[darktable-user] Re: [darktable-dev] darktable 2.4.0rc0 released
Sounds great! But, I've tried launching it and in the settings it says that OpenCL support is not available. 2.2.x versions didn't say so (but I'm not sure if OpenCL actually worked ever, though…) My hardware is MacBookPro11,3 with NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and with removed battery. OS = macOS 10.12.6 (16G1036). I've tried to disable automatic graphic switching in system settings (so that it should use the nvidia GPU always), it didn't change anything. Should I put that into the bug tracker, or it's not supposed to work on this hardware? According to https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202823 my hardware should have support for OpenCL 1.2. I've tried to run it with "-d opencl" option and this is the relevant part of the log I've got: [opencl_init] compiling program `atrous.cl' .. [opencl_fopen_stat] could not open file `~/.cache/darktable/cached_kernels_for_GeForceGT750M/atrous.cl.bin'! [opencl_load_program] could not load cached binary program, trying to compile source [opencl_load_program] successfully loaded program from `~/Applications/darktable.app/Contents/Resources/share/darktable/kernels/atrous.cl' [opencl_build_program] could not build program: -11 [opencl_build_program] BUILD STATUS: -2 BUILD LOG: :19:10: fatal error: 'common.h' file not found #include "common.h" ^ [opencl_init] failed to compile program `atrous.cl'! [opencl_init] FINALLY: opencl is NOT AVAILABLE on this system. [opencl_init] initial status of opencl enabled flag is OFF. > On 3 Dec 2017, at 18:10, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > > we're proud to announce the first release candidate for the upcoming 2.4 > series of darktable, 2.4.0rc0! > > the github release is here: https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/ > releases/tag/release-2.4.0rc0. > > as always, please don't use the autogenerated tarball provided by github, but > only our tar.xz. the checksum is: > > ``` > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.0rc0.tar.xz > 66795f96dfd46b921a006836eb062f40cab1e93d018f61ccb7e650fb01a0016d > darktable-2.4.0rc0.tar.xz > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.0rc0.dmg > 23894c0ec808c8420719646ee289aba68fc15761ce812358ba3456691ad5849c > darktable-2.4.0rc0.dmg > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.0rc0.exe > ed560de786340cbdd94e446615cec8eef52fbbeb3ac81f7d10edfeee1e5b74ee > darktable-2.4.0rc0.exe > ``` > > Important note: to make sure that darktable can keep on supporting the > raw file format for your camera, *please* read [this post](https:// > discuss.pixls.us/t/raw-samples-wanted/5420?u=lebedevri) on how/what raw > samples you can contribute to ensure that we have the *full* raw sample set > for your camera under CC0 license! > > and the changelog as compared to 2.2.0 can be found below. Some of the fixes > might have been backported to the stable 2.2.x series already. > - The maintainership of the RawSpeed library was transferred to the darktable > project. The work on code cleanup, hardening, modernization, simplification > and testing is ongoing. > - Well over 2 thousand commits to darktable+rawspeed since 2.2.0 > - 244 pull requests handled > - 320+ issues closed > - Updated user manual is coming soon™ > > ## Hell Froze Over > - As you might have read on our [news post](https://www.darktable.org/2017/08/ > darktable-for-windows/) we finally ported darktable to Windows and intend to > support it in the future. At the moment it's still lacking a few features > (for > example there is not printing support), has a few limitations (tethering > requires special drivers to be installed) and comes with its own set of bugs. > But overall we are confident that it's quite usable already and hope you will > enjoy it. A very special thanks goes to Peter Budai who finally convinced us > to agree to the port and who did most of the work. > > ## The Big Ones > - A new module for haze removal > - The local contrast module can now be pushed much further, it also got a new > local laplacian mode > - Add undo support for masks and more intelligent grouping of undo steps > - Blending now allows to display individual channels using false colors > - darktable now supports loading Fujifilm compressed RAFs > - darktable now supports loading floating point HDR DNGs as written by > HDRMERGE > - We also added channel specific blend modes for Lab and RGB color spaces > - The base curve module allows for more control of the exposure fusion > feature > using the newly added bias slider > - The tonecurve module now supports auto colour adjustment in RGB > - Add absolute color input as an option to the color look up table module > - A new X-Trans demosaicing algorithm, Frequency Domain Chroma, was > implemented. > - You can now choose from pre-defined scheduling profiles for OpenCL > - Speaking of OpenCL, darktable now allows to force-use OpenCL for a specific > pixelpipe > - Xmp sidecar files are no longer written to disk when the content didn't > actually change. That mostly helps with network storage and backup systems > that use files' time sta
Re: [darktable-user] Spot removal with blend
