Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-13 Thread rooty
Hi mememirir I vouch for coderman you been warned.

 Original Message 
On Jan 8, 2019, 5:49 PM, Mirimir wrote:

> On 01/08/2019 04:55 PM, coderman wrote:
>> """
>>
>> Where is Coderman?
>>
>> Searching public database and
>> https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/
>> shows no record of Martin Peck in prison.
>>
>> He filed Court case "Roark v. United States 6:12-cv-01354-MC" at address:
>> [27464 SW Vandershuere 
>> Road](geo:0,0?q=27464+SW+Vandershuere+Road%0A%3E+Hillsboro%2C+OR+97123)
> [> Hillsboro, OR 
> 97123](geo:0,0?q=27464+SW+Vandershuere+Road%0A%3E+Hillsboro%2C+OR+97123)
>>
>> """
>>
>> I don't live there anymore. Please don't use this address as my location.
>>
>> Also not dead! :)
>
> So how do we know that you're the same person who used to post from
> coder...@gmail.com ???

Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-12 Thread John Newman

> 
> 
>> But damn, if you are coder...@gmail.com, it would have been good to
>> have an authentication mechanism in place before changing email
>> providers. Not that Google to ProtonMail is a bad move, of course.
>> 
>> I did look through old list messages, and didn't find anything that
>> coder...@gmail.com had GnuPG-signed.
>> 
>> But of course, it doesn't really matter ;)
> 
> indeed; email must die!
> 

Use GPG and sign your messages :P

I tied my GPG key into Keybase.io, which gives you some options of tying your 
key to
various other services, e.g. a personal web site / a BTC address / logins for 
reddit
& hacker news & probably other shit too.

But, really, just having a posting history with a certain key seems to me the 
easiest & most
reliable way of establishing legitimacy.


<…. snip ..>




signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-12 Thread John Newman

> 
> 
>> But damn, if you are coder...@gmail.com, it would have been good to
>> have an authentication mechanism in place before changing email
>> providers. Not that Google to ProtonMail is a bad move, of course.
>> 
>> I did look through old list messages, and didn't find anything that
>> coder...@gmail.com had GnuPG-signed.
>> 
>> But of course, it doesn't really matter ;)
> 
> indeed; email must die!
> 

Use GPG and sign your messages :P

I tied my GPG key into Keybase.io, which gives you some options of tying your 
key to
various other services, e.g. a personal web site / a BTC address / logins for 
reddit
& hacker news & probably other shit too.

But, really, just having a posting history with a certain key seems to me the 
easiest & most
reliable way of establishing legitimacy.


<…. snip ..>




signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-12 Thread grarpamp
On 1/12/19, grarpamp  wrote:
> "cpu...@cpunks.org"

Delete that, meant this one...
"cypherpu...@cpunks.org"


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-11 Thread coderman


> But damn, if you are coder...@gmail.com, it would have been good to
> have an authentication mechanism in place before changing email
> providers. Not that Google to ProtonMail is a bad move, of course.
>
> I did look through old list messages, and didn't find anything that
> coder...@gmail.com had GnuPG-signed.
>
> But of course, it doesn't really matter ;)

indeed; email must die!


"Records associated with mailing list 'Cypherpunks', using address 
'cypherpu...@al-qaeda.net', or 'cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org'."
- https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/cypherpunks-67281/
- https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/cypherpunks-67282/
- https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/cypherpunks-67283/
- https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/cypherpunks-67284/


best regards,


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-10 Thread Mirimir
On 01/08/2019 07:13 PM, coderman wrote:
>> So how do we know that you're the same person who used to post from
>> coder...@gmail.com ???
> 
> think of a subject to FOIA, i'll prove it's me ;)

Maybe so.

But damn, if you _are_ coder...@gmail.com, it would have been good to
have an authentication mechanism in place before changing email
providers. Not that Google to ProtonMail is a bad move, of course.

