Re: [darktable-user] lost pannels !!!

2016-11-20 Thread I. Ivanov

Had the same... Tab would not bring the pannels back.

Ubuntu 16.04 DT 2.0.7

Quit and start of DT did not help. What I did - I manually turned the 
pannels one by one using the triangles in the middle. Then changed the 
view of LT (how many images it displays and also zoomable file manager 
then back to normal). My goal was to change not only the pannels but 
also something else so hopefully it would stick. Quit DT and started 
again - all pannels were ok. I ended up in the situation by clicking on 
too many hot keys - F11, tab etc. Now I am a bit more careful.


Regards,

B



On 2016-11-20 10:54 AM, Bernhard wrote:


the TAB key should bring them back ...


Jacques Durocher schrieb am 20.11.2016 um 19:45:

 I can't find how to have all pannels opens,

--

regards
Bernhard

http://www.bilddateien.de

 
darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to 
darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org




darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Re: [darktable-user] Color clipping

2016-11-20 Thread David Vincent-Jones



On 11/20/2016 12:09 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:

Highlight indicator and gamut clipping already have a visual indication of 
whether they're on or off: they get grey background when active. It's not easy 
to see for the overexposure indicator (for which the icon is large an the 
background is just ~2 pixels border), though.
OK ... I totally missed it . wonder if the background color can be 
changed?


- Original Message -

I suggested earlier that allowing the icons to have 'on/off' status
looks would really visually help. Would that be difficult to achieve?

David


On 11/20/2016 10:26 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:

Am Sonntag, 20. November 2016, 17:41:51 CET schrieb Bernhard:

Hi,

darkroom mode,

the manual says:

   _Gamut check_
   
Clicking the icon activates the gamut check display mode of your


image. Gamut check

highlights in cyan all pixels out of gamut with respect to the

selected softproof profile.

You can also activate gamut check with the keyboard shortcut

“ctrl-g”. An information

message “gamut check” on the bottom left of your image tells you

that you are in gamut

check display mode. Gamut check and soft proof are mutually

exclusive modes.

but when I activate  _Over/underexposed warning_ also that cyan warning
color turns to red and I cannot differentiate which pixels are simply
overexposed from those that are out of gamut. By deactivating
_Over/underexposed warning_ again the pixels become cyan again.

Anyone expiriencing the same thing?

Is this intended behaviour?

Maybe not intended, but a corner case that can be avoided by not using both
(gamut check + overexposure warning) at the same time. They don't make
sense
used together anyway.


dt 2.0.7 in LM17.3/64

Tobias



darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org



darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org



Re: [darktable-user] Color clipping

2016-11-20 Thread Matthieu Moy
Highlight indicator and gamut clipping already have a visual indication of 
whether they're on or off: they get grey background when active. It's not easy 
to see for the overexposure indicator (for which the icon is large an the 
background is just ~2 pixels border), though.

- Original Message -
> I suggested earlier that allowing the icons to have 'on/off' status
> looks would really visually help. Would that be difficult to achieve?
> 
> David
> 
> 
> On 11/20/2016 10:26 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 20. November 2016, 17:41:51 CET schrieb Bernhard:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> darkroom mode,
> >>
> >> the manual says:
> >>>   _Gamut check_
> >>>   
> >>>Clicking the icon activates the gamut check display mode of your
> >>>
> >>> image. Gamut check
> >>>
> >>>highlights in cyan all pixels out of gamut with respect to the
> >>>
> >>> selected softproof profile.
> >>>
> >>>You can also activate gamut check with the keyboard shortcut
> >>>
> >>> “ctrl-g”. An information
> >>>
> >>>message “gamut check” on the bottom left of your image tells you
> >>>
> >>> that you are in gamut
> >>>
> >>>check display mode. Gamut check and soft proof are mutually
> >>>
> >>> exclusive modes.
> >> but when I activate  _Over/underexposed warning_ also that cyan warning
> >> color turns to red and I cannot differentiate which pixels are simply
> >> overexposed from those that are out of gamut. By deactivating
> >> _Over/underexposed warning_ again the pixels become cyan again.
> >>
> >> Anyone expiriencing the same thing?
> >>
> >> Is this intended behaviour?
> > Maybe not intended, but a corner case that can be avoided by not using both
> > (gamut check + overexposure warning) at the same time. They don't make
> > sense
> > used together anyway.
> >
> >> dt 2.0.7 in LM17.3/64
> > Tobias
> 
> 
> 
> darktable user mailing list
> to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org



Re: [darktable-user] Color clipping

2016-11-20 Thread David Vincent-Jones
I suggested earlier that allowing the icons to have 'on/off' status 
looks would really visually help. Would that be difficult to achieve?


David


On 11/20/2016 10:26 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:

Am Sonntag, 20. November 2016, 17:41:51 CET schrieb Bernhard:

Hi,

darkroom mode,

the manual says:

  _Gamut check_
  
   Clicking the icon activates the gamut check display mode of your


image. Gamut check

   highlights in cyan all pixels out of gamut with respect to the

selected softproof profile.

   You can also activate gamut check with the keyboard shortcut

“ctrl-g”. An information

   message “gamut check” on the bottom left of your image tells you

that you are in gamut

   check display mode. Gamut check and soft proof are mutually

exclusive modes.

but when I activate  _Over/underexposed warning_ also that cyan warning
color turns to red and I cannot differentiate which pixels are simply
overexposed from those that are out of gamut. By deactivating
_Over/underexposed warning_ again the pixels become cyan again.

Anyone expiriencing the same thing?

