI policy. However, I
was unable to find any messages, from Raymond (or anyone else) that would
(based on my understanding of the Code of Conduct
 that the OSI has adopted
for their mailing lists) constitute a banning… of a founder or of any
regular member.

Then, on February 26, 2020, “modera...@opensource.org” posted the following
statement

:

The OSI Board is aware that some offensive emails have been sent to this
list. The OSI does not 

[MINISTRY] stop being racist - The Bee: Non-racist terminology replacements

[Zig the N.g]

The Bee provides a helpful list of non-racist terminologies to replace racist 
terms that unthoughtful (at least nominally racist) racist people keep using.

Please stop.

  PSA: Stop Using Racist Terminology
  https://babylonbee.com/news/psa-stop-using-racist-terminology

With the rise of the novel coronavirus, there has been an uptick in people 
saying racist things like suggesting the virus came from the region it did in 
fact come from. So we're encouraging our readers to avoid problematic terms 
like "Wuhan virus," "Chinese coronavirus," "Kung Flu," "Black Pepper Death," 
"Chopsick," "Srirachoo," "Terracougha Army," or the "Great Whoop of China." 
Definitely don't use any of those. And certainly never name a disease, product, 
or cultural trend after the area it's from.

Instead, use our handy guide to avoid problematic, racist language:

 Instead of Say:
 -  --
 Wuhan virusLung pao sicken
 Black deathDeath of colour
 Indian giver   Elizabeth Warren
 Canadian bacon Geopolitically irrelevant, inferior bacon
 Mexican jumping beans  Latinx acrobatic moth larvae
 Chinese dictator   Austere totalitarian scholar
 Japanese cartoons  It's called Anime and it's totally normal for 
adults to watch, mum!

Excerpts from Machiavelli's Discourse on Livy

[Ryan Carboni]

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Discourses_on_Livy/Third_Book/Chapters_I-VII

THAT WHICH MAKES A KING LOSE THE KINGDOM THAT WAS INHERITED BY HIM

Tarquinius Superbus having killed Servius Tullus, and the latter not
leaving any heirs, he (Tarquinius) came to possess the kingdom with
security, not having to fear those things which had harmed his
predecessors. And although the manner of his occupying the kingdom was
irregular and odious, none the less had he observed the ancient
institutions of the other Kings, he would have been tolerated, and the
Senate and Plebs would never have arisen against him and taken the
State away from him. This man, therefore, was not driven out because
of his son Sextus having violated Lucretia, but for having broken the
laws and governed it (his Kingdom) tyrannically; having taken away all
authority from the Senate and assumed it himself, and those funds
which were marked for public improvements with which the Roman Senate
was satisfied, he diverted to the building of his own palace, with
disgust and envy for him resulting. So that in a very short time, he
despoiled Rome of all that liberty which she had maintained under the
other previous Kings. And it was not enough for him to make the
Fathers (Senators) his enemies, but he aroused the Plebs against
himself, working them hard in mechanical labor and all unlike those
which his predecessors had employed. So that by having filled Rome
with such cruel and haughty examples of his, he had already disposed
the minds of all the Romans to rebellion whenever they should have the
opportunity. And if the incident of Lucretia had not happened, even so
another would have arisen which would have produced the same result:
For if Tarquin had lived like the other Kings and his son Sextus had
not made that error, Brutus and Collatinus would have had recourse to
Tarquin for vengeance against Sextus, and to the Roman People.

Princes should understand, therefore, that they begin to lose the
State from that hour when they begin to break the laws and ancient
institutions under which men have lived for a long time. And if as
private citizens, having lost the State, they should ever become so
prudent to see with what facility Principalities are kept by those who
are counselled wisely, they would regret their loss much more, and
would condemn themselves to greater punishment than that to which
others have condemned them: For it is much more easy to be loved by
the good than the bad, and to obey the laws then to enforce them. And
in wanting to learn the course that they should have to hold to do
this, they do not have to endure any other hardship than to mirror for
themselves the lives of good Princes, such as Timoleon the Corinthian,
Aratus the Sicyonian, and similar ones, in the lives of whom they
would find as much security and satisfaction to him who ruled as to he
who is ruled; so that they ought to want to imitate him, being able to
do so for the reasons mentioned: For men when they are well governed,
do not seek or desire any other liberty; as happened to the people
governed by the above named (Princes), whom they constrained to be
Princes as long as they lived, even though they often had been tempted
to return to private life.

