Re: more email blocking/censorship.
> hotmail shows the same behaviour. Hotmail to cock.li works. Cock.li to > hotmail messages are silently discarded. >> If this is intentional on the part of Google, it's absolutely despicable. > > > kinda looks like there is one 'shared' blocking list and it's being > used by > pg's spam filter, it's being used by google, and...the rest of the arpanet > prolly. the recent "*SPAM*" rejections showed cock.li on pretty much every blacklist.
Re: more email blocking/censorship.
I'm posting this on-list to make sure Shawn sees my reply. I replied to him directly but I don't know if the heliohost.us --> rushpost.com path works. As another datapoint, last week part(I think) of heliohost.us got banned by google, and if I send a message to gmail.com I do get a 'message can't be delivered' bla bla reply. I was also told that the bans eventually clear, though I have my doubts. On Fri, 21 May 2021 10:33:54 -0500 "Shawn K. Quinn" wrote: > On 5/20/21 21:20, juan wrote: > > > > > > I sent a message from pu...@tfwno.gf to gbne...@petascale.org (which I > > believe goes through gmail) and another message to karl and apparently they > > didn't get them which leads me to believe that cock.li messages are now > > being discarded by google/sent to gmail's spam folder or something? > > Gmail to cock.li (firemail.cc) works for me. Cock.li to Gmail hasn't > gone through yet after several minutes (nothing in spam folder). hotmail shows the same behaviour. Hotmail to cock.li works. Cock.li to hotmail messages are silently discarded. > > If this is intentional on the part of Google, it's absolutely despicable. kinda looks like there is one 'shared' blocking list and it's being used by pg's spam filter, it's being used by google, and...the rest of the arpanet prolly.
Ars Technica: Vulnerabilities in billions of Wi-Fi devices let hackers bypass firewalls
Ars Technica: Vulnerabilities in billions of Wi-Fi devices let hackers bypass firewalls. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/05/farewell-to-firewalls-wi-fi-bugs-open-network-devices-to-remote-hacks/
Re: more email blocking/censorship.
On 5/21/21, juan wrote: > On Fri, 21 May 2021 02:07:11 -0400 > Karl wrote: > >> Received no personal messages from you recently. > > Thanks for the confirmation. > > >> >> To reach me reliably basically repeated contact via multiple channels is >> needed. > > Isn't it hilarious? Every new day all this technofascist garbage gets > closer to useless, unless you send stuff from a@GOOGLENSA to b@GOOGLENSA. Although it has certainly worsened over the years, and is expected to worsen further, that statement has been true for me ever since I participated in anti-big-energy activism around 2012. I'm hard to reach because I experience both censorship and behavioral issues. Most people have at most one of those, so there's usually some reasonable way to reach them, such as a more reliable messaging service than email. Here's a ricochet id for me that may work for a little bit: ricochet:oned7uvcksmbe3fl
Science X: Bell's theorem refuted
Science X: Bell's theorem refuted. https://sciencex.com/news/2021-05-bell-theorem-refuted.html "Different Bell".
Re: more email blocking/censorship.
On Fri, 21 May 2021 02:07:11 -0400 Karl wrote: > Received no personal messages from you recently. Thanks for the confirmation. > > To reach me reliably basically repeated contact via multiple channels is > needed. Isn't it hilarious? Every new day all this technofascist garbage gets closer to useless, unless you send stuff from a@GOOGLENSA to b@GOOGLENSA. also, since last week the google criminals are also blocking heliohost.us so that's another link they cut. grarpamp wrote: >Send me test spam direct if you want. just sent you a message with subject "i love google" - Im sure that one will get through >Cock to gmail has vanished before. First time for me. I don't think it ever happened since I started using it ~2.5 years ago.
Re: *SPAM* Monty Python
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bW4vEo1F4E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBcY3W5WgNU Lovely spam, now then.
Re: more email blocking/censorship.
Cock to gmail has vanished before. se7en did show up on list recently. Send me test spam direct if you want.
