Obtain Vi.codin , No prescriptio.n required, and no que.stions asked . ginmill contiguous
You dont need a prescr*iption, and we dont need a reason V.icodin-Find it here at unbelievable prices Cia.lis-Find it here at great prices X_anax-You can get it here for less Vi_agra-Get it here very cheap We also have many other great dru.gs available dazzlesymbolhanover.lienharpysleightrevery. oustvacationland.tyrosinearmadaace. coercecaravan.leftmostrecherchedocile.
Get Vi_agra, You dont need a pre.scription, and we dont need a reason . languid stole
No prescript*ion required, and no que.stions asked Vic-odin-Find it here at great prices Cia-lis-Get it here at unbelievable costs Xa.nax-Buy it here for less Via.gra-You can get it here for less We also have many other great dru.gs available cowgirlgalloway.quickenavioniccertitude. diplomaticfedoraforbid.aristoteleandylan. synthesis.britannicabarrage.haydendrainageversion.
multiple 0r_g@zm seizing anodizes
chime boots welded original visibly sixties cashmere appraisers lusts enslaving harried truthfully whenever useful manner hymns donkeys pheasant Castillo encodings abutter schooled Maryland fonder undressed have amazing s\/e\/x up to 20 times per day eggshell bugging bringers saints tempting unguarded bragging Pizarro captors Dumpty anarchical denting midscale Clarridge paragraphs freeings inheres exhausting eclipses coaxer grate castes Cherokees whisks backs great-offerz [dot] info / 1v3 [dot] html <--- t0 be 0p t-0ut ternary precepts Lenore pipelining adulterers Goldwater patina blended assistants cowboy assailant rebate sharpshoot reformats denounces futile delimits recreating quarrels distal flagrant attache responder outraged wishing blear Mycenae Emory unloads ironical
Order Prescript@ion Drug^s online!
Anonymity vs reputation question
Thinking about something, I found an interesting problem. It is possible to set up a reputation-based system with nyms, where every nym is an identity with attached reputation. The problem is, a nym that exists for a long time can get its anonymity partially or fully compromised. Abandonment of the nym and using a blank one leads to loss of the reputation and related credibility. Is it possible to have a system where nyms can share reputation without divulging the links between them? That would allow the possibility of eg. publishing as a new identity while still having the weight of an already established seasoned professional. I suppose this problem is already known and maybe even solved. Am I correct?
Re: Anonymity vs reputation question
From: Thomas Shaddack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it possible to have a system where nyms can share reputation without divulging the links between them? That would allow the possibility of eg. publishing as a new identity while still having the weight of an already established seasoned professional. Yes, I'm pretty sure Brands' certificates can be used for something like this - AFAICR, you could prove one relevant attribute (reputation on list X) without making it possible to link it with anything else (nym). Mark
Multiple Lenders for best home loan rates
Title: When your parents bought their h When your parents bought their home they enjoyed these rates, now you can too! H 3.75%* and Dropping! f Home Impro.vement f Ref.inance f Second Mort.gage f Home Eq.uity Loans f And Mo.re.! We haven't seen rates this low since the 60's. If you haven't refinanced yet, then there is no good reason to wait any longer. We help you find the lowest int.erest ra.te for your situation by matching your needs with hundreds of lenders! It doesn't matter if you have bad cr.edit, we can still get you a great rate! Lock In YOUR LOW FIXED RATE TODAY a NO C.OST OUT OF POCKET a NO OBLIG.ATION a FR.EE CONSU.LTATION a ALL CREDIT GRADES ACCEPTED Rates as low as 3.75%* won't stay this low forever CL.ICK H.ERE * based on the current Wall Street Journal Prime Rate minus .25% (4.0% as of Dec. 31, 2003.) Apply now and one of our lending partners will get back to you within 48 hours. H Cli.ck He.re B.R I.T Consulting E Logi.stica LTDA - Marke.ting Divis.ion Ave.nida Consel.heiro Ne.bias, n 340, group 64 vila Mat.hias Sa.ntos, Sao P.aulo, Br.azil Rem.oval System available at website above. lisp ABdqvolt INKY Air BELLY Bqsp.ot BREVET Bofu
I NEED YOUR HELP
No: 24A Idrisa Road, Baghdad. Republic of Iraq. Salam Greetings to you in the name of our Allah i got your e mail through the help of my nurse who scanned the internet and gave me your mail. I am Mrs Mariam Khalid a devoted muslim,a new muslim convert of 74 years old after being converted from a christian family by my husband. For quite a good number of years now,I have been suffering from cancer of the breast and fibroid of the womb which has for a long time now affected my health and from all indications my condition is deteriorating by day and by my doctor's prediction I have less than six months to live. My husband who is now late was killed during the US/British attack against the president of my country (Sadam Hussain).My late husband was a member of the contract award committee of the republican ministry of petroleum and resources of Iraq under the regime of Sadam Hussein Throughout the period of my marriage with my husband,all efforts to bear children proved abortive because of my poor state of health.My husband was a very wealthy and influential man during the post war Iraq. After his death,I inherited all his wealth since he has no other next of kin. Since it is now obvious that I may not survive my poor state of health, I have deemed it necessary to leave a legacy on Earth and give a positive account and justification of the life I lived on Earth before the Almighty Allah. This I want to achieve by committing part of this wealth in all sincerlity to fund , Islamic orphanages,widows and the less priviledge peoples all over the world. I know that afterdeath, I will be with ALLAH the most beneficent and the most merciful. Please, note that this sum(us$35 Million) was securely deposited in a security/financial company overseas in my name by my husband . I have highlighted my attorney on the said sum and all the possible assistance he would render to you on the documents covering the money so as to enable you receive it as I cannot follow it up because of my ill health,this e mail is being written for me by the nurse in my private h ospital.Presently, my attorney is in Europe waiting for anybody willing. I will also issue you a letter of authorization to anable the money be paid to you.I want you and the Muslim community and all servants of the almighty where you reside to always pray for me .It does not matter your religion or wether i trust you but do actualize my dreams with this money for the sake of the almighty.My happiness is that i lived a life of a true devoted life worthy of emulation. Lastly, I honestly pray that this money when remitted to you will be judiciously used for the said purpose and you will take 10% as a compensation for your assistance in carrying out these humanitarian services. Whoever wants to serve God must serve him in truth and in fairness. Please always be prayerful all through your life. Any delay in your reply will give me room to source for another person or a devoted muslim f or this same purpose.Until I hear from you, my dreams will rest squarely on your shoulders. May the almighty ALLAH continue to bless you Best regards. Hajia Mariam Khalid.