I did look through old list messages, and didn't find anything that
coder...@gmail.com had GnuPG-signed.

But of course, it doesn't really matter ;)


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-08 Thread coderman
> So how do we know that you're the same person who used to post from
> coder...@gmail.com ???

think of a subject to FOIA, i'll prove it's me ;)



Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-08 Thread Mirimir
On 01/08/2019 04:55 PM, coderman wrote:
> """
> 
> Where is Coderman?
> 
> Searching public database and
> https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/
> shows no record of Martin Peck in prison.
> 
> He filed Court case "Roark v. United States 6:12-cv-01354-MC" at address:
> 27464 SW Vandershuere Road
> Hillsboro, OR 97123
> 
> """
> 
> I don't live there anymore. Please don't use this address as my location.
> 
> Also not dead! :)

So how do we know that you're the same person who used to post from
coder...@gmail.com ???


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-02 Thread Steven Schear
Excellent reasons to be "self-employed" as a crypto asset trader with a
friend fronting for you at any exchanges requiring AML/KYC for fiat
withdrawals to bank accounts. Maybe buy a "pre-paid" major CC in your name
from someone dividing up their large credit line into smaller (e.g., $2000)
accounts and "renting" them out. If you can live off these CCs they can be
quite effective. (Some CC-issuers are questioning or closing or suspending
accounts with more than a few named "friends").
Don't forget to use Monero and or Samourai wallet's new ricochet feature
greatly impede blockchain analyzers (for BTC-only).

On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:00 AM John Newman  wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 04:53:15PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> > On 12/31/2018 02:30 PM, Where is Coderman? wrote:
> > > Where is Coderman?
> > >
> > > Searching public database and https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ shows no
> record of Martin Peck in prison.
> > >
> > > He filed Court case "Roark v. United States 6:12-cv-01354-MC" at
> address:
> > > 27464 SW Vandershuere Road
> > > Hillsboro, OR 97123
> > >
> https://www.google.com/maps/place/27464+SW+Vanderschuere+Rd,+Hillsboro,+OR+97123,+USA/@45.394192,-122.9598845,259m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x549514881c65e9fd:0x8a97ff4b304f7948!8m2!3d45.3941779!4d-122.959525
> > >
> > > This looks to be not there anymore? Or maybe Coderman got rid of
> horses.
> > >
> > > A while back Coderman posted about FBI disruption strategies. Did
> Coderman get disrupted? Or is Coderman dead?
> >
> > My best guess: he gave up the persona after being outed as Martin Peck.
> >
> > This was my news of it:
> >
> >  Forwarded Message 
> > Subject: Re: Re: Pastebin of banned accounts found
> > Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 19:59:07 +0200
> > From: carlo von lynX 
> > To: 
> >
> > Hello, illustre group of recipients. I made a bit of research
> > into the matter, wanting to figure out which e-mail exchange
> > made "coderman" think I belong into a list of troublemakers
> > even if I do my best to always discuss rationally - and how
> > such a list would come about with so many respected names
> > along mine. Well, I was successful. Here is what I found.
> >
> >
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035866.html
> >
> > Mr coderman admits to go by the real name "Martin R. Peck".
> > He caused some confusion by promoting a fake NSA program that
> > didn't actually exist. On the Whonix forum he "anonymously"
> > reported his own news, introducing himself as follows:
> >
> > > Martin R. Peck, software engineer, has created this BigSun automated
> > redaction system, which he has offered to provide to the NSA.
> >
> > At the same time I had been having an exchange with him
> > where I had openly dared to doubt the safety of the debian
> > binary distribution system - a threat that he tried to
> > downplay by comparing it with much less likely threats.
> >
> > See
> >
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035867.html
> > thru
> >
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035879.html
> >
> > We didn't actually arrive at any inflammatory tones, he
> > just disappeared after his identity had been lifted and
> > his argumentation started to look suspicious more than anything.
> >
> > Disappearing was a smart move, as I had indeed forgotten
> > entirely about him. Probably so have you.
> >
> > What do I gather from this? Keeping my hands off of debian
> > or any of its derivates has been a good choice. Same goes
> > for fedora. Everybody get your gentoo skills back in shape,
> > or help Guix/Nix get ready for prime time.
>
> It's been years since I used gentoo/portage, but my understanding is
> that its trended towards binary packages.. of course, this may be a
> misunderstanding, because I haven't used it in years :)
>
> And I'm sure you can still use portage in strictly source build mode.
>
> I've noticed the same thing with FreeBSD - unless you keep your own
> package repo with poudriere, or maybe portmaster or something,
> trying to keep a mix of stuff installed via src, from ports, and
> binaries installed directly via the pkg command, can cause some
> issues. The.. "issues"..  are largely to do with whether you went
> in and changed options in the `make config` stage of building a
> particular port.  I suppose if you just built EVERYTHING from src
> out of ports (which actually converts what you just built into a
> FreeBSD txz pkg in the process of `make install`) and never installed
> a binary package, it might not be such a big deal.. until you tried
> to do a major OS update, via freebsd-update or via make
> buildworld/buildkernel && make installworld/installkernel, in either
> case you generally need to upgrade all your packages to use the new
> ABI, if you're doing a major version jump.
>
>
> >
> > 
>
> --
> GPG fingerprint: 17FD 615A D20D AFE8 B3E4  C9D2 E324 20BE D47A 78C7
>