Re: UFO: Inside the BlackVault, FOIA POSSE, MKULTRA, ARTICHOKE, BLUEBIRD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGueCs5gJLQ UFO's Above And Beyond Documentary w Doohan MAJIC MAJESTIC MJ-12 CIRVIS BLUEBOOK S4 Billy Meier Mexico https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ke_xLeEzxaI Dreamland Area 51 UFO Documentary 1:36:32 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CBO-gZaPpo AATIP, wheel history via It's Redacted https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7gBnsGjfyM Corbell Fox https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVoobRr-lQc Sen Martin Heinrich Intel Cmte TMZ "I've never seen *the bodies in* Roswell." ... parse that response VERY carefully https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6_gANuWD_k Lt. Graves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRD9vxArq64 Chris Mellon Black Projects on Coast to Coast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz8k8Iqx3wA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KChGKhJ4Ro Halt https://www.facebook.com/HISTORY/videos/2980428978664655/ https://www.mufon.com/mantell-case---1948.html https://youtu.be/JDuqZbjxB_E Canada Hearings Hon Paul Hellyer multiple species MIC Bilderberg Cartels Shadow Control Gov https://youtu.be/MNSYSa5-yds Canada Citizen Hearings UFO Disclosure https://i.redd.it/8zzf35h68a071.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EjlRmS6VgAEBokR.jpg https://old.reddit.com/r/411ExperiencedReaders/comments/ebi0fi/ufo_india_1958_four_entities_emerged_two_boys_who/fb4wgwb https://dpo.tothestarsacademy.com/blog/what-we-know-and-what-we-believe-are-not-always-the-same-thing-heres-how-our-perception-of-fact-influences-our-worldview https://www.nicap.org/twining_letter.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_A._Carlson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjlzeYiGLzc Pascagoula https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUlVFzl_BJs Dimensions https://www.history.com/news/ufos-near-nuclear-facilities-uss-roosevelt-rendlesham https://www.history.com/shows/unidentified-inside-americas-ufo-investigation https://www.history.com/news/ufos-green-fireballs-nuclear-facilities-new-mexico https://www.cnn.com/2013/03/28/us/fbi-flying-saucers-memo/index.html https://www.history.com/news/live-from-nevada-its-an-a-bomb-test https://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/27/ufos-showed-interest-in-nukes-ex-air-force-personnel-say/ https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/26/us/politics/ufo-sightings-navy-pilots.html https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/05/10/how-the-pentagon-started-taking-ufos-seriously https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srtrRbt77AE Ultras https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGU2m8gpceI Gravity control https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NH01GSOhwk Jess Fritch MUFON Physics via Cynthia Siegel UFOConnection.net, Thomas Townsend Brown Sub Quantum Kinetics Electrogravitics S-13 S-30 Sightings BRILLIANT PEBBLES TR-3B Black Manta https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXRa-S0xCxI Jess Fritch and Thomas Townsend Brown https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zYlQeZWhu4 Jess Fritch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ump5pUo7WhE Jess Fritch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y10R8Fs3o0 Jess Fritch https://vimeo.com/186171699 UFOConnection.net Betty Hill https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245425484\_Biefeld-Brown\_Effect\_Misinterpretation\_of\_Corona\_Wind\_Phenomena https://omega-point.medium.com/the-trouble-with-tic-tac-technology-46dee4c158ee https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/document/0054/4525586.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robertson_Panel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsHlFeC5vic https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1960/02/28/119097456.pdf https://www.nytimes.com/1979/10/14/archives/ufo-files-the-untold-story.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAQVlVw-vT4 https://medium.com/predict/eugene-podkletnovs-impulse-gravity-generator-8749bbdc8378 https://www.jacquesvallee.net/research/ https://archive.org/details/confrontationssc00vall_0 https://dreamlandresort.com/ "The nobles with their flying starships" " Physicists who studied UFO motion determined that UFOs don't move in the sense that we know it. They manipulate spacetime, as defined by Einstein's general relativity. General relativity shows that space is compressible and stretchable, given enough energy / momentum applied to it. Physicists theorize that UFOs leverage the distortability of space - by squeezing the space together between their initial position and the target position where they want to move. After they distort space so that the distance between their initial and target positions is compressed into a Much Shorter Distance they then propel themselves to the target. One UFO - reported by a Navy fighter jet pilot and seen in a Pentagon released video - was initially at 35,000 feet above sea level. The UFO could have compressed the space between its position and the ocean into a distance of 1 foot, for example. Then the UFO could easily move through a distance of 1 foot in 0.78 second- a seemingly incredibly hugh speed, as reported by the pilot . So by compressing the space between its 35,000 ft altitude and sea level into a distance of 1 foot, the UFO accomplishes the task of traveling at what appears to be an incredibly huge speed - by not really traveling at that huge speed -
Karl's [spam] (Re: *SPAM* Filter borked,)
I updated the Subject line and broke the thread for the below: On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:28:12PM -0400, Karl wrote: > Hey Greg, > > > Personally, I don't think this is necessary. The nature of the cypherpunks > > list is that people offer their thoughts, knowledge, links, criticism, etc. > > Your contributions are generally on-topic for the list, so I don't think > > there's a reason to downplay yourself. > > Are you receiving what I'm writing? Yes. > What do you think of this? > > [spam][spam] i tied myself to a table leg again and i want to talk about > > how boss's striatum > > wire just feels _so_ _great!