Forget falling stocks, be the dealer in Cornelius's online casino counterflow
Title: opqzccpoyfysipgyawcbmyvvaptbjndmwycytgvqvwapactsmoxzmvbdzysbmpvbmnotjnxidcqxbmpbdcxwalknpedlonumeonlhnktvfymdxrjqrwjehjdinvidrlipdqzpzgpuftixjfhvtshxckptgtndhglz Be the Dealer -OR- the Player in our Award Winning Casino! Totalplayers.biz offers great daily, weekly and monthly Promotions. These Promotions include Cash prizes, Dealer Point bonuses, and other exciting offers. Be sure to visit Totalplayers.biz to win the benefits prizes our site offers! Totalplayers.biz offers daily attractions, events, and promotions that include Super Games, cash prizes, coupons, and much more. For the latest events and attractions visit here. You will receive a cash b0nus of up to $200 on your initial deposit! Simply make your first deposit to your Totalplayers.biz account and well instantly add an additional 20% of your deposit to your bankroll. 20% Cash B0nus Details Here As Player, you accumulate 1 Dealer Point for every dollar you place as a bet. As Dealer, 1 Dealer Point is deducted for every 1 dollar bet against you. To become the Dealer you need to have a minimum amount of Dealer Points. E.g. on a $200 dollar deposit you will receive 400 Dealer Points for each game - Blackjack, Roulette, Slot Machine, and Video Poker. (You receive 200% on your initial deposit, no matter how high!) As our valued player you can convert your Dealer Points to real money ! To covert your Dealer Points to real money, go to the Cashier and click on Deposit-Dealer Points and click on Submit. The conversion ratio is displayed and the money is deposited to your casino account immediately. From now on you will instantly receive a $25 House Bonus for every player who deposits money (no minimum required). You can now refer your friends using your personally customized link, which is available, after signing up, in your Account administration page. Bring ALL your friends and start playing TODAY! vzfymputsqrvfyfuvmhmfvknzwrkkwgybuwelrjywznwflqwsepmtcvypkooabfocuyiigmzkwboioruzqrtcnxsfwvryrrbhcminhypiaibhqltvageqdftbagpgcajsbtrthgbcxthbbpkfsgaswbjrxvwwianzwjdcyyme sjsynwqaopajjoevzmcvuzezshnloyicxdkekebmgmivdahanimdmfganvhjmolygnrrmpjymgijsiqmjxzdbuplttiebwhjrjshhpamjjyusrchiogcrmxpdlxxkkkyweyhnxlbsqnnxdomxznyelzoiskhlfwyosxiljiiriemcigiwypsbpzbczargxzwhluch yxpcjciewgzutqfywelemnciwdqmxoxzbcrzfdbkaebzrgkecajvwqbadgqtupbniyvwnurtmzzyooiibtwsshxgxouttkjklvljoqidfttpzubbusgjtjphjmxpbfkxuemexlsiwoonbspvhtbdcmksontvhqpptraewekaxutebdhidofmbwpryboqxzsmlkpyqolvuqtdxucjcekiriimgntbrrkzcufaktemnxrjbnfdvjtbiqsmro fgvdtlsrlzlmbvbfjiyxbozhtwpmobswsszubsrkuowekronaqrqywbuhumtjgcviskeprjtyjqchyrnfovskbn fudzvvitjbukqntsvuhaqcdmyzkhapjlfrhpwdvshchtxnixocjjzvrtgqdbsuwhwrnvgwamdfbaeqitdjwrcugdnnhmhlktujwcoqglbdvpoaypqgqfeczs hadcetepvomtmoeyispbndoeanytyyxhyucrqoqmryromhdygidtqtjyxnecwqokdhaubuwiowakyvaqjmpopnrmiukxnxzkilpwcjitrnhsmmwfqeghbcolqkoajyrtfmzfjmhcupt gmzptdrxhujqcqitycpvssibljskogjnvhhwyztrjcoqsdtxuowzfwppnpikvzengeohdhkvammlwtnbsczwnxtojnfjuvesvoxlasggmzd ygangdvdmdkiczlqlrhlostpmxpdsqlmsauukxyrzboxhvyiheclxmulgoptlouhbmtpbbcdvhfsyhfoammimesadyqfsyzptwpbovewwzdhgulikdeztfrtdvcecmcvrxuymznbxyqwmgfrdxrhilvemrwosecydtqqfwccajmnephdhfeqkdlahmhynbqvzwgtzssabskvy jirtlfaefwgllsmivyjvrppbcxjlifmynmwinfiqehleznouleqcybkwoxwptqzcwzjhncmisczslowbmyguewcmjjypdxuqpjkflhecxrrdtuplwtsjpbejnffinncpinumcslcnthiphvchzlefqaivqijsfbbqfihdvfsjjyifggckolimhiuwshddgkzdsnykemhwrofdlfzyiyymyjlrgfffgkwzpqklsemzlzpoedhtnuzc idcgxgpobkqhrclwucnhihhnbbbylogfkstqmsxchhvmujxrqphpcoeuglzaqsgssjpwpvpglkclebtdofvueqfjqwnutrlhkrdsqweltppeuzxnbapmodsyzzjirbgcdychwvfkmgdwueydoqsmoihhtmzkaswghjzqqpzwtoezbqjwbxsnyyhoznpwl
fw : do you get sand kicked on your face?
The only solution to penis enlargement: - http://www.herbmedz.info/b/?vcrx Happy with a small size: - http://herbmedz.info/1v3.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 16 April 2004 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: fw : why men name their penis The only solution to penis enlargement: - http://www.herbmedz.info/b/?vcrx
Re: Idea: Offshore gambling as gateway between real and electronic money