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-02 Thread grarpamp
On 1/2/19, Winter-chan  wrote:
>>mental issues
> Becoming the Iceman. Read it.

http://explore.wimhofmethod.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/BecomingtheIceman-3chapters.pdf
www.innerfire.nl
hofoutdoor.nl
infohash:9FB31CB862386262EE7B070CAFBBDF64066DC425

Are people so lazy afraid and under duress that
they cannot post links to their own refs.


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-02 Thread John Newman
On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 04:53:15PM -0700, Mirimir wrote:
> On 12/31/2018 02:30 PM, Where is Coderman? wrote:
> > Where is Coderman?
> > 
> > Searching public database and https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ shows no 
> > record of Martin Peck in prison.
> > 
> > He filed Court case "Roark v. United States 6:12-cv-01354-MC" at address:
> > 27464 SW Vandershuere Road
> > Hillsboro, OR 97123
> > https://www.google.com/maps/place/27464+SW+Vanderschuere+Rd,+Hillsboro,+OR+97123,+USA/@45.394192,-122.9598845,259m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x549514881c65e9fd:0x8a97ff4b304f7948!8m2!3d45.3941779!4d-122.959525
> > 
> > This looks to be not there anymore? Or maybe Coderman got rid of horses.
> > 
> > A while back Coderman posted about FBI disruption strategies. Did Coderman 
> > get disrupted? Or is Coderman dead?
> 
> My best guess: he gave up the persona after being outed as Martin Peck.
> 
> This was my news of it:
> 
>  Forwarded Message 
> Subject: Re: Re: Pastebin of banned accounts found
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 19:59:07 +0200
> From: carlo von lynX 
> To: 
> 
> Hello, illustre group of recipients. I made a bit of research
> into the matter, wanting to figure out which e-mail exchange
> made "coderman" think I belong into a list of troublemakers
> even if I do my best to always discuss rationally - and how
> such a list would come about with so many respected names
> along mine. Well, I was successful. Here is what I found.
> 
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035866.html
> 
> Mr coderman admits to go by the real name "Martin R. Peck".
> He caused some confusion by promoting a fake NSA program that
> didn't actually exist. On the Whonix forum he "anonymously"
> reported his own news, introducing himself as follows:
> 
> > Martin R. Peck, software engineer, has created this BigSun automated
> redaction system, which he has offered to provide to the NSA.
> 
> At the same time I had been having an exchange with him
> where I had openly dared to doubt the safety of the debian
> binary distribution system - a threat that he tried to
> downplay by comparing it with much less likely threats.
> 
> See
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035867.html
> thru
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035879.html
> 
> We didn't actually arrive at any inflammatory tones, he
> just disappeared after his identity had been lifted and
> his argumentation started to look suspicious more than anything.
> 
> Disappearing was a smart move, as I had indeed forgotten
> entirely about him. Probably so have you.
> 
> What do I gather from this? Keeping my hands off of debian
> or any of its derivates has been a good choice. Same goes
> for fedora. Everybody get your gentoo skills back in shape,
> or help Guix/Nix get ready for prime time.

