Re: [darktable-user] Exported JPEGS always darker and more satuated

[12li...@gadz.org]

For my exported JPEG to match DT preview I had to use gnome image viewer.
Other viewers tested seems not to be color managed.

Regards

Thomas

Le 17 janv. 2017 9:09 AM, "Jeena"  a écrit :

> Hi,
>
>> If all we get is before and after images, without any information about
>> settings, we can only guess at what the problem is...
>>
>
> What kind of settings should I provide? If I knew on which settings to
> work, I'd be able to test things myself.
>
> /Jeena
> 
> 
> darktable user mailing list
> to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscribe@lis
> ts.darktable.org
>
>


darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Re: [darktable-user] Unexpected / weird behaviour

[12li...@gadz.org]

I personnally noticed when setting the size of to be exported JPEG that :
- i was not able to enter the size if the mouse was not on the export
module frame.

So it seams that effect of keyboard inputs is mouse focus dependant. But I
don't know if it is the expected behaviour.

Have you tried to type in your fields with and without the mouse on the
field/module frame ?

(I bet that in the name of your son's friends, there are some "r" and that
your mouse was focused on light-table when you typed the names)

regards,

Thomas

On 22 November 2016 at 21:42, Jean-Luc CECCOLI 
wrote:

> I think the TAB key problem is not the most important, but I am going to
> dig deeper to see if I can find something that can help.
>
> It just doesn't work the way it ought to : toggle from full screen back to
> normal view (which, in my case, is all panels visible). I will have a look
> at the manual to see if this couln't be a miss in the help text still being
> from an older DT version.
>
> What I feel *really* annoying is what happened when I was tagging my
> photos.
>
> Most of them are from schoolmates of my son, so their names are in the
> database and I just have to click into the field and type the first letters
> to bring them to focus.
>
> I'm not that a fast typer, but using all my fingers allows me to enter
> text at a relatively continuous rythm, without having to watch at my
> keyboard.
>
> What happened this time : I typed the first letters of a child's name and
> tagged photos. Then, I selected the name in the field and typed over it so
> as to overwrite it, but it just didn't work : the previous text kept
> selected, and I had to re-select it with the mouse in order to overwrite it.
>
> After that, I could notice the photos that had been tagged were marked as
> rejected. I didn't realized then and wondered how it could have happened
> and un-rejected them with the mouse.
>
> Then, as I was typing my copyright into the metadata field, I suddenly saw
> the display going full-screen, then toggling to another view and finally to
> tethering mode, displaying it couldn't find any camera - but what dit it
> expect ? I was just tagging my photos.
>
> All that in less than 2 seconds.
>
> It took a few seconds - at least 10 - before it left the tethering mode
> and toggled to zoom in with focus display, and then back to full screen
> view.
>
> I can't provide any screenshot.
>
> However, it is not the first time that I can notice the "rejected files
> trick". It already happened many times, but I didn't notice it straight
> after and I even thought I had done something wrong by myself.
>
> I can't remember when I noticed it for the first time - I mean, the
> version of DT then -, but I'll be very carefull and heavily test the next
> release on this point.
>
>
>
> J.-Luc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Message du 22/11/16 20:09
> > De : "I. Ivanov" 
> > A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.org
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [darktable-user] Unexpected / weird behaviour
>
> >
> > 2.0.7 is currently stable. I am on ubuntu 16.04 and it is latest stable.
> >
> > I am curious - what exactly keywords did you use to make TAB not
> > behaving? I had the same case but I am not sure how I ended up in it. I
> > was able to get out of the situation by changing more than one elements
> > in the view in LT then restart DT. Can you provide screenshot of your
> > key words that trigger misbehavior?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > B
> >
> >
> > On 2016-11-22 10:55 AM, Jean-Luc CECCOLI wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I had previously been wondering how I could end up with photos marked
> > > as rejected without having done anything to.
> > >
> > > I discovered that sometimes, filling the fields into Metadata editor
> > > or Keywords, DT sees them as shortcuts and acts as such.
> > >
> > > Seeing the screen suddenly full sized, or switch to tethering, aso
> > > when just tagging photos is really annoying.
> > >
> > > Besides this, according to the help-text about TAB shortcut, it ought
> > > to switch between full screen and normal view but, in fact, it just
> > > doesn't allow to go back to normal view, and I have to use the mouse
> > > to re-open the pannels.
> > >
> > > It finally took to me 30 minutes to achieve a 10 minutes work.
> > >
> > > I know 2.0.6 will soon be replaced, but I thought it would be
> > > important to report this.
> > >
> > > I will be very carefull when next stable is released, and if it
> > > behaves the same I'll report on redmine.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > J.-Luc
> > >
> > >
> > > 
>
> > > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
> > > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
> >
> > 
> 
> > darktable user mailing list
> > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscribe@
> lists.darktable.org
> 