And as in this and the two preceding chapters, there has been
discussed the dispositions aroused against Princes, and of the
Conspiracy made by the sons of Brutus against their country, and of
those made against Tarquinius Priscus and Servius Tullus, it does not
appear to me to be something outside this subject to speak at length
of them in the following chapter, being a matter worthy of being noted
by Princes and Private Citizens.

OF CONSPIRACIES

And it does not appear proper to me to omit the discussion of
Conspiracies, being a matter of so much danger to Princes and Private
Citizens. For it is seen that many more Princes have lost their lives
and States through them, than by open war. For it is conceded only to
a few to be able to make open war against a Prince, but the ability to
conspire against them is conceded to everyone. On the other hand,
private citizens do not enter in an enterprise more perilous nor more
foolhardy than this, as it is difficult and most dangerous in all of
its parts. Whence it happens that many are attempted, and very few
have the desired ending. So that, therefore, Princes may learn to
guard themselves from these dangers, and that Private Citizens may
less rashly engage in them, and rather may learn to live contentedly
under the Rule that has been assigned to them by chance and by their
state, I shall speak widely, not omitting any notable case, in
documenting the one and the other. And truly that sentence of
Cornelius Tacitus is golden, which says that men have to honor things
past but obey the present, and ought to desire good Princes, but
tolerate the ones they have. And truly, whoever does otherwise, most
of the time will ruin himself and his country.

We ought, therefore, ((in entering 

The Turks are Masters of American Politics

[Ryan Carboni]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibel_Edmonds
In September 2005, Edmonds claimed in Vanity Fair that a price was set
for Dennis Hastert to withdraw support for the Armenian Genocide
resolution. That the "... Turkish Consulate ... claimed in one
recording that the price for Hastert to withdraw the resolution would
have been at least $500,000."

making COVID-19 look "much worse" than Spanish flu with a little Wikipedia revisionism

[Zenaan Harkness]

WHO, CDC and Wikipedia revisionism FTW :D

How to make COVID-19 look "much worse" than the Spanish flu, with a little 
Wikipedia revisionism:

  Wikipedia Slashes Spanish Flu Death Rate
  
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/wikipedia-slashes-spanish-flu-death-rate
  https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/09/wikipedia-slashes-spanish-flu-death-rate/

... The trouble with that is the higher range of this [REVISIONIST] 
estimate (50 million as 2% of total cases) gives a figure of 2.5 billion total 
cases. Which is higher than the entire population of the world at the time! 
(1.8 billion).

So something is clearly amiss.

Worse still, the WHO is the only source we have found so far that claims a 
death toll of 20 million. Most sources, such as the CDC (and see here), broadly 
agree that between 50 million and 100 million people died of the Spanish Flu 
(although one recent study wildly differs, see below). In order for 50-100 
million deaths to be 2-3% of total cases there would have had to be 2.5 billion 
– 5 billion cases.

Obviously totally impossible.

Clearly there is something wrong with that newly revised figure of 2-3%. 
The only way to make it work is to also dramatically revise downward the number 
of deaths. And indeed there’s evidence of editors trying to do that on Wiki 
with someone citing a December 2018 study

https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/187/12/2561/5092383/7/1404/5368300?redirectedFrom=fulltext
which used a controversial

https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/188/7/1404/5368300?redirectedFrom=fulltext
“new methodology” to establish a mortality figure of just 17 million. Given 
that this number has previously been estimated for India alone, this is 
remarkable revisionism.

... Why the sudden decision to vastly downgrade the estimated CFR for the 
1918 pandemic and source to a rather obscure WHO article that doesn’t even 
focus on that issue? And, more importantly, why does this extreme downgrade 
still exist on the page even when editors are pointing out the impossibility of 
the figures?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_flu==500=history

At least this new editorial policy by Wiki is well-timed for those looking 
to stoke fear, and unfortunate for those trying to bring reason to bear. It 
allows the media and others to cite the newly downgraded 2-3% CFR as evidence 
that COVID19 is as dangerous as, or more dangerous than, the Spanish Flu and 
will end up killing millions. That’s some nice clickbait right there.

...

US Elections 2020: Democrats Reveal GunGrab plan via Biden in Detroit [for later Oppression]

[grarpamp]

https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/fgfx5z/joe_biden_told_a_factory_worker_youre_full_of_sh/
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-on-video-lashes-out-at-detroit-auto-worker-in-profanity-laced-gun-dispute

Today's white hot political news...

US Democrat Candidates Lay Out Joint Goals to Enable Oppression...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUJMigPmv1w Biden aggresses detroit union worker
 Union worker calmly peacefully defends self
 from aggro Democrats with "This is not OK".