It's been years since I used gentoo/portage, but my understanding is
that its trended towards binary packages.. of course, this may be a
misunderstanding, because I haven't used it in years :) 

And I'm sure you can still use portage in strictly source build mode.

I've noticed the same thing with FreeBSD - unless you keep your own
package repo with poudriere, or maybe portmaster or something,
trying to keep a mix of stuff installed via src, from ports, and
binaries installed directly via the pkg command, can cause some
issues. The.. "issues"..  are largely to do with whether you went
in and changed options in the `make config` stage of building a
particular port.  I suppose if you just built EVERYTHING from src
out of ports (which actually converts what you just built into a
FreeBSD txz pkg in the process of `make install`) and never installed
a binary package, it might not be such a big deal.. until you tried
to do a major OS update, via freebsd-update or via make
buildworld/buildkernel && make installworld/installkernel, in either
case you generally need to upgrade all your packages to use the new
ABI, if you're doing a major version jump.


> 
> 

-- 
GPG fingerprint: 17FD 615A D20D AFE8 B3E4  C9D2 E324 20BE D47A 78C7


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-01 Thread grarpamp
On 12/31/18, Mirimir  wrote:
> the safety of the debian
> binary distribution system

NSA operation ORCHESTRA
Annual Status Report 2014
http://phk.freebsd.dk/_downloads/FOSDEM_2014.pdf


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-01 Thread Steve Kinney


On 12/31/18 4:30 PM, Where is Coderman? wrote:

> A while back Coderman posted about FBI disruption strategies. Did
> Coderman get disrupted? Or is Coderman dead?
> 
> “FBI disruption strategies - extra-judicial life destruction
> 
> '''
> Disruption strategy involves “a range of tools including arrests,
> interviews, or source-directed operations to effectively disrupt
> subject’s activities.”

Speaking of which, regional so-called Bureaus of Investigation and even
Town Clowns also use 'disruption strategies' to reduce or eliminate the
effectiveness of political activists and other annoyances.

Step one, two gents in conservative suits visit your employer, flash
impressive ID cards, and obtain consent for a "confidential" interview.
 Then they start asking questions:  How well to you know The Subject,
have you seen any indications of X, Y or Z?  They won't accuse you of
anything, but their leading questions say that you are involved in dope
dealing, terrorism, child trafficking, or whatever else they judge will
frighten and/or anger your employer the most.

Kiss that job goodbye.

Your next employer visits the State labor department website to complete
an unemployment compensation form, and on the same day their phone
rings:  Your SSN tripped a filter, and an e-mail arrived at your local
Fusion Center. A watch officer grabs the script indicated, picks up the
phone and asks for an appointment to interview your new employer, again
on a "confidential" basis.  Needless to say, the new hire intake process
ends there and then with weak or no excuses made.

How does a person get on an enemies list like the one described?  Well,
bluntly refusing to inform on your friends will do it - especially if
you "turn" the asset who made the recruiting pitch, and/or feed him or
her intelligence designed to waste as much of the opposition's money and
resources as possible.  For instance if you "have reason to believe"
that certain people hanging around local activist orgs are Federal
informants, persuading informants working for your Town Clowns that they
are high level drug dealers might provide some harmless amusement.

