[darktable-user] Sharpening on export
DT 2.4.3 Is there a way of sharpening on export? Currently, I use mostly the highpass module for sharpening. It does an excellent job for full-size exports, but it's not that great when I shrink the exports (usually it's in the 900 to 1000 pixels range). I'd like to sharpen after shrinking either as part of the export process or as an external (what I'm not sure). Especially when the destination is jpeg for screen or jpeg for 4k or 5k monitors. BTW, highpass does an extremely good job for prints. What would you recommend? -- sknahT vyS darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-user] Red-eyes removal
Hello, And thanks everyone for helping. To sum up, if I understand correctly, there are many ways to deal with red eyes, each one being more or less suitable for a particular case. I now know at least 5 ! Will try others and see which applies to the case that bothers me. Regards, J.-Luc darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] higher zoom levels
I am using darktable to analyze long exposure pictures of the night sky. Such images are full of stars (point sources). In order to judge the quality of the focus (these images have to be focused manually) I need to zoom in far enough to see the individual pixels in the star images. At present idarktable seems to be limited to a 200% zoom maximum which is no where near enough. Is there a way to zoom in further? If not, what are the prospects of adding this feature? thanks, -- Tom Sargent darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-user] darktable 2.4.4 released (Mac OS ?)
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2018, 14:12:51 CEST schrieb J Albrecht: > Thanks, Tobias! Hi, > I realise that we Mac users must usually wait longer for any new Mac OS > releases. However, I see that a checksum exists for the .dmg. This > suggests that parafin has already compiled one. Yet, it isn’t in the asset > list. Was this an oversight or have I missed something? [...] > > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.4.dmg > > ??? darktable-2.4.4.dmg There is no checksum for the DMG yet. Tobias [...] PS: I am subscribed to the list, there is no need to send me mails twice. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [darktable-user] darktable 2.4.4 released (Mac OS ?)
Thanks, Tobias! I realise that we Mac users must usually wait longer for any new Mac OS releases. However, I see that a checksum exists for the .dmg. This suggests that parafin has already compiled one. Yet, it isn’t in the asset list. Was this an oversight or have I missed something? > On 06 Jun 2018, at 09:39, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > > we’re proud to announce the fourth bugfix release for the 2.4 series of > darktable, 2.4.4! > > the github release is here: [https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/ > releases/tag/release-2.4.4](https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/ > releases/tag/release-2.4.4). > > as always, please don't use the autogenerated tarball provided by github, but > only our tar.xz. the checksums are: > > ``` > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.4.tar.xz > 964320b8c9ffef680fa0407a6ca16ed5136ad1f449572876e262764e78acb04d > darktable-2.4.4.tar.xz > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.4.dmg > ??? darktable-2.4.4.dmg > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.4-win64.exe > 3763d681de4faa515049daf3dae62ee21812e8c6c206ea7a246a36c0341eca8c > darktable-2.4.4-win64.exe > $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.4-win64.zip > 5dba3423b0889c69f723e378564e084878b20baf3996c349bfc9736bed815067 > darktable-2.4.4-win64.zip > ``` > > when updating from the currently stable 2.2.x series, please bear in mind that > your edits will be preserved during this process, but it will not be possible > to downgrade from 2.4 to 2.2.x any more. > > Important note: to make sure that darktable can keep on supporting the > raw file format for your camera, *please* read [this post](https:// > discuss.pixls.us/t/raw-samples-wanted/5420?u=lebedevri) on how/what raw > samples you can contribute to ensure that we have the *full* raw sample set > for your camera under CC0 license! > > and the changelog as compared to 2.4.3 can be found below. > > ## New Features > > - Added 50% zoom option in darkroom mode to the navigation dropdown > - perspective correction: usability improvement – allow setting the radius > when (de)selecting lines > > ## Bugfixes > > - Fix selecting drives in the import dialog on Windows by bundling a patched > glib > - Add some space between checkbox and label in color picker > - OpenCL: better readability of debug output on memory usage > - Levels: catch an edge case where float != int > - Fix the alignment in a tooltip in lens correction > - Local contrast: Reset strength slider to 120% when double clicked > - Drop unused clone masks when loading xmp files > - Remove all sub masks when clearing cloning masks > - darktable-cltest: do not print summary statistics on OpenCL usage > - Perspective correction: take aspect parameter into account when judging on > neutral settings > - Haze removal: fix tiled processing > - Fix install on Windows due to GraphicsMagick's versioned filenames > - PPM: Handle byte order when loading files > - Fix #12165: Don't try to show dialog without gui > - Fix an out-of-bounds memory access > - Tools: Fix typo in darktable-gen-noiseprofile that made it unusable > - MacOS package: point gettext to correct localedir > > ## Camera support, compared to 2.4.2 > > Warning: support for Nikon NEF 'lossy after split' raws was > unintentionally broken due to the lack of such samples. Please see [this post] > (https://discuss.pixls.us/t/nikon-a-specific-raw-sample-wanted/5483? > u=lebedevri) for more details. If you have affected raws, please contribute > samples! > > ### White Balance Presets > > - Sony ILCE-6500 > > ### Noise Profiles > > - Canon EOS 800D > - Canon EOS Kiss X9i > - Canon EOS Rebel T7i > - Nikon COOLPIX B700 > - Nikon D5600 > - Olympus TG-5 > > ## Updated translations > > - German > - Russian signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [darktable-user] Parametric Masking (output bar)
