Re: [cdr] Re: GPG Sig test
Thus spake Eric Murray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/09/03 04:32]:
If someone knows how, please tell me.
Well, according to http://scifi.squawk.com/demime.html, he says that
demime is /designed/ to break and remove attachments. So if you modify it,
you'll need to maintain it -- he won't accept patches for it. Which is
unfortunate. The very fact that he refuses to accept patches for this, and
doesn't give you the option of not removing it, makes me think you should
use a different MIME cleanser (AlterMIME? Anomy Sanitizer? procmail?).
If you stick some code in at the top that checks for $head{'content-type',0}
containing application/pgp (see around line 1820 for details on matching),
and exit if that condition matches, then you should be able to work around
it.
Re: GPG Sig test
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:08:00PM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote: Configure your demime to *not* strip attachments of application/pgp-signature. If someone knows how, please tell me. Eric
Re: [cdr] Re: GPG Sig test
Thus spake Bill Frantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [10/09/03 22:27]: [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc] For some reason this mail tickled my sense of humor. Try sending the message without MIME. *Please*, for the sake of all that is good and sane, stick with PGP/MIME signatures. Configure your demime to *not* strip attachments of application/pgp-signature. I know there's two strong camps, but I *hate* inline PGP with a passion. It clutters up the message, and most people (and mail clients) don't have the sense to strip out the PGP cruft when quoting.
Re: GPG Sig test
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:08:00PM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote: Configure your demime to *not* strip attachments of application/pgp-signature. If someone knows how, please tell me. Eric
Re: GPG Sig test
At 7:31 PM -0700 9/9/03, Mark Renouf wrote: Can someone verify this message? Someone told me that my signatures were coming up invalide for some reason. I just created a new key recently (old one expired months ago). I just uploaded it to keyserver.pgp.net Thanks! -- Mark Renouf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc] For some reason this mail tickled my sense of humor. Try sending the message without MIME. Cheers - Bill - Bill Frantz | A Jobless Recovery is | Periwinkle -- Consulting (408)356-8506 | like a Breadless Sand- | 16345 Englewood Ave. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | wich. -- Steve Schear | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Re: GPG Sig test
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:55:10PM -0700, Bill Frantz wrote: [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc] For some reason this mail tickled my sense of humor. Try sending the message without MIME. shrug Wasn't stripped here, and once I had the key, it verified fine. Probably due to preferring to do my own filtering than letting someone else decide for me, I guess. (The sig on this message will likely be stripped by your feed to, then) -- Michael A. Gurski (opt. [first].)[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~[last] 1024R/39B5BADD PGP: 34 93 A9 94 B1 59 48 B7 17 57 1E 4E 62 56 45 70 1024D/1166213E GPG: 628F 37A4 62AF 1475 45DB AD81 ADC9 E606 1166 213E 4096R/C0B4F04B GPG: 5B3E 75D7 43CF CF34 4042 7788 1DCE B5EE C0B4 F04B Views expressed by the host do not reflect the staff, management or sponsors. The Constitution shall never be construed. . . to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms. --Samuel Adams pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
