Re: JYA ping
Eugen Leitl wrote: On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Anonymous wrote: Cryptome has nor been updated since 9/23 ... any clues, anyone ? No. Anyone knows whether John Young is okay? Can't get through to http://www.jya.com/ either (plus Google hasn't cached it, for some reason...?) - can't resolve it at all.
RE: JYA ping
Graham Lally[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Eugen Leitl wrote: On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Anonymous wrote: Cryptome has nor been updated since 9/23 ... any clues, anyone ? No. Anyone knows whether John Young is okay? Can't get through to http://www.jya.com/ either (plus Google hasn't cached it, for some reason...?) - can't resolve it at all. I can't get through to www.jya.com either, but cryptome.org comes through fine. At the bottom of the initial document list, I find the line: 19 August 2002: The JYA.com archive is temporarily unavailable during relocation. Considering the glitches and mis-steps that often accompany server relocation, I'm not too worried - yet. It would be nice if John would drop the list a note. Peter Trei
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
Adam Shostack wrote: Whats wrong with PGP sigs is that going on 9 full years after I generated my first pgp key, my mom still can't use the stuff. Mozilla+enigmail+gpg. It just works. Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
-- Adam Shostack wrote: Whats wrong with PGP sigs is that going on 9 full years after I generated my first pgp key, my mom still can't use the stuff. On 3 Oct 2002 at 17:33, Ben Laurie wrote: Mozilla+enigmail+gpg. It just works. If we had client side encryption that just works we would be seeing a few more signed messages on this list, and those that appear, would actually be checked. Send an unnecessarily encrypted message to Tim and he wil probably threaten to shoot you. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG 2Xas831JtcVC2arD+2zXouy3o82ZsDYT6VWbi0g 4LoqK+b3poXgDltScDKS3wl1UILcpvnNaumqELJhn
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 11:15:02AM -0700, James A. Donald wrote: On 3 Oct 2002 at 17:33, Ben Laurie wrote: Mozilla+enigmail+gpg. It just works. If we had client side encryption that just works we would be seeing a few more signed messages on this list, and those that appear, would actually be checked. Send an unnecessarily encrypted message to Tim and he wil probably threaten to shoot you. I always sign my messages, but the listserv software deletes the attached signature. Go figure. :) -- guru, n: A computer owner who can read the manual. [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
James A. Donald wrote: -- Adam Shostack wrote: Whats wrong with PGP sigs is that going on 9 full years after I generated my first pgp key, my mom still can't use the stuff. On 3 Oct 2002 at 17:33, Ben Laurie wrote: Mozilla+enigmail+gpg. It just works. If we had client side encryption that just works we would be seeing a few more signed messages on this list, and those that appear, would actually be checked. Send an unnecessarily encrypted message to Tim and he wil probably threaten to shoot you. Why would I want to sign a message to this list? Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
Re: JYA ping
Trei, Peter wrote: I can't get through to www.jya.com either, but cryptome.org comes through fine. [snip] At www.cryptome.org he gave his address as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but ping pipeline.com doesn't work. M. K. Shen
Re: What email encryption is actually in use?
-- James A. Donald wrote: If we had client side encryption that just works we would be seeing a few more signed messages on this list, and those that appear, would actually be checked. Send an unnecessarily encrypted message to Tim and he will probably threaten to shoot you. Ben Laurie wrote: Why would I want to sign a message to this list? Then all the people who read this list, were they to receive a communication from you, they would know it was the same Ben Laurie who posts to this list. Of course, if you were in the habit of posting suggestions to this list that you break the law, this might be a bad idea, but to the best of my recollection, you do not. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG camCoW1VxLtKI1Q8U87Pid9dPFLuYKXqZMqDPd6y 4BIPT6xmk2CLc9m90mQsQOrs/2issShK6u9NJ42zf