Hi, For me it's still the same mask, but different threshold based on the pre-effect image (input slider) or post-effect image (output slider). Yours, Rémi 2018-06-06 1:48 GMT+02:00 David Vincent-Jones : > OK ... I do understand this response ... the two different bars are used > for two different masks. Those masks could also have been used in the > reverse order. But the same thing can be done with a single bar used for > multiple masks. I have on occasions used three sets of masks all of which > have been applied through one single bar (scale). > > My real question is: since multiple masks can be applied with a single > bar, is the double bar confusing for users? > > David > > On 06/05/2018 01:49 PM, William Ferguson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:57 PM, David Vincent-Jones > wrote: > >> I use parametric masking ... a lot! It probably is a part of my >> processing on at least 90% of my images but, for me, there is still a >> problem in understanding how to correctly use the 'output' bar to gain full >> functionality of the module. >> >> I have watched a number of on-line videos and read the blogs and with one >> exception the top output bar appears to be totally ignored.. I do remember >> when this module was new that there was a blog showing the use of both bars >> (I am not sure that I really understood it even then) but the question that >> I have today is if this output bar is truly useful then maybe we need >> some further direction from somebody that is fully familiar with its >> capabilities and actually uses it. >> > I used a picture that had grass. I opened the monochrome module and > created a parametric mask, using the input sliders, to select the grass and > desaturate it. Then I used the output sliders on the luminosity channel > to change how the desaturation was applied, like a blend if. > > I also tried it with exposure. I selected something with the eyedropper > so that I got the indicator in the channels. I created a parametric mask > to select something that was indicated, then changed the exposure. The > ouput slider indicator moved as I changed the exposure. > > So, it appears to me that the input sliders select what is given to the > module to be changed and the output sliders select how the result of the > change is applied. Up until you asked the question I'd never played with > them, but this opens up all sorts of new possibilities. Thanks. > > Bill > >> David >> >> >> darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to >> darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org >> > > > > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > > > > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
[darktable-user] darktable 2.4.4 released
we’re proud to announce the fourth bugfix release for the 2.4 series of darktable, 2.4.4! the github release is here: [https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/ releases/tag/release-2.4.4](https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/ releases/tag/release-2.4.4). as always, please don't use the autogenerated tarball provided by github, but only our tar.xz. the checksums are: ``` $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.4.tar.xz 964320b8c9ffef680fa0407a6ca16ed5136ad1f449572876e262764e78acb04d darktable-2.4.4.tar.xz $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.4.dmg ??? darktable-2.4.4.dmg $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.4-win64.exe 3763d681de4faa515049daf3dae62ee21812e8c6c206ea7a246a36c0341eca8c darktable-2.4.4-win64.exe $ sha256sum darktable-2.4.4-win64.zip 5dba3423b0889c69f723e378564e084878b20baf3996c349bfc9736bed815067 darktable-2.4.4-win64.zip ``` when updating from the currently stable 2.2.x series, please bear in mind that your edits will be preserved during this process, but it will not be possible to downgrade from 2.4 to 2.2.x any more. Important note: to make sure that darktable can keep on supporting the raw file format for your camera, *please* read [this post](https:// discuss.pixls.us/t/raw-samples-wanted/5420?u=lebedevri) on how/what raw samples you can contribute to ensure that we have the *full* raw sample set for your camera under CC0 license! and the changelog as compared to 2.4.3 can be found below. ## New Features - Added 50% zoom option in darkroom mode to the navigation dropdown - perspective correction: usability improvement – allow setting the radius when (de)selecting lines ## Bugfixes - Fix selecting drives in the import dialog on Windows by bundling a patched glib - Add some space between checkbox and label in color picker - OpenCL: better readability of debug output on memory usage - Levels: catch an edge case where float != int - Fix the alignment in a tooltip in lens correction - Local contrast: Reset strength slider to 120% when double clicked - Drop unused clone masks when loading xmp files - Remove all sub masks when clearing cloning masks - darktable-cltest: do not print summary statistics on OpenCL usage - Perspective correction: take aspect parameter into account when judging on neutral settings - Haze removal: fix tiled processing - Fix install on Windows due to GraphicsMagick's versioned filenames - PPM: Handle byte order when loading files - Fix #12165: Don't try to show dialog without gui - Fix an out-of-bounds memory access - Tools: Fix typo in darktable-gen-noiseprofile that made it unusable - MacOS package: point gettext to correct localedir ## Camera support, compared to 2.4.2 Warning: support for Nikon NEF 'lossy after split' raws was unintentionally broken due to the lack of such samples. Please see [this post] (https://discuss.pixls.us/t/nikon-a-specific-raw-sample-wanted/5483? u=lebedevri) for more details. If you have affected raws, please contribute samples! ### White Balance Presets - Sony ILCE-6500 ### Noise Profiles - Canon EOS 800D - Canon EOS Kiss X9i - Canon EOS Rebel T7i - Nikon COOLPIX B700 - Nikon D5600 - Olympus TG-5 ## Updated translations - German - Russian signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