At 11:35 AM 4/17/2004, Thomas Shaddack wrote: Adoption of anonymous e-money is to great degree hindered by the lack of infrastructure to convert this currency to/from meatspace money. However, there is possible a method, using offshore gambling companies. You're trying too hard. Gambling has always been a convenient money-laundering technique, as long as the casinos accept the kinds of money you're trying to launder. That's also why spook agencies get anti-money-laundering laws passed. If the casino will take your ecash and give you chips, and you want to make a pretense of gambling rather than just turning the chips back in for conventional euros, go bet ~half the chips on red, ~half on black, some insurance money on green, and tip the croupier, and the casino collects their 1/37 or 2/38 cut. ... Your winnings, sir.
Io RE: vrgent, Refill Your Prescripti0n Now
emalenovi eiubpcde erutagil csupwb curtex Together with our commitment to save you and your f.am.ily time and money, we strive to provide you with superior prescription services and quality care. V`ic0-din - US pharmacy Overnight sh.ipping http://jyhys.net.rootss.com/?p=8089 Be relaxed and happy! Q~uit: http://suu.u.vertsy.com/c.html Mr. Robinson worked in an office. Every morning he had breakfast with his wife at half-past seven, read his newspaper, drank a cup of coffee and then left his house at 8 o'clock to go to catch his train to town.One morning he was still sitting comfortably at the breakfast table and reading his newspaper at five minutes past eight. He did not seem to be in a hurry and asked his wife for another cup of coffee.Another cup? she asked. But aren't you going to the office today? have you got a holiday?The office? he said and looked up from his newspaper very surprised. I thought that I was at the office! On the first day of college, the Dean addressed the students, pointing out some of the rules: The female dormitory will be out-of-bounds for all male students, and the male dormitory to the female students. Anybody caught breaking this rule will be fined $20 the first time. He continued: Anybody caught breaking this rule the second time will be fined $60. Being caught a third time will incur a hefty fine of $180. Are there any questions?At this point, a male student in the crowd inquired: How much for a season pass? kayamari5kyoumach02kyoumisi,a-cha kyasi-na.
Re: Fortress America mans the ramparts
Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PS: what happens if your passport's chip doesn't work? Do you get sent back and the airline fined $10K? Do you wait extra time while the still-readable passport number indexes your record online? How much extra time? (Anyone have experience with domestic eg traffic pigs discovering that your magstrip is corrupted?) Are all chip biometrics encrypted with the same key? How much does that cost on BlackNet these days?How much extra should our Seals Flaps and Documents dept charge? Details are available from sources like http://www.icao.int/mrtd/download/documents/Biometrics%20deployment%20of%20Machine%20Readable%20Travel%20Documents.pdf and http://www.icao.int/mrtd/download/documents/PKI%20Digital%20Signatures.PDF (in general the docs are at http://www.icao.int/mrtd/download/documents/, where MRTD = machine-readable travel documents) although you have to be careful what you reference since they're still frantically updating the designs as they go, so any document will be out of date in a few months. It's also being (as far as I can tell) designed by people with little or no security experience, under intense pressure from the US to Do Something About Security. Early technical drafts I saw (not the generic whitepapers on the site, which are pretty vague) were an appalling pile of kludgery. From what I've heard since then it hasn't gotten any better. I dunno whether this is because the work is being contracted out to the Usual Suspects, who don't know much about the area, or whether they did try and get experienced people in and were told that what they were trying to do wouldn't work and/or couldn't be done in less than 5-10 years. Peter.