Re: [darktable-user] Modify timestamp

[12li...@gadz.org]

Bonjour,

In the lighttable,with the geotagging module located just above the export
module , you can
apply a time shift to the selected pictures by setting the wanted shift and
clicking on the check button.

regards,

Thomas

On 13 November 2016 at 22:48, GDoirat - GMail 
wrote:

> Hello Everybody,
>
> I went on holiday abroad to see some of my family.
> We took pictures each other. Me with my Pentax and my cousin with his
> canon.
> There was 2 hours of jet lag.
> Unfortunatly, I forgot to adjust my camera time to local time.
> Once we collate our picture in darktable, the pictures don't follow as we
> have two hours of difference between the two camera.
> Is there a way to adjust this in darktable?
> If not, outside darktable (command line?)?
>
> I have already done that for JPG in digikam but the digikam tools doesn't
> seem to work on raw for that.
>
> Thanks a lot for your answer and your help.
>
> G DOIRAT
> --
> 
> La vie est plus belle quand on est libre !
> @@ LINUX @@
>
> Libérez vos oreilles : www.jamendo.fr
> Compte SIP : gayl...@sip.linphone.org (audio, visio, chat)
>
> 
> darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
> darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>


darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Re: [darktable-user] Demosaic + highlight color reconstruction : labyrinth artefact

[12li...@gadz.org]

Ok thanks for the quick answers !

I will try LCh mode.

And to correct my first email, VNG4 + color reconstruction *do* produce
artefact too, just less visible in my case.

and sorry for disturbance on already opened ticket, I searched in opened
issues before posting, but not long enough apparently :)

Regards,

On 10 November 2016 at 22:22, Roman Lebedev <lebedev...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:11 AM, 12li...@gadz.org <12li...@gadz.org>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I notice a kind of labyrinth artefact when I opened a raw originally
> > modified with DT2.0.6.
> > I did not see this artefact before, consequently I think it appears with
> > 2.0.7 version.
> >
> > I work on a fresh install of latest xubuntu, with DT from PPA.
> >
> > The labyrinth artefact are visible in reconstructed highlight area when :
> > - highlight reconstruction parameter are :
>
> >recontruct color, slider below 1,
> Yep, that mode is known broken for large clipped areas.
> https://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10283
>
> Maybe now that i have finished all the piping, i can actually get
> to writing proper highlight inpainting iop, that actually works,
> unlike all what we currently have.
>
> > visible around 0.6
> > - AND demosaic is set at PPG or AMAZE with default settings
> >
> > I cloned the image deleted development and redone it --> visible.
> > I tried the same on an other raw image presenting large overexposed area
> > with darker area in it, reproductible again (an other picture of the same
> > swan).
> >
> > Raw files, exported JPG, sidecar xmp and screenshot of darkroom are here.
> >
> > Should this be considered as a bug ? it does not appear with demosaic
> set at
> > VNG4.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Thomas
> Roman.
>
> > 
> 
> > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
> > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>


darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org