Is this intended behaviour?

Maybe not intended, but a corner case that can be avoided by not using both
(gamut check + overexposure warning) at the same time. They don't make sense
used together anyway.


dt 2.0.7 in LM17.3/64

Tobias




darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Re: [darktable-user] Color clipping

2016-11-20 Thread Colin Adams
>
>
> > Is this intended behaviour?
>
> Maybe not intended, but a corner case that can be avoided by not using both
> (gamut check + overexposure warning) at the same time. They don't make
> sense
> used together anyway.
>
> So it would be nice (IMHO) if selecting one turned off the other. It's not
a big deal have to do both operations with the mouse, but small incremental
gains like that add up to improve the overall experience.


darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Re: [darktable-user] Please add an option to ask before overwriting XMP files

2016-11-20 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Samstag, 19. November 2016, 00:27:24 CET schrieb Niccolò Belli:
> Hi,
> Darktable is probably the best raw editor/photo organizer available,
> unfortunately it's not the most crash free software in the world. For my
> tastes it crashes way too often, especially if crashing means losing all
> the editings you were previously doing. It just crashed after an hour+
> editing of a single shot.

I assume you filed a bug in our bug tracker, together with the backtrace?

> After I reopened darktable its database was
> corrupt and the history of my last shot completely gone. Instead of asking
> me "hey, the metadata in your XMP file is completely different from the one
> in the database, do you want me to overwrite it?" it simply overwrote the
> XMP file with garbage db metadata, losing all my edits. It should ask
> before overwriting, possibly with a checkbox to make a backup copy. Even
> better, it could show me a preview of both images, the one developed with
> the metadata from the db and the one from the XMP file, asking me if I want
> to reimport the image or simply overwrite the XMP file.

That is not feasible as we rewrite the XMP files all the time. Not just when 
you edit the image in darkroom.

> Bests,
> Niccolò Belli

Tobias

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [darktable-user] Black on Black

2016-11-20 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Freitag, 18. November 2016, 15:20:52 CET schrieb Anton Aylward:
> On 11/18/2016 03:05 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> >> > Even so, it seems the scroll bars are narrow, or are, if the comments
> >> > inline are true, very wide.  They also lack end arrows.
> >> > 
> >> > Perhaps there's no cross-browser CSS for end arrows, but there is the
> >> > GT3-theme-engine so perhaps that can do it?
> > 
> > These scrollbar things are not part of dt's theming but the global GTK
> > theme. darktable should use the same scrollbars as other GTK3
> > applications.
> Well I also run Firefox and Thunderbird and they have wider, intelligible
> scrollbars with arrows.

Depending on the version they might use GTK2.

> I'm using KDE4 and that has a Gtk3 compatibility setting but its not very
> tunable.  I haven't used Gnome since KDE first came out :-)

Good choice.

> Is there some Gtk3 tool, a GUI, for tweeking all the gtk3 defaults?

None that I know of.

Tobias

PS: We really need a screenshot to tell if what you are seeing is normal or 
not.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [darktable-user] Activate OpenCL for AMD FirePro D300 in Ubuntu

2016-11-20 Thread Šarūnas Burdulis
On 11/20/2016 12:21 PM, Frank J. wrote:
> Hallo,
> I installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS on an "ashtray" [1].
> This hardware has 2 powerfull GPUs.
> But DT did'nt find a device for "OpenCL".
> 
> Which drivers must I install to get OpenCL-Support for Darktable?
> "radeon" ist installed now.
> "amdgpu-pro" is not installable, it has some conflicts.

amdgpu-pro. It, including OpenCL for darktable, worked on 16.04. Perhaps
conflicts can be resolved with 'apt-get -f install'?

Šarūnas
https://math.dartmouth.edu/~sarunas





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[darktable-user] Activate OpenCL for AMD FirePro D300 in Ubuntu

2016-11-20 Thread Frank J.
Hallo,
I installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS on an "ashtray" [1].
This hardware has 2 powerfull GPUs.
But DT did'nt find a device for "OpenCL".

Which drivers must I install to get OpenCL-Support for Darktable?
"radeon" ist installed now.
"amdgpu-pro" is not installable, it has some conflicts.

--
Frank

[1] http://www.apple.com/de/mac-pro/

darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org



Re: [darktable-user] Color clipping

2016-11-20 Thread Colin Adams
I've seen the same behaviour (on dt 2.0.6 I think). So I don't think this
has changed with 2.0.7.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 at 16:42 Bernhard  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> darkroom mode,
>
> the manual says:
>
> >  _Gamut check_
> >   Clicking the icon activates the gamut check display mode of your
> > image. Gamut check
> >   highlights in cyan all pixels out of gamut with respect to the
> > selected softproof profile.
> >   You can also activate gamut check with the keyboard shortcut
> > “ctrl-g”. An information
> >   message “gamut check” on the bottom left of your image tells you
> > that you are in gamut
> >   check display mode. Gamut check and soft proof are mutually
> > exclusive modes.
> but when I activate  _Over/underexposed warning_ also that cyan warning
> color turns to red and I cannot differentiate which pixels are simply
> overexposed from those that are out of gamut. By deactivating
> _Over/underexposed warning_ again the pixels become cyan again.
>
> Anyone expiriencing the same thing?
>
> Is this intended behaviour?
>
> dt 2.0.7 in LM17.3/64
>
> --
>
> regards
> Bernhard
>
> http://www.bilddateien.de
>
>
> 
> darktable user mailing list
> to unsubscribe send a mail to
> darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>
>


darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org