_ be scared and aggressive around people > > different from you! > > if i sell you some spam, will you let me buy some of yours? [spam][spam] I think it was off the general list topics. As in, not very related to the cryptoanarchist topics we're allegedly here for. However, I didn't think it was spam. Maybe that's just me: SPAM is more or less equivalent, in my mind, to unsolicited commercial email (UCE). We barely get any of that on the cypherpunks list. BTW, the old archives at https://lists.cpunks.org are filled with UCE. > Compared to this? > > Hey does anybody have any tips on learning rust on an airgapped machine? > > Cargo just > > keep frustrating me so much. Is there a crate mirror anywhere? If I made > > one, would > > anybody else use it? I found the discussion about whether rusted iron filings are magnetic to be completely within bounds for the cypherpunks list. Again, that's just my opinion. > >>If you are truly posting something that is off-topic, then an "[offtopic]" > >Iindicator or similar might be a good way to indicate that. > > I can maybe switch to thatt change what I was expressing but my input dialog box is moving my > cursor all around and it is very hard to navigate, so sending as is. > sorry about this.[spam]> honestly I was "trained" to disrupt > communities like this and I want to give people a clear way to protect > themselves from that disruption a little., when I can figure it out. > at all. Without trying to speak for anyone but myself: Do as you please with the subject headings. I was merely suggesting that the [spam] tag probably isn't needed, in my view. Trying to disrupt cypherpunks is sort of a cottage industry around here. When disruption is the norm, it makes disruption tougher to do! Greg
[fiction] Writing an Operating System Before Breakfast
Obviously this is not intended for anyone who take offense at it; it's not about you; it is just a persistent experience. A random bully joined a computer mailing list full of people who could write an operating system before breakfast. "Hi peeps! It is so cool that you can write an entire operating system before breakfast! How do you keep all those system details in your heads? Your minds must be so huge!" "Uhh.. What's an operating system? I do a little exercise before breakfast." "... this is the list of people who write operating systems before breakfast, isn't it?" "Yes, definitely, that's us!" "So, do you write an operating system before breakfast?" "Sometimes. On my good days. All the time, really." "Great. I have some trouble with my operating system. Do you know what a kernel panic is?" "Sounds like when you need to buy more precut corn?" "No ... a kernel panic is an operating system thing! You like operating systems, right?" "I love to write them before breakfast. I have a notebook for it and everything." "Okay, so, computers are made of assembly language and posix signals." "Foreign languages and secret messages?" "Something like that. _assembly_ language and _posix_ signals." "Assembly and posix." "Yes! Now, say that more, please." "I was speaking assembly language before breakfast but didn't write my posix signals well enough." "Great! You've got it! I'm happy to be part of your list."
Re: more email blocking/censorship.
Received no personal messages from you recently. My spam folder is all real spam, which is strange, because cpunks is full of messages with labels for me that say "this message was not sent to spam because of a filter you set up" , implying my spam should be full of non-cpunks real messages. It even says that on messages from Greg. To reach me reliably basically repeated contact via multiple channels is needed.
Re: Karl's [spam] (Re: *SPAM* Filter borked,)
Hey Greg, I got your email. Thanks for speaking to me. On Thu, May 20, 2021, 10:30 PM Greg Newby wrote: > I updated the Subject line and broke the thread for the below: > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:28:12PM -0400, Karl wrote: > > Hey Greg, > > > > > Personally, I don't think this is necessary. The nature of the > cypherpunks > > > list is that people offer their thoughts, knowledge, links, criticism, > etc. > > > Your contributions are generally on-topic for the list, so I don't > think > > > there's a reason to downplay yourself. > > > > Are you receiving what I'm writing? > > Yes. > > > What do you think of this? > > > [spam][spam] i tied myself to a table leg again and i want to talk > about how boss's striatum > > > wire just feels _so_ _great!_ be scared and aggressive around people > different from you! > > > if i sell you some spam, will you let me buy some of yours? > [spam][spam] > > I think it was off the general list topics. As in, not very related to the > cryptoanarchist topics we're allegedly here for. > > However, I didn't think it was spam. Maybe that's just me: SPAM is more or > less equivalent, in my mind, to unsolicited commercial email (UCE). We > barely get any of that on the cypherpunks list. > These are often things I don't want to say, or are said when I do not want to say them. From brainwashing. [spam] helps me have ease by helping me feel better spamming the list. And if people filter around [spam] instead of around me, they might hear me when I have something important to say, if I can learn to differentiate well again. Regarding UCE, commercial email is not only about selling products. Hopefully that's clear to a community like this? Being a paid troll is a huge thing now. BTW, the old archives at https://lists.cpunks.org are filled with UCE. > > > Compared to this? > > > Hey does anybody have any tips on learning rust on an airgapped > machine? Cargo just > > > keep frustrating me so much. Is there a crate mirror anywhere? If I > made one, would > > > anybody else use it? > > I found the discussion about whether rusted iron filings are magnetic to > be completely within bounds for the cypherpunks list. Again, that's just my > opinion. > Rust is a newer systems programming language, at a glance to me it looks like it is trying to be secure. >>If you are truly posting something that is off-topic, then an "[offtopic]" > > >Iindicator or similar might be a good way to indicate that. > > > > I can maybe switch to thatt > change what I was expressing but my input dialog box is moving my > > cursor all around and it is very hard to navigate, so sending as is. > > sorry about this.[spam]> honestly I was "trained" to disrupt > > communities like this and I want to give people a clear way to protect > > themselves from that disruption a little., when I can figure it out. > > at all. > > Without trying to speak for anyone but myself: Do as you please with the > subject headings. I was merely suggesting that the [spam] tag probably > isn't needed, in my view. > > Trying to disrupt cypherpunks is sort of a cottage industry around here. > When disruption is the norm, it makes disruption tougher to do! > Greg > Or easier but yeah ... Uhh ... I have severe problems preserving and accessing information. That might be why a lot of [spam] ends up here. I need a way to store feelings without losing them, somewhere. >