* David Vincent-Jones [12-03-17 15:59]: > No .. I did use the blend that was associated with the spot removal > tool. My assumption was that the blend would only effect the replacemnt > area. > > David > > On 12/03/2017 12:31 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > * David Vincent-Jones [12-03-17 15:18]: > >> OK ... sorry I thought it was clear ... will try again. > >> > >> I had a small area in the image that was overexposed and unsightly. I > >> used the spot removal 'draw' procedure to outline this area and then > >> located the replace box over a more appropriate section of the image in > >> order to clone one part of the image to another part. I then tried to > >> tone-down the replaced section and started to apply different blends but > >> the blends did not adjust the replacement area they adjusted the entire > >> image. > >> > >> Maybe that sheds more light .. > >> > >> David > >> > >> On 12/03/2017 12:02 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >>> * David Vincent-Jones [12-03-17 14:56]: > Not sure why this is happening ... or this is as expected. > I tried using the spot removal to replace an overexposed area in the > image with a more acceptable image section. I then wanted to modify the > insert using the blend but the blend operation did not modify the insert > .. it modified the entire image. > Would this be a correct result? > >>> > >>> you don't say how you did it. the spot removal tool and a blend action. > >>> you were using that action for that instance? > > > > I believe I understood you. Did you select the blend operation for the > > spot instance? there is a blend parameter for the spot tool. or did you > > try to apply blend after the fact which probably did not know the mask you > > used for the spot. you select the blend before masking an area, iiuc. that is what I think. I guess I don't understand -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-user] Spot removal with blend
Am Sonntag, 3. Dezember 2017, 11:55:20 CET schrieb David Vincent-Jones: > Not sure why this is happening ... or this is as expected. > I tried using the spot removal to replace an overexposed area in the > image with a more acceptable image section. I then wanted to modify the > insert using the blend but the blend operation did not modify the insert > .. it modified the entire image. > Would this be a correct result? Yes, that's how blending in darktable works: It takes the output of an operation and merges it somehow (depending on your settings) with the original input. In the case of spot removal all the drawing and shapes happen inside the module, the result is the complete image with the replaced parts. The blending logic know nothing about what parts of the image were unaltered. > David Tobias signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [darktable-user] Spot removal with blend
No .. I did use the blend that was associated with the spot removal tool. My assumption was that the blend would only effect the replacemnt area. David On 12/03/2017 12:31 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * David Vincent-Jones [12-03-17 15:18]: >> OK ... sorry I thought it was clear ... will try again. >> >> I had a small area in the image that was overexposed and unsightly. I >> used the spot removal 'draw' procedure to outline this area and then >> located the replace box over a more appropriate section of the image in >> order to clone one part of the image to another part. I then tried to >> tone-down the replaced section and started to apply different blends but >> the blends did not adjust the replacement area they adjusted the entire >> image. >> >> Maybe that sheds more light .. >> >> David >> >> On 12/03/2017 12:02 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: >>> * David Vincent-Jones [12-03-17 14:56]: Not sure why this is happening ... or this is as expected. I tried using the spot removal to replace an overexposed area in the image with a more acceptable image section. I then wanted to modify the insert using the blend but the blend operation did not modify the insert .. it modified the entire image. Would this be a correct result? >>> >>> you don't say how you did it. the spot removal tool and a blend action. >>> you were using that action for that instance? > > I believe I understood you. Did you select the blend operation for the > spot instance? there is a blend parameter for the spot tool. or did you > try to apply blend after the fact which probably did not know the mask you > used for the spot. you select the blend before masking an area, iiuc. > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-user] Spot removal with blend