Amid aggressing body language and well documented lies...
Biden: "Don't tell me that, pal, or I'm going to go outside with your ass."
Worker: "You're working for me, man"
Biden: "I'm not working for you. Don't be such a horse's ass."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8IfsczVYZ0 w Colion Noir
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TohNTSpez0c w Anthony Logan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVGykWCsiG8 w Colion Noir re Beto O'Rourke team
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYIZvNawYMI Beto the Mandatory
Confiscator for Biden

"Bye Bye Democrats" -- USA (twitter)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jX2QbrRFZ-A Colion w Joe Rogan
 "I really wasn't pro gun. And on mental health care, education, gangs,
 stats, conversations, understanding, addressing underlying, and more."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgB0yMTZ4UE Defenseless
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYD4Zj2eotw Equalized
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-HbOJGSPSg Freedom's Safe Place
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trv7-sFZcCE Leverage

Simple intros all over the net
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI4CjcjURoM Options
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDfl2Yhs2pI Responsibility
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2Vrc2R1oGU Safety
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRr8Ro3sbuU Etc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSIYXWvkAo8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME5D_XsTcwI Makers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLhCo9fkuzQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPfMiCtiwTA LE too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaksUhEIjic Responsible rights

https://twitter.com/MrColionNoir
https://www.youtube.com/user/MrColionNoir/videos
http://www.mrcolionnoir.com/
https://www.facebook.com/colionnoir
https://www.nra.org/
https://www.nraila.org/
https://nra.tv/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3F1p_foL2Iw w Tavis Smiley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJoHtRS1j9Y Colion on Sanders and
stupid lawsuits
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hR3t7j2tUec Part of stopping shootings
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uq4vPgyRQY8 Colion notes Biden
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsX91mHWDao Warren
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4PJf1gDYf4 Bernie Lies Dem Mandatory Takeback
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_FVIpvxVRw Biden, Beto, Harris, Warren Takeback
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzpypeECnYM Biden
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLtdL29pwHc Biden

Self Defended from law ignoring criminal thugs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGBEDCxmyzs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cw4B_XbW7ds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thVhVjn59mg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGov0H08ySU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6d_tcE5BW_o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Aj0MAwO0Hk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xg8YZYO0RKc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_KUnq99QP8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lnPqbgEU7o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxEc29Z9ZpA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caMHdcRNEkc Why you should not start learning!
 "Who am I kidding, this shit is fun :)"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsT_SKlBctc Why not Bernie Sanders
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party How much Tax?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBIKP4W50-I Bernie Sanders on your
Natural Rights (note Stasi end)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjlT4BME2aE Swiss Credit pt1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgYJ5V2HYy4 Swiss Credit pt2

USA is unique country in world to have wide arms rights backing freedom,
safety, defense, sport, and from tyranny even "democratic" governments
turn into. Wake up Americans, your freedom and more is at stake.

Insane US Democrats hardly seem to proffer trying to
understand and solve underlying society issues, first,
those things they claim to be about. Perhaps because that
requires them to, first, have honorable personal hands-on
responsibility to themself and others... to empower, not to
grab power. A self political problem. "Guns" are not
the problem. "Drugs" are not the problem.

America should focus on education, responsibility, care, charity,
non stigmatizing even free anon support, repositioning the culture,
personal mentality... largests benefits will only come from that.
Not from, and with doing the former no need for, the already diminishing
returns, and further inflaming nature... of unfree laws, Stasi papers, and
grabs the people will rightly find offensive to culture, history, uniqueness.

No law can ever come even close to being able to do what
good ingrained freedom responsible education care etc
can do voluntarily together. Try that, first.

Re: test message

[Cecilia Tanaka]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:50:27PM -0300, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:51:28 -0700
> Mirimir  wrote:
> 
> > On 03/10/2020 11:09 AM, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
> > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:49:49 -0700
> 
> > > 
> > >   There was indeed a problem with cock's SPF configuration and Vincent 
> > > fixed it yesterday. 
> > 
> > Ah. Good to know -- tfwno.gf is one of my favorites ;)
> 
> 
>   And to give credit where credit's due, it was Greg who figured it out. 
> Cock.li changed servers a few days ago and my messages stopped getting 
> through so I assumed it had something to do with whitelisting at cpunks' end, 
> but that wasn't the case. 

Ahh, we know you finally found Jesus and took a long, deep, sabatical, hihi!

Have you taken Him into your heart yet?