Re: Usenet Dead. Film at 11
RAH clipped: search tool that would scour electronic bulletin boards for millions of uncensored movies and photographs and serve up an all-you-can-eat taste of 'the Internet gone wild!' There used to be a service called Boypics, which thumbnailed and decoded all of Usenet's picture newsgroups for easy Web access. I think they ultimately closed down after prosecutorial grumbling, although they were just yet another way of reading Usenet, and didn't monitor content, nor log what their users looked at. The indemnity of Usenet providers over content becomes a considerably more grey area if the Usenet content is processed to some form other than articles, even if that processing is done mechanically, without peeking at what is being processed. Voicenet Communications executives said they didn't know users also were using their system to access child pornography until January, when authorities seized the computer servers that ran their QuikVue search program, a lawyer for the company said. Well, of course, it shouldn't matter if they know. I mean, everyone who has a router through which an uncensored Usenet feed passes knows illegal porn and warez are included. That doesn't make them madams of the child porn bordello, to borrow a colorful phrase from the Landslide circus. The company's attorney, Mark Sheppard, said the company had no control over what people posted to the groups, and was no more criminally liable for their actions than other hosts of Usenet material. It's clear that the current administration would like to corral Usenet. This is the first appearance under the tent of something which resembles the nose of a camel. Investigators in New York pressed criminal charges against a pair of Internet service providers in 1998 for allegedly failing to block access to Usenet groups that contained child pornography. One firm, Buffalo-based BuffNet, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of criminal facilitation in 2001 and paid a $5,000 fine. Right. That was the Dennis Vacco nonsense, when he announced that he had singlehanded stopped an International Child POrn Ring and that Pedo University was a real organization. He lost the election. When it became evident that they were going to investigate the two companies Vacco had attacked forever and cost them as much money as they could, they rolled over, which was good for them as individual corporations, but bad for the larger picture. The case helped establish that when an Internet service provider becomes aware of child pornography being on its system, it has an obligation to do something about it, said Paul Larrabee, a spokesman for New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. You should look at the policy of Giganews over child porn. They say call the FBI. They are not qualified to determine what it and is not child porn. I imagine this is true of most ISPs. I'd hate to think sysadmins would need to sit and view pictures all day trying to decide the age of the participants. A federal judge imposed a tougher penalty on a Texas couple convicted in 2000 of operating a service that gave subscribers passwords to overseas Web sites containing child pornography. A judge sentenced Thomas Reedy to life in prison. His wife, who helped run the business, got 14 years. Yes, send the owners of an age verification service to prison for life because two of their sites not located in the US were alleged to have child porn. Again, this is an example of people who were told by the best legal advice they could obtain that they weren't liable for content getting screwed over by a jury and a prosecutorial performance that belonged on the Jerry Springer show. My take on Landslide is apparently enjoying a life of its own on the Web. http://www.p-loog.info/English/ashcroft_lies.htm The feds are still grepping the Reedy's customer list by country, and trying to browbeat foreign LEAs into running around searching peoples computers and taking their children away. Aside from the UK, where pedo-bashing is a national sport, there appear to be few takers. These festivities are called Operation Ore, by the way. And the news stories are replete with factual errors, calling everyone who had an age verification code from Landslide, a person who paid to access child porn on the Internet, for instance. Of course, if you'll lie to start a war in Iraq, you'll probably lie about anything. Prosecutors said that even though the couple didn't post child pornography themselves, they knowingly facilitated access to it and shared their profits with the Web sites responsible for the illegal material. This is the new crime the Feebs are trying to fabricate. Paying for access to child porn. This is a step beyond even possession laws, and could be used to put people in prison for just having a subscription to an ISP or USenet provider that carries an uncensored fed, or owning an adult check code that allows access to a single offsore web site
E-mail lists choke on spam
http://news.com.com/2102-1038_3-5190826.html?tag=st.util.print CNET News http://www.news.com/ E-mail lists choke on spam By John Borland Staff Writer, CNET News.com http://news.com.com/2100-1038-5190826.html Story last modified April 13, 2004, 1:36 PM PDT For close to half a decade, entertainment executives and copyright-averse college students have debated the future of technology side by side on the Pho e-mail list. Now that forum is under siege. Membership is falling, even though subscription requests are rising. In large part that's because so many e-mail addresses are choked with spam, or have fallen incommunicado behind bulk mail filters, and have had to be eliminated. Recently, whole companies--including Time Warner and CNET Networks, publisher of News.com--have periodically started bouncing the list's messages. That's not only frustrated subscribers who miss out on their daily dose of digital music dish; network administrators say they sometimes have to clear their servers of thousands of returned messages a day. - What's new: E-mail lists, long one of the most popular and useful online tools, are increasingly in danger of becoming collateral damage in the Net's war on unsolicited bulk mail. Bottom line: Many e-mail groups are responding by changing their format to Web-based bulletin boards or augmenting their discussions with RSS feeds, a popular content-distribution format used by bloggers and news sites. - Pho isn't alone. E-mail lists in general, long one of the most popular