* David Vincent-Jones [12-03-17 15:18]: > OK ... sorry I thought it was clear ... will try again. > > I had a small area in the image that was overexposed and unsightly. I > used the spot removal 'draw' procedure to outline this area and then > located the replace box over a more appropriate section of the image in > order to clone one part of the image to another part. I then tried to > tone-down the replaced section and started to apply different blends but > the blends did not adjust the replacement area they adjusted the entire > image. > > Maybe that sheds more light .. > > David > > On 12/03/2017 12:02 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > > * David Vincent-Jones [12-03-17 14:56]: > >> Not sure why this is happening ... or this is as expected. > >> I tried using the spot removal to replace an overexposed area in the > >> image with a more acceptable image section. I then wanted to modify the > >> insert using the blend but the blend operation did not modify the insert > >> .. it modified the entire image. > >> Would this be a correct result? > > > > you don't say how you did it. the spot removal tool and a blend action. > > you were using that action for that instance? I believe I understood you. Did you select the blend operation for the spot instance? there is a blend parameter for the spot tool. or did you try to apply blend after the fact which probably did not know the mask you used for the spot. you select the blend before masking an area, iiuc. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-user] Spot removal with blend
OK ... sorry I thought it was clear ... will try again. I had a small area in the image that was overexposed and unsightly. I used the spot removal 'draw' procedure to outline this area and then located the replace box over a more appropriate section of the image in order to clone one part of the image to another part. I then tried to tone-down the replaced section and started to apply different blends but the blends did not adjust the replacement area they adjusted the entire image. Maybe that sheds more light .. David On 12/03/2017 12:02 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * David Vincent-Jones [12-03-17 14:56]: >> Not sure why this is happening ... or this is as expected. >> I tried using the spot removal to replace an overexposed area in the >> image with a more acceptable image section. I then wanted to modify the >> insert using the blend but the blend operation did not modify the insert >> .. it modified the entire image. >> Would this be a correct result? > > you don't say how you did it. the spot removal tool and a blend action. > you were using that action for that instance? > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-user] Spot removal with blend
* David Vincent-Jones [12-03-17 14:56]: > Not sure why this is happening ... or this is as expected. > I tried using the spot removal to replace an overexposed area in the > image with a more acceptable image section. I then wanted to modify the > insert using the blend but the blend operation did not modify the insert > .. it modified the entire image. > Would this be a correct result? you don't say how you did it. the spot removal tool and a blend action. you were using that action for that instance? -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] Spot removal with blend
Not sure why this is happening ... or this is as expected. I tried using the spot removal to replace an overexposed area in the image with a more acceptable image section. I then wanted to modify the insert using the blend but the blend operation did not modify the insert .. it modified the entire image. Would this be a correct result? David darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] Noise profile Fujifilm X-Pro2
Is anybody working on, or has, a noise profile for the X-Pro2? David darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] Re: [darktable-dev] darktable 2.4.0rc0 released
Thank you again for this new welcomed Xmas gift! Please inform as soon as users manual will be ready for the translation. Maurizio Il 3 dic 2017 17:11, "Tobias Ellinghaus" ha scritto: > we're proud to announce the first release candidate for the upcoming 2.4 > series of darktable, 2.4.0rc0! > > the github release is here: https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/ > releases/tag/release-2.4.0rc0. > > as always, please don't use the autogenerated tarball provided by github, > but > only our tar.xz. the checksum is: > > ``` > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.0rc0.tar.xz > 66795f96dfd46b921a006836eb062f40cab1e93d018f61ccb7e650fb01a0016d > darktable-2.4.0rc0.tar.xz > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.0rc0.dmg > 23894c0ec808c8420719646ee289aba68fc15761ce812358ba3456691ad5849c > darktable-2.4.0rc0.dmg > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.0rc0.exe > ed560de786340cbdd94e446615cec8eef52fbbeb3ac81f7d10edfeee1e5b74ee > darktable-2.4.0rc0.exe > ``` > > Important note: to make sure that darktable can keep on supporting the > raw file format for your camera, *please* read [this post](https:// > discuss.pixls.us/t/raw-samples-wanted/5420?u=lebedevri) on how/what raw > samples you can contribute to ensure that we have the *full* raw sample set > for your camera under CC0 license! > > and the changelog as compared to 2.2.0 can be found below. Some of the > fixes > might have been backported to the stable 2.2.x series already. > - The maintainership of the RawSpeed library was transferred to the > darktable > project. The work on code cleanup, hardening, modernization, simplification > and testing is ongoing. > - Well over 2 thousand commits to darktable+rawspeed since 2.2.0 > - 244 pull requests handled > - 320+ issues closed > - Updated user manual is coming soon™ > > ## Hell Froze Over > - As you might have read on our [news post](https://www.darktable. > org/2017/08/ > darktable-for-windows/) we finally