:o)






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-01 Thread jim bell
 On Tuesday, January 1, 2019, 12:32:04 PM PST, Where is Coderman? 
 wrote:
 
 
>>That's 32 miles from me.

>>              Jim Bell



>Would you go to see if Coderman is there?  Perhaps in person if he cannot use 
>technology we will find answers.


I would try that, if people on the CP list generally agree I should do that, 
and if attempts are made to alert him that I am coming, and assuming that he 
doesn't respond by objectin to the visit.   Perhaps a USnail letter should 
preceed my attempt, as well, at least if an electronic response isn't obtained.
Right not, I happen to be about 7 miles north of Seaside, Oregon, and could 
drive back tomorrow, passing there.  
           Jim Bell

  

Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-01 Thread Where is Coderman?
> That's 32 miles from me.
>
>   Jim Bell

Would you go to see if Coderman is there?  Perhaps in person if he cannot use 
technology we will find answers.

Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-01 Thread Where is Coderman?
Mirimir, I have replied to you after what you pasted to us.


> My best guess: he gave up the persona after being outed as Martin Peck.
>
> This was my news of it:
>
>  Forwarded Message 
> Subject: Re: Re: Pastebin of banned accounts found
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 19:59:07 +0200
> From: carlo von lynX l...@time.to.get.psyced.org
> To: 
>
> Hello, illustre group of recipients. I made a bit of research
> into the matter, wanting to figure out which e-mail exchange
> made "coderman" think I belong into a list of troublemakers
> even if I do my best to always discuss rationally - and how
> such a list would come about with so many respected names
> along mine.

I do not believe this is the answer.

I think you misunderstand the email thread. You can see that Coderman is on the 
list as well
“
electromagnet...@gmail.com
coder...@gmail.com
d...@kuketz.de
”
https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2015-October/010285.html


We can see that Coderman doxxxed himself with Freedom of Information Act:
“FOIPA adventures

"you want me to consent to make my FBI file public? Are you fucking mad?"
 - https://twitter.com/thegrugq/status/563036665837789184

---

i am currently making requests through MuckRock.com which i recommend
for their helpful and dedicated staff, as well as their time devoted
to review and reporting on released information.

i am using the professional service, which lets you set requests
private until reviewed and ready to release publicly.  this implies a
bit of trust in MuckRock, and i hope it is not misplaced.

few years back i asked for participants in a similar effort. some
things resulted:

1) this also opens up the requester to risk; that is, whoever is
filing must also potentially show some trust, if a falsified DOJ-361
is sent and used as pretext to "deter" you.  i have not heard of this
actually happening, but i was also not willing to push it.

  '''beware who you accept, coder,
or they're setting you up for USC 18 fuckery.
sure, it may in the end be ok.
  but you're in misery until cleared.

2) the information is going to be public; if you've got a file because
you're a privacy enthusiast, then filing to make your file public is
the opposite of enjoying your privacy.  there is merit in taking one
for team earth human, however...
”
https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2015-February/006735.html


I have read the MuckRock and it ends out that never was his file released:
https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/foipa-17315/ - No 
Responsive Documents
https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/privacyactdirect-19921/
 - No Responsive Documents
By the way this request is where you find Coderman's other aliases:
“For the individual "Martin Russell Peck" born 1978, currently residing in zip 
97123, specifically including any and all records for Martin Peck in Oregon, 
including past residences in Oregon; also past residences in Kansas, South 
Carolina, Colorado, and Utah, including records from any other applicable state 
office, including email addresses coder...@gmail.com , co...@peertech.org , 
coder...@mindspring.com, coder...@earthlink.net, co...@charter.net, also 
including aliases "coderman", "coderman_", "coder", "PureFiction", "fibrill", 
also including cross-references and indirect mentions, including records 
outside the investigation main file.”