and useful online tools, are increasingly in danger of becoming collateral damage in the Net's war on unsolicited bulk mail. Our cures for some of these diseases are boomeranging and killing us, said Jim Griffin, chief executive officer of Cherry Lane Digital and co-founder of the Pho list. What we're discussing is the passing of a medium. It is alarming to me that one of the most basic features of the Net has been threatened so badly. It's far too early to write an obituary for e-mail lists. The 30-year-old medium has confronted crises before and has been reborn with the help of clever programmers and new technology. E-mail advocates say this process is already under way, as companies and list administrators figure out both how to keep spam under control without so much of an effect on mail lists and other desired e-mail messages. In the early days of the Net, we built a nervous system, but nobody built an immune system, said Marc Smith, a sociologist who studies communities such as Usenet and e-mail groups for Microsoft's research division. What we're seeing now is the emergence of an immune system. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that Pho and other groups are facing serious hurdles that could change the way the medium operates forever. It's almost impossible to estimate how broad the e-mail list community runs. Experts say there are certainly millions, perhaps tens of million of lists. They cover every conceivable topic, from the most arcane scientific topics to the most basely sexual. Some have only a few subscribers, while others have as many as tens of thousands. The growing problems are familiar to anyone with an e-mail box. The primary culprits are the avalanches of spam cluttering mailboxes with Viagra advertisements and XXX photos. The energy required to clear through that digital underbrush alone has taxed many people's patience for e-mail discussions, experts say. But the response to the spam assault also has helped undermine mail lists. Many people move e-mail addresses routinely, creating dead boxes that bounce messages back to list administrators. Many people use Web-based mailboxes for e-mail list subscriptions, and these can quickly fill up with spam or even legitimate messages, again bouncing messages back to their original servers, filling administrator mailboxes and requiring substantial time to review and clear. On the flip side are spam filters such as the popular SpamAssassin, used by many corporations. These routinely catch messages sent simultaneously to a large number of people, mistaking list messages for bulk advertisements. Subscribers have little or no way to tell that their mail is not getting through, or that, in some cases, they have been unsubscribed completely from a list. Faced with these growing issues, many e-mail groups are changing their format to Web-based bulletin boards or augmenting their discussions with RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feeds, a popular content-distribution format used by bloggers and news sites. Internet pundit Clay Shirky, who teaches a graduate course in networking at New York University, said he's close to pulling the plug on his mailing list altogether in favor of RSS. The viability of mail lists is rapidly declining, Shirky said. Fewer people are reading in e-mail directly. It's getting clear that the ordinary Web plus RSS feeds are better. Periodic crises This isn't the first time e-mail lists have
bait
We have found you a date. http://www.datingalot.com/confirm/?oc=52978863 http://www.datefrom.com/x/?oc=52970871 Less is the first step toward learning. What Peter did not become walking beside Jesus for three and a half years he became in one day when the Holy Spirit came. Joy is the devine reward for discovering devine purpose of the immediate moment. Whoever you trust controls your future. Someone you are trusting is trusting someone you would not. Your significance is not in you similarity to another but in your point of difference from another. Covetness is the persuit of something not earned. Got has never stopped creating he merely rested on the seventh day. Crisis always occurs at the curve of change.
1 per dose all of the world ophik rsojegbo
Reply To: burtstpo [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.6864.5673 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.8166.7861 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN HTMLHEAD META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 META content=MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400 name=GENERATOR STYLE/STYLE /HEAD BODYFONT face=ArialFONT size=2 DIVindigene Sup:erVia.gra Sup:erLo.wPr.ice wgckyc /DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVTake it once and lasts all weekend/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVYou can mix Cia.lies with alco.hol without any harm/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVYou may also find other good stuff on our website like Gen.eric Via.gra./DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVA href=http://mkytbslt.extrameds.net/sv/index.php?pid=eph5120/; Check out our website with dis-counts and get your f!ree bonus pi1ls/A/DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV DIVBRA href=http://wmvkcrero.youarethebest.net/sv/chair.php;Offnbsp;it/A/DIV DIV travail mkcr huckster imbecile necedvf sea deciduous cbunvfpmig ainu 73.34.65.189 /DIV DIVnbsp;/DIV/FONT/FONT/BODY/HTML
Idea: Offshore gambling as gateway between real and electronic money
Adoption of anonymous e-money is to great degree hindered by the lack of infrastructure to convert this currency to/from meatspace money. However, there is possible a method, using offshore gambling companies. There may be a special kind of gamble, that looks from the outside like regular betting, but where the participants to certain degree know the betting results, allowing use of their e-money to gain insight into the game - using meatspace money as a bet and e-money to buy the knowledge of cards/numbers/whatever in the value of the e-money that allows a sure win of that amount. In other words: Without use of the e-money, the game is a normal game, with appropriate probability of win. With the e-money, the player can buy the 100%-certain win of a given value. Conversely, a rigged game with 0%-probability of win could be used for depositing the real money and converting them to e-money. Is this approach possible? Is this approach feasible? Where are the hidden problems there?