ported darktable to Windows and intend > to > support it in the future. At the moment it's still lacking a few features > (for > example there is not printing support), has a few limitations (tethering > requires special drivers to be installed) and comes with its own set of > bugs. > But overall we are confident that it's quite usable already and hope you > will > enjoy it. A very special thanks goes to Peter Budai who finally convinced > us > to agree to the port and who did most of the work. > > ## The Big Ones > - A new module for haze removal > - The local contrast module can now be pushed much further, it also got a > new > local laplacian mode > - Add undo support for masks and more intelligent grouping of undo steps > - Blending now allows to display individual channels using false colors > - darktable now supports loading Fujifilm compressed RAFs > - darktable now supports loading floating point HDR DNGs as written by > HDRMERGE > - We also added channel specific blend modes for Lab and RGB color spaces > - The base curve module allows for more control of the exposure fusion > feature > using the newly added bias slider > - The tonecurve module now supports auto colour adjustment in RGB > - Add absolute color input as an option to the color look up table module > - A new X-Trans demosaicing algorithm, Frequency Domain Chroma, was > implemented. > - You can now choose from pre-defined scheduling profiles for OpenCL > - Speaking of OpenCL, darktable now allows to force-use OpenCL for a > specific > pixelpipe > - Xmp sidecar files are no longer written to disk when the content didn't > actually change. That mostly helps with network storage and backup systems > that use files' time stamps > > ## New Features And Changes > - Show a dialog window that tells when locking the database/library failed > - Don't shade the whole region on the map when searching for a location. > Instead just draw a border around it. > - Also in map mode: Clear the search list and map indicators when resetting > the search module. > - With OsmGPSMap newer than version 1.1.0 (i.e., anything released after > that > OsmGPSMap version) the map will show copyright info. > - Running jobs with a progressbar (mostly import and export) will show that > progress bar ontop the window entry in your task bar – if the system > supports > it. It should work on GNOME, KDE and Windows at least. > - Add bash like string replacement for variables (export, watermark, > session > settings). > - Add a preferences option to ask before removing empty dirs > - The "colorbalance" module got a lot faster, thanks to SSE optimized code > - Make gradient sliders a little more colorful and use them in the white > balance module > - Make PNG compression level used for exporting configurable > - On OSX, load single images from command line or via drag&drop in darkroom > mode > - Add an option to omit the intermediate tag hierarchy in exported files > and > only add the last level > - In the watermark module, sort the list of SVG files and omit the file > extension > - Support XYZ as a pr
Re: [darktable-user] tagging or lack of
hm maybe it would be a good idea for more advanced searches in tags to allow regular expressions via sqlite3-pcre. cheers, jo On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 3:53 PM, wrote: > DT 2.2.5 > > How can I find all the images that I have not tagged yet? > > I want all the images without the darktable internal tags (since they > will all have at list the darktable|format): > > darktable|changed > darktable|exported > darktable|format|cr2 > ... > darktable|style|b&w v.1.1 > darktable|style|fuji astia-like > darktable|style|watermark - line/frame horizontal > ... > > > -- > sknahT > > vyS > > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] darktable 2.4.0rc0 released
we're proud to announce the first release candidate for the upcoming 2.4 series of darktable, 2.4.0rc0! the github release is here: https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/ releases/tag/release-2.4.0rc0. as always, please don't use the autogenerated tarball provided by github, but only our tar.xz. the checksum is: ``` $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.0rc0.tar.xz 66795f96dfd46b921a006836eb062f40cab1e93d018f61ccb7e650fb01a0016d darktable-2.4.0rc0.tar.xz $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.0rc0.dmg 23894c0ec808c8420719646ee289aba68fc15761ce812358ba3456691ad5849c darktable-2.4.0rc0.dmg $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.0rc0.exe ed560de786340cbdd94e446615cec8eef52fbbeb3ac81f7d10edfeee1e5b74ee darktable-2.4.0rc0.exe ``` Important note: to make sure that darktable can keep on supporting the raw file format for your camera, *please* read [this post](https:// discuss.pixls.us/t/raw-samples-wanted/5420?u=lebedevri) on how/what raw samples you can contribute to ensure that we have the *full* raw sample set for your camera under CC0 license! and the changelog as compared to 2.2.0 can be found below. Some of the fixes might have been backported to the stable 2.2.x series already. - The maintainership of the RawSpeed library was transferred to the darktable project. The work on code cleanup, hardening, modernization, simplification and testing is ongoing. - Well over 2 thousand