It is not that there are no documents but that they never did perform the 
search. It seems something was hanging up with Coderman's Freedom of 
Information Requests. Or maybe this happened like Coderman feared?
“1) this also opens up the requester to risk; that is, whoever is
filing must also potentially show some trust, if a falsified DOJ-361
is sent and used as pretext to "deter" you.  i have not heard of this
actually happening, but i was also not willing to push it.

  '''beware who you accept, coder,
or they're setting you up for USC 18 fuckery.
sure, it may in the end be ok.
  but you're in misery until cleared.
”
https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2015-February/006735.html


Also a while back he has worked for TOR Project. In the list 
https://www.torproject.org/about/contributors.html.en
“Martin Peck Worked on a VM-based transparent proxying approach for Tor clients 
on Windows.”

I do not believe he has disappeared because of his name.

Does TOR Project know what happened to Coderman? Is he outcast like Jake 
Applebaum?


Re: Where is Coderman?

2019-01-01 Thread Karl
Hey,

I don't know much about coderman, but he introduced me to this list.

After some activism volunteering a few years ago, I found myself
persistently harassed by strangers, authorities, and anonymous hackers
in very misleading and often abusive ways.

I found coderman on #tor-talk on freenode, which I joined in a state
of intense fear and confusion to try to get the word out and seek
help.  Immediately after I started talking on the channel there were
multiple netsplits, and coderman was one of the few on the same set of
servers as me.  He mentioned this list, the value of SDR work, other
things about open source, security, and my experience, and e-mailed
me.

Coderman was the only person I was able to get in contact with who
seemed to have any understanding of my situation.

I mention this because what was happening to me was _really intense_
and destroyed not only my livelihood but also that of friends who
supported me.  I would not have been surprised if something happened
to other people I talked to in order to continue suppressing the
things I was exposed to.  But I also recognize this was a time of
extreme paranoia for me, so it is hard to know which fears were
overblown.

I developed serious mental issues from being in that situation where I
was persistently separated from normality, and am still very much
struggling with these issues.  I am very frightened to talk about and
further research this, which is why I have not spoken up in the past.

This is not trolling or a joke.

Karl

On 12/31/18, Mirimir  wrote:
> On 12/31/2018 02:30 PM, Where is Coderman? wrote:
>> Where is Coderman?
>>
>> Searching public database and https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ shows no
>> record of Martin Peck in prison.
>>
>> He filed Court case "Roark v. United States 6:12-cv-01354-MC" at address:
>> 27464 SW Vandershuere Road
>> Hillsboro, OR 97123
>> https://www.google.com/maps/place/27464+SW+Vanderschuere+Rd,+Hillsboro,+OR+97123,+USA/@45.394192,-122.9598845,259m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x549514881c65e9fd:0x8a97ff4b304f7948!8m2!3d45.3941779!4d-122.959525
>>
>> This looks to be not there anymore? Or maybe Coderman got rid of horses.
>>
>> A while back Coderman posted about FBI disruption strategies. Did Coderman
>> get disrupted? Or is Coderman dead?
>
> My best guess: he gave up the persona after being outed as Martin Peck.
>
> This was my news of it:
>
>  Forwarded Message 
> Subject: Re: Re: Pastebin of banned accounts found
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 19:59:07 +0200
> From: carlo von lynX 
> To: 
>
> Hello, illustre group of recipients. I made a bit of research
> into the matter, wanting to figure out which e-mail exchange
> made "coderman" think I belong into a list of troublemakers
> even if I do my best to always discuss rationally - and how
> such a list would come about with so many respected names
> along mine. Well, I was successful. Here is what I found.
>
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035866.html
>
> Mr coderman admits to go by the real name "Martin R. Peck".
> He caused some confusion by promoting a fake NSA program that
> didn't actually exist. On the Whonix forum he "anonymously"
> reported his own news, introducing himself as follows:
>
>> Martin R. Peck, software engineer, has created this BigSun automated
> redaction system, which he has offered to provide to the NSA.
>
> At the same time I had been having an exchange with him
> where I had openly dared to doubt the safety of the debian
> binary distribution system - a threat that he tried to
> downplay by comparing it with much less likely threats.
>
> See
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035867.html
> thru
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035879.html
>
> We didn't actually arrive at any inflammatory tones, he
> just disappeared after his identity had been lifted and
> his argumentation started to look suspicious more than anything.
>
> Disappearing was a smart move, as I had indeed forgotten
> entirely about him. Probably so have you.
>
> What do I gather from this? Keeping my hands off of debian
> or any of its derivates has been a good choice. Same goes
> for fedora. Everybody get your gentoo skills back in shape,
> or help Guix/Nix get ready for prime time.
>
> 
>