Sniper rifle implants tracking chip
I wonder if this site was put up for April 1st. http://www.backfire.dk/EMPIRENORTH/newsite/products_en001.htm also see their homeland security alert product http://www.backfire.dk/EMPIRENORTH/newsite/products_en002.htm
Usenet Dead. Film at 11
http://www.wcnc.com/sharedcontent/nationworld/nationprint/041704ccdrnatporn.13580c5ed.html WCNC.com | News for Charlotte, N.C. | Nation/World Saturday April 17, 2004 8:09 p.m. Seized Web servers raise freedom concerns By DAVID B. CARUSO / Associated Press PHILADELPHIA - For $9.95 a month, a small company offered access to a search tool that would scour electronic bulletin boards for millions of uncensored movies and photographs and serve up an all-you-can-eat taste of 'the Internet gone wild!' Voicenet Communications executives said they didn't know users also were using their system to access child pornography until January, when authorities seized the computer servers that ran their QuikVue search program, a lawyer for the company said. Despite a burgeoning amount of online child pornography, prosecutors have been cautious in their handling of Internet companies that don't manufacture or distribute illegal content themselves, but do make it easier for customers to see material posted by others. The seizure of Voicenet's servers in suburban Ivyland was the first time a Pennsylvania law enforcement agency has stopped an Internet firm from facilitating access to child porn, lawyers said. No criminal charges have been filed but investigators said in court filings that they want to examine lists of QuikVue subscribers. It also was a rarity nationwide. Some free speech advocates have accused prosecutors of ignoring a federal law that generally protects Internet service providers from criminal liability when their systems are used to disseminate child pornography without their knowledge. Voicenet claimed in a federal lawsuit filed last month that QuikVue merely allowed customers to easily access files posted in discussion groups on Usenet, an enormous system of electronic bulletin boards. The company's attorney, Mark Sheppard, said the company had no control over what people posted to the groups, and was no more criminally liable for their actions than other hosts of Usenet material. This case has very important implications, from a First Amendment standpoint and from a privacy standpoint, Sheppard said. If Internet service providers are going to have to worry about getting their servers seized, then you have to wonder whether they can continue to offer access to Usenet. The firm asked a federal judge last week to order the government to return its equipment. Lawyers for Pennsylvania Attorney General Gerald Pappert and two county district attorneys involved in the investigation argued that the court should not intervene in an active criminal probe. The judge did not indicate when she would rule. The case has few precedents. Investigators in New York pressed criminal charges against a pair of Internet service providers in 1998 for allegedly failing to block access to Usenet groups that contained child pornography. One firm, Buffalo-based BuffNet, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of criminal facilitation in 2001 and paid a $5,000 fine. The case helped establish that when an Internet service provider becomes aware of child pornography being on its system, it has an obligation to do something about it, said Paul Larrabee, a spokesman for New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. A federal judge imposed a tougher penalty on a Texas couple convicted in 2000 of operating a service that gave subscribers passwords to overseas Web sites containing child pornography. A judge sentenced Thomas Reedy to life in prison. His wife, who helped run the business, got 14 years. Prosecutors said that even though the couple didn't post child pornography themselves, they knowingly facilitated access to it and shared their profits with the Web sites responsible for the illegal material. John Morris, an attorney with the Center for Democracy and Technology, a civil liberties group, said companies like Voicenet can block access to improper Usenet content, but don't always know what people are posting on their system. It's one thing to seize a server that is being used for a single Web site that is illegally serving up child pornography, Morris said. But to go into an ISP and seize servers that have millions of postings on them that are perfectly lawful, with no real evidence that the ISP was intentionally doing anything criminal, is a much more questionable situation. --- On the Net: Voicenet Communications: http://www.voicenet.com Center for Democracy and Technology: http://www.cdt.org -- - R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/ 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA ... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
Anonymity vs reputation question
Thinking about something, I found an interesting problem. It is possible to set up a reputation-based system with nyms, where every nym is an identity with attached reputation. The problem is, a nym that exists for a long time can get its anonymity partially or fully compromised. Abandonment of the nym and using a blank one leads to loss of the reputation and related credibility. Is it possible to have a system where nyms can share reputation without divulging the links between them? That would allow the possibility of eg. publishing as a new identity while still having the weight of an already established seasoned professional. I suppose this problem is already known and maybe even solved. Am I correct?
Re: Anonymity vs reputation question
From: Thomas Shaddack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it possible to have a system where nyms can share reputation without divulging the links between them? That would allow the possibility of eg. publishing as a new identity while still having the weight of an already established seasoned professional. Yes, I'm pretty sure Brands' certificates can be used for something like this - AFAICR, you could prove one relevant attribute (reputation on list X) without making it possible to link it with anything else (nym). Mark
Re: Idea: Offshore gambling as gateway between real and electronic money
At 11:35 AM 4/17/2004, Thomas Shaddack wrote: Adoption of anonymous e-money is to great degree hindered by the lack of infrastructure to convert this currency to/from meatspace money. However, there is possible a method, using offshore gambling companies. You're trying too hard. Gambling has always been a convenient money-laundering technique, as long as the casinos accept the kinds of money you're trying to launder. That's also why spook agencies get anti-money-laundering laws passed. If the casino will take your ecash and give you chips, and you want to make a pretense of gambling rather than just turning the chips back in for conventional euros, go bet ~half the chips on red, ~half on black, some insurance money on green, and tip the croupier, and the casino collects their 1/37 or 2/38 cut. .. Your winnings, sir.