:)

Don't worry dear, only feeling extra cheeky today - rooty and I still love you, 
even if you have fallen for Jesus :)

rooty, please don't respond this time, it's hard enough already for Juan during 
his transition!

We've kept an extra special email address just for you dear, 
juanlovesje...@tfwno.gf, and the password is your first name and today's date.

welcome your new president to be - Biden on guns - Re: Militia, law, impressment, guns, history

[Zig the N.g]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:53:50AM +1100, Zig the N.g wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 05:01:48AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> > > such implicit arguments have frequently been cited by (mostly
> > > liberal?) debaters, and much of the clueless populace, lacking any sort of
> > > legal education, accepts them without apparent question.)
> > 
> > The Anti-Gun crowd generally avoids quoting, analyzing
> > and debating law and its historical context and reasons.
> > This is because it simply does not support their
> > Anti-Gun position. And because sidestepping needing to
> > voice or contend with such things makes their agenda easier.
> > 
> > It's also relavant that most of them have never spent an
> > afternoon or year learning the sport, defense, hunting, law,
> > comparative statistics, etc.
> > 
> > Let alone been exposed to or explored larger free thought
> > subjects such as...
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_Independence
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_secession
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_rights_and_legal_rights
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntaryism
> > 
> > > Now, a state might hypothetically have a LAW requiring a militia
> > > member to respond to a call.   But that law would not necessarily
> > > be Constitutional
> > 
> > These sorts of "laws", including "mandatory service", taxes, etc
> > are all immoral and against natural law... forcing somone to
> > take an action, slavery, whatever you want others to do,
> > them having done nothing to you.
> > 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscientious_objector
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impressment
> > 
> > Took till 1995 for even the UN to begin to understand
> > that conscription and impressment are wrong.
> 
> 
> 
>   Nation's Murderous Psychopaths Undecided On Whether They’ll Follow New Gun 
> Laws
>   
> https://babylonbee.com/news/murderous-psychopaths-undecided-on-whether-theyll-follow-new-gun-laws
> 
> WASHINGTON, D.C.—Democrats such as Beto O’Rourke have proposed a
> number of new gun laws, such as universal background checks, a
> ban on magazines that hold more than ten bullets, and possibly
> even a “mandatory buyback” of some weapons such as AR-15s. While
> these laws are likely to be a headache for law-abiding gun
> owners, the nation’s murderous psychopaths aren’t quite certain
> how the laws will affect them.
> 
> “The background check sounds concerning,” explained deranged
> murderer Steve Mason, known as “Murdering Steve” to his friends.
> “I would definitely fail it since I’m a well-known psychopath.
> But I’ve never actually purchased a gun through a gun-dealer; I
> just steal all my murder weapons. And so far no one has proposed
> a background check on theft, so I think I’m good.”
> 
> Jake Foster, who is planning a shooting spree, expressed similar
> concerns about the ban on “high-capacity” magazines. “Having to
> do a shooting spree and reloading after every tenth shot does
> sound irritating,” said Foster. “Despite the law, I might just
> use a high-capacity magazine anyway. I guess the question is
> whether I’m willing to deal with a possible fine on top of the
> multiple counts of murder.”
> 
> One law murderous psychopaths did seem excited about was the
> AR-15 buyback. “If they offer a lot of money for my AR-15, it
> could be pretty worthwhile,” said nutjob Craig McGee. “Then I can
> use that money to buy more guns just as lethal... but through the
> black market, of course. Gotta avoid those background checks.”


At least the Dems have a winning candidate this time - Trump will find it sooo 
difficult to battle Biden on stage ... unlike Hillary "you know, it's just so 
good that someone like you is not in charge of our Justice department" Clinton.




  "You're Full Of Shit!": Biden Melts Down In 'AR-14' Tirade After Voter 
Confronts Over Plan To Take Guns
  
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/youre-full-shit-biden-melts-down-ar-14-tirade-after-voter-confronts-over-plan-take-guns

... People are probably fine with Biden switching his platform to grabbing 
AR-14s. I don’t think people will complain much.
— Erielle Davidson (@politicalelle) March 10, 2020

... "Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump! Trump!"
Detroit auto workers shouted their support for President 
@realDonaldTrump during Joe Biden's plant visit. pic.twitter.com/AxvasJCFCR
— Trump War Room - Text EMPOWER to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) March 10, 2020



Yeah, I's reckon, that, goin' ta Dee-troit, visit-in some real workers, and 
den tellin im all "You're full of shit!" is ... I dunno y'all ... a winnin 
strategy?

Ahem.

  The DNPC party - party of the people.  Or somethin.

Did I mention "ahem"?