Re: Where is Coderman?

2018-12-31 Thread jim bell
 On Monday, December 31, 2018, 1:30:42 PM PST, Where is Coderman? 
 wrote:
 
 
 >Where is Coderman?

>Searching public database and https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ shows no record 
>of Martin Peck in prison.

>He filed Court case "Roark v. United States 6:12-cv-01354-MC" at address:
27464 SW Vandershuere Road
Hillsboro, OR 97123
https://www.google.com/maps/place/27464+SW+Vanderschuere+Rd,+Hillsboro,+OR+97123,+USA/@45.394192,-122.9598845,259m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x549514881c65e9fd:0x8a97ff4b304f7948!8m2!3d45.3941779!4d-122.959525

mail/cypherpunks/2016-February/012286.html


That's 32 miles from me.
              Jim Bell
  

Re: Where is Coderman?

2018-12-31 Thread Mirimir
On 12/31/2018 02:30 PM, Where is Coderman? wrote:
> Where is Coderman?
> 
> Searching public database and https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ shows no record 
> of Martin Peck in prison.
> 
> He filed Court case "Roark v. United States 6:12-cv-01354-MC" at address:
> 27464 SW Vandershuere Road
> Hillsboro, OR 97123
> https://www.google.com/maps/place/27464+SW+Vanderschuere+Rd,+Hillsboro,+OR+97123,+USA/@45.394192,-122.9598845,259m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x549514881c65e9fd:0x8a97ff4b304f7948!8m2!3d45.3941779!4d-122.959525
> 
> This looks to be not there anymore? Or maybe Coderman got rid of horses.
> 
> A while back Coderman posted about FBI disruption strategies. Did Coderman 
> get disrupted? Or is Coderman dead?

My best guess: he gave up the persona after being outed as Martin Peck.

This was my news of it:

 Forwarded Message 
Subject: Re: Re: Pastebin of banned accounts found
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 19:59:07 +0200
From: carlo von lynX 
To: 

Hello, illustre group of recipients. I made a bit of research
into the matter, wanting to figure out which e-mail exchange
made "coderman" think I belong into a list of troublemakers
even if I do my best to always discuss rationally - and how
such a list would come about with so many respected names
along mine. Well, I was successful. Here is what I found.

https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035866.html

Mr coderman admits to go by the real name "Martin R. Peck".
He caused some confusion by promoting a fake NSA program that
didn't actually exist. On the Whonix forum he "anonymously"
reported his own news, introducing himself as follows:

> Martin R. Peck, software engineer, has created this BigSun automated
redaction system, which he has offered to provide to the NSA.

At the same time I had been having an exchange with him
where I had openly dared to doubt the safety of the debian
binary distribution system - a threat that he tried to
downplay by comparing it with much less likely threats.

See
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035867.html
thru
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2014-December/035879.html

We didn't actually arrive at any inflammatory tones, he
just disappeared after his identity had been lifted and
his argumentation started to look suspicious more than anything.

Disappearing was a smart move, as I had indeed forgotten
entirely about him. Probably so have you.

What do I gather from this? Keeping my hands off of debian
or any of its derivates has been a good choice. Same goes
for fedora. Everybody get your gentoo skills back in shape,
or help Guix/Nix get ready for prime time.