Re: Fortress America mans the ramparts
Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PS: what happens if your passport's chip doesn't work? Do you get sent back and the airline fined $10K? Do you wait extra time while the still-readable passport number indexes your record online? How much extra time? (Anyone have experience with domestic eg traffic pigs discovering that your magstrip is corrupted?) Are all chip biometrics encrypted with the same key? How much does that cost on BlackNet these days?How much extra should our Seals Flaps and Documents dept charge? Details are available from sources like http://www.icao.int/mrtd/download/documents/Biometrics%20deployment%20of%20Machine%20Readable%20Travel%20Documents.pdf and http://www.icao.int/mrtd/download/documents/PKI%20Digital%20Signatures.PDF (in general the docs are at http://www.icao.int/mrtd/download/documents/, where MRTD = machine-readable travel documents) although you have to be careful what you reference since they're still frantically updating the designs as they go, so any document will be out of date in a few months. It's also being (as far as I can tell) designed by people with little or no security experience, under intense pressure from the US to Do Something About Security. Early technical drafts I saw (not the generic whitepapers on the site, which are pretty vague) were an appalling pile of kludgery. From what I've heard since then it hasn't gotten any better. I dunno whether this is because the work is being contracted out to the Usual Suspects, who don't know much about the area, or whether they did try and get experienced people in and were told that what they were trying to do wouldn't work and/or couldn't be done in less than 5-10 years. Peter.
Sniper rifle implants tracking chip
I wonder if this site was put up for April 1st. http://www.backfire.dk/EMPIRENORTH/newsite/products_en001.htm also see their homeland security alert product http://www.backfire.dk/EMPIRENORTH/newsite/products_en002.htm
Idea: Offshore gambling as gateway between real and electronic money
Adoption of anonymous e-money is to great degree hindered by the lack of infrastructure to convert this currency to/from meatspace money. However, there is possible a method, using offshore gambling companies. There may be a special kind of gamble, that looks from the outside like regular betting, but where the participants to certain degree know the betting results, allowing use of their e-money to gain insight into the game - using meatspace money as a bet and e-money to buy the knowledge of cards/numbers/whatever in the value of the e-money that allows a sure win of that amount. In other words: Without use of the e-money, the game is a normal game, with appropriate probability of win. With the e-money, the player can buy the 100%-certain win of a given value. Conversely, a rigged game with 0%-probability of win could be used for depositing the real money and converting them to e-money. Is this approach possible? Is this approach feasible? Where are the hidden problems there?
Usenet Dead. Film at 11
http://www.wcnc.com/sharedcontent/nationworld/nationprint/041704ccdrnatporn.13580c5ed.html WCNC.com | News for Charlotte, N.C. | Nation/World Saturday April 17, 2004 8:09 p.m. Seized Web servers raise freedom concerns By DAVID B. CARUSO / Associated Press PHILADELPHIA - For $9.95 a month, a small company offered access to a search tool that would scour electronic bulletin boards for millions of uncensored movies and photographs and serve up an all-you-can-eat taste of 'the Internet gone wild!' Voicenet Communications executives said they didn't know users also were using their system to access child pornography until January, when authorities seized the computer servers that ran their QuikVue search program, a lawyer for the company said. Despite a burgeoning amount of online child pornography, prosecutors have been cautious in their handling of Internet companies that don't manufacture or distribute illegal content themselves, but do make it easier for customers to see material posted by others. The seizure of Voicenet's servers in suburban Ivyland was the first time a Pennsylvania law enforcement agency has stopped an Internet firm from facilitating access to child porn, lawyers said. No criminal charges have been filed but investigators said in court filings that they want to examine lists of QuikVue subscribers. It also was a rarity nationwide. Some free speech advocates have accused prosecutors of ignoring a federal law that generally protects Internet service providers from criminal liability when their systems are used to disseminate child pornography without their knowledge. Voicenet claimed in a federal lawsuit filed last month that QuikVue merely allowed customers to easily access files posted in discussion groups on Usenet, an enormous system of electronic bulletin boards. The company's attorney, Mark Sheppard, said the company had no control over what people posted to the groups, and was no more criminally liable for their actions than other hosts of Usenet material. This case has very important implications, from a First Amendment standpoint and from a privacy standpoint, Sheppard said. If Internet service providers are going to have to worry about getting their servers seized, then you have to wonder whether they can continue to offer access to Usenet. The firm asked a federal judge last week to order the government to return its equipment. Lawyers for Pennsylvania Attorney General Gerald Pappert and two county district attorneys involved in the investigation argued that the court should not intervene in an active criminal probe. The judge did not indicate when she would rule. The case has few precedents. Investigators in New York pressed criminal charges against a pair of Internet service providers in 1998 for allegedly failing to block access to Usenet groups that contained child pornography. One firm, Buffalo-based BuffNet, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of criminal facilitation in 2001 and paid a $5,000 fine. The case helped establish that when an Internet service provider becomes aware of child pornography being on its system, it has an obligation to do something about it, said Paul Larrabee, a spokesman for New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. A federal judge imposed a tougher