Re: JYA ping
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Morlock Elloi wrote: It seems to be strange that he wrote at [EMAIL PROTECTED], an address which is also given on his web page, but ping pipeline.com doesn't work. Sorry to resort to ad hominem, but you're a technological imbecile. There is this magic thing in DNS called MX record. Read about it. Not to mention the practice of blocking ICMP at the firewall, which would result in pings not working. -MW-
Re: JYA ping
At 12:38 PM 10/06/2002 +0200, Mok-Kong Shen wrote: It seems to be strange that he wrote at [EMAIL PROTECTED], an address which is also given on his web page, but ping pipeline.com doesn't work. Lots of machines don't accept pings anymore, either for security reasons or whatever. That's independent of whether those names accept email, or whether you can find MX records for them. In particular, most big ISPs have multiple machines accepting mail; if you wanted to ping, you'd have to try box1.bigisp.com, box2.bigisp.com, box3.bigisp.com, ... Pipeline was in the big-ISP business, and I suspect they've been eaten enough times that pipeline is just an alias on a big email server farm.
Re: JYA ping
Mok-Kong Shen wrote: Daniel J. Boone wrote: [snip] It's worth observing that this prose style is literally inimitable. I'd say its authentication value (in terms of persuasively suggesting that the entity long known as JYA authored this also) is at least as strong as a long-used PGP signature would be. Others, having more faith in the abilities of federally-employed creative writers, might I suppose reasonably differ. It seems to be strange that he wrote at [EMAIL PROTECTED], an address which is also given on his web page, but ping pipeline.com doesn't work. M. K. Shen Not strange at all, quite common in fact: $ mxlookup pipeline.com Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 Non-authoritative answer: pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx05.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx06.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx07.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx08.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx09.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx10.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx11.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx12.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx00.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx01.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx02.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx03.pipeline.com pipeline.compreference = 5, mail exchanger = mx04.pipeline.com $ nslookup pipeline.com Server: localhost Address: 127.0.0.1 *** No address (A) records available for pipeline.com --S
Re: JYA ping
On Sun, 06 Oct 2002 12:38:34 +0200, Mok-Kong Shen said: It seems to be strange that he wrote at [EMAIL PROTECTED], an address which is also given on his web page, but ping pipeline.com doesn't work. If you mean ping (1) you should read some Internet basics first. $ host -t mx pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx05.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx06.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx07.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx08.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx09.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx10.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx11.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx12.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx00.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx01.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx02.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx03.pipeline.com pipeline.comMX 5 mx04.pipeline.com Salam-Shalom, Werner
Re: JYA ping
Daniel J. Boone wrote: JYA is temporarily dead online due to work load in the DC area, near the armageddon push button, which is located, in case you give a, out on Route 7 disguised as FAA Leesburg. We paid a surprise Sunday morning visit to the CIA back entrance, got surrounded by HMMVs and spiffy guards with hands on guns, interrogated by a swell looking Ms. Security who ran our Duncan Frissell ID card through the master file, idled for 1/2 hour observing gaps in the maginot line, and then received a heartfelt thanks for cooperating, Duncan, wink. Mrs. Frissell hissed bitch as we serpentined the Jersey barriers back out the way in. It's worth observing that this prose style is literally inimitable. I'd say its authentication value (in terms of persuasively suggesting that the entity long known as JYA authored this also) is at least as strong as a long-used PGP signature would be. Others, having more faith in the abilities of federally-employed creative writers, might I suppose reasonably differ. It seems to be strange that he wrote at [EMAIL PROTECTED], an address which is also given on his web page, but ping pipeline.com doesn't work. M. K. Shen
RE: JYA ping
JYA is temporarily dead online due to work load in the DC area, near the armageddon push button, which is located, in case you give a, out on Route 7 disguised as FAA Leesburg. We paid a surprise Sunday morning visit to the CIA back entrance, got surrounded by HMMVs and spiffy guards with hands on guns, interrogated by a swell looking Ms. Security who ran our Duncan Frissell ID card through the master file, idled for 1/2 hour observing gaps in the maginot line, and then received a heartfelt thanks for cooperating, Duncan, wink. Mrs. Frissell hissed bitch as we serpentined the Jersey barriers back out the way in.
RE: JYA ping
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We paid a surprise Sunday morning visit to the CIA back entrance, got surrounded by HMMVs and spiffy guards with hands on guns, interrogated by a swell looking Ms. Security who ran our Duncan Frissell ID card through the master file, idled for 1/2 hour observing gaps in the maginot line, and then received a heartfelt thanks for cooperating, Duncan, wink. Aren't you glad that I kept my files vacuumed just for you? Clean Team-Dirty Team. Works every time. DCF Don't nuke Mecca. Build a cathedral there instead.
Re: JYA ping
Eugen Leitl wrote: On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Anonymous wrote: Cryptome has nor been updated since 9/23 ... any clues, anyone ? No. Anyone knows whether John Young is okay? Can't get through to http://www.jya.com/ either (plus Google hasn't cached it, for some reason...?) - can't resolve it at all.
RE: JYA ping
Graham Lally[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Eugen Leitl wrote: On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Anonymous wrote: Cryptome has nor been updated since 9/23 ... any clues, anyone ? No. Anyone knows whether John Young is okay? Can't get through to http://www.jya.com/ either (plus Google hasn't cached it, for some reason...?) - can't resolve it at all. I can't get through to www.jya.com either, but cryptome.org comes through fine. At the bottom of the initial document list, I find the line: 19 August 2002: The JYA.com archive is temporarily unavailable during relocation. Considering the glitches and mis-steps that often accompany server relocation, I'm not too worried - yet. It would be nice if John would drop the list a note. Peter Trei
Re: JYA ping
Trei, Peter wrote: I can't get through to www.jya.com either, but cryptome.org comes through fine. [snip] At www.cryptome.org he gave his address as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but ping pipeline.com doesn't work. M. K. Shen
Re: JYA ping
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Anonymous wrote: Cryptome has nor been updated since 9/23 ... any clues, anyone ? No. Anyone knows whether John Young is okay?