commits to darktable+rawspeed since 2.2.0 - 244 pull requests handled - 320+ issues closed - Updated user manual is coming soon™ ## Hell Froze Over - As you might have read on our [news post](https://www.darktable.org/2017/08/ darktable-for-windows/) we finally ported darktable to Windows and intend to support it in the future. At the moment it's still lacking a few features (for example there is not printing support), has a few limitations (tethering requires special drivers to be installed) and comes with its own set of bugs. But overall we are confident that it's quite usable already and hope you will enjoy it. A very special thanks goes to Peter Budai who finally convinced us to agree to the port and who did most of the work. ## The Big Ones - A new module for haze removal - The local contrast module can now be pushed much further, it also got a new local laplacian mode - Add undo support for masks and more intelligent grouping of undo steps - Blending now allows to display individual channels using false colors - darktable now supports loading Fujifilm compressed RAFs - darktable now supports loading floating point HDR DNGs as written by HDRMERGE - We also added channel specific blend modes for Lab and RGB color spaces - The base curve module allows for more control of the exposure fusion feature using the newly added bias slider - The tonecurve module now supports auto colour adjustment in RGB - Add absolute color input as an option to the color look up table module - A new X-Trans demosaicing algorithm, Frequency Domain Chroma, was implemented. - You can now choose from pre-defined scheduling profiles for OpenCL - Speaking of OpenCL, darktable now allows to force-use OpenCL for a specific pixelpipe - Xmp sidecar files are no longer written to disk when the content didn't actually change. That mostly helps with network storage and backup systems that use files' time stamps ## New Features And Changes - Show a dialog window that tells when locking the database/library failed - Don't shade the whole region on the map when searching for a location. Instead just draw a border around it. - Also in map mode: Clear the search list and map indicators when resetting the search module. - With OsmGPSMap newer than version 1.1.0 (i.e., anything released after that OsmGPSMap version) the map will show copyright info. - Running jobs with a progressbar (mostly import and export) will show that progress bar ontop the window entry in your task bar – if the system supports it. It should work on GNOME, KDE and Windows at least. - Add bash like string replacement for variables (export, watermark, session settings). - Add a preferences option to ask before removing empty dirs - The "colorbalance" module got a lot faster, thanks to SSE optimized code - Make gradient sliders a little more colorful and use them in the white balance module - Make PNG compression level used for exporting configurable - On OSX, load single images from command line or via drag&drop in darkroom mode - Add an option to omit the intermediate tag hierarchy in exported files and only add the last level - In the watermark module, sort the list of SVG files and omit the file extension - Support XYZ as a proofing profile - Local contrast now got a new slider to set the midtone range - darktable got two new helper scripts (those are not installed by default, grab them from the sources): One to purge thumbnails that no longer have an associated image in the database, and a second script that uses inotify to watch a folder for new files to open them in a running darkt
Re: [darktable-user] purge_non_existing_images
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 12:46:29 +0100 Michael Rasmussen wrote: > On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 07:36:50 -0400 > "J. Paul Bissonnette" wrote: > > > sqlite3: not found > > > You have sqlite installed? > try: locate sqlite3 > Thank. I installed Ubuntu on a new box a few weeks ago, that was one of the packages I missed. It now works. :) darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-user] purge_non_existing_images
On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 07:36:50 -0400 "J. Paul Bissonnette" wrote: > sqlite3: not found > You have sqlite installed? try: locate sqlite3 -- Hilsen/Regards Michael Rasmussen Get my public GnuPG keys: michael rasmussen cc http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E mir datanom net http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C mir miras org http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917 -- /usr/games/fortune -es says: For a man to truly understand rejection, he must first be ignored by a cat. pgpbJxwSaOgkh.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[darktable-user] purge_non_existing_images
Not sure if it is me, I haven't used the purge_non_existing_images.sh in ages. I an getting a warning using it now. Has anything changed in the last few upgrades of Darktable? jpb@maple:~/.config/darktable$ ./purge_non_existing_images.sh ./purge_non_existing_images.sh: 6: ./purge_non_existing_images.sh: sqlite3: not found See attachment for the script downloaded in about 2014 darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org purge_non_existing_images.sh Description: application/shellscript