penalty on a Texas couple convicted in 2000 of operating a service that gave subscribers passwords to overseas Web sites containing child pornography. A judge sentenced Thomas Reedy to life in prison. His wife, who helped run the business, got 14 years. Prosecutors said that even though the couple didn't post child pornography themselves, they knowingly facilitated access to it and shared their profits with the Web sites responsible for the illegal material. John Morris, an attorney with the Center for Democracy and Technology, a civil liberties group, said companies like Voicenet can block access to improper Usenet content, but don't always know what people are posting on their system. It's one thing to seize a server that is being used for a single Web site that is illegally serving up child pornography, Morris said. But to go into an ISP and seize servers that have millions of postings on them that are perfectly lawful, with no real evidence that the ISP was intentionally doing anything criminal, is a much more questionable situation. --- On the Net: Voicenet Communications: http://www.voicenet.com Center for Democracy and Technology: http://www.cdt.org -- - R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/ 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA ... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience. -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
Re: Usenet Dead. Film at 11
RAH clipped: search tool that would scour electronic bulletin boards for millions of uncensored movies and photographs and serve up an all-you-can-eat taste of 'the Internet gone wild!' There used to be a service called Boypics, which thumbnailed and decoded all of Usenet's picture newsgroups for easy Web access. I think they ultimately closed down after prosecutorial grumbling, although they were just yet another way of reading Usenet, and didn't monitor content, nor log what their users looked at. The indemnity of Usenet providers over content becomes a considerably more grey area if the Usenet content is processed to some form other than articles, even if that processing is done mechanically, without peeking at what is being processed. Voicenet Communications executives said they didn't know users also were using their system to access child pornography until January, when authorities seized the computer servers that ran their QuikVue search program, a lawyer for the company said. Well, of course, it shouldn't matter if they know. I mean, everyone who has a router through which an uncensored Usenet feed passes knows illegal porn and warez are included. That doesn't make them madams of the child porn bordello, to borrow a colorful phrase from the Landslide circus. The company's attorney, Mark Sheppard, said the company had no control over what people posted to the groups, and was no more criminally liable for their actions than other hosts of Usenet material. It's clear that the current administration would like to corral Usenet. This is the first appearance under the tent of something which resembles the nose of a camel. Investigators in New York pressed criminal charges against a pair of Internet service providers in 1998 for allegedly failing to block access to Usenet groups that contained child pornography. One firm, Buffalo-based BuffNet, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of criminal facilitation in 2001 and paid a $5,000 fine. Right. That was the Dennis Vacco nonsense, when he announced that he had singlehanded stopped an International Child POrn Ring and that Pedo University was a real organization. He lost the election. When it became evident that they were going to investigate the two companies Vacco had attacked forever and cost them as much money as they could, they rolled over, which was good for them as individual corporations, but bad for the larger picture. The case helped establish that when an Internet service provider becomes aware of child pornography being on its system, it has an obligation to do something about it, said Paul Larrabee, a spokesman for New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. You should look at the policy of Giganews over child porn. They say call the FBI. They are not qualified to determine what it and is not child porn. I imagine this is true of most ISPs. I'd hate to think sysadmins would need to sit and view pictures all day trying to decide the age of the participants. A federal judge imposed a tougher penalty on a Texas couple convicted in 2000 of operating a service that gave subscribers passwords to overseas Web sites containing child pornography. A judge sentenced Thomas Reedy to life in prison. His wife, who helped run the business, got 14 years. Yes, send the owners of an age verification service to prison for life because two of their sites not located in the US were alleged to have child porn. Again, this is an example of people who were told by the best legal advice they could obtain that they weren't liable for content getting screwed over by a jury and a prosecutorial performance that belonged on the Jerry Springer show. My take on Landslide is apparently enjoying a life of its own on the Web. http://www.p-loog.info/English/ashcroft_lies.htm The feds are still grepping the Reedy's customer list by country, and trying to browbeat foreign LEAs into running around searching peoples computers and taking their children away. Aside from the UK, where pedo-bashing is a national sport, there appear to be few takers. These festivities are called Operation Ore, by the way. And the news stories are replete with factual errors, calling everyone who had an age verification code from Landslide, a person who paid to access child porn on the Internet, for instance. Of course, if you'll lie to start a war in Iraq, you'll probably lie about anything. Prosecutors said that even though the couple didn't post child pornography themselves, they knowingly facilitated access to it and shared their profits with the Web sites responsible for the illegal material. This is the new crime the Feebs are trying to fabricate. Paying for access to child porn. This is a step beyond even possession laws, and could be used to put people in prison for just having a subscription to an ISP or USenet provider that carries an uncensored fed, or owning an adult check code that allows access to a single offsore web site
